Comments (563)
sorted by:
starsabove 852 points ago +855 / -3

Kiss of death.

Reputations are like glass. Tucker smashed his reputation. You don't recover from that.

deleted 339 points ago +339 / -0
TwoCents 106 points ago +106 / -0

Fuck that cucked tuck

QuranIsToiletPaper 107 points ago +107 / -0

It's strange how the communists have co-opted the word "folks."

Muh queer folks of color. Trying to sound like a legitimate "populist" movement.

Their usage of it here with "MAGA folks" sounds stilted and fake, because it is.

RooftopKoreanBBQ 93 points ago +93 / -0

Greetings, fellow MAGA folks!

hillaryforprison 58 points ago +58 / -0

Whenever the most negative, sinister, propaganda tabloid stops calling you racist, white nationalists, stupid, and says 'Hey MAGA folks!' I think it's natural to assume whatever follows is yet another deception. This is like the snake in the garden of eden saying 'Hey Eve, check out this nice looking fruit that will make you smart.'

RooftopKoreanBBQ 35 points ago +35 / -0

Absolutely. It's been apparent to me for a long time that whatever the MSM says to do or wants me to think, usually the exact opposite is true. They are very consistent with their lies and manipulation.

TillaMAGA 13 points ago +13 / -0

(Not smart, immutably aware of the nature of good and evil, a stolen innocence, after a fashion, an introduction of corruption, like satanists raping a child)

FergieJR 2 points ago +4 / -2

Exactly. But it's interesting that if you dive into it, it is satan that makes us human.

It is why we all have the original sin inside of us. There is no such thing as humanity without satan. We have to live with that and be in constant battle with it.

We were just as animals, oblivious of good and evil, creatures of earth among the rest.

The apple opened our mind and soul to understand actions, emotions, reason and more.

BSherman 2 points ago +2 / -0


BSherman 1 point ago +1 / -0

So on point!

KS-76- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't give up on snek.

Sneker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks, Pede.

Huntercole 12 points ago +12 / -0

Trump calls us patriots not folks.

Kompromat 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thank you! I fucking hate the "folks" thing! Only fucking elitist phonies say that, when attempting to appeal to "normal" people, did you ever notice?

trump212121 10 points ago +10 / -0

Get woke, Go broke!

arebee 9 points ago +9 / -0

hello caterpillar what a great day it is to be racist and sexist!

KeyDoorQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s just hilarious. Made me laugh!

side_o_beef 42 points ago +42 / -0

Greetings my fellow white folks!

RustyShackleford450 20 points ago +22 / -2


PlasmaNoire 6 points ago +6 / -0


Sneker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think your spelling is off, yet intuitively, I knew just what you said.

Transgirl_4_Trump 29 points ago +30 / -1

In the US, we use "Folk" to mean "people", but actually the word has a much more specific meaning. In particular, it's a bastardization of the word "Volk"...which refers to anyone in the german cultural block - anyone from the Rhine to Ukraine basically. The concept was really popular among nazis.

Basically - 50% chance the writer is just ignorant and 50% chance he thinks he's being clever and subtly calling us nazis to our face.

BigMikesDingALing 16 points ago +16 / -0

Trump uses the rhetorical question, "Don't we, folks?" all the time.Volk is a German word, not a Nazi word. Unless you think all Germans are Nazis. Trump used it first. I'm reminded of a scene from the movie Office Space.

Michael: "Michael Bolton: There was nothing wrong with it… until I was about 12 years old and that no-talent ass-clown became famous and started winning Grammys."

Samir: 'Why don't you just go by Mike?"

Michael: "No way, why should I change? he's the one who sucks."

Transgirl_4_Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're not wrong. The difference is good faith. I have every reason to believe Trump is using the normal American use of the word. I also have every reason to believe this op ed author is badly motivated and might attempt a veiled insult.

It's like if I'm hanging out with my friends and someone calls me "bitch" I'll react very differently than if someone cuts me off in traffic and then calls me "bitch". Same word, different context.

Thiswillbeintheexam 4 points ago +4 / -0

50% chance of A WAPO author being clever?

I'll fucking take those odds!

Futuramawe 22 points ago +22 / -0

It's the mark of the leftist: Thinking that they fight for "the people" while simultaneously looking down on the common man.

rooftoptendie 18 points ago +18 / -0

I was a lifelong prog before '16. They really do think like this. They think civilization is too advanced for its own good, and too far in the wrong direction (ie corruption), and the nightmare future is irreversable barring some kind of catastrophic event that takes us back to the bronze age. They want everyone and everything that contributes to this suit-wearing gizmo-making tv-watching society to burn to the ground. The ultimate goal is to start society over, knowing what we know now, back from about the bronze or iron age. Re-level the playing field.

The idea is pure madness, completely unrealistic, completely disastrous. But progs think with their feelings, and their feelings tell them they HATE the system that ground them up and spat them out, and they want it to die. And that's as far as they think that through. The brainwashing is so heavy it leaves them very little room for critical thought.

Kweebecker 18 points ago +18 / -0

Who honestly says "folks" except as a shorthand for direct family?

"I'm going to visit my folks", you don't assume they're going to visit a black power riot, or a MAGA march, or a yakuza initiation, you assume they're going to visit a blood relative, likely parents.

The only people to use "folkxs" in this manner are weird stilted leftists.

Ironmike119 8 points ago +8 / -0

And that’s all folks

rooftoptendie 7 points ago +7 / -0

I use it sometimes. But now that I think about it, it IS always as a term for direct family/friends. I think I got it from watching a lot of looney tunes when my kids were little.

FreedomSteak 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck of death? XD

NealKenneth 17 points ago +21 / -4

If Tucker hadn't changed, he seriously had a good shot at Presidency in 2024+

He was the guy during the rioting and looting this summer. He was the only one who'd talk about Hunter. Now he's just another talking head.

rooftoptendie 18 points ago +18 / -0

he permanently damaged his reputation. I can't figure why he did that. Really really unwise move.

