Comments (815)
sorted by:
sully [S] 1763 points ago +1770 / -7 (edited)

MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh
WI - Amy Coney Barrett
PA - Samuel A. Alito
GA - Clarence Thomas

Lets go boisssss

Edit: Oh dang my first sticky!! Thanks mods! Love youuuuu

fazzman23 480 points ago +485 / -5

Sucks for arizona and Nevada tho

PatrioticMemeLord 338 points ago +344 / -6

It's because we don't need SCOTUS for those two states the margins are so close.

giggitybooped 304 points ago +307 / -3

Fact check me on this but I believe Trump has an endgame which is SCOTUS but he did mention in one of his meetings a few weeks back that it could go to the supreme court but that it's possible it may not even NEED to go to the SCOTUS.

JohnDoe81627 256 points ago +256 / -0

It won't need to get to SCOTUS because SCOTUS justices are heading down to the circuit court of appeals

giggitybooped 196 points ago +196 / -0

Could you do a small ELI5 around this process for the dummies out there like me?

deleted 379 points ago +379 / -0 (edited)
SoNoRiko 194 points ago +194 / -0

This is mindblowing... I had no idea the SCOTUS functioned like this.

I'll have to research this later but still wow.

giggitybooped 105 points ago +105 / -0

You da best, thanks, Pede!

Mathelm 103 points ago +103 / -0 (edited)

13 circuits - (1-11. Federal and DC circuits)

DC, Federal, and Fourth is Chief Roberts (MD, NC, SC, WV, VA)
First is Breyer, (ME, MA, NH, PR, RI)
Second is Sotomayor (CN, NY VT)
Third and Fifth is Alito (DE, NJ, PA, VI -- LA, MS, TX)
Sixth and Eighth is Kavanaugh ( KY, MI, OH, TN -- AK, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD)
Seventh is Barrett ( IL, IN, WI)
Tenth is Gorsuch ( CO, KS, NM, OK, UT, WY)
Eleventh is Thomas ( AL, FL, GA)

DoIMAGAYouHornyBaby 42 points ago +42 / -0

Thank you for that answer. I was a bit curious myself.

dingua 26 points ago +26 / -0

There are thirteen circuit courts, and the justices are reactive, not proactive, in relation to them.

SirPoopsAlot 21 points ago +21 / -0

I upvoted and realized I'm slightly dumber cause I didn't ask the question first 🙃 😅

deleted -16 points ago +6 / -22
Thekraken 14 points ago +15 / -1

Biden can’t appeal a appeal doesn’t work that way

Zytos 38 points ago +38 / -0

I'm not so sure about that. Whoever loses at the circuit level--be it Biden or Trump--will unquestionably appeal to the Supreme Court.

SocalPede 103 points ago +103 / -0

And what's biden going to appeal to the supreme court? That it's not fair that his coup was defeated? Fuck that guy in half, until he catches fire. It's over and he knows it. All that's left now is negotiating his way out of the complete destruction of his party.

"I am the democrat party." - Joe Biden "I don't need your vote to get elected." - Joe Biden "It's great that my married son and my other son's widow started smoking crack together and banging" - Joe Biden

Limaro 89 points ago +89 / -0

"Fuck that guy in half until he catches fire." is my new favorite sentence.

GlacialSpeed 36 points ago +36 / -0

I love this place

Leakedgenderfluid 29 points ago +29 / -0

“Fuck that guy in half” 😂😂😂

SenorTrumper 21 points ago +21 / -0

Hunter also fucked his niece Natalie on video.

Marshall 6 points ago +6 / -0

They always appeal based on misapplication of the law and seek relief at the next level. Sometimes they are heard and sometimes not. The assignment suggests an appeal to SCOTUS is more likely than not.

CuckerCarlson 40 points ago +40 / -0

It would be so funny if Biden had to appeal. Then we can all meme like "BUT U R RUINING MUH ELECTION INTEGRITY!!! THE COURTS HAVE SPOKEN!!!"

stonetears_anus 24 points ago +25 / -1

Bingo, but it gives us a win for the optics.

NotTheTendies 16 points ago +16 / -0

I have a feeling Biden won't appeal anything

DrBJTester 12 points ago +12 / -0

Except an early parole from prison on humanitarian grounds because he's near death and suffering dementia.

