8318
Comments (626)
sorted by:
795
MakeAmericaGreat9 795 points ago +807 / -12

Only thing I don't like is them broadcasting to the judges that they want it done fast

338
Rwkp 338 points ago +345 / -7

Very true

288
John-Miller 288 points ago +289 / -1

It's not really a secret. They already know they can run out the clock, they are still doing it in the first term with General Flynn's case.

244
Sweden_wuz_Rite 244 points ago +244 / -0

If its stuck in the state courts they cant certify it either. Its a win win.

178
DrBJTester 178 points ago +179 / -1

We are watching advanced art of the deal. Trump can not be stumped.

90
NostalgicFuturist 90 points ago +93 / -3

This might also be a 4D chess move. Egging the cuck judges on so that they definitely WILL drag things out. This would allow Team Trump to gather/organize more evidence and maybe even get together a very large-scale operation involving the military, and arrests, and so forth--a highly complicated and unprecedented move.

This may be way out there in Speculation Space, but I'm tossin' it on the cracker barrel.

54
DrBJTester 54 points ago +55 / -1

It's fun to speculate exactly what the chess move is or isn't. We get to safely hide and watch, the legal team is in the arena fighting for all of us.

63
xzibit_b 63 points ago +64 / -1

I don't know about "The legal team is in the arena fighting for all of us." The last couple of weeks have shown us that TheDonald has been absolutely instrumental in getting the legal team evidence. It's like those patriots stood side by side with Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, and Donald Trump, fighting right next to them by conducting investigations of their own and passing off the results to them. It was beautiful.

17
realmaga2020 17 points ago +17 / -0

Why would they need more evidence?

48
RealRedneck 48 points ago +48 / -0

To make a case so airtight even grandpa watching CNN will see the truth.

20
AmericanGuy 20 points ago +20 / -0

Because they likely want to catch everyone involved, not just a couple people.

10
NostalgicFuturist 10 points ago +10 / -0 (edited)

If they find more, why not use it? They're still investigating. Who knows what else they might uncover?

Edit: I assume they have a team of statisticians conducting forensic analysis of huge datasets. Doing a thorough, precise analysis and putting it into layman terms might be taking them a while, understandably--they need to make an airtight case.

2
XinnietheFlu 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lawyer once told me that edvidence is just like ammo. You can NEVER have too much ammo

13
Aambrick 13 points ago +13 / -0

Actually, it is a very real possibility. At the moment it is more speculation, but if this does continue it does in a way give more ground for it.

The major thing is if there is enough evidence that can involve the military which would require Tremendous amounts of evidence. We are talking about where Terrorists have reached the upper areas of government and start committing mass illegal moves(Let's be real this is already happening, but its the proving of it that is the problem. The fact that there is so much on such an important function of our nation means that the possibility is quite high the longer this is dragged out, and quite likely going to involve the help of the people to being on the ground, on the internet, and keeping eagle eyes on gangs and drugs).

4
NostalgicFuturist 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's particularly difficult considering that those at the top of the agencies that should be doing the law enforcement are themselves criminals.

-26
deleted -26 points ago +1 / -27
4
Tdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like your thinking.

2
Frogleg3 2 points ago +2 / -0

I m sure they have plans for both contingencies. Fast or slow.

10
freemanwhocan 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is beyond advanced. It's multi-level-dimensional art of the deal mastery.

7
DrBJTester 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's Trumptonian.

3
ChippingToe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trumptuous

5
Afeazo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cant stump the Trump

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
41
Please_Clap 41 points ago +44 / -3

If they run the clock out they get fucked too. Go get em Rudy!

14
glow-operator-2-0 14 points ago +19 / -5

Interrogative - how would running out the clock help Mr Trump? Especially if there is no certified winner by Jan 20, then the House Speaker becomes POTUS?

68
KeepMOGreat 68 points ago +70 / -2

The Electoral College votes on December 14. That's what really matters- and what determines who is sworn in on January 20, regardless of anything going on with the popular vote. Here's my understanding of the nuts and bolts of the process to get there:

When you vote in a presidential election, you aren't voting directly to seat a slate of electors. You're voting to tell your state legislature which slate of electors you want them to seat - the Republican slate or the Democrat slate, chosen by the state party delegates at their respective conventions.

First the popular vote gets certified by local election officials and the secretary of state. From there, it goes to the state legislature. They can vote to certify it (and therefore seat the slate of electors who the voters chose), or they can vote not to certify it, in which case the popular vote in that state is thrown out entirely and the legislature chooses their own slate of electors. This almost happened in Florida in 2000, but SCOTUS ruled for Bush on the same day that the Florida legislature was scheduled to vote.

All of the states the Trump team is contesting have Republican-controlled state legislatures. If the courts run out the clock, it will cast enough doubt on the results that those legislatures might vote against certifying the popular vote and move to seat their own slate of electors.

In Arizona and Georgia, there are also Republican Governors who would likely approve this move, bringing Trump's electoral vote total to 259.

Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Nevada have Democrat Governors who would not sign off on the legislatures' move to seat new electors. If the clock runs out in those states -no agreement reached between the Republican legislature and the Democrat Governor before December 14- then those states don't send electors.

That makes the electoral college vote total 259 Trump - 227 Biden. Because no one has 270, it goes to the House of Representatives, where a candidate needs the approval of 26 state delegations to win.

Republicans control 27. Trump wins.

36
thxpk 36 points ago +39 / -3

Stop counting on the legislatures to do this, in each of these states they are controlled by RINOs who hate Trump. Despite being constitutional, they will never send their own electors, if Trump hasn't got enough wins by then the rino republicans will not help him, it will be over.

16
Challenger322 16 points ago +16 / -0

Agree with all this except I believe Republicans will have 31 delegates, Democrats 19. Even better.

7
12ip 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you for this!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Clandestiny 4 points ago +5 / -1

I love your conscise reply. Consider it stolen as I will now be copying and pasting it for some normies I know :)

28
shitPostingChamp 28 points ago +28 / -0

No electors appointed in contested states = contingent election = Trump most likely wins

5
AntiDespot 5 points ago +5 / -0

If Trump wins that way there will be a civil war in this country.

1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see 🤔

Will be interesting. Do you when the results for electors will be posted? 12/15?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

Especially if there is no certified winner by Jan 20, then the House Speaker becomes POTUS?

Please not that! DO NOT WANT

1
CocaineRimJob 1 point ago +1 / -0

In that event the congress chooses a temporary president and senate does so for a VP. Its complex and im not a US govt expert but there are hardcoded safeguards in the constitution.

1
McCrinckle 1 point ago +3 / -2

Hey, that's a good point! In fact, "running out the clock" is the exact opposite thing they want to do -- they want to run it through the courts ASAP.

4
Bluedane 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sidney has already said that even if they do run the clock out and certify the elections this case would still stop and reverse the process. But it sounds like this will all come out before the end of this month

13
Paul-Revere 13 points ago +13 / -0

BTW, perfect username. Sweden got their Covid plan right: no lock downs, no mask mandates, no tyranny (apart from the usual Scandinavian socialism-lite) just common sense.