Angerisagift 6 points ago +6 / -0

Whenever he was “complimented” as having boyish charm it made me cringe. Guy is pushing 50. Then I learned about his being expelled from a school in Switzerland. Started to click that he’s one of those spoiled rich kids who never fully matured, could get away with silliness and even criminality. His affinity for Hunter became obvious. His supposed defiance of the elites almost entirely a pose. As for what he really believes and thinks, I’m not certain he knows. I think sometimes a contrarian only works in reaction to others.

rooftoptendie 4 points ago +4 / -0

You have great psychological instincts, you could very well be right, I could see that.

winsome 11 points ago +12 / -1

Tucker for president? What color's the sky in your world?

NealKenneth 5 points ago +8 / -3

You sound like someone from 2015 saying a reality tv star couldn't be President.

Or an actor in 1979.

GoldenEagle1776 6 points ago +6 / -0

Neither Reagan or Trump were talking heads for corporate media.

Bigly_Brick_Bot 5 points ago +5 / -0

putting tooth paste back in the tube

RoccoTaco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Noooo Tucker, you were the chosen one. how could you!?

LyinBiden 153 points ago +157 / -4 (edited)

Honestly, that might be this Wemple guy's intent... Tucker had an ongoing feud with him towards the beginning of his primetime run on FOX. He butted heads with him probably as often as Kurt "Tentacle Enthusiast" Eichenwald, and even sold Wemple themed mugs:





GlacialSpeed 108 points ago +109 / -1

We're all still worried about what a news anchor says?

They're trying to steal the presidency.

Tucker is done, he's either an idiot or controlled.

This is noise, not the signal.

fadelio 40 points ago +41 / -1

This guy gets it.

HanAssholeSolo 27 points ago +28 / -1

Spot on. I don’t give a crap what anyone says except for POTUS and his team.

PEPE_the_Frog 14 points ago +15 / -1

We're all still worried about what a news anchor says? They're trying to steal the presidency. Tucker is done, he's either an idiot or controlled.

This is noise, not the signal.


JohnMcCainsTumors 44 points ago +45 / -1


Pandullo 19 points ago +21 / -2

I think the intent is to encourage in-fighting within this community. The ideal situation for the opposition is to divide Trump supporters along certain controversial issues, and since most are against Tucker they want to toss him some support but more importantly they just want to keep the issue alive for its potential to cause division. They don’t really care if we support Tucker or not. They only care that it’s an issue that has potential to cause in-fighting and weaken the community.

Note that Bannon saying not to discuss the Tucker issue is ironically a meta issue that has possibly more potential to cause division than the original issue, since most on here are against Tucker but people seem fairly evenly split between thinking the issue should or shouldn’t be discussed.

The-unflattering-6 20 points ago +22 / -2

What I find peculiar is the people who say they "haven't given up on Tucker yet." Like he's somehow important enough to be worthy of such consideration.

He's not, and any supporter of Trump knows that. We go where the truth is told, and where value can be added to the conversation. Lou Dobbs, Stuart Barney, and Maria Bartiromo are exceptional in that regard. Carlson is just white noise. So is Laura Ingraham. Sean Hannity, for his part, seems more interested in the fight than actually winning. He is still stuck on the old Republicans vs Democrats model that Trump cast aside 5 years ago.

Pandullo 8 points ago +9 / -1

I don’t think that any mainstream media personality should be totally trusted, and once they take an anti-trump position like Tucker did by attacking Sidney Powell they should at least be treated with a high degree of suspicion if not totally abandoned. However, to the extent that a guy like Tucker might still support Trump on certain issues, he could be viewed as useful for that purpose—he just can’t be trusted.

DL535 11 points ago +13 / -2

This is a good post. It is a very standard tactic to whip up internal disputes within an enemy faction. Just about the oldest trick in the book.

I don't like, at all, what Tucker did but he has also done such sterling service in the past, and literally faced physical danger for it (remember when Antifa rioted outside his house?) that I will give him the benefit of the doubt, for now. How much longer he keeps that is up to him. He needs to stand up to his corrupt sellout bosses at Fox, if he leaves the network to speak freely, I think we should give him a chance.

Pandullo 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think the important thing is not really whether you give Tucker a chance or not, but remembering not to engage in in-fighting (as opposed to respectful debate) with other true Trump supporters over their decision to abandon Tucker or not, whether they agree with Bannon’s statements about signal/noise, etc.

Bond 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nailed it. This is meant to cause infighting and pretty much nothing else.

BigIronBigIron -73 points ago +39 / -112

Have we considered the possibility that this is a coordinated lefty psy-op against Tucker, who has the market cornered on Boomer conservatives?

KingSweyn 189 points ago +190 / -1

So you're saying Sidney Powell is part of a lefty psyop? Pull the other one. He treated her like crap.

He got his material from us to gain our trust, but he is only a conduit for our message, and if he fails to accomplish that, he's not our boy. THE ONLY CULT OF PERSONALITY WE WANT HERE IS FOR THE PRESIDENT.

We don't need newsactors and we don't need authorities. We are the investigative reporters. We are the town criers. We celebrate those who amplify our message, but they're not our masters and they don't make our opinions. If they're on our side, we make theirs.

CocaineMitchsDealer 133 points ago +135 / -2

he is only a conduit for our message, and if he fails to accomplish that, he's not our boy.

It's really this simple. We support those that reflect our values, and Tucker seemed to reflect and fight for them, by far the biggest corporate media personality doing so. Tucker proved to be a turncoat, so we're finished with him.

They thought we were programmed like everyone else and we'd just follow Tucker and Fox like the pied piper.

All I care about now is who at Fox conspired in the coup so that they can receive a traitor's treatment like the rest of them.

