Comments (245)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
NinjaSquirrel 7 points ago +7 / -0

They have two options: let a legal count happen and get caught or try to cover it up and avoid being caught. I’m sure they’re choosing the latter

KMacsBinder 6 points ago +6 / -0

The one that irked me the most was them trying and failing to remove the language regarding absentee ballot application requirements. When confronted with the fact that electronically requested absentee ballots do not have proof of the required application/certification necessary to be counted according to Statute, the fags just said that the Clerks ignored that during the last election and would probably just ignore it again. What the fuck now?

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that reviewable by SCOTUS? Or at least by WI Supreme Court? All we need is evidence of this flouting of the rules, and their shit should get rekt.

KMacsBinder 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is in direct violation of Wisconsin Statute, so should be reviewable by Wisconsin Supreme Court and appealed from there if necessary.

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well good thing they stole the WI Supreme Court seat this April then, huh? Thanks for confirming the info

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are caught trying to cover it up. How do they hide that from SCOTUS?