4
Sweden_wuz_Rite 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you, had to start over after the Purge a couple monthe ago..

5
BestTimeToBAlive 5 points ago +5 / -0

Question: isn’t there a lawsuit in MI currently as well? Then why are they trying to certify?

If a state can’t be certified while there’s a case in its courts, then wouldn’t PA, MI & WI all force a contingent election?

5
Sweden_wuz_Rite 5 points ago +5 / -0

You are selling a car thats on a lift in the shop, they can only make things worse.

5
BestTimeToBAlive 5 points ago +5 / -0

they can only make things worse.

We’re talking about libtards here, they totally don’t care about optics... they only care if they can get caught. All is fair game w them.

1
Sweden_wuz_Rite 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree, but Legally speaking it doesnt matter how they FEEL. We are taking names and crimes.

1
Harper42190 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well they withdrew because the county didn't get certified, but I guess it did... So idk man.. It's a mess

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have to force their narrative so the mindless thinks everything is moving along with the pretender Biden. They think the more they push eventually they will win or trump will concede. It won’t work but this is all they got to not loose face

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
70
TerpenoidTester 70 points ago +71 / -1

Well, now if any courts drag their feet with a decision Trump can claim bias.

It's kind of a win/win for him to bring it up.

28
KumOnHerHairAss 28 points ago +29 / -1

This guy 4D Chesses!

15
americanjerky 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not to mention, if they don't do it fast, it will give them an opportunity to present evidence, more win - win.

7
Tantalus4200 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nice

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right and also they are letting the people know that this is not a setback and that they are right on track and only moving closer to the goal and into the higher courts where we have a better chance for our constitution to be upheld. Love how they pointed out this bias judge who refused their evidence was an “Obama elected judge”.

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s more of a hey the more you keep abusing your power the closer we get to our goal.

1
HKFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

They know they can't run out the clock in this situation, too many people watching. It has to get decided or to SCOTUS one way or another in about a month. Unlike Flynn who most outside of us don't realize/care how badly he's been betrayed

22
doug2 22 points ago +23 / -1

I'm pretty sure there are ways to force their hand. This is going to the SC.

20
magabirdlady 20 points ago +20 / -0

Oh yeah my thoughts as well.

118
deleted 118 points ago +120 / -2
8
Bomberman 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yea, but then the other judges will catch on, and run the clock.

6
WildSauce 6 points ago +6 / -0

Going through the circuit courts is only a formality. The Trump campaign can always appeal directly to the SCOTUS, as happened in Bush v. Gore.

3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

If these lawsuits gets held back however the state may not certify the electors at all so wouldn’t be smart for any judge to let the clock run out.

1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has this ever happened before?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
110
deleted 110 points ago +116 / -6
27
Gipgm2 27 points ago +27 / -0

Trump is The President

10
CeruleanShadow 10 points ago +10 / -0

Trump is the shitlibs President, whether they like it or not (REEEE!)

11
Gipgm2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fucking A right The bastards have screwed with the MAN for five years-- Now its his turn to take the kinks of the line of bullshit they have been pushing. The fucking they get will be 10 fold the fucking they tried to give. Trump's going to plant these pricks with their asses up and make bicycles racks out of them

3
RallyinStJohnsWood 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump's going to plant these pricks with their asses up and make bicycles racks out of them

Most creative threat I've heard in a while

2
Gipgm2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks I worked at that one

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

I laugh at doomers who really think Donald Trump is not holding a Trump card that he will only drop at the perfect moment! No one will know until then and no one from his team is going to reveal it. Everything now is just building up to that moment and making the left expose them selves more than ever. Fox and their hosts have shown their true colors for one and the rest of the left have let down all guards and gone full psycho with their “lists to round up a Trump enablers” and their full denial of facts and ignorance to true journalism. Not to mention big tech. Everything is coming out and it is starting to overflow. Pay attention doomers to what’s happening instead of focusing on what you think should be happening. The time will come so be patient and have some faith.

2
JihadAlot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, the media has done a great job at demoralizing the people and most are just ready to accept defeat. Almost all of my peers either believe that our government and courts are to corrupt for a fair conclusion on election fraud or they outright believe Biden won and the "fraudulent votes" are only in the hundreds. I think the media is actually affecting people and demoralizing them into just accepting Biden as president.

Its like, I read the news here and what I see in reality is just people accepting everything and moving on with their lives. Reminds me a lot of Brexit in which people decided to fight hard to stand up but than ultimately lost the battle when they realized Brexit was never actually happening. Corrupt courts/officials + 99% media bia=break and demoralize people into accepting.

I don't blame people for being doomers, they are seriously worried because they know what hurdles Trump has to face to bring truth to light. I'm gonna support Trump until the election is decided and continue to spread the word. Its a matter of Realism vs Optimism. A realist says that even if you could prove millions of votes were fraud, the media and courts will disprove them and the sheep of this world will just accept it. A optimist thinks Trump has never made a mistake in his presidency and is thinking 10 moves ahead of his opponents. Many of us are in the middle of those two ways of thinking so don't shit on people but rather encourage them with the facts.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +11 / -19
9
BBQTiddies 9 points ago +11 / -2

Wat

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
5
BBQTiddies 5 points ago +6 / -1

I didn't call you anything lol

16
Hawksendoom 16 points ago +16 / -0

(hands everyone grilled cheese sandwiches and a beer) Calm the fuck down groovy cats

6
MakeAmericaGreat9 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can get down with a grilled cheese.

5
LiskaEman 5 points ago +5 / -0

I like grilled cheese too! Thanks!

3
MakeAmericaGreat9 3 points ago +5 / -2

something is way fucked up here. I keep seeing a different username

3
BBQTiddies 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was more confused on why it seemed like it went 0 to 100 really quick lol

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
60
nairebis 60 points ago +61 / -1

I thought that too, but 1) I don't think judges need reminding that it needs to be done fast, and 2) maybe they're trying to telegraph to future judges that they'll be well aware of what they're doing and they'll fight it.

43
Quoc01 43 points ago +43 / -0

A) Give it some credibility & run out the clock
B) Give it no credibility, and let them appeal.

22
OconusLurex 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yup, damned if they do, damned if they don't. The Rudy Fingertrap.

9
Gipgm2 9 points ago +9 / -0

The Dems will have more than hair dye running down their legs

3
MuricanaBanana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did he really have to dye his hair right before the presser? Lol I mean I know it’s irrelevant but he didn’t have to give them meme fodder. They had a fucking field day over it.

6
IHerdUlikeMAGAkips 6 points ago +6 / -0

Having more evidence that attests to the nature of their character is always useful.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

It makes it more likely for normies to watch the conference, if they know something goofy happened

1
Gipgm2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could envision Sir Trump watching it on TV with his head in his hands and stareing through his fingers while cursing very quietly --- I did the same

410
pmurTJdlanoD 410 points ago +414 / -4

"Thank you Obama for giving us this corrupt judge it helps our case" is fucking savage, thank you Rudy and Jenna.

