4486
posted ago by EdwardSolomon (edited) +4487 / -1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIlI46HdqKg

Bitchute (still processing): https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lqw0wDQ0kJXy/ https://open.lbry.com/@EdwardKingSolomon:5?r=F4FQsJxBgsLgjc8G7ruAcVj3Loe5eZmQ

rumble (backuped by another pede): https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html

https://open.lbry.com/@EdwardKingSolomon:5?r=F4FQsJxBgsLgjc8G7ruAcVj3Loe5eZmQ

In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.

In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below): https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

EDIT adding this second image for clarification: https://ibb.co/THZf3Hq

A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.

Original data sets: https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6


Edit, adding my youtube comment:

"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)."


Update:

To repeat this experiment, take any 2020 election dataset with timestamps.

Make a new column, with the array formula (Trump votes divided by Total Votes). Call this Column Z (Ratio Column).

Then sort the spreadsheet by: Column Z (ratio)

Then by: Time Column

then by District/Precinct Column.

It's that easy!


Update 2: It's confirmed the Philly uses ES&S voting systems. That being said we should still check for this paradigm in Dominion regions.


Update 3 (Sunday, Nov 22) I mapped all of the ratio transfers that occur within ONE TIMESTAMP of each other, no less than 115,343 votes were flipped to 89% Biden. Most of these ratios are chained for the entire week, transferring to a new set of precincts within a single timestamp (within one global update).

Took me all day to figure out how setup a logic board to only identify the most suspicious transfers. When the "timestamp difference" parameter is increased, the amount of cases go up linearly.

For this experiment I kept the timestamp difference at 1, so no false positive would emerge (the logic board on the "mother edited" file is so strict, I most likely negated dozens of actual positives).

All documents included in the go.file link. You can match the "Mother Number" entries from the condensed googlesheet version to the "Mother Sheet" file.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Feu70w7RDoMR1w9rSzq-Yn7hfmQEmv3WfzdnisGNvsk/edit?usp=sharing

https://gofile.io/d/X262uw


Update 4

Found a major red flag in one of the ratio transfer timelines, the tabulations actually increase in Precinct 52-05 three times by 14:13:1 in a four hour span.

https://ibb.co/h1k9v52


Update 5: Added Live Simulation.

https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes


Update 6:

ONE: All of the people claiming to "debunk" my Ratio transfer don't even understand my theory are are purposely misrepresenting it for their agenda.

They THINK (or claim) I'm discussing the repeating precincts, I'm not, precincts naturally repeat until they update. They either don't know this and are stupid and didn't watch the video), or deliberately lying, trying to do a drive analysis to confuse other people who may not have watched the entire video.

Or, they think these are the only ratios in the whole datasheet that that are shared by distinct precincts. No. It's OK if the same ratio is reported by another precinct, so long as the time difference between the reports is either several timestamps (or several hours). In fact most ratios are repeated by different precincts, but at vastly different times.

TWO: Then they claim (the smartest of the dumb, or the smartest of the disinfo agents) that if I remove duplicate entries (from precincts not updating), that the evidence goes away. Yes, and if I bleach a murder scene the evidence also goes away.

It's actually the other way around. The duplicate entries come from dead precincts (that no one is voting at) that the local bosses stuffed harvested ballots. Because of this I can ONLY detect the POSITIVES between dead precincts. I also believe the system prefers these dead low turnout precincts in it's seizure logic.

Thus, I'm sure the system occasionally took live precincts as well, but I can't detect them with my "reverse algorithm" because the difference in time between the live precincts (that were seized) reporting the same ratios can't be differentiated from the legitimate data (most of of the data is clean) and ratios being reported by normal precincts that weren't seized.

THREE: Then the "debunkers" start to play "super stupid" when I catch them in all their bullshit. They start saying "but all the ratios change, look bidens votes changed while trump's stayed the same," meanwhile I'm talking about Trump's votes to total votes, which can be obfuscated by the third party vote. They also deny that in most series of ratios that are transferred that some of the "repeat entries" are actually being updated via a direct injection votes. Although rare, there are at least 200 entries where the "repeat" actually updates with new totals (in the same precinct), and it's the same ratios.

FOUR: Finally you got the "super smart" disinfo agents that link me scatter plots of integer ratios and their intersections. The scatter plots only prove that different precincts will report the same ratios at some point. Yes, that's true, and yes most of the ratios in the datasheet that are shared between precincts are CLEAN and not suspicious, because they are reported at vastly different times. These scatter plot boys fail to add the dimensional component of TIME, and the fourth component of Probability (based on the integer sizes of the numerator and denominator and their prime factorizations).