Thekraken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump is already the challenger bub 😂

inTDwetrust 28 points ago +28 / -0

Can you elaborate please? How does that work?

deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0 (edited)
inTDwetrust 18 points ago +18 / -0

I see. So they are not participating in those circuits other than overseeing them? This is to get the election cases fast tracked to SCOTUS?

chesswhilehigh 10 points ago +10 / -0

Also please elaborate. I’m confused on what this technically means.

sideOfBeef2016 7 points ago +8 / -1


MAGAmigo 38 points ago +40 / -2 (edited)

Correct. But SCOTUS is a double edged sword. They will not take any case on this election unless their decision would be dispositive of the result. Ie trump needs to put enough states in play either through recounts, audits lawsuits or legislatures refusing to certify such that the SCOTUS decision determines the election outcome.

They will not take the case if his relief is “moot,” that is, if he wins it he still would not become President because there are not enough electoral votes in question

Thus, the strategy at present is to win enough lawsuits, get enough legislatures to refuse to certify, or straight up toss enough votes out that the case, when presented to SCOTUS would decide the election. To do this, Trump needs to remove enough Biden votes that he is below 270, and put enough states in play such that Trump will have 270 if he wins before SCOTUS. Depending on whose count we listen to, Trump has already accomplished the former. He is in process of achieving the latter

SCOTUS is in fact, a parallel avenue to the emergency election clause of the constitution. He can win by SCOTUS, or by state legislatures nominating “faithless objectors” as their electoral college representatives, thereby triggering a vote in the House for President and a Vote in Senate for VP.

TPG4Life 14 points ago +14 / -0

but rulings from WI, MI, PA, and GA would be enough to overturn? i think im confused

MAGAmigo 28 points ago +28 / -0 (edited)

It depends what those rulings say.

If a Supreme Court of any of those states says “x amount of votes are invalid” or “the vote cannot be certified.”

That will be a victory for Trump as it relates to positioning himself for a win before the Highest 9.

In this regard it is critical the GoP in these states follows the lead of PA and clark County, MI. Refusal to certify takes the decision away from the Courts, which at the state level, contain liberal, shill, extrajudicial legislators fashioned in black robes. I clerked in a Superior Court. Judges are highly partisan people.

PresidentErectHunter 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is confusing. Wayne County Detroit board refused to certify.

But the two GOP leaders of the Michigan State Legislature promised that they would not appoint Trump Electors.

Now the only hope is If the SCOTUS voids the Election.

But it would be much easier if the Michigan State Legislature does it. The Constitution allows the Michigan State Legislature to do it but the GOP leaders are absolutely refusing. state GOP are saying that it is not in the spirit of the law to overturn the popular vote and will of these people.

Trump is down 150,000 votes in Michigan.

Niburc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is certification at risk in Pennsylvania other than via judicial means? I knew about the Michigan local board refusal but didn’t think there was a realistic path in Pa. outside of the courtroom.

BlondeBombshell88 10 points ago +10 / -0

major props for this comment.

SirPoopsAlot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks for this man!

megapat100x 6 points ago +6 / -0

i didnt understand a god damn thing you wrote.

GoopNIL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Faithless electors, not objectors, I think you mean.

DemsFuckKids 18 points ago +18 / -0

Given the libs false hope to crunch them harder

xkgb 11 points ago +11 / -0

Possible endgame strategy:


spinometer 9 points ago +9 / -0

The civil lawsuits are one track. I hope there is a criminal track too.

terrichris 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ring. Ring. Ring. Clue Phone. DOJ/FBI, it's for you.

AndrewLB 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're probably working on prosecuting Trump supporters and the laptop repair guy.

InRevelation12now 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't dispute the legal options being discussed here, but I would not label any of these steps 'end game'. The final decision is made in Congress. The House has the power to toss out a whole state's electoral votes. If that means nobody has 270, then triggers choice to be made by who? The House. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/heres-how-trump-wins-take-fight-to-house-where-rules-favor-gop That's last ditch Constitutional protection, but call it the end game if you want.

Niburc 4 points ago +4 / -0

So the House can toss a state’s electors regardless of what the state wants?

Notaliberal 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, because the new house delegates will then cast a vote on behalf of the states, the electoral will be put aside. Right now the Republicans have more house delegates than the Dems since we flipped a few seats in some key places. From my understanding.