116
magabirdlady 116 points ago +116 / -0

Thanks Obama!!

1
SwedenPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait - that can be used in an unironic way!

50
buckinghampi 50 points ago +50 / -0

get his ass!!!

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
57
Barack-Obama2 57 points ago +57 / -0

My wife has a 14 inch penis.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
9
Dontberetarded 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's big.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
6D_chess 3 points ago +3 / -0

An entire bag of Skittles

4
DaddySmooth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Michael Obama enters the chat

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

The chat bites the pillow.

3
XirMichaelObama 3 points ago +3 / -0

The term wife assigns me a gender. You bigot! Barry loves me no matter how big of a hog I’m packin

2
ObamaBinladin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh shit mine too

1
DrBJTester 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big Mike batting clean up...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
PostalJusticeWatson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look Ma! No hands!

-4
Yippity -4 points ago +1 / -5

I just don’t understand the support . Rudy is not the mastermind he’s made out to be. He could barely carry basic legal acumen in court. Feel free to hit me with a told you so, but he’s the softest of soft leaders for this.

2
JoelMatip 2 points ago +2 / -0

The guys a fucking rottweiler. FUCK YOU!

2
TwoBearArms 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow it seems that the response you got is very level-headed and rational. I hope it cleared things up for you.

247
DapperDan 247 points ago +250 / -3

Got em.

Everything going to plan.

109
Thetick130 109 points ago +111 / -2

These people are really just getting started. Masterful legal and pr planning. This is going to get spicy.

75
DBallsandJScrotes 75 points ago +76 / -1

Public opinion is already basically even with many former sideline sitters becoming at least skeptical that the possibility of fraud exists. Biden camp (including media) has expended all of its false enthusiasm already. They are getting spanked big time.

32
DrBJTester 32 points ago +32 / -0

No one right, left, communist or pede believes the drive by media anymore. Having them run out there tired dog and pony show that there's nothing to see here makes about half of America think I probably need to pay attention to this.

12
Momreccos 12 points ago +12 / -0

They have sacrificed so much good will in their blind hatred for orange man. They are close, if not past, the point of no return.

9
MAGA9428 9 points ago +9 / -0

I hope after all this is done and Trump remains the sitting president that people really shit all over the media and regard them as the lying, Chinese propaganda like outlets that we've always known them to be. Imagine how much the MSM is going to be humiliated if they lose this battle.

This really is the endgame.

7
DrBJTester 7 points ago +7 / -0

Once upon a time one of the strongest messages that the left had was compassion. Now their messages is hate, division, identity politics oh wait that's hate again, and entitlement.

2
MrBabySpam 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have all been transformed by hatred and its the media and education systems fault.

2
DrBJTester 2 points ago +2 / -0

We let it happen fren. We better fix it soon.

0
Yippity 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have to see that in this statement alone, you’re perpetuating identity politics.

72
deleted 72 points ago +72 / -0
24
IntergalacticWalrus 24 points ago +25 / -1

I hope they rule the way we think.

11
ZeroDeltaTango 11 points ago +13 / -2

really is amazing to watch. Rudy wove an absolute masterpiece in court, and got exactly the result he wanted.

Can you clarify the masterpiece? Thx :)

-1
Yippity -1 points ago +3 / -4

Agree. Let’s stay honest. His opening arguments drew bipartisan criticism.

2
analog_shitposter 2 points ago +2 / -0

New account with lots of fence-sitting comments hmmmmmm

2
crazyfingers619 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the dude still has time to make snazzy-ass cigar commercials.

Absolute legend.

40
TheNewRepublic 40 points ago +40 / -0

I’m under the impression that the team has irrefutable evidence that would be shown in the Supreme Court. Trump team and auxiliaries are creating a lot of noise to corral everything to the Supreme Court while giving the illusion that Biden has the upper hand. Appear weak when strong.

20
LtColonelPlease 20 points ago +20 / -0

I have to agree with this. They’re throwing the low hanging affidavits out there and pushing crafted cases in court to push it up to the SC as fast as possible.

-1
Yippity -1 points ago +3 / -4

You cannot introduce new evidence in an appellate court. They can only review the case you were appealing. It wouldn’t make sense to ever try and withhold any kind of evidence to appeal to a higher court.

3
JoelMatip 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can if there's a national security concern like there would be with election fraud.

Watermarked ballots evidence will likely only be presented to the SCOTUS.

6
SutopSutolf 6 points ago +6 / -0

correct impression.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +6 / -16
4
Flow777 4 points ago +7 / -3

Really, so you’re saying Powell’s statement that she will present the proof to the court not media is incorrect? Mmm who are you again? Sit down shill

2
ThePantsParty 2 points ago +3 / -1

You're out of your depth and not following.

Powell can file a new case and present her evidence, that is not in question or even being discussed here.

The topic here is this specific case that was just dismissed in PA. He is pointing out that the rules prevent evidence from being submitted for anything but the claims in the case as filed. So even if the SC picked up this case, since none of the claims in this case were about Powell's stuff, they can't present the evidence as part of this case.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
5
giggitybooped 5 points ago +5 / -0

Very, very well known lawyers. Rudy took down 5 mob families. Sydney arguing cases to the supreme court. They have reputations and they wouldn't put them on the line if they didn't have anything.

1
RationalRat 1 point ago +3 / -2

Rudy and Sidney are being paid a lot to do the job and their obligation is to advance the President's position. And regardless of whether they win or lose the case, they'll be beloved by the right and they'll be able to drum up business going forward.

Gafasipmurt is correct. In law, you don't try to ambush the opposing party with evidence in front of an appellate court. That's a good way to have your evidence excluded. Appellate courts as a rule don't permit new evidence without permission of the court. To get that permission you'll need a good reason why you couldn't introduce the evidence sooner.

In general (not just in appeals courts), ambushing the opposing party is a good way to get on a judge's bad side. Court isn't the place for playing games; that's what cable network legal dramas are for.

When I reviewed the legal material in some of the President's cases, I thought it was trash, and I knew that those cases weren't going anywhere. They didn't have good evidence and their legal arguments seemed weak. I held my tongue because I didn't want to be a doomer, I didn't have the time to go through everything and explain it in a way that interested readers might understand, and because this site is an echo chamber, a self-described non-stop rally.

We were promised that this week, we would get evidence that would prove a bombshell case. That didn't happen. We got a lot of allegations, but no hard evidence to support them.

It should be becoming clearer now to people that none of these cases are going to alter the election results.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you were a lawyer you would have some comprehension of how much time it takes to build a case of this matter. Sidney even explained it usual takes months and up to a year so they are having to do this in god speed in a matter of weeks. Many ducks to get in that row. But I have faith they will get there in just the right time to drop this MOAB.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
4
Bluedane 4 points ago +5 / -1

LMFAO. Every PEDE here KNOWS Trump has ALREADY won this. Doomers and shills are not part of the club so move back to twitter or reddit where you will be welcomed with a big bag of blue pills.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've heard this as well, that SCOTUS doesn't decide on new evidence...