Although it's possible for ONE precinct with a ratio to stop reporting that ratio and then ANOTHER precinct picks up that ratio within one timestamp, it's INSANE when multiple precincts pick up the same ratio at the SAME TIME and then when they finally stop reporting it, another NEW SET of unique precincts picks up (AT THE SAME TIME), and that pattern of transferred ratios (within one timestamp) between new sets of precincts continuing from November 4th through November 11th.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIlI46HdqKg Bitchute (still processing): https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lqw0wDQ0kJXy/ https://open.lbry.com/@EdwardKingSolomon:5?r=F4FQsJxBgsLgjc8G7ruAcVj3Loe5eZmQ rumble (backuped by another pede): https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html https://open.lbry.com/@EdwardKingSolomon:5?r=F4FQsJxBgsLgjc8G7ruAcVj3Loe5eZmQ In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth. In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below): https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds EDIT adding this second image for clarification: https://ibb.co/THZf3Hq A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week. Original data sets: https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6 ------------------------------------- Edit, adding my youtube comment: "The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage. It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day. Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count. To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts). During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment). This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)." ______________________ Update: To repeat this experiment, take any 2020 election dataset with timestamps. Make a new column, with the array formula (Trump votes divided by Total Votes). Call this Column Z (Ratio Column). Then sort the spreadsheet by: Column Z (ratio) Then by: Time Column then by District/Precinct Column. It's that easy! ------------------- Update 2: It's confirmed the Philly uses ES&S voting systems. That being said we should still check for this paradigm in Dominion regions. ---------------------------- Update 3 (Sunday, Nov 22) I mapped all of the ratio transfers that occur within ONE TIMESTAMP of each other, no less than 115,343 votes were flipped to 89% Biden. Most of these ratios are chained for the entire week, transferring to a new set of precincts within a single timestamp (within one global update). Took me all day to figure out how setup a logic board to only identify the most suspicious transfers. When the "timestamp difference" parameter is increased, the amount of cases go up linearly. For this experiment I kept the timestamp difference at 1, so no false positive would emerge (the logic board on the "mother edited" file is so strict, I most likely negated dozens of actual positives). All documents included in the go.file link. You can match the "Mother Number" entries from the condensed googlesheet version to the "Mother Sheet" file. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Feu70w7RDoMR1w9rSzq-Yn7hfmQEmv3WfzdnisGNvsk/edit?usp=sharing https://gofile.io/d/X262uw ------------------------------ Update 4 Found a major red flag in one of the ratio transfer timelines, the tabulations actually increase in Precinct 52-05 three times by 14:13:1 in a four hour span. https://ibb.co/h1k9v52 _____ Update 5: Added Live Simulation. https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes _____________ Update 6: ONE: All of the people claiming to "debunk" my Ratio transfer don't even understand my theory are are purposely misrepresenting it for their agenda. They THINK (or claim) I'm discussing the repeating precincts, I'm not, precincts naturally repeat until they update. They either don't know this and are stupid and didn't watch the video), or deliberately lying, trying to do a drive analysis to confuse other people who may not have watched the entire video. Or, they think these are the only ratios in the whole datasheet that that are shared by distinct precincts. No. It's OK if the same ratio is reported by another precinct, so long as the time difference between the reports is either several timestamps (or several hours). In fact most ratios are repeated by different precincts, but at vastly different times. TWO: Then they claim (the smartest of the dumb, or the smartest of the disinfo agents) that if I remove duplicate entries (from precincts not updating), that the evidence goes away. Yes, and if I bleach a murder scene the evidence also goes away. It's actually the other way around. The duplicate entries come from dead precincts (that no one is voting at) that the local bosses stuffed harvested ballots. Because of this I can ONLY detect the POSITIVES between dead precincts. I also believe the system prefers these dead low turnout precincts in it's seizure logic. Thus, I'm sure the system occasionally took live precincts as well, but I can't detect them with my "reverse algorithm" because the difference in time between the live precincts (that were seized) reporting the same ratios can't be differentiated from the legitimate data (most of of the data is clean) and ratios being reported by normal precincts that weren't seized. THREE: Then the "debunkers" start to play "super stupid" when I catch them in all their bullshit. They start saying "but all the ratios change, look bidens votes changed while trump's stayed the same," meanwhile I'm talking about Trump's votes to total votes, which can be obfuscated by the third party vote. They also deny that in most series of ratios that are transferred that some of the "repeat entries" are actually being updated via a direct injection votes. Although rare, there are at least 200 entries where the "repeat" actually updates with new totals (in the same precinct), and it's the same ratios. FOUR: Finally you got the "super smart" disinfo agents that link me scatter plots of integer ratios and their intersections. The scatter plots only prove that different precincts will report the same ratios at some point. Yes, that's true, and yes most of the ratios in the datasheet that are shared between precincts are CLEAN and not suspicious, because they are reported at vastly different times. These scatter plot boys fail to add the dimensional component of TIME, and the fourth component of Probability (based on the integer sizes of the numerator and denominator and their prime factorizations). Although it's possible for ONE precinct with a ratio to stop reporting that ratio and then ANOTHER precinct picks up that ratio within one timestamp, it's INSANE when multiple precincts pick up the same ratio at the SAME TIME and then when they finally stop reporting it, another NEW SET of unique precincts picks up (AT THE SAME TIME), and that pattern of transferred ratios (within one timestamp) between new sets of precincts continuing from November 4th through November 11th.
Comments (290)
sorted by:
263
Socially_Covid 263 points ago +268 / -5

