6938
Comments (370)
sorted by:
392
take-no-part [S] 392 points ago +392 / -0

WATCH THE FIRST MINUTE

STRONG EVIDENCE OF FRAUD

  • Biden's lead in Georgia is only 12,781 votes.

  • This analysis is based on official timestamped election night data from Edison Research which was obtained from the NYT website.

  • This batch of 23,487 votes went, at an absolute minimum accounting for all decimal places, 97.9779% for Biden.

  • This batch was uploaded at 12:18AM EST on Nov 4 (election results began the evening of Nov 3).

  • This is not a case of updating one candidate at a time; we can see from looking at the surrounding batches that Trump did not receive any corresponding entries.

  • According to official data released by the state of Georgia, the county in which Biden received the highest percentage of total absentee by mail votes was Dekalb County at 86.39%.

  • That makes this batch of votes extremely suspect, even if every single allowance is made with the minimum number of votes gained and assuming it's 100% mail in from the most heavily D county.

The ballots that comprised this batch should and must be obtained and independently audited (i.e. not by city officials) as soon as possible.

Nine witnesses of the recently completed Georgia audit including at least one registered Democrat swore to have seen suspiciously pristine, uncreased mail ballots, uniformly and perfectly filled out, almost always for Biden. In one case, a batch of such ballots included 500 ballots in a row all cast for Biden. Is there a relation?

287
PyroSphere 287 points ago +291 / -4

To be fair, being a Democrat is strong evidence of fraud.

100
zipodk 100 points ago +101 / -1

Dead or alive, you're voting with me

20
BillDStrong 20 points ago +20 / -0

These never get older.

14
they-see-me-trollin 14 points ago +14 / -0

and when it gets old and dies, it starts voting democrat.

2
Litehouse 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

I want to know why some of the three most conservative counties in GA got huge gains for Biden over Hillary 2016. 70% in Cherokee, 80% in Forsyth, 55% in Hall, and many more here. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/19ss4a3frulxq9h090mga/GA-2020-v-2016-v2.xlsx?dl=0&rlkey=wdx281xjism83pgdwn8vb3ris

Where there is smoke, there is fire

2
Lunatic_Fringe_PhD 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm going to say they went fishing in the stock pond.

-67
deleted -67 points ago +1 / -68
10
BigMikesBlackCock 10 points ago +13 / -3

Kill yourself faggot

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
vegaspatriot1776 6 points ago +6 / -0

DEPORTED

3
GeoG85 3 points ago +6 / -3

Single mom with 4 kids? Shit, man, shoulda stopped at 2 lol Like being disagnosed with cancer and buying a carton of cigarettes - at some point, it's gotta be the victim's [email protected]

-3
MichelleObamasCockkk -3 points ago +2 / -5

Are you retarded or did you not know that someones husband could die?

6
GeoG85 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yes, the millions of single moms in America, all their husbands died.

Shill harder.

2
Shakakka99 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Robocop music starts in my head whenever I read this. Thanks.

1
Junosu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Three times, maybe four.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7 (edited)
1
AlGoreLikesHandjobs 1 point ago +1 / -0

^^^^^^ Don't go to this link. It's a scam! Hit Deport ^^^^^^

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
23
hotdogsforsale 23 points ago +23 / -0

SPAM LINK DO NOT CRICK

10
errydaktal 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is a higher percentage than Assad got in 2014

7
King5150 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

this is way higher than Xi Jinping's internal vote victory way back in 2013....seems Criminals try to outdo each other

8
errydaktal 8 points ago +8 / -0

Putin knows that Trump won

5
HockeyMom4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Prease crick!

32
AenAllAin 32 points ago +32 / -0

I don't know why people think we need to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Trump beat Biden or we have to accept Biden as President.

There is vastly more evidence and indicators than necessary to invalidate any outcome for Biden in this election!

Even if we did not have all the evidence and more to prove a Trump landslide and win ...

The election results are still so compromised they do not validate a Biden win!

29
Cuck_no_more 29 points ago +29 / -0

This is really well done analysis. If every American took 5 minutes to watch this...

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Donaldiscool 2 points ago +3 / -1

But no matter how unlikely, at the end of the day they can just say it was slim odds... even one in a trillion odds is possible, though not likely. I see this shit all the time with psychic phenomena and skeptics.

4
daddy8ball 4 points ago +5 / -1

Given an infinite timespan, any unlikely event should occur. But the universe is only 13 billion years old. One can calculate how long it should take for X event to happen, if it's older than the age of the universe... well..

99
LyinBiden 99 points ago +99 / -0

I'm curious, has anyone on the left been able to provide an even semi-plausible excuse for why this isn't evidence of fraud? What's the default NPC line when confronted with this?

121
Paul_Revere 121 points ago +121 / -0

What's the default NPC line when confronted with this?

Probably along the lines of "Hahahaha, Drumph is just a sore loser conspiracy theorist. And you're a Nazi!"

99
Kekistancoffee 99 points ago +99 / -0

So, I work with an NPC and run lots of this stuff by her.

So with this kind of evidence I'm told two things:

  1. Trump is a sore loser baby conspiracy theorist (literally exactly what Paul Revere has said).

  2. She truly believes that 100% of 23,000 ballots would come up for Biden without any down-ballot votes because "people hate Drumpf that much."

So... there you go. It's legit insanity clown-world nonsense that comes out of the mouth of the NPC.

45
DJ_Trump2020 45 points ago +45 / -0

Yep I see a lot of 'People just HATED Trump that much' on the twatter. I mean a LOT.