Paul_Revere 44 points ago +44 / -0

They thought we were programmed like everyone else and we'd just follow Tucker and Fox like the pied piper.

Well, that's how their minds work, so naturally, they'd assume we are the same species of lemming.

The_Litehaus_Abides 26 points ago +32 / -6 (edited)

Frankly, we have no reason to trust Steve Bannon who also took up for Tucker and SCOLDED US for bringing attention to it. I do not want to see War Room stickied here any more. Bannon isn't trustworthy.

Steve Bannon committed perjury against Roger Stone during that poor man's persecution and I have NO idea why he's being idolized here! WTF??

Btw, even General Flynn is upset with Tucker. I think Carlson's been a "sleeper" against us the entire time.


Tejas_Pepe 16 points ago +18 / -2

we have no reason to trust Steve Bannon who also took up for Tucker and SCOLDED US for bringing attention to it.

This^ I don't take orders from Steve Bannon. He turned on President Trump, cost us a seat in Alabama, and fucked over Roger Stone. Got no use for the guy.

Tyrone_biggums 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can someone give a synopsis on why Bannon and Stone are enemies?

Rusty911 38 points ago +39 / -1


deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
TheRealMaga 33 points ago +34 / -1

This means that Democrats probably do have that level of control over their followers.

What's the limit of what they would do if Rachel Maddo suddenly told them to?

rooftoptendie 5 points ago +5 / -0

It depends on the prog, their temperament and level of brainwash. For example, all of the progs I know were all originally Berners who "held their nose and voted for hilldawg". And then they got fucked over during their primaries this year SO bad, and they got burned SO hard on russiagate... that to be quite honest, all of the progs I know have emotionally divested from the news. They'll skim a few headlines every now and then, and mainly just work, play with the pets, garden, paint, anything but politics.

So maybe several years ago Madcow could have gotten my loved-ones who are progs to say march and protest, attend a meeting or rally, maybe sign petitions or volunteer to do some light field work. But now, she has NO power over them whatsoever.

So the limit of what my prog loved ones would do for rachel madcow, or for democrat marching orders in general, is very very low. Sub-basement levels low.

All that means though is that the people who still DO take marching orders and hang on every word the MSM says... are particularly stupid and unstable people.

Southern_Belle 17 points ago +17 / -0

Start with Paul Ryan and Donna Brazile, and who hired them.

SunnyDisposition 20 points ago +21 / -1

Now I question everything.

Throughout his career, Paul Ryan had never lost an election other than his defeat in the 2012 United States presidential election; of all the times he has won, he has never received less than 54% of the vote.[1]

Wikipedia --- which incidentally is begging for money. Let em die

SirPoopsAlot 31 points ago +32 / -1

I'm in a CULT FOR NO MAN only for the CONSTITUTION!!

Freedom2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

and Jesus

BigIronBigIron 23 points ago +31 / -8

I'm saying the squabble with Sidney Powell is a crack they're trying to drive a wedge into.

Scroon 48 points ago +52 / -4

The fact that he has a problem with what Powell is saying means either he's dumb as glass or he's controlled opposition.

Keep in mind a centrist/neutral standpoint would be to say that any claims of fraud should not be dismissed out of hand, but so far Fox has not been provided with any evidence.

Instead, Tucker launched into a bit about how they have more evidence on UFOs than Powell's claims.

deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
AlFreeman 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

UFOs are real. The only reason people don't know about the evidence is the media has spent decades gaslighting and mocking anyone who said as much. Exactly what they are doing now with evidence of election fraud. If they are suddenly saying the opposite, it's definitely a distraction or they are up to something like you say. UFOs have been in our skies since at least the 1930s. They aren't doing anything new or different, whatever they are.

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 14 points ago +14 / -0

The trashing of Sidney Powell serves two purposes:

  1. Demoralize conservatives and seed doubt in their minds that there is any evidence of widespread election fraud.

  2. Boost the morale of Democrats by showing a supposed "MAGA" representative like Tucker agreeing with their narrative that there was no election fraud.

DaddySmooth 13 points ago +13 / -0


RedReddit 11 points ago +18 / -7

The bulk of your message is good; however, your opening question is flawed. There is a scenario where Tucker and Powell had miscommunication and he thought maybe she had been turned or was sabotaging the case.

Wait and see with Tucker, don't let a leftist rag reinforce your doubts about him. The Washington Post is CIA, it is quite plausible that they expect this op-ed to further distance us from the only mainstream anchor we have any trust for.

Tucker deserves a chance at redemption, yet our wariness in trusting him right now is also justified. If he is comprised, that will become more apparent through his own words, not the CIA's.

LiveFreeOrMeme01 11 points ago +11 / -0

Just want to point this out... "a miscommunication" might have happened, but why would TC feel the need to blast SP on air? It was a shit move, for no reason, and done at a terrible time. He hurt the President with his curlish behavior, and that makes him an asshoe.

Power 5 points ago +9 / -4

Agree, I mean the guy has been a patriot forever, and he does one wrong move and he’s out, although there is that thing with Hunter Biden too.... but for the most part he was pretty good and cared about the country

Hades440 10 points ago +10 / -0

Benedict Arnold was a patriot too until one wrong move.

A life of good deeds doesn't protect you when you betray people.

BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Judas Iscariot was the most loyal disciple until he wasn't.

somethinga9230k 10 points ago +11 / -1

I thought he was good too, but my impression now is that he is one of the controlled opposition people that is much more skilled than average.

Hades440 6 points ago +6 / -0

They overplayed their hand. They've had him parrot back our talking points so we'd trust him and they thought they could push our train of thought this way or that if he nudged us along and this time they pushed just a little too hard and got caught.

Peart44 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have doubts that Tucker is personally getting data from Sidney. Perhaps one of his staff is sabotaging this? Doubtful, but possible...