PIN THIS!

250
EdwardSolomon [S] 250 points ago +252 / -2

It's over.

Now everyone will know exactly what to look for in all of the county datasets (by precinct).

I'm expecting hundreds of similar videos to come in with the same results after this thread gets its due attention.

103
AdamBomb 103 points ago +103 / -0

Do you have this video uploaded to other sites besides YouTube? video.maga.host, bitchute, etc? YouTube can and probably will pull this if it goes viral.

88
EdwardSolomon [S] 88 points ago +88 / -0

Making bitchute video.

Magahost has a 500MB limit.

42
CowForCow 42 points ago +42 / -0

Edit your comment with the bitchute like as soon as you have it. We need to prioritize friendly sites over hostile ones.

39
TheQuickening 39 points ago +39 / -0 (edited)

Backup Video on Rumble

https://rumble.com/vbas2t

UPDATE:

Another backup that can be downloaded as well, https://gofile.io/d/AujNmp

5
EdwardSolomon [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I need you to change "Dominion" to "ES&S" in the title. I can't change a video you uploaded.

1
errydaktal 1 point ago +1 / -0

We know that the election was hijacked on mass scale but how confident are you right now that the whole election will be overturned when the supreme court sees the evidence? They might be bribed or think that it would be best not to uproot the entire system as it is. Certainly criminal for even the democrat justices to not vote in favour of this

1
EdwardSolomon [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The best bet is the State Legislators sending their own Electors, regardless of any SCOTUS ruling.

It's the nuclear constitutional safeguard for a crisis like this.

19
MAGA_Flocka_Flame 19 points ago +19 / -0

How big is the video?

15
TheQuickening 15 points ago +15 / -0

350MB

You can get it here https://gofile.io/d/AujNmp

13
TheQuickening 13 points ago +13 / -0

Also, add this link too -> https://gofile.io/d/AujNmp

So others can download the video and upload other places too. Thanks

7
BigPuma 7 points ago +8 / -1

Put on Rumble and Parler as well.

13
K-Harbour 13 points ago +13 / -0

It will get blocked in no time.

9
crimsonfancy 9 points ago +10 / -1

I second this suggestion.

24
Anon_Army 24 points ago +29 / -5

I'm a promoted guy in the Data group. I've been looking this over and discussing with OP, I'm leaning towards this being a nothingburger, careful guys.

Feel free to argue against this, I'd like OP to be right actually, but.

I think if we presume precincts are updated in groups, it's not unreasonable that out of the 1703 precincts, the ratio of 1 or 2 or 3 of them are going to match one or two or three precincts from the next timestep update.

This is also because the vote counts are low, and it's Philadelphia, so the ratios are already going to be low and simple for trump. It's not surprising the ratio in one out of 1703 of these precincts is 2:31 or whatever.

That's why you would see a group of precincts change the ratio at once, if the vote batch was for the entire group. All the ratios would change of course. And it's likely one or two of the precincts after the update, would match the previous ratio. This is not surprising, it doesn't mean the ratio was "transferred".

I think OP is vastly overstating his case. Be careful.

I think there is fraud and problems, but I don't want to blow our load on something flimsy.

Spamming in a few places here to get word out. Again, feel free to criticize my logic, I'd be happy to be wrong, but this looks like normal behavior.

6
Thecloudsurfer91 6 points ago +8 / -2

As a fellow data guy, I tend to agree with you. Seems like you are looking too hard to find a statistical analysis. This video could probably be summed up and it might be a better argument.

4
EdwardSolomon [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ok...well here you go, the full summary of the number of precincts seized and ratio transfers within one global timestamp...thousands siezed, over 115k votes flipped.

Entire series of transfers of the same ratio (within one global timestamp) for several days straight.


Update 3 (Sunday, Nov 22) I mapped all of the ratio transfers that occur within ONE TIMESTAMP of each other, no less than 115,343 votes were flipped to 89% Biden. Most of these ratios are chained for the entire week, transferring to a new set of precincts within a single timestamp (within one global update).

