6259
Comments (245)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
XithePooh 5 points ago +5 / -0

They already presented their case to the public, and they have the evidence, much of which can be seen and looked over on your own, commie cuck. Maybe if you weren't dosed to the eyeballs on soy and out from the bernie bro reddit faggotry, you'd be able to look around here and see it for yourself. But no, you just keep your head shoved up your ass and say "I don't see any proof."

-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18
3
XithePooh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Naturally, a purposefully stupid reddit faggot surrounded by proof on a site they can just click and see for themselves - statistical analyses, actual tracing of ballots to dead people, evidence of beyond sketchy algorithmic shifts, and statistically impossible percentages of ballots going to pedo joe...yet they keep saying "there's no proof."

There's definitely proof of your retardation, that's for sure.

-17
deleted -17 points ago +1 / -18
2
ajoed3 2 points ago +2 / -0

They only need to show red flags that are enough to warrant an audit and checking of ballots. It is nearly impossible to prove anything more than that before doing a thorough investigation of these types of issues, no matter if it was blatant fraud or just an innocent coincidence. If they find no further suspicions after auditing, they can go forward with the original numbers. If they find cheating, they reverse it. If there is a destruction of records and the evidence, without available explanations or alternatives, then State legislatures will decide it through their electors. If it can't be shown the Biden red flags are nothing in a critical vote number, this will end up being outright overturned or decided by electors. Which is the law.

If you don't like it, this could be avoided by having a clean audit and/or making more secure election rules, but oddly, Democrats seem to hate these ideas.