Spirit_of_Resistance 9 points ago +9 / -0

although there is that thing with Hunter Biden too

Don't forget when he immediately went with the 'salary dispute' narrative for Juicy Smollett, never making the connection between him and Kamala Harris' lynching legislation which passed as a result of the hoax

ClownTamer -1 points ago +6 / -7

I’m willing to give Tucker a shot still. I think he’s hedging his bets at this point though, which I have mixed feelings about.

With Hunter Biden, Tucker covered a lot of it. I think he tried shifting the focus away from Hunter’s dong not because he likes Hunter but because it was getting in the way of the actual message of the laptop: that Joe Biden was peddling influence and doing everything Trump accused him of doing with the Ukraine and elsewhere. We all got caught up in dick pics and at times choice clams and it didn’t help the message of the laptop.

Spirit_of_Resistance 7 points ago +7 / -0

think he tried shifting the focus away from Hunter’s dong not because he likes Hunter but because it was getting in the way of the actual message of the laptop: that Joe Biden was peddling influence and doing everything Trump accused him of doing with the Ukraine and elsewhere

There's enough time in his show to cover all that. It's pretty significant news that he was having sex with his own underage neice with text messages all but verifying it. If you want to continue to sit under tucker's ballsack while he teabags you, you're a free citizen

Freedom2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I question if it was as simple as a multi million dollar bribe given to Tucker. Wondered that about Ingram as well.

somethinga9230k 3 points ago +4 / -1

Any thoughts on this video?: https://streamable.com/cb7kj0

Cut from this Faux News video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXgO7L0rcAQ

Spirit_of_Resistance 2 points ago +3 / -1

Tucker deserves a chance at redemption

Yes, that's what I gave him after he refused to cover the information regarding Hunter Biden and the incest with his underage neice.

If you're still with tucker at this point, you'll follow him right back to where we started before Trump. Cuckservatism.

LyinBiden 41 points ago +42 / -1 (edited)

I gave Tucker the benefit of the doubt up until the Sidney Powell thing (and the doubling down last night), but I don't think it's some grand conspiracy. I think he IS getting some pressure from management, but I think his instinct is just to default to the establishment consensus in times of crisis (just like his personally convincing Trump to buy into Covid hysteria) and that's what's driving this. If the states are all saying you lost and the AP has called it, you just concede in his mind - that's how it's always been done. He just has bad, kneejerk instincts when the pressure is on. He's watched the same people frame Trump on Russia, Ukraine, white supremacy and a million other things, but it's like he's incapable of believing they would rig an election, too. He's lived in DC forever and is friends with all of the establishment people, but likes to slum with the populists from time to time on his show.

Or in a few weeks we'll find out Sidney and Rudy really are full of it (doubt it), at which point we may eventually forgive Tucker.

DaddySmooth 33 points ago +36 / -3

He's lived in DC forever and is friends with all of the establishment people...

That's all you need to know if whether he's with us or not. He was NEVER with us! The sooner everyone realizes that and moves on from TUCK THE CUCK the better.

deleted -8 points ago +4 / -12
DaddySmooth 10 points ago +11 / -1

So what's your point? Are you suggesting Trump is establishment and not for us? I surely hope that's not what you're implying because you're about to get downvoted into oblivion. Again, what is your point?

SirPoopsAlot -8 points ago +5 / -13

No I'm not cause most people on here can read what I said without jumping to ridiculous conclusions. You don't have the power you think you have keyboard warrior

ESolveig 2 points ago +2 / -0

and that one dude on twitter, lmao

tentonbudgie 19 points ago +20 / -1

Another way to look at Tucker is the wartime/peacetime personality. Dr. Nassir Ghaemi's book A Fine Madness goes into civil war leaders who were great on paper but choked on the battlefield. Trump is wartime, he does not choke when the going gets tough, he fights. Tucker is great in peacetime but it didn't take much to rattle his cage hard enough that he folded.

Tucker's a peacetime hero. You'd want to have a beer with him.

PandyFackler 9 points ago +9 / -0

So in brief he's a complete coward

tentonbudgie 2 points ago +2 / -0

KING HENRY V Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. In peace there's nothing so becomes a man As modest stillness and humility: But when the blast of war blows in our ears, Then imitate the action of the tiger; Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage;

BigIronBigIron 0 points ago +1 / -1

He's put more on the line than you... Unless you receive death threats and have protestors in your driveway.

PandyFackler 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ok fanboy

LyinBiden 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

That's a great way of looking at it - I wish I had thought of it, it would have saved me a hundred words. It's like from The Godfather: a wartime or peacetime consiglieri.

tentonbudgie 5 points ago +5 / -0

The other word that fits this personality type is the "homoclite" which has nothing to do with homosexuality. Look up homoclites, it's an interesting discussion.

BigIronBigIron 5 points ago +7 / -2

I think that if he'd known that THIS would be the reaction to his words, he would have used different words. He read the room wrong.

Scroon 9 points ago +11 / -2

I agree somewhat. Tucker's always struck me as reactionary and not exactly full of thought. Doesn't mean he's not part of the machine though. Like you could point him at some issue you know he'd have a problem with, and he'd bark like a rabid dog.

In Powell's case, a producer could say, hey Tuck, I don't believe Powell at all, go try and get some more info from her -- knowing full well that Powell's not going to publicly reveal the hard evidence in an ongoing case.

My opinion, he's always been controlled opposition.

ITinMT 9 points ago +10 / -1

His punting on the Hunter Laptop story seemed to show he was compromised. Stopped watching him at that moment.

Southern_Belle 3 points ago +4 / -1

Tucker Carlson: globalist shill.

No thanks.

He's dead to me.

Gold-Eyed-Cat 29 points ago +29 / -0

The left made Tucker cover for Hunter Biden and attempt to discredit Sidney Powel? Tucker isn't a victim here. And WaPo is the unimportant ravings of a mad woman.