Took me all day to figure out how setup a logic board to only identify the most suspicious transfers. When the "timestamp difference" parameter is increased, the amount of cases go up linearly.

For this experiment I kept the timestamp difference at 1, so no false positive would emerge.

All documents included in the go.file link. You can match the "Mother Number" entries from the condensed googlesheet version to the "Mother Sheet" file.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Feu70w7RDoMR1w9rSzq-Yn7hfmQEmv3WfzdnisGNvsk/edit?usp=sharing

https://gofile.io/d/X262uw

2
Thecloudsurfer91 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amazing work bro. I am going to dive into this and corroborate.

1
bear__aware 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something is missing from the argument overall which is; why would they use such a dumb algorithm. Why not do something probabilistic, some kind of stochastic model that more believably and smoothly simultes realistic election behavior. I.e. fudges the numbers without doing any hacky fixed ratios and whatnot. Even if you think the ratio allocation scheme is somehow a good algorithm, I'd say it's not because... why not just add a little bit of noise on top of it to make it harder to detect.

The only reasons I can think of:

  1. incompetence

  2. lack of time to implement something better

  3. the odd hackiness of the algorithm and its overall simplicity could be more easily hidden or made to look innocuous in the code. e.g. some coomer could slip this in to a pull-request and have it go unnoticed. or it could be an agreed upon "feature" that was implemented in this way to evade detection in some source code audit (speaking of which... we know these voting systems are not open source to the public, but did the states using these systems at least audit the source code internally or by hired 3rd party analyst?)

Maybe a combination of 1/2/3. I still don't see why one wouldn't just add a little bit of PRNG noise to these allocations in order to make them less noticeable. That implies heavy reliance on reasons 1 or 2. For reason 3... maybe some complex algorithm would be ruled out but... to add a little bit of PRNG noise on top of this procedure would not be a difficult thing to hide in addition, if already going to the lengths to hide the whole thing.

2
EdwardSolomon [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because then you'd had to spread it over every precinct uniformly.

How weird would it be if every precinct got exactly 63.5% to 66.5% Biden?

And how do we know they didn't use a little RNG?

I set the condition for a " positive" so tight, that I have yet to test for PRNG.

The condition:

Must be the same integer ratio Trump to Total. Must apply to set of precincts at the same time. Must transfer to a different set at the exact same time within one time stamp). Must persist for at least 24 hours (most of the ratios I found are chain transferred for the entire week within one timestamp).

1
bear__aware 1 point ago +1 / -0

What happens if you reverse the whole procedure, as in, switch Biden and Trump. Sort first by Biden ratio, and so on. Do you get fewer or no such events?

There was another guy looking at the timeseries data that did that for his hypothesis, and it seems it strengthened his argument.

4
cryogen 4 points ago +4 / -0

OK so you and the video author seem to have different priors about the probabilities involved.... Can anyone do the math here? I certainly can't.

3
ClownTamer 3 points ago +4 / -1

I also read someone in the YouTube comments of the video mention that the repeating totals happen a lot because they have not yet been updated yet, which to simplify would mean that you see a lot of repeat numbers until a new time stamp shift because the old data hadn’t yet been updated, not that they were counting more votes like this.

His video’s far too long and I could only see so much of it, but that could potentially account for the entirety of this if true. I’d love for all of this to be true, but until someone makes a more condensed chart and graph and explanation of this, that comment on the YouTube video does sound pretty compelling.

5
EdwardSolomon [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

My video isn't about repeating ratios (due to a precinct no updating), it's about the time difference between two precincts reporting the same ratio.

2
rootofjesse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you might have picked up the trail. other people with your level of expertise need to do the analysis independently. You have given people a great way of looking at the data and for what kinds of things to look for. But very few people are capable of that kind of analysis.

2
ZippyDev 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can confirm that ballots are being added in Wayne County MI. I did not get the AV Ballot Statuses of all voters in PENN on Nov 3rd-6th. I should have. But in Wayne County, there was simply not enough mail-in vote as of nov 6th to cover the total mail-in vote reported in the final election tally. The system swaps votes / controls votes, no doubt in real time, then later someone comes back in over the following days or weeks to back fill or adjust the counts to match the final number produced by the algorithms in the voting systems. For example, I can prove that almost the exact same number of mail in ballots were added in specific precincts in Wayne County MI.They seem to be using voter information to back fill ballots to get pass a recount or audit. There is a back room somewhere making these ballots with known voters, this is why dead people are voting. IMHO

2
B3fre 2 points ago +2 / -0

What do the rows represent? Do they show a precinct's daily tally?