30
WOMP_WOMP_FAGGOT 30 points ago +30 / -0

It's such a stupid argument. Hate doesn't get voters to get off of their asses and wait in line to vote. Many of us hated Hillary Clinton more than any candidate in history, but if it was Hillary vs. Jeb! I bet a lot of us wouldn't have bothered voting in Democrat states, me included.

11
HockeyMom4Trump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Agree. Hate is not as strong a motivator as love. And a Trump is loved.

7
abradald_lincumph 7 points ago +7 / -0

The additional argument is likely that many states provided the path to least resistance possible for voting this time around - a claim that they attempted to franchise all of the maligned minorities that republicans frequently 'demonize and disenfranchise'.

With a path of least resistance (lol mail vote received, mark bubble, mail vote back) there are surely more people voting in this election than many before - or at least that is the most reasonable means to obfuscate the fraud as we well know.

5
streakybacon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah well, they don't get to claim that as a sudden explanation for a major statistical outlier that indicates fraud. If that happened often, sure. The most likely explanation here though is fuggery.

3
dakin116 3 points ago +3 / -0

Response to that is always "so how did trump turn out 10,000,000 new votes?"

16
BecMonTchew 16 points ago +16 / -0

And definitely 100% of all mail-in votes were for Biden, so that's totally what they were counting. Never mind that Trump was doing unprecedentedly well in mail-in votes before election day. Never mind that I personally have over a dozen relatives over 70 with sugar beetus that are worried about plandemic comorbidities that all voted for Trump by mail. All mail-in ballots were for Biden, bigot!

9
AenAllAin 9 points ago +9 / -0

You make a VERY good point. We are doing this the hard way. Trying to prove every fraudulent Biden vote, or to find all votes for Trump is an enormous amount of work!

It would be so much easier if we just went out and counted the number of people who actually voted for Biden. We could just setup a website or a call center for anyone who voted for him to report to. We could count those numbers in like an afternoon!

Even with all the attempted fraud they would try again they still would not come anywhere near the numbers they produced by switching Trump votes to Biden, fake ballots for Biden, and counting ballots for Biden over and over.

8
HockeyMom4Trump 8 points ago +8 / -0

C’mon man. There is nothing fishy about 47 people calling from my phone number.

3
AenAllAin 3 points ago +3 / -0

HeHe. Still less than reporting 10,000 votes as 100,000 for Biden because they "accidentally" moved the decimal place, or flipping 6,000-30,000 votes from Biden to Trump over and over! ...seriously, how do these idiots believe they won?! We do a re-vote and this shit is over yesterday!

1
sentinel20 1 point ago +1 / -0

The statistical results for mail-in ballots was ridiculous, beyond statistically improbable. The election was probably stolen in a variety of ways; tampering with voting machines, dead people voting, adding illegitimate voters to the rolls on election night, changing electronic vote totals, preventing poll-watchers from viewing, etc, etc. but the NUMBER #1 source was definitely mail-in votes. If you were going to rig an election, you'd push for extensive mail-in voting. Why? It gives you plenty of time to rig up how many ballots you need. It gives you time to throw out the opposition's ballots. The chain of custody for these ballots passes through the US Postal Service -- which by the way endorsed Joe Biden!

The only question is: what fraud will be figured out before states are certified in the electoral college? Probably not enough. Unfortunately the true significance of fraud probably won't be known for years. My own estimate is that there is at an unexplainable difference of 250K votes in PA alone.

14
Hyperlight381 14 points ago +14 / -0

Girlfriends parents gave me this exact excuse last night when we were visiting as they played the “But she was asleep in her bed” breana Taylor documentary in the background. Needless to say i couldn’t wait to get back home

15
HockeyMom4Trump 15 points ago +15 / -0

You might want to get out now. You do not want these people as your children’s grandparents. You want good genes, intelligent genes, to be passed on to your offspring. Find a smart conservative family.

12
Hyperlight381 12 points ago +12 / -0

After last night it crossed my mind...

2
247MAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please seriously reconsider. Unless your fiance is super based you're setting yourself up for divorce court hell..... it also depends on how she relates to them- if they influence her decisions and thoughts a lot, then that is a terrible red flag. Check out stefan Molyneux for help identifying thr red flags (or just ask me! Lol)

1
clampie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Listen to your gut feeling.

13
AenAllAin 13 points ago +13 / -0

So weird! They hated Trump so much that the average Biden voter turnout rate nation-wide was 10-30% ... I guess they only "hate Trump that much" in specific swing state precincts that also happen to have all the 'irregularities'.

13
Deadsilos 13 points ago +13 / -0

Of course none of those are in any way an attempt at honestly addressing the issue 😅

20
DemsFuckKids 20 points ago +20 / -0

Easy, they show pics of Rudy’s hair dye running. But I don’t care about Rudy’s hair dye running, that’s what it looks like to work ur ass off. It’s more like war paint

12
HockeyMom4Trump 12 points ago +12 / -0

When they can’t defeat Rudy’s legal argument, they have to criticize his appearance.

Imagine, you are the defense attorney for a murderer. The prosecutor lays out all his evidence and you retort, “Yeah, well you’re fat!” Boom! Case over.

Instead of looking at the case and finding concrete facts to disagree with Rudy, they talk about his hair dye. Pathetic.

7
nsulltan 7 points ago +7 / -0

I actually saw almost that exact line tonight on a young Turk post. You NPC?

4
loverat 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've only seen that 33423424 times since election night - ARE YOU PSYCHIC??

56
WWG1WGA 56 points ago +59 / -3

The default line would be "Oh yeah, I'm going to trust some random dude using excel. God you Drumpftards are stupid "

42
TheCandiru 42 points ago +42 / -0

This. If the source isn't NPR or AP or NYT, they won't even give it a second glance. Ad hominem all day long. You Nazi.

