89
Comments (6)
sorted by:
[–] pure_focused_autism (5 points) 4 hours ago

Shills Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeported

[–] maddog_dad (4 points) 3 hours ago

But without the censorship.

[–] shadypollster [S] (3 points) 3 hours ago

Indeed. Lose the censorship, keep the shill-tards for entertainment :D

[–] Dan_K_79 (3 points) 3 hours ago

Just hit my first deport button. Someone posted a guardian article link with a misleading title. They seem to think if we read a Guardian article about how much evidence there is against Trump we'll turn NPC and get back in line.

Dumbass, We SAW the actual evidence. We heard Turner ask Sondalnd if ANYONE ON EARTH told him about Trump linking aid to actions (lol). So, an article telling us Sondland's fever dream is evidence is going to be LESS than effective!

[–] shadypollster [S] (1 point) 3 hours ago

The problem is these "people" like to use headline titles as a summary. My favorite are the polling ones. Typically their methodology section is shit such as not listing what % of party affiliation particpated. But even simple concepts escape the NPC.

[–] free_dom0 (2 points) 2 hours ago

The main difference being, the site rules aren't rigged against us here!s