I urge you to take the time to think of ways to explain the data without fraud. That will help you avoid easy mistakes in your analysis. We are looking for solid evidence of fraud.

It could be the case that all precincts update their counts at about the same time. If this happens, then all precinct ratios will change in lockstep. That would make a ratio disappear for certain precincts, and other precincts would have a chance of gaining that ratio. And that explains your video w/o fraud.

You can double-check your data to support or disprove this possibility, for example, by looking at one of the suspicious precinct's full day of data before, during, and after the time it had the ratio in question.

Further, many of the ratios in the video aren't very interesting (e.g., 1:5, 1:6, 1:16, 1:18) since they could happen normally. The ones that seem unlikely are the ones that are involve primes (or prime multiples) like 4:65 and 5:31.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ZippyDev 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the ratios carry a chronological timed order, which is even more alarming.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
GrumpyAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

New acct... curious. Your spamming everywhere, with some “master data file” you want people to use. Sounds fishy.

1
kung-flu-fighting 1 point ago +1 / -0

First - is the data from the json files really meaningful? What is the origin / chain of custody of that data? I would hesitate to draw any real conclusions without knowing that first. In this case OP should dedup where votes don't change over time - I think a lot of the patterns will look different - then need some other math people to weigh in as well - if there is something to find I'd be happy to have it found.

21
deadbugdale 21 points ago +21 / -0

Praying for your safety. You are doing the Lords work.

12
Frestpost 12 points ago +12 / -0

Let me ask two questions:

Possible to reverse engineer to figure actual vote counts?

Explain a scenario where overwhelming turnout makes their rations broken?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
10
The_Litehaus_Abides 10 points ago +10 / -0

Can't mods pin this even though it's a couple of hours old? It really needs to be stickied. Holy crap!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
MeanAngryVeteran 4 points ago +4 / -0

PIN PIN PIN

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
85
hovercraft 85 points ago +86 / -1

Wow your brain so heavy. But I basically get it. Ratio the max number of votes a guy can get, move the throttle from precinct to precinct so it's not so obvious?

89
EdwardSolomon [S] 89 points ago +89 / -0

Correct.

Going to copy and paste my youtube comment:

"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from expected vote count, based on the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, it reassigns the same "ratio set" to different precincts throughout the day, so the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio.

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)."

See the image I made for a visual: https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

21
hovercraft 21 points ago +21 / -0

So this goes on continuously during the vote count. And these ratios will show up in different geographic locations (data from other states). So what happens at times of big ballot dumps? Don't those have a very high ratio? Are you using GMT in your excel sheet - sorry I haven't downloaded yet.

32
EdwardSolomon [S] 32 points ago +32 / -0

I'm pretty sure Dominion operates in a county division.

So these ratios were calibrated only for the city of Philadelphia.

That being said, I haven't checked any other county yet. If the same ratios show up at the same time, and transfer at the exact time, it would be even more preposterous than it happening only in the city.

15
hovercraft 15 points ago +15 / -0

Please post when you do, thanks.

11
BigPuma 11 points ago +11 / -0

Bet this occurred in Detroit as well. Be curious to see that.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
6
aNavywife 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think the big 3 am data dumps had to be done because these ratios weren’t working and Trump was still winning. Then they had to use other methods of cheating on the ground.

3
ThomasPaine2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

These ratios were in play, but were not enough. That's why they needed the data dump. IMO

11
TrumpsThirdLeg 11 points ago +11 / -0

u/EdwardSolomon, what tipped you off to this? Did you notice the same ratio of votes between the candidates between several updates or something? Or was it just data sleuthing?

35
EdwardSolomon [S] 35 points ago +35 / -0

I heard a lot of talk about fraction magic.

I expected to find the same precincts with the same fraction (obvious fraud), but I didn't' see a pattern.

Then I thought...LET ME SORT BY THE FRACTION.

12
LiberalismIsTheVirus 12 points ago +12 / -0

Absolutely brilliant. You're a hero!

9
The_Litehaus_Abides 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bev Harris has been trying to warn us about this for many years. I don't think she's ever done anything like this, though. Excellent work.

5
Tantalus4200 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bravo

2
Anon_Army 2 points ago +9 / -7

I'm a promoted guy in the Data group. I've been looking this over and discussing with OP, I'm leaning towards this being a nothingburger, careful guys.

Feel free to argue against this, I'd like OP to be right actually, but.

I think if we presume precincts are updated in groups, it's not unreasonable that out of the 1703 precincts, the ratio of 1 or 2 or 3 of them are going to match one or two or three precincts from the next timestep update.