54
Brucesky420 54 points ago +54 / -0 (edited)

Yet they ignore the fact that the night of the election AFTER several democrat strongholds just randomly stopped counting, the NYT election homepage had Trump at an 82% chance of winning. Then less than 12 hours later, Everything is flipped upside down as these democrat counties start reporting insanely absurd high percentages for Biden, percentages not even found in the strongest democrat counties around the states that did report in time.

It still blows my mind how we went from the night of the 3rd, where the leftist media was downtrodden after experiencing another ass whooping, not realizing the democrats would do the unthinkable, which was to cheat so fast and hard that it would be obvious. Then once they realized that the DNC was actually going to do it, the media took the narrative back under control and started acting like Trump never had a chance and began helping the democrats hide their insane cheating - just hours after they had basically accepted defeat.

Seriously though, even places like The Young Turks had accepted defeat and started calling hispanic people white supremacists for voting for Trump. Then you wake up in the morning and it's "oh yea, Biden had this in the bag the whole time, what are you idiots talking about? Trump never had a chance. Yea just ignore the fact he was leading by 8 points with less than 20 percent of the vote left in that state"

13
AntiProgressive 13 points ago +13 / -0

I remember watching and when they stopped i just said "Uh-oh!"

I did not know what it meant but i knew i was not good.

I thought they may fix a State or something. I really did not think big enough.

I told a friend earlier that day that they would likely cheat a win out of Pennsylvania and Nevada because of the changes they made.

Again i did not think big enough

9
HockeyMom4Trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

I thought the same thing. Made absolutely no sense to stop counting. None. No one has a reasonable excuse for why things were halted.

4
AntiProgressive 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was too audacious a plan for them to so blatantly run the table and with impunity. Yet they did

4
current_horror 4 points ago +4 / -0

Imagine going to bed thinking your candidate got spanked, waking up to a blowout in your favor, and not wondering for even a second wtf happened in between.

1
AntiProgressive 1 point ago +1 / -0

With thinking there would be no fuckery. I know. That'd be eeally heartbreaking

1
1984means1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very well said!

16
Nicademus 16 points ago +16 / -0

The statistics presented come from the NYT, oh the irony.

6
DixOut4Donald 6 points ago +6 / -0

And they STILL call me a conspiracy theorist when I mention that, too.

3
indelible 3 points ago +3 / -0

This was my exact experience on November 4, after a friend of mine had a meltdown over "conspiracy theorists" doubting Biden's lead. I sent her an article from the Federalist that went into the NYT reporting stats, and her reply was "but that's a really biased source! And I've heard contradictory info elsewhere!" Like it's a fucking op-ed using NYT data - verifiable - and you're still bitching about bias? Of course this shit is going to be reported in right-wing media, because there's no way the mainstream outlets would ever publish the story! But even when you use their sources, if your conclusion contradicts the sanctioned narrative it's just dismissed as bias and conspiracy theories.

2
DixOut4Donald 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea and try telling them he somehow got the most votes in history while also winning the least number of counties. Watch them try to cope around that

8
roytheboy 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is probably close to the most legitimate answer. But this Edison data keeps coming up again and again, and honestly I'm starting to feel like an NPC repeating this the last 2 or 3 weeks: it's garbage data, it can't be trusted to give accurate results if you're looking at individual batches, and it's worthless in court.

10 days ago this pede made a really good website that analyzes the database, and points out times where there are mathematical impossibilites:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XO1jLE/help-me-get-attention-on-this-re/

What you'll notice if you flip through a few states - multiple times where the total number of votes decreases. Multiple times where Biden seems to gain more votes than mathematically possible, but also multiple times where Trump does the same.

To call this "official timestamped election night data from Edison Research" is... technically correct I suppose, but Edison is a consumer research firm, and there's nothing really "official" about this data as far as an state or court is concerned.

1
Vla1ne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump having these number jumps is actually more reason to use the data. These jumps make no sense regardless, the entire election has been shown to be fucked, and that is why there is a need to audit, but unlike the right, the left is happy with the result, and is afraid to even look back on it, while the right is willing to look into it. Every single time, we have seen bidens lead drop by a significant amount. A 13% drop in a hand recount, no audit, no canvass, means that there is so much wrong that even a basic hand count is showing ample fuckery beyond any presidential election ever.

It's not that the data is garbage, but that the argument most often used alongside it, is terrible.

1
247MAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did the 13% drop come from? Was that Georgia? If so I thought they were still gonna go by thr original vote totals?

1
Vla1ne 1 point ago +1 / -0

the 13% was georgia, they can say what they like about using the original totals, but the original totals were clearly fucked, and the handcount alone proved that. the new audit, assuming even one degree of integrity (long shot, i know) will turn up even more than that.

30
VoteCyborgTrump2040 30 points ago +30 / -0

You know exactly what the line is. It's the mantra they repeat in MSM. There is no evidence. They just say there is no evidence. That's what they're programmed to say, even in the face of evidence.

4
HockeyMom4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yet somehow they thought there was tons of evidence to impeach Trump. These people are the worst.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
10
zooty 10 points ago +10 / -0

"I can't see anything at all".

21
1776ThereIsaidIt 21 points ago +22 / -1

About the time of the "water main break".

21
AmazingFlightLizard 21 points ago +21 / -0

How has that not come up? The water main break with no work order. No moneys allocated to fixing it. Magically fixed a couple hours later.

12
Streetz 12 points ago +12 / -0

They clogged it with Trump votes nothing to see here ya racist bigot 🙈

5
BadRadDad 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was addressed the following day or so they saw an email or text saying it was really small leak that was isolated from the machines.