Marshall 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the new Congress has a quorum and there are disputed slates of electors, they decide which ones are legitimate. If that results in no candidate receiving a majority, then it;s thrown to the House for President with Pence presiding and 1 vote per state delegation. VP is done by the Senate and presided over by the Speaker pro tem of the Senate.

Test_user21 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because it's a federal election. Federal rules, for a federal position.

Back in 1787 it was more feasible for each state to do things rather than centralize it - but the Founders realised that that opened the doors to fraud.

MadRussian 5 points ago +6 / -1

That's just silly.

SilverBackTrump 71 points ago +71 / -0

Kagan is the best of the liberal justices so if we are going to be stuck with one I would much rather it be her than the others.

macfoo 59 points ago +60 / -1

agree. she is actually intelligent and well-considered in her opinions, more intellectually honest than the others. the goblina is like literally a stupid person. breyer is 100% predictable. Kagan surprises once in a while.

SoldierofKek 38 points ago +38 / -0 (edited)

As a "wise Latina'. That really pisses me off that certain minorities are allowed to claim some knowledge the rest of us aren't privy to by virtue of their race. I should demand a job at NASA. As a "wise" Teutonic American, I have special insight into rocket science. Fuck these SJWs.

PikachuJohnson 10 points ago +10 / -0

I mean, without former German scientists (like von Braun), America wouldn't have gotten to the Moon, so you're not wrong lol.

AndrewLB 4 points ago +4 / -0

We would have. It just would have taken longer.

Test_user21 4 points ago +4 / -0

You mean Scottish- about 90% of the science involved in getting to the moon came from the Scots

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
reignenergydrink 7 points ago +7 / -0

muh noble savages

AOCs_tits 29 points ago +29 / -0

The goblina! Perfect.

Sarthax 29 points ago +29 / -0

So sexist. it's goblinx.

AOCs_tits 10 points ago +10 / -0

What's wrong with being sexy? said in spinal tap voice

The_General_Patton 6 points ago +6 / -0

Smell the glove!

YourTendiesWillBurn 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kissing a goblinx

Adjudicating goblinx

In bed with a goblinx

Ergh, ergh, dump it!

PineAppleMan247 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's actually pretty good to know. I'm glad to know that there are liberal SCOTUS justices I can at least understand, if not agree with.

Kind of like how RBG despite being a huge partisan liberal was one of Justice Scalia's closest friends.

inquimouse 29 points ago +29 / -0

Scalia made friends with her and took her shooting.

GameOnGlobalists 23 points ago +23 / -0

Then they took Scalia shooting.

Peart44 7 points ago +7 / -0

Cheney style?

IsrorOrca 17 points ago +17 / -0

This! She's one of the most reasonable liberal justices I've seen.

Goodcook1 12 points ago +12 / -0

That's my train of thought. You never know. I won't hold my breath, but I've been shocked before. Besides, even if a lone judge rules, can't it still be put through to a full court vote with enough push back? Maybe I read the rulings incorrectly, but this process seems like an express SCOTUS ruling, but if need be, could still be heard in a full setting.

FuckPlebbit 10 points ago +10 / -0

Definitely better than breyer or sotomeyer.

I don't think Kagan will rule in our favor anyway but I could see a far more nuanced opinion pre-SCOTUS ruling then from those two.

Dictator_Bob 18 points ago +18 / -0

Sotamayer is on Connecticut, New York, Vermont. So far as I can tell that is very good.

The-unflattering-6 16 points ago +16 / -0

I'm glad she holds court there because let's be honest - those are throwaway states anyway. Those of us in the rest of America should always be skeptical of anyone who comes from there.

Dictator_Bob 8 points ago +8 / -0

We will win all three states again. It likely won't be as a Republican party. However, importantly, the party that wins them will not be a disloyal party. That will be a big win for our nation as a whole.

deleted 16 points ago +31 / -15
supremeisland 30 points ago +34 / -4

lol i think you meant illegals

DIARRHEA_FIGHT 20 points ago +22 / -2

I love being here and I'm not a faggot but seeing people say "mexican" instead of "illegal" is a bit of a wtf for me.

orthodoxvirginian 12 points ago +14 / -2

Yeah. I used to get into fights 20 years ago when people called my wife a Mexican when she is an American of Salvadoran descent. It's just willful ignorance. Hispanic is the best term, Latino is ok but becoming the preferred leftist term since Hispanic is "too closely related to Spain, which were colonial meanies." Only use the demonym if applicable.