This is also because the vote counts are low, and it's Philadelphia, so the ratios are already going to be low and simple for trump. It's not surprising the ratio in one out of 1703 of these precincts is 2:31 or whatever.

That's why you would see a group of precincts change the ratio at once, if the vote batch was for the entire group. All the ratios would change of course. And it's likely one or two of the precincts after the update, would match the previous ratio. This is not surprising, it doesn't mean the ratio was "transferred".

I think OP is vastly overstating his case. Be careful.

I think there is fraud and problems, but I don't want to blow our load on something flimsy.

Spamming in a few places here to get word out. Again, feel free to criticize my logic, I'd be happy to be wrong, but this looks like normal behavior.

6
Test_user21 6 points ago +7 / -1

How can someone claim to be a Data group guy, and also not know there is no such thing as a fractional vote?

BIden cannot have 54% of a vote, as is indicated in the Dominion code

7
nsulltan 7 points ago +7 / -0

Side note 5 day old acct comes in to shit on a thing. Weird.

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just curious what your most promising lead on potential election fraud could be if not this?

1
SirPokeSmottington 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes

This makes no sense, how does Biden win, if you're giving Trump all his votes, and Biden only a percentage.

2
EdwardSolomon [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

???

If you take a 100 votes, and only give Trump 25 votes each time, you give Biden a minimum of 74 votes, and Jo 1 vote, then Biden wins.

68
AdamBomb 68 points ago +69 / -1

This needs more traction. Good stuff!

(PS: I hope your name is a pseudonym)

2
alexnader 2 points ago +2 / -0

So this is why those communist fucks have tried so hard to discredit basic math.

Sorry commies, 2+2 =/= 5.

Math and science will be their downfall, how fucking fitting.

68
RageBringer 68 points ago +70 / -2

I found one thing in particular with Minnesota.

There was definitely a QUOTA played on ALL COMBINED 3rd party candidates for PRESIDENT. The quota was 2.1% MAX. Every time votes came in, the 3rd party candidates LOST votes to prevent them going over 2.1%. Only on a couple occasions when a LARGE batch was input (bigger number of votes), did the 3rd party candidates exceed 2.1%, but was quickly "corrected" back down to 2.1%. Total them up for yourself right now, all the Presidential Candidates in MN, I bet they will still have 2.1% combined.

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
16
plasmaburnz 16 points ago +16 / -0

I'm really disturbed by the idea of simulated elections. "tabulating" votes should just be adding up totals from precincts. This software should be incredibly simple and transparent. If vote=Trump, nTrump++. It shouldn't bother with ratios. The poll workers should be able to see the number they sent to the total to verify it's the same.

7
ViduusMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

But then you wouldn’t need The Great Reset!

(at 4:00am)

41
throwaway-5947375959 41 points ago +41 / -0

Great work! You should sync it to censorship-proof, blockchain-based LBRY in case YouTube pulls it. Very easy to do: https://lbry.com/youtube

20
EdwardSolomon [S] 20 points ago +20 / -0

I'm ding this too. New to me but looks like a great back up.

6
fpc13 6 points ago +6 / -0

+1 for LBRY

37
Inmate2020 37 points ago +37 / -0

You Brilliant patriot you. This is good stuff. Please keep spreading this and for the love of god and country get this to Trump team ASAP!!

32
CommunismIsForLosers 32 points ago +32 / -0

Get this to GEOTUS campaign/legal teams!

3
CitizenPlain 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope it gets the proper attention.

31
deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
1
Smudgerator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not the most statistical guy, but I saw reports that Benford’s is not especially suited to elections because they won’t have unbounded data sets. Many precincts will be sized around 1k to 3k. No? I agree that Sidney Powell would be a good choice to break this though.

1
Smudgerator 1 point ago +1 / -0

On second thought, Benford’s against the set of all the Ratios at all the update times might well be interesting...

27
SryServiceDown 27 points ago +27 / -0

Commenting for visibility.

I am honored to be kicking it with people like you pedes. We will talk of this to our grandkids.

KAG

26
Jestre 26 points ago +26 / -0

The entirety of the deep state, hundreds of democrat lawyers, foreign governments, and the mainstream media versus Trump, a handful of lawyers, and an army of autists. Who wins?

6
CaptainShortyShorts 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not fucking tired of winning!!!

25
username20 25 points ago +25 / -0

Great job. Please don't let this get buried. Anyone on twitter? Mods?

20
DJTrumpMAGA 20 points ago +20 / -0

It's clear that the votes were throttled. The software is taking all votes and slowly distributing them to Biden while sprinkling in Trump. This ensures Biden gets enough votes. At the end of the voting scam the software adds enough Trump votes to balance out the Trump loss.