BigIronBigIron 15 points ago +15 / -0

WaPo is the unimportant ravings of a mad woman

No argument there. Although, don't you find it off that WaPo is speaking to "MAGA folks" in the first place, after never acknowledging us for anything else except scorn? And, that they're speaking about this particular kerfuffle? They're tossing oil on the stove.

Gold-Eyed-Cat 13 points ago +13 / -0

You walk past the WaPo on the street and she stops her incessant unintelligible ravings just long enough to yell "THAT'S MY COAT" at you as you walk by. You know it's not her coat, but now you are wondering why she would say that shit. It's nothing more than the WaPo trying to interject themselves into the conversation. Trying to be relevant. Stinking of desperation.

BigIronBigIron 10 points ago +10 / -0

YOU know it's not her coat, but the crowd around you now thinks you stole the bitch's coat

Gold-Eyed-Cat 7 points ago +7 / -0


DrBJTester 11 points ago +14 / -3

His name is Cucker TuckGame he's an actor sad to say he's our version of AOC. He was likable he said a lot of things that we wanted to hear but when we really needed him he was a traitor.

BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +4 / -1

Uh huh. Take this issue up again on January 21st.

DrBJTester 6 points ago +6 / -0

The day of Salt.

As it will be known to all future generations.

RedReddit 7 points ago +7 / -0

I am currently considering this. Expect future op-eds like this "supporting" other MAGA warriors.

I am not letting this influence my opinion on Tucker. He went against Soros against Fox's policy, but he could have been turned after that.

I am on the wait and see side with Tucker.

BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

Come closer, let me whisper in your ear. You know you can't trust your allies right? Hisssssssss

RedReddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. It's almost as if 7 Trumpets have sounded. Tell me, how many immediate members in Trump's family?

FancyBeerCoozyBeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bar for "evidence" is set at definitive proof that can be fit into an easily digestable two minute bit. If you feel entitled to the impossible, you're a moron. Tucker should go look at a tree or something.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Mavdick96 15 points ago +15 / -0

Judas fucking Iscariot.

FightTheSWAMP 14 points ago +14 / -0

The funniest part of it is the commie pub WAPO thinks we will all of a sudden read their garbage

martypete 5 points ago +6 / -1

honest question, was it just his interaction with sidney that makes us feel this way? what exactly did he do? im out of the loop apparently

LyinBiden 21 points ago +21 / -0

He's basically implying that Sidney Powell is full of shit - he's not outright saying it, but was apparently confrontational with her and has done two shows in a row casting serious doubt on her claims.

Predictably, the media is using Tucker's soundbites to try and torpedo Trump's case.


Djt2029 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tuned out of Fox post election, but Tucker was always spot on IMO. I've only read here people crying about him now. I just watched this clip. Is this seriously the worst of it? He's making fair points and never says Trump is full of it, he comes across as he's always comes across. Anyone should want evidence for such a large claim like this. Sentiment around Tucker on here is ridiculous if this video is the extent of his "selling out".

skygz -3 points ago +8 / -11

Tucker's still a hell of a lot better than everyone else in the MSM and his opinion doesn't change the outcome of any court cases, I don't see why people are so upset about that. We can't afford to lose allies.

LyinBiden 9 points ago +10 / -1 (edited)

They are pissed because his quotations are being used to discredit Trump's case, and because he's making a big deal about it at a pivotal time when he doesn't have any evidence to the contrary so far.

I like Tucker, and if you see my comments above, I don't think he's part of a conspiracy, but he's really fucking up just like he did when he personally lobbied Trump to buy into lockdown nonsense.

GreatBambino 1 point ago +1 / -0

An ally doesn't stab you in the back. An ally doesn't defend a well-known sexual deviant and pedophile aka Hunter Biden. An ally doesn't call a pedophile a "good guy with some problems." An ally doesn't concern troll and throw a patriotic lawyer under the bus simply because she refuses to hand over all of her evidence to help him lift his falling ratings. He's a piece of shit.

GreatBambino 3 points ago +3 / -0

He defended Hunter Biden and called him a "good guy with some problems." As if defending a pedophile wasn't bad enough, he then shits on the Sidney Powell. Her reputation is sterling. We shouldn't be surprised though.. Tucker was originally a "journalist" on MSNBC and CNN before he came to FOX.

ProdigalSon1997 289 points ago +289 / -0 (edited)

LMFAO What the fuck? A solid left-leaning news source tells us to not bail on Tucker? Who are they to tell us what the fuck we should be doing? Tucker became corrupted by the love for his job over the truth, and now he's a leftist shill. The left have been praising him for dissing Sidney Powell -- I saw this in one tweet. However, if the left were to take over, Tucker would be one of the first thrown to the angry mob. Simply put, Tucker is a fool.

CuckerCarlson 171 points ago +175 / -4

I thought it was a great article.

DeusVultPepe 97 points ago +97 / -0

Username checks out

tdwinner2020 18 points ago +19 / -1

The two who downvoted didn't get the joke. SAD!

hmflagler2 6 points ago +6 / -0

The journalist is connected to Gawker and his wife works for mother jones.

MaxineWaters4Prez 62 points ago +62 / -0

When the WaPo tells you what to do, you do the opposite.

DaddySmooth 24 points ago +24 / -0


_-Th0r-_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Use your brains folks. What if WaPo recommended all MAGA peeeeedes watch Steve Bannon’s War Room?


MaxineWaters4Prez 4 points ago +4 / -0

They exist solely to subvert the American way of life. They wouldn't make that recommendation.

KingSweyn 30 points ago +31 / -1

He had his chance to learn from Megyn Kelly. Viewers doesn't mean influence, unless you're dealing with boomers or the left.

Redsriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

So his entire audience. Ok.