AOCs_tits 9 points ago +9 / -0

No Latinx? Oh yeah that term was made up by white academics.

christianknight 8 points ago +8 / -0

Latin or Spanish works. Heard a black guy call a guy Latin after robbing him in south FL. Latin sounds dignified.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
AndrewLB 1 point ago +1 / -0

Latino\Latina is the preferred word if you're speaking of their race.

orthodoxvirginian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hispanic/Latino is not a race. There are Hispanics of all races and combinations thereof. It is an ethno-cultural category.

The term Hispanic refers to anyone from Spain or Latin America who speaks Spanish. Brazilians are not Hispanic. Spaniards are Hispanic.

Latino refers to anyone from Latin America. Brazilians are Latinos. Spaniards are not Latinos.

Modern leftists have begun using the term Latino (and now Latinx) over Hispanic because Hispanic has "colonialist" connotations. That is why I almost exclusively use the term Hispanic. That is, unless I am referring to my hot Latina wife, because "hot Latina wife" rolls off the tongue better :P

The-unflattering-6 7 points ago +7 / -0

I like how you qualified your statement by saying "I'm not a faggot."

DIARRHEA_FIGHT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just lettin ya know where I'm coming from

MakeCaliRedAgain_202 6 points ago +6 / -0

Illegals come in so many forms that it’s really the only accurate definition. I’ll probably be judged a bit for this, but one of my buddies got arrested for human trafficking not too long ago and it was Chinese dudes that he was bringing across the border.

BeardedNinjaPede 0 points ago +1 / -1


MakeCaliRedAgain_202 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol He already got arrested for it.

cincydan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't take offense. It's an old habit for many. One of my favorite persons ever is of Hispanic descent, I have said Mexicans before to him and regretted it, but he knew what I meant and never batted an eye.

AndrewLB 2 points ago +2 / -0

No Latino likes being told they're from a country they're not. Heck, that kinda goes for just about everyone. Call a Greek or Bulgarian a Turk and hope you can run fast.

Dictator_Bob 4 points ago +8 / -4

I like faggot Mexicans. I like some of the faggot illegals too, however, they have to go back.

DwellerMike 7 points ago +8 / -1

Which are mexicans. Or canadians for that matter.

Axiom502 9 points ago +9 / -0

Canadians are Snow Mexicans

Friar_Pede 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hondurans and Guatemalans

bluebahloo 18 points ago +18 / -0


The-unflattering-6 4 points ago +4 / -0


supremeisland 0 points ago +5 / -5

lol whatever floats your boat mate

AnotherPedeInTheWall 5 points ago +5 / -0

If they are here and are Mexican, that would be illegal i suppose.

supremeisland 2 points ago +3 / -1

ahhhh i see what you did there, they should be American

deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1 (edited)
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
MichelleIsAMan 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think we’re starting to see that maybe they didn’t. I don’t believe this voter fraud started this year.

Pedeville 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ofc it didnt. This exact same shit happened in midterms and 2016

PikachuJohnson 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. They just didn't go all-in because they didn't think there was a chance in Fucking, Hell that Trump would actually be elected.

202020242028 7 points ago +8 / -1

Just goes above Circuit to Supreme. Make some precedents along the way.

AmericaFirstMAGA88 74 points ago +75 / -1

Do we need to go 4 for 4 in these states? Hopefully everyone holds the line

the_pragmaticist 73 points ago +73 / -0

No, any three will do.

jubyeonin 47 points ago +47 / -0

We got MI, PA, and GA. 😊

berson129 44 points ago +44 / -0

POTUS has always sounded optimistic avout WI for some reason

Rufinator 28 points ago +28 / -0

I think its WI that the algorithm going haywire is the most obvious (or at least thats the first one I saw)

juicemoney9 7 points ago +7 / -0

He damn well should be

Sanctii 15 points ago +15 / -0

Wisconsin actually seems the easiest to me.

jubyeonin 3 points ago +3 / -0


TrumpSavedWesternCiv 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'm not the person you were asking, but I would say it is because their numbers are so blatantly false. There is absolutely no way that the entire state had 90% voter turnout.

jubyeonin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thanks. I was thinking PA because they destroyed the evidence after Alito's order.