2
AmazingFlightLizard 2 points ago +2 / -0

But good enough to kick people out... and continue to count.

2
deport_from_kekistan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve been pointing that out. From the start. The recounts were for show. This is the only way to stop the GA steal. Finding the real electoral fraud. Dominion may be the culprit, but they could also just be doing it the old fashion way, injecting fake ballots. It’s so much harder to prove and won’t leave a trace you can subpoena from a private company.

16
FrakasFra 16 points ago +16 / -0

Huge. What are the odds that Biden takes mail-in ballots by that margin? Mathematically, and proportionally, I think it would be interesting to look at what percentage of party voters voted in person and by mail.

3
OOIIIIIIIIIIIIIID 3 points ago +3 / -0

Almost all of us were saying to vote in person and on election day so the odds are probably high, but not that high...

2
ObviousCommonSense 2 points ago +2 / -0

As I say here, based on COVID-19 behavioral surveys and polls of Republicans and Democrats, I think a realistic number of Republican mail-in voters is somewhere between twenty-five and thirty-five percent.

2
Minarchist_Manlet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then the next estimate is how many Republicans would vote for Biden? I think that number is tiny.

2
HockeyMom4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

It would also be interesting to compare Biden’s percentage in other areas of the country

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
Tookens 7 points ago +7 / -0

How to reconcile this vs. the hand recount of GA ballots?

5
voiceofreason 5 points ago +5 / -0

good question. it seems like they should be required to organize the ballots by the batches that are reported. I doubt the process is "throw them into a giant pile and we can go through them later if we need to" - although it seems that you could easily relabel the batches or "accidentally mix them up" and there would be no way to prove it.

7
nrjk1 7 points ago +7 / -0

I doubt the process is "throw them into a giant pile and we can go through them later if we need to"

Ahhh, you've never worked with <90 IQ people I see.

6
loverat 6 points ago +6 / -0

True this. They can't even organise their own fucking lives and they are in charge of important things like an ELECTION? Not even all >90 IQ people have the ability to organise effectively. I swear the only people qualified to do this job are the autists.

5
Brucesky420 5 points ago +5 / -0

I guarantee there will be plenty of things "that normally do happen every election, but somehow didn't happen for this one"

2
voiceofreason 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was COVID-19... we had to change things for safety purposes. Think of the children (and grandparents)!

1
Litehouse 1 point ago +1 / -0

The election officials were told “by the state” if there was a discrepancy, to use the original count (one was caught on audio saying this). The ones who spoke out against the discrepancies all got fired by the SOS in GA

145
Sturm43s 145 points ago +146 / -1

You know, I'm starting to think this whole "Biden wins" thing is a little fishy.

62
barefootozark 62 points ago +62 / -0

Are you trying to tell me that there might be malarkey!? Why? Why? Why? Why?

30
TrudeauIsAsshoe 30 points ago +30 / -0

You're gettin' nervous man!

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
12
4
Beegie 4 points ago +4 / -0

That never gets old

17
J_Von_Random 17 points ago +17 / -0

I was promised no malarkey!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
BigMikesBlackCock 2 points ago +4 / -2

Bernie sanders joins the chat

10
No_Malarkey_Joe 10 points ago +10 / -0

C'mon man!

5
toasty 5 points ago +5 / -0

Look, Fat. I'll Corn-Pop you out behind the bleachers!

6
Grond999 6 points ago +6 / -0

No Malarkey! Look the other Wray.

12
MakeAmericaGreat9 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hey man, c'mon, you know..the thing.

But yeah, you're right. Something if fishy

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
11
take-no-part [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Look fat, let's do pushups and we'll see who's fishy

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
17seven6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed, I smell something... Best move for Dems is to replace Sleepy with Tulsi. I know it's a bit late in the game but the steal would be a lot more plausible.

120
NvCrone 120 points ago +121 / -1

Send to [email protected], Tracy Beanz, @LLin Wood, Trump Campaign, hereistheevidence.com., and @sidneypowell1.

37
Hellofren 37 points ago +40 / -3

Send but its the same thing we have seen for weeks. Everyone knows already.

41
deleted 41 points ago +42 / -1
28
Hellofren 28 points ago +34 / -6

Not concrete at all. Its third party data. It means very little, we need the real dts data.

18
Senaleb 18 points ago +19 / -1

Its important so that they look into it, whether you think so or not.

8
Godswillbedone 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hmm God says that those who diligently seek Him will find him. I think all we can do is plant the seeds. Imho only God can lift that veil of blindness they seem to have solidly in place. We don't know if or when God will do that, maybe close to the end of this. Coming at them to much will just drive them further away. Plant seeds, pray for them and show them God's grace and loving kindness. Remember this world is fallen and the world to come is our ultimate goal.

15
modded 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's the data that the YouTube and Twitter gods are using when they say Biden won. Even if it's bs data, its a good starting point.

9
rentfREEEE_since2016 9 points ago +9 / -0

Look, Of course a lot of this analysis is not the silver bullet “kill shot” of the Biden campaign. But it’s not meant to be an iron clad anchor point of a court case. What pedes are doing is analyzing the data they have available, to highlight instances of fraud, or very probably instances of fraud.

Don’t assume the Trump lawyers are aware of all of this stuff. And don’t assume that they necessarily have MIT PhD data analysis engineers on staff to find it on their own. There’s a lot of data to sift through. Analysis like this gives them a point of focus to , and line of inquiry , for conducting more in depth investigations, and possibly processing subpoenas etc.

It’s all hands on deck. This pede is doing his part.