Filo76 28 points ago +28 / -0

Left leaning?

Calling the WaPo left leaning is like calling the 1980’s Pravda slightly socialist.

GeoG85 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nicely said.

The Left kill each other. "Only the strong survive". Acting like we're still in the caves, and it's what their attitudes try to do! Destroy the planet until we're all living in caves.

Who the fuck would join a Leftist system if there was no other system? Choosing fear, suffering - a literal Hell? There's only one way a Leftist system ends, and it's not with happy trails. You're not gonna burn your way into Heaven - that's the trick to go to the OTHER place.


Thehonkswamp 5 points ago +5 / -0

Better to die free on your own two feet than live forever begging on your knees.

deleted 180 points ago +180 / -0
DaddySmooth 44 points ago +44 / -0

Nothing to see here, Deplorable Chump. Move along... /s

canuckspionage 3 points ago +3 / -0

is this some reverse psychology? are they telling us not to bail because they know we'll do it out of spite?

Socialismsuckz 165 points ago +165 / -0

Wtf is this real?

polyking 108 points ago +108 / -0

Was asking that myself.


It definitely is.

Behemoth1 72 points ago +73 / -1

Good gawd that article is so full of excrement that we need cousin Eddy.

Haitianbychoice360 23 points ago +24 / -1

Wow. Now I need some brain bleach.

fat50 17 points ago +17 / -0

I want to punch this motherfucker after the first paragraph.

ADAM_SCHITT 16 points ago +16 / -0

Basically confirming they flipped Tucker wtf

Thehonkswamp 11 points ago +11 / -0

These people are truly soulless and shameless.

Perhelion 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao!!! Amazing find!!!

UnoriginalNickname 14 points ago +14 / -0

Real fake news

mcvities2 51 points ago +53 / -2

And you know who wrote that article? Erik Wemple. The guy Tucker made fun of for the better part of 3 years. Guess that was fake too and they were buddies all along.

crimeariver 20 points ago +21 / -1

My God...

CuckerCarlson 15 points ago +16 / -1


donutreplyplz 7 points ago +7 / -0

Did you read the whole article? It’s still unabashedly anti-Tucker and mocks us for ever having listened to him. It’s only meant for his reader base to reaffirm their stance on us being oh so credulous

Pearls_Swine 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just finished reading it and it's exactly how it comes off as. "Come on, idiots, this is literally the only man in the planet that bullshits you about how orange man is not bad".

Not that I'm shocked, but I'd expect this level of estrogen-fueled snark from Buzzfeed bloggers.

mcvities2 3 points ago +3 / -0

For sure. Everything he wrote was garbage. He's stirring the pot, saying "look - the Trumpers are turning on each other."

Batmemejr3 105 points ago +105 / -0

The Washington Post is like the soldier in animal House telling the panicking crowd "remain calm! All is well!"

FRONT_TOWARD_LEFT 28 points ago +28 / -0

ROTC cadet Chip Diller, played by Kevin Bacon.

Ithrowawaay 8 points ago +9 / -1

Thank you Sir, may I have another!

FRONT_TOWARD_LEFT 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

I was riding in coach on a flight a few years ago, and Animal House was on the in-flight entertainment. I hadn't seen it in decades, so I started watching it.

I was in the aisle seat, and the plane was full, so there was a young lady maybe in her early twenties sitting in the center seat beside me.

I assumed all the raunchier parts would have been cut or edited out, but when it got to the scene where Bluto peeps through the sorority house window, it was uncut. That embarrassed me, so I quickly stopped the movie and watched something else.

At some point later in the flight I caught a bit of what the lady next to me was watching out of the corner of my eye, and it looked like straight-up soft porn like they used to run on Cinemax in the 1980s.

HeIsVigo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Good old Skinemax. Going to the blocked channels late at night waving an arm in the air with the feverish hope of seeing a nipple and maybe 2 boobies if only for a few seconds. The best of times.

Batmemejr3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Y'know... It's been years since I've seen that, and I seem to recall that it was Kevin Bacon... But I wasn't exactly sure!😁

kmillz 93 points ago +93 / -0

BYE Tucker. And btw, we didn't bail on him. HE BAILED ON US.

ACanadianInCanada 3 points ago +4 / -1

He was never "on our side". Fox is and always will be controlled opposition.

kmillz 5 points ago +6 / -1

Oh now Tucker stabs us in the back and suddenly people are going to pretend they always knew he was a snake lmao get real.

Squeakyguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think that comment can be read as reflective instead of knowing.

kmillz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair enough. I don't think it's even true though, Tucker sold out. That doesn't mean he wasn't big for our movement.

ACanadianInCanada 1 point ago +1 / -0

I suspect it is possible all those things can be true. He works for the company. Believes in the words he speaks. Is "on our side" yet sold out for reasons that scare the shit out him.

Suppose he WAS recruited by intelligence for a moment. We know from the Church commission in the 70s that cia employed people in media to follow narrative. We also know they made the program voluntary instead of scrapping it.

What do you think Tucker was told or mandated when he started? "Here's the plan tucker .... you're on board? Great!" I doubt it. Compartmentalization is how you keep information from spreading. My company does it all the time to prevent leaks before products come out. He was told just enough to make him believe he was acting in his principled interests. Fox is run by Murdoch. NOT a conservative. Just a rich guy filling a market niche. Fox always has been a pawn in a sick game to control the discussion of the masses.

What do I know. Sounds like a conspiracy ...

_-Th0r-_ -4 points ago +5 / -9

Why? Because Sydney Powell refuses to come on his show?

Sorry but I’ve valued Tucker’s independent style for years, and I have barely heard of Sydney Powell.

kmillz 4 points ago +5 / -1

First of all I said NOTHING about her, and second of all it's Sidney not Sydney.