Shakakka99 30 points ago +30 / -0

Fuck that. I want all 4 + the other ones the Prez is entitled to. NOTHING LESS.

SnapperL 8 points ago +8 / -0

A tie from 2 would also be a win.

Groz699 37 points ago +37 / -0

we need 3 out of 4. Any combination of 3 will get us to 270.

deleted 54 points ago +54 / -0
nocrazies 31 points ago +31 / -0

Second this. He loses PA hes below 270, He loses WI and MA hes below 270, mix and match as you like. once Biden drops below 270 its contested even if Trump hasn't certified to 270 yet it goes to the legislatures. This is the best case for us; then we can see by vote who's with the Average American and who is not.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Vla1ne 5 points ago +5 / -0

if i'm correct, then they couldn't even if they wanted to, it's the prisoners dilemma, If they turn on him without a guarantee of victory and fail, they die in the cold with nobody to support them, and even if they win, we all know they'll have several strong challengers on their ass next election ready to take them out. Trump put people in office just by being trump. nobody wants to fuck with a kingmaker unless they have a guarantee of winning.

mittens is a guaranteed turncoat, but the rest of them stood with him through impeachment, so i've got at least that much trust that they'll stand with him for the second term. He won so hard he broke their system, that likely has even the RINOs shook enough to walk on the straight and narrow for long enough to get him back in office, while the DINOs likely saw how disgusting this event as a whole was, and might vote for him simply for their own sense of honor.

GoopNIL 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want to think that's true, but then I see how the cucks in GA are treating Trump, and I have to wonder. The Republican Party still has too many traitors in its midst.

2020boogaloo 29 points ago +29 / -0

^ this, he doesn’t need to flip the state, just show it is hopelessly fraudulent.

morphagent 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is the way.

The-unflattering-6 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is the way.

IHerdUlikeMAGAkips 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dis is de way.

Notaliberal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Da wae

Sumarongi 33 points ago +34 / -1 (edited)

Another scenario. Results are invalidated. Neither candidate gets 270. Vote gets kicked to delegations in the house

BuyPepe 27 points ago +27 / -0

Or civil war because the American people (patriots) won’t stand for a rigged election. Any way I see it, we won.

KristiNoemFaceFuck 19 points ago +19 / -0

We win if it goes to house delegations as long as the state GOPs don't cuck out. You know the left will literally try to kill them if it gets that far so I'm hoping Trump has a way to keep these guys safe.

Sumarongi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, that’s the last backstop

Paul-Revere 11 points ago +12 / -1

Epoch Times had a good video recently about that scenario. Sounds very hopeful.

Hold the line. Keep donating. Keep prepping. Keep praying!!!

fazzman23 5 points ago +5 / -0

Republicans have slim majority with state houses. Can anyone verify? Is it 26 to 24 or 28 to 22....I've heard both

cryogen 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think it was 26-24 before 2020. It probably increased slightly after house gains.

basedBlumpkin 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe it's 26 to 24 with the other 2 being independents

HolyGrail20 3 points ago +3 / -0

No way there are two states where independents control the majority of seats in their respective's congress, is there?

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
Cropgun 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the play

deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
jerryjerry 27 points ago +27 / -0

3 out of the 4 will put us over 270 as Trump has 232 right now. Don't leave out AZ, NV, and something about NM and VA came up yesterday from Rudy.

MI:16, WI:10, PA:20, GA:16

DickTick 15 points ago +15 / -0


Wal_Mart_Security 34 points ago +34 / -0

Joker: Here. We. Go...

Deadpool 25 points ago +26 / -1

My god the Trumpian 4D chess!

sketchy_at_best 13 points ago +33 / -20

It's high time for some gang rape and high tech lynchings motherfuckers

giggitybooped 29 points ago +32 / -3

"It's high time for some gang rape." ...don't stoop to the swamp's level.

sketchy_at_best 19 points ago +20 / -1

It was figurative. I was referring to the personal destruction of Kavanaugh and Thomas.

giggitybooped 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know, Pede :) was a joke because most of us are aware of the rumors around some private island "getaway" owned by some rich guy that flew his gang of other richies over in some private jet for these "events".