20
shotgunrebel 20 points ago +20 / -0

Great stuff

19
HodgeTwin 19 points ago +19 / -0

Send to trump

6
AsaNisiMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

This.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
14
TrumpsThirdLeg 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yep, that's the gist of what he's saying. This way you get the manipulated votes you need to bump Biden, but you obfuscate the fact you're adding votes for Biden by shifting the manipulation around to different places at different times to pick up the votes.

11
EdwardSolomon [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes.

-6
Anon_Army -6 points ago +6 / -12

I'm a promoted guy in the Data group. I've been looking this over and discussing with OP, I'm leaning towards this being a nothingburger, careful guys.

Feel free to argue against this, I'd like OP to be right actually, but.

I think if we presume precincts are updated in groups, it's not unreasonable that out of the 1703 precincts, the ratio of 1 or 2 or 3 of them are going to match one or two or three precincts from the next timestep update.

This is also because the vote counts are low, and it's Philadelphia, so the ratios are already going to be low and simple for trump. It's not surprising the ratio in one out of 1703 of these precincts is 2:31 or whatever.

That's why you would see a group of precincts change the ratio at once, if the vote batch was for the entire group. All the ratios would change of course. And it's likely one or two of the precincts after the update, would match the previous ratio. This is not surprising, it doesn't mean the ratio was "transferred".

I think OP is vastly overstating his case. Be careful.

I think there is fraud and problems, but I don't want to blow our load on something flimsy.

Spamming in a few places here to get word out. Again, feel free to criticize my logic, I'd be happy to be wrong, but this looks like normal behavior.

15
EyesInTheHills 15 points ago +15 / -0

Of course the guy proving fraud with spreadsheets also plays Eve...

17
EdwardSolomon [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yep.

Spreadsheets online.

4
LittleGlowingFriend 4 points ago +4 / -0

Clintons kill Gamer-Americans, be careful OP!

1
Pepega 1 point ago +1 / -0

I specialized more in laggy ass mega space battles, only played spread sheets to buy cheapest shit lol

15
BidensHairyLegs 15 points ago +15 / -0

Mods please sticky. Great, great work pede. When the truth is on your side, there's no limits as to what we can do.

15
BinLid 15 points ago +15 / -0

To the OP. Early in the video you flick briefly to your desktop where the background would seem to be a photo of you and your wife. You may want to edit that segment out to avoid being identified. Great work btw!

4
Luckyftw 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm identifying the man as a fuckin stud.

15
thesas 15 points ago +15 / -0

Holy crap.dude - I just watched your video. You are THE MAN! .We need to get this to.Trumps team. Can we start assessing other data from other states with the dominion sw? This is awesome!!!!!!!!!!

14
Dessert4TWO69 14 points ago +14 / -0

Real science, having hundreds of pedes duplicating the results.

14
Hairy_Mouse 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm not a mathematician or statistician...

How significant and accurate is this?

Has this been mentioned anywhere, or is this a major breakthrough?

16
pithys 16 points ago +16 / -0

If I'm understanding it correctly: The likelihood of different precincts having the exact ratio of biden to trump votes throughout the day is literally incredible. Each precinct is counting different votes from different people. There's no way throughout the day the ratio could remain the same from different locations

8
Mukato 8 points ago +8 / -0

Worse than incredible, on the same order of impossible as you phasing through a solid brick wall. Technically could happen on an intimate timescale, but infinitesimally small odds.

7
cryogen 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's also my question. There are so many data points that it's hard for me to know what's natural coincidence and what's not.

4
swimmingguy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Switching by itself is not weird. But switching the same ratio within a very close period of time is weird. And that happening many times, with many different strange ratios, definitely shows some human maniuplation

14
hisnamewasjeff 14 points ago +14 / -0

SEND THIS TO TRUMP'S TEAM, CROWDER, BANNON AND OTHER BASED PEDES

14
kanyewon 14 points ago +15 / -1

i dont quite understand im about to fall asleep. but i gave an upvote so more awake people can read :)

13
bluetrench 13 points ago +13 / -0 (edited)

Have you tagged Team Trump on Twitter? Please confirm that you've reached out to them!!

Edit: also submit it to their fraud-gathering site(s)

13
gqsone 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sticky

13
CAPatriot2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is big! Awesome job, my fellow pede! I would send this to the Trump team ASAP.

8
Boruzu 8 points ago +8 / -0

Absolutely. Get this material to the Trump team at maximum freaking speed.

12
OmgYoshiPlz 12 points ago +12 / -0

gotta cut this vid down, and have both. apebrained dems wont understand it if it doesnt have a graph attached.