_-Th0r-_ -3 points ago +1 / -4

I haven’t had the time to be on here for a few days and all of a sudden Tucker is Megyn Kelley.

I’m asking why.

Best I can tell it was because of something he said about Powell on his show.

So I went back and watched, and all he said is she made a lot of claims, we offered her unlimited time to come on the show and present evidence, and she not only refused but said stop bothering me.

Is this why ppl are mad at Tucker? I’m actually asking, and can’t find an answer.

kmillz 4 points ago +5 / -1

Ok again putting words in my mouth, Tucker is not Megyn Kelley wtf? If you don't know why people are mad at Tucker than you're not paying attention, it predates whatever fued he has with Sidney. It's the fact that he has fully bought into the narrative that there isn't enough fraud to overturn the election and he is peddling that garbage to the, at one time, largest audience in all of cable news.

TrumpMaskReplica 0 points ago +1 / -1

Pathetic. You've had dozens of examples to see Carlson's treachery, from the Kavanaugh hearing, to the fearmongering of Covid, to so much more. You're an idiot or a shill.

CrushAlot 63 points ago +63 / -0

As an aside, what conservative reads the WP? For the lollies?

polyking 38 points ago +38 / -0

Know thy enemy

knightofday 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yessir. That’s a major factor that sets us apart from liberals, gives us a major edge

crazyfingers619 5 points ago +5 / -0

When we read a liberal publication we get tinges of sadness that others can hate this country so much, and laughs that they can be so damned stupid and follow these parasites.

When liberals get into alternative media their brain starts to hurt, and the walls start closing in and piercing, painful facts start assaulting their brain that they may be wholly wrong about everything.

They close the feed and note to themselves they will never open that pandora's box again. Then they fervently log into facebook to smash the upvote button of the first "Drumpf bad" comment they can get their hands on.

nimblenate 54 points ago +54 / -0

Democracy Dies in Darkness is their slogan?

I think I'll pass.

Ameronaut 16 points ago +16 / -0

Inadvertently rayciss slogan

TheLeningrad27 13 points ago +13 / -0

I mean, they're not wrong, with the 4 AM ballot dumps and all.

Xenovista 7 points ago +7 / -0

"If you don't want your naked child laid upon the altar of Satan, you're a racist, sexist, homophobe!"

"As you wish." (cocks shotgun)

Kweebecker 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not a warning, it's their mission statement.

Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either you've heard me say that before or we have the same brain.

Fabius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like 4 AM darkness?

grassshrimp 49 points ago +49 / -0

Tucker lost our trust, you can't win that back. Fox is completely irrecoverably fucked.

KingSweyn 19 points ago +20 / -1

Finally got my parents off Fox News though. All I had to do was predict exactly how the election would go. Finally they can get in touch with some real news.

grassshrimp 15 points ago +15 / -0

Did the same with my mother-in-law. Took her to see a Trump boat parade, hundreds and hundreds of boats. Told her that the news wouldn't cover it or pretend hardly anyone participated. She didn't believe me. Sure enough, there was a 10 second blurb on local news that showed two boats. She woke up.

MAGAA2020isback 47 points ago +48 / -1

This is like teaching kids not to take candy from anyone named Chester.

Deplorablechump1213 41 points ago +43 / -2

Stop looking at the squirrel- focus pedes, FOCUS!!!

UnderCoverTrumper 5 points ago +6 / -1


Krysdavar 1 point ago +1 / -0

omg SQUIRREL!1!1!

Staatssicherheit 35 points ago +35 / -0

The biggest mistake Tucker made was that he thought it was about him and not the MAGA movement. The way he cheerfully said that the rumors of him leaving Fox is false and while gloating that he was actually offered more hours/programming at Fox showed me what kind of person he is.

meme_oil 25 points ago +25 / -0

tucker is a controlled limited hangout operation owned by the murdochs used to steer conservatives back into their slumber!

Honk4Trump 25 points ago +25 / -0

Wow so incredibly telling. He was a shill all along.

KingSweyn 10 points ago +10 / -0

If you look at his dad, it's perfectly likely he was a shill before anyone had heard his name.

Xenovista 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah, if he was Antifa wouldn't have targeted his wife.

AllyInAsia 8 points ago +8 / -0

Useful idiots are still idiots.

Tawburgle2 24 points ago +24 / -0

Holy shit, this is real? LMAO.

CrAzD 24 points ago +25 / -1

This is a distraction, focus on things that matter.

Alpha_plus 5 points ago +6 / -1

Exposing snakes matter.

CrAzD 0 points ago +3 / -3

Guys I'm gonna go point out this snake that's irrelevant, but don't worry you guys go fight the British empire. The snake is more important to waste resources and time on.

TrumpMaskReplica 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, identifying influential traitors is extremely important, this must be hard for you.

CrAzD 0 points ago +1 / -1

Guys guys, I know we pointed out a hundred times yesterday that there's someone we don't like anymore. But I can't control myself so I'm going to keep wasting everyone's time pointing something out that's irrelevant to what's going on.

You need to grow up. You're behaving like a middle/high school kid going on and on about what someone you thought was cool said. Pay attention to what matters and stop wasting resources on irrelevant people. It's like you've never ended a relationship before, move on.

sackofwisdom 0 points ago +1 / -1

What someone you thought was cool said.

Sounds like you are just parroting Bannon's rant.

CrAzD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not an argument.

Barracuda 23 points ago +23 / -0

Hey WAPO, we play a new game now. It's called ONE STRIKE and your out.

kag-2020- 20 points ago +20 / -0

Lmfao! The Washington Post of all garbage news outlets too. Might as well just have Haspel herslef come out and demand we keep watching him.

x79q3pb 15 points ago +15 / -0

Or the Hawaiian judge overturn our decision to stop watching.

x79q3pb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love it! All the upvotes!

ravioli_king 18 points ago +18 / -0

LOL They spend so much time trying to get people to avoid watching Fox... oh now watch Fox! Daily Show spent 20 years making fun of Fox.

sociopathix 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't want us exposed to the likes of Greg Kelly. 1 Deplorable + 1 Deplorable = 2A.