But perhaps they can present new evidence in the circuit court now?

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are already on the way there. Lol. But regardless it doesn’t matter because the MOAB coming out with the Dominion case most defiantly will end up at SCOTUS if not illegitimated before then should the DOJ, CIA or FBI against all odds step in and do the right thing

0
Dave___Smith 0 points ago +1 / -1

We’re seriously pretending laws even matter at this point?

17
MagaRick420 17 points ago +17 / -0

This is the only way...

6
antatapicnic 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the way.

2
Shrodax 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Man-Donald-orian.

1
antatapicnic 1 point ago +1 / -0

This feels like a meme in the making.

223
PatrioticMemeLord 223 points ago +224 / -1

Translation: Good Morning, Justice Alito.

TOPKEK

56
Mavdick96 56 points ago +56 / -0

So will Alito alone be ruling on it or is it gonna be all 9?

70
undef 70 points ago +70 / -0

Alito is the gatekeeper

57
Xnyr21 57 points ago +57 / -0

Then it is DONE. Alito might be more pissed than I am.

60
undef 60 points ago +60 / -0

I doubt Alito is nearly as pissed as Thomas and Kavanaugh.

29
buckinghampi 29 points ago +29 / -0

soon

13
Hillarys_Diaper 13 points ago +13 / -0

wow.. Trump 2020 in a nutshell. Sheesh.

9
iron_patriot22 9 points ago +10 / -1

J̸̛̝̤͒͊O̴͇̩̻̩̓͑̔̈́̚Ş̴̘̬̀̆͜Ȩ̶̯̮͙̗̉̋̄͝P̷͈͓̂̐̅͐Ḫ̷̢̭̮̍

3
CeruleanShadow 3 points ago +4 / -1

I remember the graffiti "waterfall" effect the trolls' comments had, covering other comments, how'd they achieve that?

22
RedditIs4Retards 22 points ago +22 / -0

Isn't it just beautiful, that the judges who were unjustly fucked by the Democrats are gonna be the very judges to dish out ultimate justice. This is gonna be delicious

8
EchoLight 8 points ago +9 / -1

The coldest dish, fresh from the freezer.

6
giggitybooped 6 points ago +6 / -0

The very fact they know how corrupt they are and what lengths they will go to to take down someone they simply don't like, is hopefully in the back of all their minds.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

They all had to sit through crucifying confirmation hearings so yeah I think they have a pretty good clue about how the left works

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have never been more excited about our constitution until now. The more I tru to understand how it would apply in these cases the more faith I have we will WIN. Trump knows this and his team knows this. The law and truth is on our side!!

15
ProdigalSon1997 15 points ago +15 / -0

They did ignore Alito's previous ruling, so he's likely not happy with the left

8
DrBJTester 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thomas and Kavanaugh are Patriots that love their country so their mood right now would best be described as furious.

7
Xnyr21 7 points ago +7 / -0

I havent heard shit from those two but ive heard Alito literally threaten the lower courts AT LEAST twice now. They disobeyed a direct ruling from him.

3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because Alito rules over Pennsylvania where that all went down. The other states have not yet reached the level of SCOTUS

5
giggitybooped 5 points ago +5 / -0

Liberals: "He'll be all smiles and siding with us after ignoring his court order...twice..."

2
Mavdick96 2 points ago +2 / -0

So will it be all the other guys there too?

24
Omgwtfbbq 24 points ago +24 / -0

Alito warned them that they had to give them meaningful access and specified the max distance or something.

22
DrBJTester 22 points ago +22 / -0

And then they completely ignored Alito. Because they thought they could get away with it and even a Justice of the United States Supreme Court has no business trying to stop their scamming. Because orange man bad.

3
giggitybooped 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's scaring me about this is if the Dems are certain they are going to lose and this is their plan B. They saw election night that they were hit by a landslide and then started right up with their second plan.

So now media runs with a madeup office for Biden. Many people only see this reality day in and day out. So they take it as fact at face value, including those in Antifa, BLM, and just Never Trumpers.

Now they have the rug pulled out from under them after a month's barrage of propaganda. Cities possibly going to have worst civil unrest than pre-election.

4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's not going to be unrest when Trump makes sure the arrested rioters remain in jail.

The riots so far were simply allowed to happen.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the evidence is big enough to smack them in the face there will be no routes for denial anymore. We could be seeing a mass awakening of all those who have been in the dark and ignored the truth...and it will be a rude one may I say. If this happens just let them kiss your feet and beg for mercy. Then tell them to go repent to Jesus for their sins of supporting evil.

1
Adolf_Kekler 1 point ago +1 / -0

How naive lol

1
XinnietheFlu 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will have to scrub all the floors in Hyrule before we can talk about mercy

30
ClokworkGremlin 30 points ago +30 / -0

Oooo, and he's got a grudge already.

17
antatapicnic 17 points ago +17 / -0

And more importantly, he’s willing to apply the law. That shouldn’t sound so controversial but law and order seem to be in pretty short supply these days.

5
ClokworkGremlin 5 points ago +5 / -0

You would think that wouldn't be a controversial thing, but so many Democrats at The Honorable Barrett's hearing seemed to think applying the law as written was "disappointing" and "shameful."

5
Hillarys_Diaper 5 points ago +5 / -0

rawwrrrrr

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Grudge or not his power will be laid out in the constitution. But I am absolutely sure he will not be denying the law or neglect to apply it correctly as opposed to these biased corrupt Obama elected judges

132
Arcticwolf55 132 points ago +133 / -1

QUICK, CALL 911 . Trump just murdered this poor judge in cold blood.

56
ClokworkGremlin 56 points ago +56 / -0

I don't know what you're talking about. That judge clearly shot himself in the back of the stairs, threw himself off of a high building, and then beat himself to death before he hit the ground.

37
Centrist_Vet 37 points ago +37 / -0

Covid-19....sad. Don't mind the 2 bullet holes in the back of the head execution style either.

6
clara__ 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's how Covid got him! Sneaked in through the holes, should have worn a mask.

8
Hawksendoom 8 points ago +8 / -0

is that before or after the gym? XD

3
XinnietheFlu 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was at a bar somewhere in Ohio at 10:01PM

6
CeruleanShadow 6 points ago +6 / -0

That judge clearly shot himself in the back of the stairs, threw himself off of a high building, and then beat himself to death before he hit the ground.

Amazing reflexes, I'll give him that.

6
Porkbut 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ah, a Clinton judge

6
Skywise 6 points ago +6 / -0

And threw the gun into another building at that!

10
Arvakr 10 points ago +10 / -0

Take it.

119
Nomoralcompass89 119 points ago +119 / -0

When the lefts anger actually hurts them more. 4D chess.