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
5
BadRadDad 5 points ago +6 / -1

But the “process” is not random. The process is well defined and documented. Data can be as random as shit, but the process is not. All kinds of shot shouldn’t be happening. And yes I have programmed tabulation Data processes.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
ReaganGenerationX 2 points ago +3 / -1

The improbability (weak evidence) should trigger a precinct’s full audit, to enable discovery of proof

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
5
Grond999 5 points ago +5 / -0

More is better than less. Data like this may fall in line with the timing of what witnesses saw. Trump's legal team is apparently snowed under. The more hands on deck the better.

2
take-no-part [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Send to [email protected], Tracy Beanz, @LLin Wood, Trump Campaign, hereistheevidence.com., and @sidneypowell1.

Whose email is that?

I tweeted it to a few of those people.

https://twitter.com/ElectionNoBueno/status/1330378445470240770

I have no idea if those tags will get anywhere lol I've never had Twitter before...aiming high for my Twitter debut!

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
NvCrone 1 point ago +1 / -0

The email is tracy beanz. she put out the call to today for everyone to archive and send everything, socials, info, videos on votes, etc. echoed by Gen Flynn.

81
tragician 81 points ago +82 / -1

We keep seeing this but nothing from the doj.

57
TwitterIsTrash 57 points ago +58 / -1

We have to do their job cause they’re too busy fist-pumping kamalala and helping Joe Hiden find his meds while they video chat with Obama

10
SutopSutolf 10 points ago +10 / -0

*fisting

6
trogdortheburninator 6 points ago +6 / -0

Meanwhile, Joe's very upset that Zoom doesn't have smell-o-vision.

22
Liberty_Prime 22 points ago +22 / -0

You should probably stop expecting FBI and DOJ intervention. It's clear they're staying out of it.

14
XakEp 14 points ago +14 / -0

To be fair, a proper investigation means no one knows it's happening until they start picking people up off the street. No leaks whatsoever.

I'm not saying that's the case, but it's also not impossible since Barr did direct federal prosecutors to start moving across the country.

7
Brucesky420 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even before the election there was already reports the DOJ was afraid to do anything about Obamagate because they feared retaliation if Biden won. So now with the media forcing the Biden win, the DOJ isn't going to do shit.

The DOJ was the weakest part of Trump's first 4 years, and if he manages to pull this one off he needs to do a complete overhaul of the DOJ before moving on to anything else

2
Liberty_Prime 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed.

7
DarkestB4ThaDon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Barr is about to get right on it... after that bucket of KFC first

2
Boltbeam 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guys, give the KFC bucket jokes a rest.

He's had plenty of time to finish the bucket.

It's onto the McDonald's BOGO for him.

6
SacredBandOfPedes 6 points ago +6 / -0

DOJ isn't gonna get involved until after the in state remedies are exhausted. Elections are for the most part a state level event, and ANY federal agency is going to let the state level process and appeals play out.

Once you get to the federal level, then you can really start to argue the 14th amendment consequences. In general, a state court isn't going to entertain a 14th amendment argument. A state court is going to rule based on that particular state's constitution.

1
Xnyr21 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, we wouldn't be hearing ANYTHING anyway if doj is involved.

77
Loiuzein 77 points ago +78 / -1

Honestly I don't even care about evidence anymore.

There is a widespread refusal to abide by transparency considerations, orders, and statutes. THAT is the fraud. The failure to be transparent fully invalidates all voting in the area.

34
pray_for_kekistan 34 points ago +35 / -1

if we had a real media we would have every outlet barging down doors asking what the fuck is edison data and why the fuck are they using percentages of votes

4
mishaclara 4 points ago +4 / -0

If Biden had lost and Repubs had cheated they would. I was an election worker in Texas. I saw similar cheating as they are mentioning here. I think they are dropping it because although my county lost, the state won. The Judge Admin passwords on the epollbooks were the same at every precinct and used in early voting. All the clerks were logging on to my admin section with my password. I asked them how they got it and they said it was the same in early voting their judge let them use it.

7
Hellofren 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes^^^

3
TheCremaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel exactly the same way, a completely opaque election process means no accountability. I'm getting pretty furious about the use of disinterested/apolitical citizens as proxies for the elites get thousands and thousands of votes unlike the rest of us who get only 1. America was built because of patriots willing to make sacrifice. If you don't care enough to drove down to the polling place on election (assuming you arent military who should probably get at least 1 + 3/5 votes each) you are a proxy voter for someone else.

We need a divorce even if its a brutal nasty one.

2
uncuckedpicard 2 points ago +2 / -0

why have rules if they can just ignore them? why have rules why not who can fit the most people in a phonebox

65
AwareNonCompliant 65 points ago +65 / -0

This guy does a great job of explaining the limitations of using the Edison/NYT data. He worked within those limitations and still could prove a huge batch of votes were basically 100% Biden and enough to flip GA.

8
voiceofreason 8 points ago +8 / -0

This definitely helped me. I kept hearing (and believing) the "jumps" but couldn't wrap my mind around it until I saw the data. Helps explain why we're not able to use the data to make exact claims (due to rounding). The problem remains whether the source data matches (this is just fed to NYT).

Unless someone has access to the source data, they could easily manipulate the original data if required to show "proof" and say they accidentally sent the data in batches wrong (but the totals would still match).

3
take-no-part [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah I'm sure there are ways they can cover this up, might even be as simple as switching ballots from "Batch A" box to "Batch B" box in case they are fraudulent but they'd still have to explain the sheer % going to Biden and they'd have to make up some lie for that I would think.

Man, I would love for them to pull up this exact batch and look at every one of those ballots.

4
MC_Liberal_Stomper 4 points ago +4 / -0

You would see a fuckton of machine stamped perfect ovals for Biden and Biden only on a pristine ballot.