Rja3 17 points ago +17 / -0

Too, late.

Pepe1776_ 17 points ago +17 / -0

Apparently he's trying to back pedal now but I have no interest in what he has to say and didn't watch the video lol

DarkMemeDuck 15 points ago +15 / -0

Why would one news outlet tell people they hate to not bail on another news outlet that they hate?

Ex-libtard 13 points ago +13 / -0


Serioush 12 points ago +12 / -0

"We invested all this time setting up controlled opposition!"

independentbystander 12 points ago +12 / -0

LOLWUT? I know the Tolerant Left™ gets off on ordering normal people around... but why would one of the most obvious sources of Leftist propaganda think we would take their advice on anything?

I'm pretty sure if you go back 3 weeks, the Washington Post would have been posting articles bashing Tucker Carlson as MSM always has. Now suddenly that he is seen as "helpful" by contradicting Sidney Powell they are trying to boost his ratings? CLOWN WORLD IS NO JOKE

MAGA_Flocka_Flame 12 points ago +12 / -0

If they aren’t listening to Tucker anymore, they sure as hell aren’t listening to WaPo

mathman 5 points ago +5 / -0

WaPo isn't just a blatant propaganda organ like Der Sturmer, although Bezos is pushing it harder than ever in that direction. WaPo has always had another, more subtle role. It's the daily cheat sheet for the left.

Amateur leftists all over America get daily talking points from the Washington Post, specifically to feed their friends and family who don't know that they read the Washington Post. That's what makes the propaganda more subtle and effective. It gets around our defenses by appearing to be common-sense reasoning from people just like us, when in reality it's anything but that.

Doctor_S 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm sure we all are going back to watch Cucker Tarlson after the Washington Compost tell us to do that....

Mobmando 11 points ago +11 / -0


Check this out. His own words.

Zelnik 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is beyond the kiss of death.

It’s why I am skeptical, it’s a little too on the nose.

CyberCriminaI 9 points ago +10 / -1

honk honk

Epy00 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hahahahahahahaha proof he sold out! Incredible.

Carbum 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lol.. definitely time to bail.

geocitiesuser 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wow, I'm convinced to never listen to Tucker again. Wapo is quite literally the enemy

semisane17 7 points ago +8 / -1

LOL WaPo defending Tucker? Oh, Wemple. Tucker's secret butt buddy if I'm not mistaken.

omind 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Never believe anything until it is officially denied"

-- Otto von Bismarck

brsmith77 7 points ago +7 / -0

I love that they have "Democracy dies in darkness" under their Logo...on a black background.

DaddySmooth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly what they want! They don't even hide it.

SpaceCityPede 7 points ago +8 / -1

Sweet Jesus, it’s REAL

Gramma53 5 points ago +5 / -0

I bailed already on all things Fox News.

DeplorableAmerican45 5 points ago +5 / -0

Time to bail! They are losing their controlled opposition as we transition to real opposition. China Joe has got to go!

turdinthepunch 5 points ago +5 / -0

I feel like this is a taunt and they are taking a stab at us and tucker... didn't read the piece tho..

"Hey Bernie Bros: Don't bail on Biden!"

OneBreathe 5 points ago +6 / -1


You_Aint_Black 5 points ago +5 / -0

They call us “folks” because they think we’re dumb enough to fall for shit like this. kek

NewDonWhoDis 5 points ago +9 / -4

You mean the Bezos washington post wants us to boost ratings on Disney's Fox News?

That's a little weird...

Truthseeeeker 9 points ago +10 / -1

Disney doesn't run Fox News.

TheRealChelseaClintn 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't know why people here still can't figure this out

CuckerCarlson 5 points ago +7 / -2

Did Bannon give you permission to make fun of me yet?

PlasmaNoire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hows it feel to be a cuck Tuck, did your wifes boyfriend let you post here?

BoerboelMummy 4 points ago +5 / -1

Riiiiiiiiight... the same Washington Post, that's been a Trump hating machine for 4 years, and has been wrong on just about every issue of substance since Bezos bought it for chump change now thinks we'll take a single thing they say seriously? Self awareness score -100

DefendTheInnocent 4 points ago +4 / -0

"They're not following the Judas Goat. They're just milling around on the ramp. We've got an entire shift sitting around getting paid for nothing. Now, you get those sheep up the ramp right now!"

DeadOverRed 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL. Because former Tucker watchers ever cared what WA Compost said.

toophless 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey WaPo make the bail complete...HIRE HIM!!!

Deadline 3 points ago +6 / -3

This is simple reverse psychology. They want people to ditch Tucker. They have no reason to think a clear anti-Trump article on their left wing news site would motivate conservatives to give him another chance. Just the opposite, using themselves as a damaging endorsement.

Not that it's necessary. I'm not planning to watch him anymore anyway, so unfortunately I'll be granting their wish.

GermAno 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

I don´t think they have the mental capacity for something like reverse psychology, especially not the author of that article based on the way he writes.

Me personally find that excerpt here really telling:

Keep in mind that Carlson is trying to hold together a vast community of viewers, a sliver of which believes he’s an honest broker who keeps everyone honest

I think in his mind he sees Tucker as a centralized tool to lead the masses by his "honesty". Think about it, a decentralized organic community like this here is much harder to control if there is no central information source. This is exactly how they control all the other sheep, so why couldn´t it work for us?

I tell you why it couldn´t, because people here actually care about the truth and integrity. Sure, people here as well can be misled by stories and wanting-it-to-be-true bias is real but that attitude remains at its core.

Honestly fuck MSM, they should all die out already like the disfunct tools they are.