IHerdUlikeMAGAkips 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah they kinda got borked. :^)

VoteCyborgTrump2040 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't get in his way or you might get boofed, motherfucker!

arterius2 290 points ago +301 / -11 (edited)

Courts are just formalities, Trump has his trump card reserved for the very last moment, and when released it will apparently "shock you to your core" 😉

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ty9Rj4t_kY

Chopblock 211 points ago +212 / -1

Is it his 70 million-strong army of pissed-off patriots and ‘pedes? Because all he needs to do is say ‘go’.

GenericInsult 94 points ago +95 / -1

^ This is true.

deleted -55 points ago +21 / -76
GenericInsult 51 points ago +56 / -5

OK Doomer

Cropgun 1 point ago +15 / -14

You are confusing a realist with a doomer. I will happily fire the first shot.

Thedaythe_redditdied -6 points ago +13 / -19 (edited)

I don’t see 70 million people in this country refusing to wear a mask. I don’t think mask pussies are going to pick up a gun and fight. Don’t get me wrong we don’t need 70 million to win. But seriously it would be a couple million.

Edit: Any down voters feel free to point out a place where less than 50% wear a mask into a grocery store. I’ll wait.

keoyome 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, I wear a mask but I'm not anal about it. If I leave it in the car, then that's where it stays until I leave the store.

Five_Star_Amenities 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not very many in my town wear one. Maybe one in 50.

Lovepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think the mask is a battle worthy to die for. Elected representation is.

TheClassicalLiberal 1 point ago +1 / -0

I live in NYC. I don't wear one while walking but will not be allowed in stores without a mask.

I still have dipshits making a wide circle away from me or walking off the sidewalk into the street.

Makes for a funny/sad/annoying walk.

deleted -3 points ago +4 / -7
Shayhawk 22 points ago +22 / -0

Way more than we need to finish off these fucks on the left.

knightofday 5 points ago +5 / -0

And that’s ALL that matters!

WinnerPlaysTCU 17 points ago +17 / -0

350,000 armed and pissed off Pedes, many of whom I imagine have prepped if youre saying only the extremes will show up first, is a pretty damn good start

Five_Star_Amenities 3 points ago +3 / -0

350,001. I decided to join when I heard there was going to be cheese.

TexasPiper 10 points ago +10 / -0

Even assuming that is correct (which it isn’t) that’s still 350k. That is a substantial force.

rektspec 2 points ago +2 / -0

People’s Liberation Army has only 1 million soybois so assuming 1 pede can take out 3 PLA, these odds are well good.

TexasPiper 2 points ago +2 / -0

3? Gotta pump those numbers up!

hillaryforprison 10 points ago +10 / -0

We know which side has most of the guns and which side will win. Not the side that calls everything with a long black handle an 'assault rifle'.

Philhelm 28 points ago +28 / -0

Imagine the glory to be had to serve in the name of the God-Emperor.

nocompromise 25 points ago +25 / -0

As a cheese maker I would be honored to fight alongside you pedes

2020boogaloo 25 points ago +25 / -0

Blessed are the cheese makers

MegoThor 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Emperor protects!

Overlord 6 points ago +6 / -0


Chopblock 6 points ago +6 / -0

Imagine the joy of bringing a reckoning to answer the silenced cries for justice from the hundreds of millions of victims of communism

IncredibleMrE1 11 points ago +11 / -0

70 100 million

45stoppin_powa 10 points ago +10 / -0

80 million.

-f-b-i- 9 points ago +9 / -0

Maybe 90

PEPE_the_Frog 10 points ago +10 / -0

the real number of that army is

90 million STRONG

DickTick 79 points ago +79 / -0

Phrases like that are not meant for us.... That is something that way too many people around here don't understand and they get let down time and time again.... They don't mean that it will shock us to our core, fuck we're the ones that found most of the fraud. They mean that it will shock normal average people to the core. People that don't get online for more than to say hi to Grandma....

Captain-D 49 points ago +49 / -0

I agree. I've also learned that lesson over my years in this saga. The "bombshells" are almost always things I've slowly watched unfold here/Reddit wherever and not new to me. It's definitely for the normies.