1
TheCremaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is we are cucks for accepting it. It's bullshit, everyone knows its bullshit, and they look us in the eye and smirk to say "prove it."

5
4republic 5 points ago +7 / -2

I've got about 20 hours of time in now analyzing Edison data and my concern is that the "batches" Edison reports to its clients in the media are not the same as a randomly collected set of ballots cast by voters. Edison is a data service and as far as I can tell it is a system of data collection and system of reporting and the reporting side makes corrections for the collection side. We cannot look at the batches and say they are representative of voting at a certain minute in time and therefore we cannot say it represents a random collection of ballots.

Sorry but the analysis we are celebrating here is flawed. We can't use Edison data this way. Ditto for the negative Edison vote batches that many ppl have been hyperventilating about.

Our forensic work has to focus on 1) actual evidence of fraudulent voting, 2) actual evidence of negligent and fraudulent activity at polling centers, and 3) machine code.

0
koyima 0 points ago +1 / -1

"as far as I can tell it is a system of data collection and system of reporting and the reporting side makes corrections for the collection side"

where did you come up with this?

1
4republic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Edison reports data nationally that is collects from all US states. Some states like Georgia have one voting system (in this case "Clarity" owned by Scytl) which makes collecting results easier because there's one feed and one data format to deal with. For many states, Edison deals with numerous voting systems and has to aggregate results. All of that information has to be collected in real-time across numerous feeds, aggregated and reported. We know that Edison reports to NYT and others in real-time across delivering one set of voting count information.

I'm not an insider but I'm confident on the above based upon what I've learned the last couple weeks. I would love to talk with an insider to understand the limitations of Edison individual batch data. My GUESS - totally speculating here, is that they have a model that sometimes over-estimates votes and this model smooths the results Edison reports. As a result, when the actuals come that deviate from the modeled / reported vote count, Edison must make small corrections. This would explain why we see so many negative batches (both candidates!) in the Edison data sets.

-1
koyima -1 points ago +0 / -1

Yes, your guess. It is your guess, but it is pretty retarded, because there is no reason to estimate anything

1
4republic 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Dude, you offer zero rebuttal. What part of what I said does not make sense to you? And what a cucked fuck you are - I offer you a full explanation and you downvote. Fucking pussy.

And WTF are you doing to help? I'm at least doing something - volunteering 5-6 hours of my time every single day since the election on a T_D discord server as part of a team of analysts slogging through data and reports.

1
koyima 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no substitute for a brain

1
koyima 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is a representative from a team that says they cross-referenced the Edison data and the anomalies hold: https://youtu.be/3kA8ZxrB69E?t=2296 Correct timestamp

There is no reason the Edison data would need to be predictive or have to reconcile anything, this is less complicated than a video game and I have coded multiplayer video games

The number of votes can only increase, you can send all sets of numbers without resorting to percentages, you don't need to predict anything, because you are showing precinct data as they come in

It is the simplest most easy to implement set of rules possible, you can only screw this up on purpose

Counting votes is not magic, neither is figuring out a percentage

1
4republic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ty for the serious response. I'll have a close look at that link.

2
take-no-part [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! That is exactly why it's so damning I think.

46
1776ThereIsaidIt 46 points ago +47 / -1

I'm sorry 'pedes but I stayed up until 4 a.m. and woke at 6 a.m. when I dozed off Trump was leading in every rust belt state by hundreds of thousands of votes, two hours later he was down in Wisconsin and Biden was miraculously catching up in Michigan and Pennsylvania. I knew something sinister was going on, ( water main break in Atlanta). Just a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach and it wasn't because I thought Trump was losing. I knew he was winning. Not during my lifetime has any presidential candidate ever made up those kind of deficits that quickly if at all.

We have to do everything humanly possible to stop this shit and hope that the Almighty himself has some smiting in store too.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
1
Rufus_Shinra 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched live as tens of thousands of Biden ballots were added in Wisconsin around 4am all at once. What an obvious cheat.

1
poliphilosophy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remeber going to bed at 12:30 and passed my wife saying "Looks like Trump is going to win the election". When I woke up the next morning, my first words were "Looks like Democrats are stealing this election".

36
Filo76 36 points ago +36 / -0

These are North Korea esque numbers.

11
ChrisSuperDude 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're above North Korea. Not even Rocketman is willing to lie THIS much.

23
rankandbank 23 points ago +23 / -0

Where would the human race be without spreadsheets.

5
AZ2020Maga 5 points ago +5 / -0

Africa

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
12
SweatTryhardSweat 12 points ago +12 / -0

Thanks for sharing! The voter fraud in Georgia is too obvious.

11
Poomer1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Has someone backed up this data somewhere? Getting page not found from NYT. Wanting to look into my own state.

15
take-no-part [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yes I believe people have backed these pages up but this link still works: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/georgia/president.json

Replace Georgia with your state, use colon for two words.

3
Poomer1 3 points ago +3 / -0

awesome, snapped a local copy for my state. Thanks!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
take-no-part [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably if I can figure out how to remove any identifying information that could go with the file.

I tweeted her, no idea if that will work.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
9
ft4eare 9 points ago +9 / -0

Breaking...no one got arrested despite overwhelming evidence. Stay tuned for something BIG next week when no one will be arrested again.

2
Fauxcahantos 2 points ago +3 / -1

yes the kraken is coming, this time the kraken is coming

9
busyDad 9 points ago +14 / -5

everyone knows georgia people are just tired of trump and want to unite under biden. 98% seems quite reasonable.

11
NADSAQ 11 points ago +12 / -1

well obviously, they would have voted for the first black President with that much solidarity but Black Panther had yet to be made so they didn’t know they lived in Wakanda

4
CrimsonSentinal 4 points ago +5 / -1

Ahhh, the ol' sarcasm shtick... I get it.