68
ClokworkGremlin 68 points ago +68 / -0

The last 4 years could be adequately summarized as Donald repeatedly telling the left to stop hitting themselves.

12
RussianLimbaugh 12 points ago +12 / -0

Way longer than 4 years of the left Fing themselves over for an emotional immediate win/attempt to dissolve the American system. But you’re spot the hell on about the last 4 yrs being the season of throwing the left’s BS back onto them (or as GEOTUS framed it, teaching the republicans the forgotten art of WINNING!)

29
MainstreamDeviant 29 points ago +30 / -1

it hurt itself in its confusion!

9
TheEmoEngineer 9 points ago +9 / -0

Outsider Trump wants to battle

112
deleted 112 points ago +112 / -0
58
FuckPlebbit 58 points ago +58 / -0

They all thought it meant the case couldn't be appealed, but it can and it just gets kicked up higher... which is exactly what DJT wants anyway so I get a laugh at the retards who didn't realize it on twitter.

29
DrBJTester 29 points ago +29 / -0

It's reminiscent of when the house voted articles of impeachment and the idiot leftists thought that meant president Trump would have to leave office immediately. It's not like they never passed a civics class they never took one because they opted for underwater basket weaving instead.

7
giggitybooped 7 points ago +7 / -0

I can't remember the source so fact check me if you need to. Trump did mention that the supreme court CAN act in an expedited manner in extenuating circumstances.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly and once Sidney files the dominion case everything else will just tie it together. This is strategically planned to take down as many involved as they can including the top heads.

25
Buttfart88 25 points ago +25 / -0

What does with prejudice mean?

48
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 48 points ago +48 / -0

It means they can't bring the same case to the same level court again. Meaning they can only appeal the decision or drop the issue. So in this case it will go to the next level court.

6
Hawksendoom 6 points ago +6 / -0

https://i.gifer.com/YAsQ.gif

Just for you groovy cat, love the username.

-9
moraxal -9 points ago +2 / -11

It also means there can't be new evidence...and that hurts us.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah but the judge refused to look at the evidence or accept affidavits so those will move along with the case and an honest judge would allow it

11
SoAngryRanger 11 points ago +12 / -1

That it has to be appealed. If it was dismissed without it would mean fix it and come back to this court.

2
EchoLight 2 points ago +3 / -1

Honest question, how did they manage to coax him into dismissing "with prejudice" rather than just a simple dismissal?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
15
my_pw_is_password 15 points ago +15 / -0

Leftist are dumb because they media keeps them completely in the dark. The media has to claim it’s all hopeless conspiracy, and therefore isn’t informing their mindless peasants how it might play out and what to watch out for. pikachu_face.png

4
Sumsuch 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is all happening this way, as it has always done through history, because the ideology of tyrants relies upon the dumbest segments of society to do their dirty work for them, and those extremely stupid people can't help but fuck it up.

7
maddog20 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why is this? Please explain?

28
jubyeonin 28 points ago +28 / -0

Dismissed with prejudice on the most basic level means you can't bring up the same case, but the Twits don't understand that it applies to that level, so it can still go to the Supreme Court. It's a good way to get the case heard quickly since they don't need to wait for the corrupt judge who can drag the case past the time the electors cast their votes.

5
antatapicnic 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good explanation, thanks

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

But can we present it directly to the SCOTUS now, or do we need a case in the circuit court first?

If yes, what's the composition of the circuit court?

And can we add new evidences to the case?

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

First APPEALS then SCOTUS

-7
moraxal -7 points ago +2 / -9

It also means there can't be new evidence...and that hurts us.

10
jubyeonin 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, but it is PA, so they should have enough evidence. It was enough that Alito sent an order that was ignored. The campaign can't add more evidence, but there should be more than enough. It's mostly that the corrupt judge threw a fit and screwed up.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have evidence. The judge denied it to be even considered and just dismissed cased based on no evidence. So what ever they filed still has to be considered by the appeals and possibly scotus

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

The campaign can't add more evidence

Are we sure about this? What if something else comes up?

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's how it generally works. They can probably bring up Alito's order since it is part of the process of the appeal, but that's about it.

1
scyenceFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

New pede here... The judge (Brann) excluded claims and evidence based on Bognet v. PA in the 3rd circuit, and he has to stick by that precedent (That's the one Alito already had to step into). If 3rd circuit interprets this case differently, and doesn't apply Bognet; or USSC throws Bognet under the bus, all that evidence comes into play once again.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
stjimmy92 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dismissing with prejudice means this level court can never hear the case again. That means they either have to drop or appeal to a higher court. If it was dismissed without prejudice, they would have had to come back to this level of court again.

6
marishiten 6 points ago +6 / -0

It just means they can't file the same issue in the circuit that judge is in. Nothing more. You can still appeal rulings. You can still request oversight.

No one cares about prejudice at this point because the same case is going to go up the chain and not be refiled in the same lower courts.

77
xparnie 77 points ago +77 / -0

Brann is such a hack. Sighted voter suppression and no evidence in his ruling. Get bent dickhead.

66
KeksRUs 66 points ago +66 / -0

Cited no evidence and canceled the evidentiary hearing, how convenient.

42
marishiten 42 points ago +42 / -0

it shows his clear party line bias and puts him in a negative light with his peers (since judges are supposed to be apolitical) that he wouldn't even let any kind of evidence be presented. He just said 'no. And don't refile.'

That looks really, really bad for that judge and hurts him with all future rulings he does since it'll be easier to appeal and win cases that go through him here on out.

14
iron_patriot22 14 points ago +14 / -0

can we get rid of a judge for that shit? Because I feel like we should be able to.

8
Jimmy_Russler 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah there should be a judge impeachment process... Surely the forefathers could have foreseen corrupt activist judges

-7
aidaman22 -7 points ago +1 / -8

He's a Republican.

12
micaarzur 12 points ago +12 / -0

On paper, that's what he claims, yes....

The deep state want people thinking in terms of republican vs democrat, it keeps the public focus off the real party system, which is Deep State vs MAGA party.

-1
aidaman22 -1 points ago +1 / -2

how exactly do you expect any other republican judge to rule differently?

6
Bluedane 6 points ago +6 / -0

He was Obama appointee which brands him with the mark of the beast

15
OconusLurex 15 points ago +15 / -0

That's a hilarious level of hackery.

15
SoNoRiko 15 points ago +15 / -0

When I read the order about no evidence I had no idea the judge cancelled the evidence hearing.

That would make a big difference on the outcome of a case one would think.

11
KeksRUs 11 points ago +11 / -0

And he says it so smugly too: Page 10: At the conclusion of the argument, I determined that an evidentiary hearing (previously scheduled to take place on November 19, 2020) was no longer needed and cancelled that proceeding.

4
mixednuts86 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the campaign can't present the evidence, how can they win at SCOTUS? Doesn't the evidence need to be presented at the lower courts, or do they need to change their lawsuits?

3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

They did present it and the crooked judge refused to look at it. It will be looked at by the higher courts now and I doubt they will deny the mounting evidence of this case

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I'd like to know too.

But are we in the circuit court now? Maybe new evidence can be presented there?

24
I_Love_45-70_Gov 24 points ago +24 / -0

Brann as a kid: Mom, I want to destroy America when I grow up.

Mom: Sure son. What indoctrination center do you want to attend after highschool?

14
Chalwa222 14 points ago +14 / -0

Obama judge. Need i say more?

-1
aidaman22 -1 points ago +3 / -4

He was selected by Pat Toomey, the Republican senator from PA. He is a member of the Federalist society and is a lifelong Republican.

8
excellente_magnifico 8 points ago +9 / -1

Toomey was all congrats president elect biden and blah blah blah after this case was dismissed.

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

So a Rhino got it. You just proved our point. This is not about left or right as both sides are majority in the deep state party with only a few exceptions

48
Thegreatcanadianpede 48 points ago +50 / -2

The Obama appointed judge in his chambers reading this following his decision

"I could have just ran out the clock?"

29
ALargeBovine 29 points ago +30 / -1

It's a bit of a 50-50 because if he admits the case then he legitimizes the merits of the suit, which means the media can't argue zero evidence etc since if there is zero evidence the case gets tossed.

Since the meme they're pushing is muh evidence, the Obama RINO judge is in sync.

4
Bluedane 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sure and then the state would most likely not certify the results. Cmon he knew this and dismissed it just to please deepstates and strengthen their weak narrative

1
Thegreatcanadianpede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair. I was just trying to make a "you guys get paid?" Meme.

45
throwaway187 45 points ago +45 / -0

All according to plan.

42
Facebooks 42 points ago +42 / -0

Remember lads Bannon said this is going to be the hardest weeeks ahead we still got this

12
MAGAlikethis 12 points ago +12 / -0

The Antifa-supporters in our government can't play Trump's level of 4D chess, but they still have some nasty tricks of their sleeve. They will be getting violent and threatening more of our people along the way.

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

Especially since they think Trump is only capable of playing Yahtzee

30
MustBeTrump 30 points ago +31 / -1

FOR ANYONE THAT THINKS THE DEMS KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING, READ THIS STATEMENT AGAIN.

9
Swallwell_Gas_Co 9 points ago +11 / -2

FOR ANYONE THAT THINKS THE DEMS KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING, READ THIS STATEMENT AGAIN.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
28
letrain 28 points ago +28 / -0

Why would they say this? And that they hope the next judge decides quickly and that the plan is the supreme court is the ultimate goal, but the next judge could run out the clock...why lay out your plans?

34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
28
ThaDtothaOtothaN 28 points ago +28 / -0

And he is already pissed that PA ignored his earlier requests.

2
CuttingEdgeRetro 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot of people are saying this. But maybe I missed it. Did Alito say something that suggests he's mad about their behavior? Or is everyone assuming that because they ignored his requests? (maybe that's a good assumption)

5
ThaDtothaOtothaN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you ever seen a judge not get pissed when you ignore their judgments? Now translate that to one of the top judges in the land.

0
MAGA1775 0 points ago +10 / -10

That's good. But this is just PA. Even if PA gets to SCOTUS and they rule in our favor, Trump still loses because we need 2 other states.

The issue with broadcasting the plans, is I'm guessing we will need 2 other states to make it to SCOTUS and now they'll know they need to run down the clock.

38
Trump4WorldPresident 38 points ago +38 / -0

Thing is: a supreme court ruling CANNOT be overruled by a lower court. If they get a precedent in the supreme court they'll be able to file equivalent lawsuits in all states and the judges won't be able to rule differently from SCOTUS. That's why winning in the supreme court is best. Win there once and you win it all.

11
MAGA1775 11 points ago +12 / -1

Great point, didn't think of that

11
iron_patriot22 11 points ago +11 / -0

When PA falls, GA falls the same way. Possibly other states as well.

5
Bluedane 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly and right now PA is their strongest case to win in SCOTUS as the state clearly ignored not only laws of the constitution but also a court order from the very Judge who may end up ruling on this case. And yes this would set of a domino effect...

10
OconusLurex 10 points ago +10 / -0

Unless I'm mistaken, running down the clock in court puts the decision in the hands of congress (not the Dem-run house, but the house counted by state,) where the Republicans have the advantage as well. So no matter if they fast track it or slow walk it, they're screwed.

9
Bramage 9 points ago +9 / -0

Except how many of those "Republicans" are RINOs?

9
OconusLurex 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, this is a concern for us. I've been trying to encourage people to put pressure on them, because politicians do respond to the threat of becoming insignificant and powerless. We don't need them to actually care; we just need them to do the right thing out of self preservation.

That's why it's so good that we're being loudly decisive about those who betray us- I promise that those politicians are looking at how thoroughly Fox got iced out overnight and including that in their calculations.

The problem is that they are also including leftist intimidation into those same calculations; those lists of "Trump sycophants" were not directed at us; they were directed at all the Republicans who are in a position of power in this process. That's why we need to put pressure on them, let them know that surrendering will not be the "easy way" out. And that if they make the right decision, we'll have their backs.

We have to make the right choice also the most politically expedient for them.

It's a risk and calculation for sure, but so is relying on the justice system.

But that's for us -- for the leftist judges weighing whether to slow walk the case, choosing to place the decision completely in the hands of the Republicans is an unthinkable risk.

7
LtColonelPlease 7 points ago +8 / -1

You think those power hungry RINOs would vote against Trump and risk the entire GOP never winning an election again? The voter base would be livid. They have no choice.

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

If depends on whether the state legislatures want to appoint Biden's electors even if there are court cases outstanding.

I don't think we can run the clock, I think we need a win at SCOTUS before they certify, or at least before the 14th of December

5
DahRage 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let's be honest, they already knew that they needed to run down the clock anyway. Everyone knows time is of the essence here.

27
marishiten 27 points ago +27 / -0

You have to remember something; the Democrats, as awful as they are, aren't stupid. They know the plan already. They know Trump isn't going to quit and that this was going to SCOTUS. They knew that from the beginning. No one actually believed that Trump was going to take this laying down. They tried to pressure him into it, but that doesn't work with Trump. AT ALL.

Democrats plan is to demoralize the masses as much as possible and apply as much mean spirit and will in the attempt to break Trumps morale before it goes to SCOTUS. The Democrats don't want it to go to SCOTUS.

They also said that as a forewarning to the next judge; don't wast our time and try to run the clock out. We know that's something you want to do to bind us up. We know it. Don't play with us, just get out of the way.

15
KingOfChicag0 15 points ago +15 / -0

Exactly!

Remember, when the Dems concocted this scheme many months ago, they were banking on Ginsburg being there, if it went to SCOTUS. She is gone now, and their plain is most likely foiled!

4
Bluedane 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes I believe this is the real reason they fought against the ACB nomination to SCOTUS. They already knew their case against truth and the laws of our constitution have no chance of survival in front of that committee.