What more "bombshell" is there than a ballot machine company being a front for globally organized and weaponized election manipulation software that has been used to control elections and the entire populace for decades and was used to propel a 78 year old corrupt man in mental decline to President of the United States as a ploy to Trojan Horse in the socialist takeover of America in partnership with the Chinese Communist Party as part of the Great Reset to execute Globalism around the world, made possible by a Chinese bio weapon called COVID-19 that made the worlds citizens hostages in their own homes so it could destroy the world economy?

deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
Kneel4Jesus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly. What a time to be alive. We've learned all this over time, and weren't as shocked about the election fraud. Even then, with all that info, many here have been in shock/doubt the last month. But for the typical person just trying to live their life this will be too much. Some will accept it, but others won't be able to cope: they'll shut down, break down, or deny it.

The time is here for "normies" to accept and confront this uncomfortable truth (everything you've described) or to stick with the comfortable lie (it's hard for anyone to be humble and accept they've been duped by the people and organizations they trust)

Captain-D 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's too much, I'm exhausted, lol. Sometimes I wish I were blissfully ignorant but I've come way too far to turn back now. And, I didn't even get into lizard people and pizza maps...

JesusisKing 5 points ago +5 / -0

its fantastic though because it frenzies our most schitzo into surging for new evidence.

Shamb3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah we are all aware of most of the irregularities and many of the affidavits.

Hard proof and people going to jail / being punished would shock me at this point :D.

Xnyr21 27 points ago +29 / -2

I would give up my life for this to be true. Seriously, if for some reason Trump showed up and said "I have the evidence but the only way it can come out is if you die" id put a bullet in my head.

prospektor 36 points ago +36 / -0

Let me rephrase Patton on this: The objective here is not to die for our cause, but to make the other guy die for his.

nocompromise 12 points ago +12 / -0

I appreciate the sentiment. I also would be glad to lay my life down for my country. But it would be better, if it came to war, that we help the commies lay down their lives for... uh well it's not really a country. I guess they would be dying so that boys can use girl's bathrooms, or so that they can be inferior to other races, or so that pedophiles can rule them, or... man it sucks to be them. It reminds me of a quote from POTUS: "Some of them will look back and wonder if they made the right choice."

whatlike_withacloth 11 points ago +11 / -0

No dumb bastard ever won a war by going out and dying for his country. He won it by making some other dumb bastard die for his country.

General George S. Patton

Ithrowawaay 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very true, but what gets me all amped up is: you have to first be willing to lay your life on the line for that which you believe in.

I would. If this is our Great War, BRING IT ON.

I am not as as prepared as I would like, in the event, but I’ll be much more prepared than my adversaries.

jsmith81 2 points ago +3 / -1

To be honest? Me too. Does it make me a hero? Mmmyes, most certainly. But I too would put a bullet in your head if it was the only way the evidence could come out.

edit: thanks for the gold kind stranger!

Thoreauly 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh really?

jpark 5 points ago +6 / -1

Can you expound?

arterius2 13 points ago +15 / -2 (edited)

I think the recent military activities can point to this, the unprecedented military aircraft flights are also an indication. With the latest news of Christopher Miller asking all spec op leaders to report to him directly, that seems to seal the deal. CIA/FBI at this point is all but defunct.

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ty9Rj4t_kY

Ferzth 10 points ago +10 / -0

Truth. Seems that Miller is trying (and pray to God) succeeding in undercutting whatever "army" the CIA/NSA/FBI think they can call on when this shit goes hot.

And bringing the troops home is a brilliant play by GEOTUS. "Hey Private, some REMF is telling you that some administrative flunky in some alphabet government agency, is giving you orders to commit treason and sedition, by refusing to uphold and defend your Oath and the Constitution, against all enemies, foreign and domestic, by acting against the legally and Constitutionally-elected civilian government of Presiden Donald Trump. Oh, and the President wanted to bring you all home before Christmas, but we in the New World Order pooh-pooh-ed that idea."

Clearly too much thalidomide in the drinking water of most Liberals.

fazzman23 244 points ago +246 / -2

Fucking huge news....all the states with obvioua fraud have a conservative justice

rethek 73 points ago +73 / -0

So does this mean that even if they certify the fraudulent votes, we just overrule them in the courts?

cryogen 73 points ago +73 / -0

It means that whatever legal shit has to be slogged through we have light at the end of the tunnel (assuming the justices don't betray what they stand for).

SpaceManifestDestiny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kavanaugh and Thomas are safe bets. Alito maybe a bit less so. