Comments (245)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
ontothefuture 78 points ago +79 / -1

7 precients with over 100% voter participation

Shakakka99 34 points ago +34 / -0

This should be an auto-disqualify. Throw that precinct right out. OBVIOUS voter fraud.

andrew_jacksanon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah it should, but the liberal i bounce ideas off so i can think things out better tried telling me that some states/jurisdictions don't require people to register ahead of time and THAT'S the reason for the precincts reporting in higher than 100%... anyone know if this is accurate or is he regurgitating faux news propaganda?

resoluteAction 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's BS. If they registered same day, the book on registrations would already be updated. The overvote includes same day registration.

HKFan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even if it's like that anyway, if you can't balance your books while allowing same day registrations, DON'T ALLOW FUCKING SAME DAY REGISTRATIONS!!!

Vla1ne 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)

One better, if it's same day registration, that implies that the ones not on the list either A) voted in person or B) registered far too late for their mail-in ballots to count. We all know republicans are more likely to vote in person, but that then implies that the majority of same day registrations were republicans, so where did all those newly minted dem votes come from?

Anybody who watched tim pool (he has his moments) knows that it was reported that new republicans and dem-to-republican switches were happening at historic rates, so where exactly did all these new democrat votes come from?

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same day registration exists in WI, but as resoluteActoion says, those would be included. You'd never get over 100% voter turnout. 90% is what you get where voting is LAW. 80% turnout is suspicious. 60-65% is normal here.