5
busyDad 5 points ago +5 / -0

the downvotes keep me humble:)

8
fusreedah 8 points ago +9 / -1 (edited)

This has to be countable as evidence.

Even if you couldn't prove anything regarding Dominion or printed ballots etc, this is proof that fraud has taken place, even though we may not be able to prove by what mechanism it has taken place.

It's like if you find someone stabbed to death, you know that a murder has taken place, even if we cannot find the murder weapon or know exactly what blade was used. Not finding the murder weapon makes it harder (but certainly not impossible) to convict the murderer, but it doesn't mean we stop treating it as a murder and decide they must have died of natural causes instead.

Likewise, we can mathematically establish that fraud has taken place. The results should therefore be immediately decertified, even if it takes longer to prove how the fraud happened and even longer to prove who should be in prison because of it.

1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Memorable analogy

6
feminismiscancer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bitchute that shit please

5
Bendadick_Arnold 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oops I read that as “Shit chute that bit please”

5
You_Aint_Black 5 points ago +5 / -0

u/pray_for_kekistan

sticky on this one mods?

5
trumplandslide 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sticky!

5
TheEmoEngineer 5 points ago +5 / -0

I love how this Domsite can generate 200 comments on any sticky post no matterwhat time of day it is. We are High Energy folks.

5
NPCNN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Edison Research is faggot ass bill gates

4
Deadsilos 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can we please hire Poland and Hungary to to come count all the votes?

4
FlashGordon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hi Pede!

Great job! Did you check this link out? Maybe it can help with your analysis?

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/precincts/GAGeneral-latest.json

Also, look at this: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/liveModel/2020-11-03/president/GA-G-P-2020-11-03.json

Notice the timestamps and the estimated ballot types submitted! Maybe you can correlate with your current data

2
FlashGordon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check out his json, they are more accurate vote_shares AND they provide absentee and provisional and electionday stats

{ "leader": "democrat", "margin": [ -0.0145, -0.0035, 0.0035, 0.0116, 0.0224 ], "vote_counted": 4719743, "vote_estimate": 5047968, "vote_remaining": 328225, "second": "republican", "democrat_voteshare": [ 0.4866, 0.4921, 0.4959, 0.4997, 0.505 ], "democrat_voteshare_absentee": [ 0.6401, 0.6439, 0.6466, 0.6492, 0.6529 ], "democrat_voteshare_early": [ 0.4634, 0.4635, 0.4636, 0.4636, 0.4637 ], "democrat_voteshare_electionday": [ 0.396, 0.3992, 0.4014, 0.4036, 0.407 ], "democrat_voteshare_provisional": [ 0.428, 0.467, 0.4937, 0.5194, 0.5585 ], "other_voteshare": [ 0.0121, 0.0122, 0.0123, 0.0124, 0.0126 ], "other_voteshare_absentee": [ 0.0112, 0.0112, 0.0112, 0.0112, 0.0112 ], "other_voteshare_early": [ 0.0093, 0.0093, 0.0093, 0.0093, 0.0093 ], "other_voteshare_electionday": [ 0.021, 0.021, 0.0211, 0.0211, 0.0211 ], "other_voteshare_provisional": [ 0.0103, 0.0107, 0.011, 0.0113, 0.0117 ], "republican_voteshare": [ 0.4825, 0.4881, 0.4918, 0.4956, 0.5011 ], "republican_voteshare_absentee": [ 0.3359, 0.3396, 0.3423, 0.3449, 0.3487 ], "republican_voteshare_early": [ 0.5269, 0.527, 0.5271, 0.5271, 0.5272 ], "republican_voteshare_electionday": [ 0.572, 0.5753, 0.5775, 0.5797, 0.5829 ], "republican_voteshare_provisional": [ 0.4302, 0.4696, 0.4953, 0.5214, 0.5607 ], "democrat_voteshare_counted": 0.4831, "other_voteshare_counted": 0.0122, "republican_voteshare_counted": 0.5047, "democrat_wp": 0.635, "democrat_wp_absentee": 1, "democrat_wp_early": 0, "democrat_wp_electionday": 0, "democrat_wp_provisional": 0.497, "other_wp": 0, "other_wp_absentee": 0, "other_wp_early": 0, "other_wp_electionday": 0, "other_wp_provisional": 0, "republican_wp": 0.365, "republican_wp_absentee": 0, "republican_wp_early": 1, "republican_wp_electionday": 1, "republican_wp_provisional": 0.503, "timestamp": "2020-11-04T11:03:21Z" }

2
take-no-part [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Too much for brain to handle right now. Big sleep deficit lately lol. I tried to look at the second one but I'm not really sure what's going on. Thanks for sharing though.

I know other people have been analyzing precinct info including shifts from last election.

1
FlashGordon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Check it out here: https://github.com/midnjerry/trump-ga

There are two files.

GA-G-P-2020-11-03.json - this is the 2nd json file from New York Times

Georgia.xlsx - Has 2 sheets, 1 with original data, and 2nd with this new data in same format. I didn't graph out absentee, provisional, or in-person but I can if you want.

1
FlashGordon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was able to process it, but i don't know what it means. It looks like the presidential election. The vote shares are 4-5 decimal points, though.