8
Razi 8 points ago +8 / -0

My guess is to force one of only two possibilities. Allow for a hearing which this judge denied that would then present evidence and force the judge to rule. No Obama judge would want to have to make the decision to kneecap a potential Biden presidency it will end their career as a future bookseller and speech giver.

Or it force them to do just what happened here which is wash their hands of a decision and punt it forward to the next court.

26
deleted 26 points ago +27 / -1
3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

This guy took down the mob. If anyone can pull this off it’s Rudy. He is a mastermind just like GEOTUS and deserves the Medal of Honor for his courage

26
fkn_lost_my_password 26 points ago +26 / -0

lol, I love how they shitpost every chance they get.

22
Freedomandliberty20 22 points ago +22 / -0

Mad lads

19
UnderCoverTrumper 19 points ago +19 / -0

BLESS THIS MESS

17
Totally_Kyle 17 points ago +17 / -0

Fuck em up

3
z89101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let the traitors, seditionists, and foreign actors colluding against the interests of a free USA meet the end prescribed by law.

Swing

16
gamingthisandthat 16 points ago +16 / -0

Love how the left thinks the judge shooting it down is a victory lol. Do they even understand how the process works? I know they dont LOL. This makes it easier for Trump team to move the ball to next ranking court. Clearly people dont know basic civics.

3
Bluedane 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which is exactly why Trump put up that statement to fix the narrative and let everyone know this is our win as it moves us closer to the goal. Where they see weakness we only grow stronger. I can’t wait for them to receive their rude awakenings when all the shit (evidence) really hits the fan. They will be covered in shit from top to toe and they will no longer be able to deny it unless they willingly admit they are just pieces of shit themselves. Everything and everyone will be and is being exposed. We've only just gotten started..

-18
deleted -18 points ago +2 / -20
7
my_pw_is_password 7 points ago +7 / -0

English

3
Momreccos 3 points ago +3 / -0

Engrishu

15
mr_keylime 15 points ago +15 / -0

4D chess time

14
AmericaFirstPepe 14 points ago +15 / -1

FUCKING SAVAGE!

This is not what people sound like when they are worried about losing!

10
uzi5v2 10 points ago +10 / -0

I really don’t think any of these lawsuits really matter. I think they’re going for the big treason charge. Biden can’t be President from GITMO!

11
AmericaFirstPepe 11 points ago +11 / -0

You're right. They have enough damning evidence against Biden he could never be inaugurated because he's a treasonous national security threat.

This is just setting precedent so it never happens again. Same reason they "let" the fraud happen in the first place. You can't stop it from happening until you expose it and make laws/rules to prevent it in the future.

1
trescommaclub 1 point ago +1 / -0

They can’t charge anyone though. That would require the DoJ to get involved.

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes we’ve been trying to wake up Barr. I suspect there could be some more rounds of firings before we see arrests since these agencies are fighting for our enemies.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t forget Dominion though. This is the case that has the possibility of taking them ALL down. Sidney said they all have ties to this and it was a conspiracy that involved many too democrats including Obama.

14
Executioner 14 points ago +15 / -1

This entire process is doing one thing perfectly: separating the patriots from the traitors. The internet never forgets.

11
s2upid 11 points ago +11 / -0

Its win win for trumps attorneys atm. Either the judge go quick and it goes to the SCOTUS quicker, or the do it properly and they get to lay out all their evidence again and again and again. Seems like they didn't have a chance with this first go with this Obama judge.

11
chopz 11 points ago +11 / -0

Biden campaign statement on Pennsylvania Ruling:

sdjlf;ghlajflanfshlndfa;lhnd fl;hnadf;lhnd;lfhnadfl;hn;ladnh asdfkhjgbl;kadnsfhgklajdnh;adfnh;klfdnh adlj;lhndflhna;dflhna;'ldfnh 'ladnfh'la;dknfh'l;lakdmnfhm a;dkljfhn;ladkfhn'la dkfnhl;kanmdfh'l;kamdf blkmadfh adkfj;bngh;lajnhdf'landf'hlkna' dlfnhk'lkadfnh'lknmadh adlfkkjnh'l;kna'dflk'h 'l akdf h'adifkanm.d,mf hg'l;dk mh ad'lfkhn;,am l;kdfb';ladkfmb 'ad kj;fdm,gh'ad;fkhj';adkfmh adfh'ljn'a;ldkmkjal;ghasjklhdgja klhs;glAJH;ALJGN;ALJNl;janfg a;l'dfjkng'al;dkfnhg'al;dfkjgn'ad l;fknmdlkhn'adfl;kmh'ldkfhnm'l; sdjlf;ghlajflanfshlndfa;lhnd fl;hnadf;lhnd;lfhnadfl;hn;ladnh asdfkhjgbl;kadnsfhgklajdnh;adfnh;k adlj;lhndflhna;dflhna;'ldfnh 'ladnfh'la;dknfh'l;lakdmnfhm a;dkljfhn;ladkfhn'la dkfnhl;kanmdfh'l;kamdf blkmadfh adkfj;bngh;lajnhdf'landf'hlkna' dlfnhk'lkadfnh'lknmadh adlfkkjnh'l;kna'dflk'h 'l akdf h'adifkanm.d,mf hg'l;dk mh ad'lfkhn;,am l;kdfb';ladkfmb 'ad kj;fdm,gh'ad;fkhj';adkfmh adfh'ljn'a;ldkmkjal;ghasjklhdgja klhs;glAJH;ALJGN;ALJNl;janfg a;l'dfjkng'al;dkfnhg'al;dfkjgn'ad l;fknmdlkhn'adfl;kmh'ldkfhnm'l

  • Jer Berden - Persdernt Erlerct - Orferce of Persernt Erlerct.
10
gummibarenaked 10 points ago +11 / -1

The legal team was quite careful not to specifically allege fraud. It's a much higher legal standard that must be proved to win a fraud case. The absolute proof of fraud that Giuliani and Powell have spoken about recently actually didn't fall into place until after this lawsuit was filed. Since the beginning I presumed that the reason for not alleging fraud was both evidentiary and strategic.

I can think of several reasons not to try a fraud case involving American-based voting machines in a federal district court. There would be no realistic way in presenting such a case that our enemies could be prevented from learning exactly how their fraud was discovered. You can be damn sure that any attempts to interfere in our future elections wouldn't make that same mistake. The entire case would need to be presented in a secure manner or it would need to be heard in a forum where the possibility of such security leaks could be eliminated.

There was a DOJ aircraft that flew to Toronto a few days ago. Dominion does have a large corporate presence there. Recall that a person of interest, if not THE main perp was supposedly not able to be located in the USA as of last week. If he were apprehended in Canada, you can do the math to figure out where jurisdiction could possibly be for a national security case. That is where Coomer would then be transported.

The next question that comes to mind is what is the most expedient way to make all of the current electors aware of the precise nature of the fraud and prove the fraud to their collective satisfaction that there would be no reasonable risk to Trump that the House would ensure his continued presidency.