1
Data 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do we need Dems to understand it? They wouldn't believe it even if you pared it down to 3 words: Joe Biden Lost. But their understanding, agreement, and acceptance aren't required for any of this. The only thing that matters is Donald Trump gets inaugurated in January for his second term.

12
JosephCraig 12 points ago +12 / -0

Shared on Parlor, Enjoyed getting the credit for a couple minutes before I felt guilty enough to admit I was just sharing for awareness.

24
EdwardSolomon [S] 24 points ago +24 / -0

Please share it everywhere.

I don't care about credit.

I did what God put me on this earth to do.

6
Nameless 6 points ago +6 / -0

I got goosebumps because of your comment, patriot!

7
BigPuma 7 points ago +7 / -0

Shared it on Parler as welll

11
Woohan 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm so impressed. You are amazing. Thank you.

10
Zude 10 points ago +10 / -0

What in the fuck...all over TDW and seems like /pol, there's these really brilliant people doing this amazing shit. Kudos to all the people bringing their skills to this problem and producing what basically amounts to expert analysis. I'm totally serious. A lot of really cool stuff coming out.

1
Pepega 1 point ago +1 / -0

wink

9
kekkk 9 points ago +9 / -0

Nice work

9
banumerchantmarine 9 points ago +9 / -0

I love you pedes.

Crowdsourced evidence gathering in an era where the government is at best crippled, inefficient and slow and at worst compromised by globalists.

9
ladylibright 9 points ago +9 / -0

I love our autists so much. We have the smartest men hands down!!!

8
Jfreak7 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm trying to understand, so I'll just recap in my own words and see if that's right. Basically, we see districts using a ratio approach for many hours. That alone is fraud, however, in order to try and hide it, it appears as though these systems had their ratios changed throughout the night from districts to other districts.

What are the chances a district has the same ratio two hours in a row. What are the chances a district has the same ratio three hours in a row. We're expected to believe it's going on for 7 or 8 hours? Crazy.

Is that about right?

12
EdwardSolomon [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0 (edited)

The "pretense" would be that the precinct didn't update its tabulations for several hours.

In reality Dominion is holding the precinct until it reaches a minimum quota AND finds another precinct stuffed full of fresh ballots, that could could take as little as an hour, to eight/ten hours. Then it releases the precinct and seizes another precinct and applies the same ratio.

The old precinct (that was released), now counts its votes without any fraud (unless it is seized again later).

2
Granny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ed can you graph your data, Sidney likes graphs.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
BigPuma 4 points ago +4 / -0

Think from Biden's perspective. They need the downtime and ratios to hold in the precincts in order to "create" ballots. That's assuming they were smart enough to do it.

8
FoxTail 8 points ago +8 / -0

PA seemed to screw up a lot of peoples votes in the burbs

7
TrumpsThirdLeg 7 points ago +7 / -0

PA was definitely ground zero for fuckery as far as i can tell from everything I've looked at.

7
foom 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sticky!

7
TDRefugee1 7 points ago +7 / -0

WOW! Great work

7
Skatemyboard 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sticky pls

6
YagamiFire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Color me intrigued. I will be watching this! Make sure to get this over to the autists on /pol as they will almost assuredly work to vet it and compare it to other places. They love shit like this

6
SaintPablo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Excellent work!!

6
StaryHickory 6 points ago +6 / -0

HO LEE FUK

GUYS

This guy has it, this shit is unmistakable. And this is the tip of the iceberg. If we analyze the data enough we could essentially reverse engineer the code that was used.

This guy has one piece of it. But it fucking clear as day.

1
rootofjesse 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. It is being independently verified by others. If correct, then similar traces of same manipulation can be found in other data sets(precincts) across the country.

Don't be surprised if all hell breaks loose before this gets recognized en mass or by a court.

6
trumplandslide 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can you share it with Sidney Powell?

6
Varukers 6 points ago +6 / -0

just a normie but i fully understand this video and feel like this is the proof needed to win, thanks dude really appreciate it good work

6
GuyOnABuffalo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sticky this, please.

5
veon784 5 points ago +5 / -0

You may have saved the election figuring this out man. I cannot commend you enough how great of a job you did.

5
pxmose 5 points ago +5 / -0

did anyone grab the video and squirrel it away?

5
Jjabrams 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holy heck! !

5
WildSauce 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is huge. It is obfuscated enough that it would never be caught if we didn't have the timestamped data, which for most elections we don't get. It would be obvious if a precinct held the same fraction the entire night, but by switching the fractions around they gain plausible deniability for each individual precinct while still maintaining control over the entire population. I'm incredibly impressed that you found this. This information needs to get into the right hands.

5
pxmose 5 points ago +5 / -0

Get the video off of youtube.

5
Eaglebro 5 points ago +5 / -0

Great cyberhacking pede!