1
FlashGordon 1 point ago +1 / -0
    "democrat_voteshare_counted": 0.4831,
    "other_voteshare_counted": 0.0122,
    "republican_voteshare_counted": 0.5047,
    "democrat_wp": 0.635,
    "democrat_wp_absentee": 1,
    "democrat_wp_early": 0,
    "democrat_wp_electionday": 0,
    "democrat_wp_provisional": 0.497,
    "other_wp": 0,
    "other_wp_absentee": 0,
    "other_wp_early": 0,
    "other_wp_electionday": 0,
    "other_wp_provisional": 0,
    "republican_wp": 0.365,
    "republican_wp_absentee": 0,
    "republican_wp_early": 1,
    "republican_wp_electionday": 1,
    "republican_wp_provisional": 0.503,
    "timestamp": "2020-11-04T11:03:21Z"

Yea here are the fields, if you could break it down by absentee, early, electionday, etc. then it could help you build your case.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
lorentz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anyone seen this? Smoking Gun: Dominion Transferring Vote Ratios between Precincts in PA. - By: Edward Solomon https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html?mref=6tc17&mc=9kez7

1
Tardigrade 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but i dont fully understand it

3
Davito2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't be scared off by all the information on the page

Awkward Moment Seal

3
matrik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are there that many "true-believers" on the left involved in all this? Or are some moderate Dems being coerced to do what they're told and keep their mouths shut?

3
Thehumancentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if the ballots were separated by candidate and uploaded ? Does trump ever have batches similar to this?

2
C10H15N 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was addressed in the video

1
roytheboy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, he does. Maybe u/take-no-part can check his data to verify because he seems to be way more organized/better at this than me, but at 11:49pm, Trump seems to get between 92% - 325% of a batch.

1
take-no-part [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

These ones?

{"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.535,"bidenj":0.453},"votes":3801772,"eevp":74,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T04:48:28Z"}

{"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.534,"bidenj":0.453},"votes":3801884,"eevp":74,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T04:48:54Z"}

{"vote_shares":{"trumpd":0.535,"bidenj":0.453},"votes":3804335,"eevp":74,"eevp_source":"edison","timestamp":"2020-11-04T04:49:03Z"}

Look at % change and total vote change and you will see why we can't glean anything useful from these entries due to the rounding.

3
Paul_Revere 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe every word of it. But honest question, is statistical analysys admissible as evidence in legal proceedings?

4
LawfulSilentMajority 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's not even statistics. It's just a fact parsed out of what's being reported. Either you've got to explain what mistake happened in the chain of reporting that batch or you've got to defend Biden winning 98%+ of the batch.

1
kamalaforprison2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was wondering the same.

This has some good examples of when it can't be used which makes me think it doesn't apply to our case. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/statistics-legal-evidence

Hopefully someone here has more insight into this

3
PhilippElhaus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Video is good.

3
RPD2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it possible the 98% biden batch came from a cucked town, or cucked part of a city?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
HeavenlyTrumpets 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol...

-1
MysteriousCheese -1 points ago +1 / -2

Good rebuttal man

3
slewrock 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is what it looks like when you have thousands of ballots diverted as "unscannable" and then manually override them and submit all as votes for one candidate. Stankyyyy

3
chopz 3 points ago +3 / -0

defendyourballot.com

3
SutopSutolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

To the Lawyers!

3
WarGreymon77 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm glad we've got number people here, because I'm not a math guy at all.

2
Ladiesman727 2 points ago +2 / -0

AUDIT AUDIT AUDIT! SEND THIS TO RUDY N SYDNEY

2
B3fre 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, sudden jumps like this one is very suspicious. This person's methodology seems fine too.

The only ways I can explain this involve fraud or unfairness. Fake ballots, fake counts/reporting, or extreme ballot harvesting.

2
icockmyglock 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs

Gabon's opposition says it was cheated of victory, in President Ali Bongo's home region, with 95% of votes in his favour.

2
SirScotalot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aren't they suppose to catch this kind of stuff? When's the audit happening, if ever? Wtf did we even elect Kemp for

2
BloodDe 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's no doubt in my mind they committed mass fraud. I highly suspect they did it in 2018 and I wouldn't be surprised to find out they did it in 2016 too.
That would explain why they didn't contest any of the razor thin margins. They didn't want to get caught.

1
EdisonHwy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here is a deep dive into the voting history in Georgia.

https://archive.is/ByvsM

2
OKtobeWhite 2 points ago +2 / -0

Atlanta’s the biggest shithole in the US

2
kevinrittenhouse 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s giving me an error when I try to watch. Bc I’m on my cell phone maybe ?

2
bear19643 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watched. Thank you. Very clear and informative. Stats don't lie, and they are piling up.

2
Right_of_Sinner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!!

2
MysteriousCheese 2 points ago +4 / -2

Ohhhh the 900th bombshell. PUT THEM IN FUCKING JAIL. MAKE THAT HEADLINE

-1
MsQleo -1 points ago +1 / -2

SLAMS BREAKING BOMBSHELL MOAB NUKE

2
Bloom620 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://audittheelection.com/ Has anyone checked out this site?

2
KeyDoorQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent work

2
PikachuJohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

This alone gives Georgia to Trump!

2
kung-flu-fighting 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simple to debunk. It's from the town with the largest cemetary.

2
BadRadDad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are their any leads on actual Raw data and not reporting data for news feeds and websites?

2
npeachmint 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's weird about these 95%+ batches is that they are from mostly black areas supposedly all pro Biden. But the exit polls show 30% of blacks went for Trump, double that of 2016. Hope that is being presented by Trump team as evidence. It's statistically impossible that any precinct of this size would have been more than 80% for Biden.

2
Observation 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

But the exit polls show 30% of blacks went for Trump, double that of 2016.

Where’d you see that? I haven’t looked at it in a while, but the exit polling I saw showed not much more than 10%.

1
ViduusMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Highly improbably but not impossible.

Maybe a very few batches in specific precincts but definitely not more then that.