According to Occam's razor and established procedure for national security cases, that is the path that this is going to follow during the next few weeks. There isn't much room beyond the constitution itself for how things will proceed

Disclaimer: If I were ever anybody who knew anything about something, I'm now retired and I can't always remember everything about something.

Even if you don't understand anything at all about the law, just take your cues from the body language and words of Trump, Powell and Giuliani. They appear extremely confident. I would say they appear almost exuberant.

10
US_Grants 10 points ago +10 / -0

Looks like PA Senator Pat Toomey threw our President under the bus and so early. We will never forget the elected politicians who not only did not fight for a fair election, but never had our backs. Yesterday Brian Kemp, today Pat Toomey.

10
sak951 10 points ago +10 / -0

Toomey is not seeking reelection in 2022, he's an establishment RINO through and through. He can say what he wants, nobody cares honestly.

9
Spawnlingman 9 points ago +9 / -0

Judge better be ready for jail soon.

9
Buff_cousin_Elroy 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh yes frens, it’s getting good

8
1776ThereIsaidIt 8 points ago +8 / -0

In the judge's ruling he stated he couldn't find precedent for throwing out and disenfranchising millions of votes. Well maybe that's because the votes that they sought to throw out hadn't been cast in such a manner as this before, genius.

2
Bluedane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because he refused to look at any of their evidence. But they will present that to the higher courts which is what we want anyways.

1
Txiribiton 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the feelings of some voters are more important than judging if the law was followed. This clown should change his job.

8
runonce 8 points ago +9 / -1

I love all the dems trying to make out that this is a victory when it does nothing but seal their fate.

-18
deleted -18 points ago +2 / -20
3
Bramage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Deport.

2
The_Left_The 2 points ago +2 / -0

Signed affidavits, cuck.

8
BigHonk 8 points ago +8 / -0

So he's admitting that these judges can just run out the clock if they wanted too?

Hope that doesn't happen

7
marishiten 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's a threat.

It's saying 'you could try that, but it would be detrimental to you if you do.'

4
my_pw_is_password 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they are confident about the upper courts going forward

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
Terriblesubreddit1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Obama appointed judge BTFO

7
uglybugs 7 points ago +8 / -1

What kind of free country doesnt even consider or look at the evidence in a court?

Its 2020 and the courts are like the Salem Witch trials. Townsfolk would present their dreams (yes, dreams as in what you have when you sleep) as evidence that another woman is a witch. Often the judge wouldnt care as to look at the evidence before sentencing a "witch" to death. These trials took place in the 1600s.

Democrats are using their imaginations to falsely accuse anyone who dares threaten their globalist agenda. They will lie, cheat, and steal from the American people and go to other great lengths at the cost of everyone else's lives, liberties and pursuits of happiness.

2
SarahCartersPuppies 2 points ago +2 / -0

"as in what you have when you sleep" wait you mean other people have those too?

-24
deleted -24 points ago +3 / -27
4
Bramage 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are a fool. This high-level play is way beyond you, knave.

1
InRevelation12now 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dimissed in a lower court does not preclude taking it to a higher court. Happens all the time. Only an idiot would think it's over at this point.

1
MrOrangeHorseman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hello, Cuck Department?

1
NaturalBornGinger 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re retarded

7
Matrix_Exodus 7 points ago +7 / -0

4d chess. Don't these fools know who's board they're playing on?

6
boreal_storm 6 points ago +6 / -0

Zero fucks given.

6
CrankyCrab 6 points ago +6 / -0

A lot of interesting comments on this thread. I never underestimate Team Trump and I'm going to wait and see how all this plays out at the end. We are not privy to everything that is going on behind the scenes. Everything Trump does is strategic and calculated. We didn't win every battle when we fought the British, but we won the war. Hold the fucking line!

6
Pixel 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck Obama. Thank you judge!

5
1776ThereIsaidIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Been saying this for a few days. The faster they get shot down by lower courts the quicker they can get before SCOTUS.

5
Alkaizer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rudy and Jenna probably laughed together writing this statement. Laughing at the swamp! HAHA

5
pizza_lawyer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Awesome response from the Trump legal team. This is information warfare and we are fighting back!

5
DrinkTeaNotKoolaid 5 points ago +5 / -0

Either way works; time is on Trumps side. Supreme Court covered. State legislatures covered. House delegation covered............I hope and pray...

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +3 / -2

Sorry, but time is not on our side. We have about 2 weeks left before electors start meeting, and they vote on Dec 14th.

We need to get 3 states to SCOTUS by then.

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

If states refuse to select their electors however because there is a hold up in court then that state doesn’t count in the total electoral map which means this could be sent to the house for a vote which we would win with a Republican majority.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Lurking-My-Life-Away 5 points ago +5 / -0

They've already brainstormed every outcome.

4
petiteputnam 4 points ago +5 / -1

LMAO COOKED THEIR ASS!!!

ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN

4
JackBurton 4 points ago +4 / -0

PLEASE DON'T THROW ME IN THE BRIER PATCH!

4
5thavenue 4 points ago +4 / -0

you can hear jennas spice in there

4
Indianapede 4 points ago +5 / -1

Ok. When do we get a decision and flip?

12
marishiten 12 points ago +12 / -0

Look. Here's the deal. It's super straight forward.

We're not interested in flipping or getting to 270. That'd be nice, but it's not going to happen since people have drawn lines in the sand.

We're interested in making sure Biden doesn't get to 270. That's the goal. You dead lock the certs with injunctions.

You want to set precedent in the Supreme Court since all lower courts have to follow it. So if the SCOTUS says 'yeah, there's fraud, shits all fucked up, we need to put injunctions on all this shit', Then, when you start putting injunctions on everything, the precedent is already there and they don't have to waste time trying to convince judges all over the country.

Once you deadlock and injunction all of those states, no one gets 270, it goes to delegates, delegates vote by party lines, 28 R 22 D. It's done.

1
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the timeline for that? Like when would that happen?

2
trescommaclub 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has to be by Dec 14th

1
Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's assuming the state legislatures won't certify while there's a lawsuit going on, and I don't think that's the case.

-1
Indianapede -1 points ago +1 / -2

When is that happening? This week? Next?

3
my_pw_is_password 3 points ago +3 / -0

Before xmas

2
Texapede66 2 points ago +3 / -1

In its own time. In the meantime, relax.

4
leanpocket 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks Obama!

4
KingOfChicag0 4 points ago +4 / -0

One theory that I have, is that Trump knew ALL ALONG about Dominion. He even tweeted about it in 2012, and that he had a plan this whole time to deal with this....he wargamed it out in advance.

2
EnemiesDestroyed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably why he brags about 2016 so much. He knows he beat far more than just Hillary, he short-circuited Dominion.

3
PandyFackler 3 points ago +4 / -1

But what will Cucker Carlson think about this I wonder?

1
Bluedane 1 point ago +1 / -0

He has no credibility any more and no one cares what he thinks or if in fact they are even his own thoughts.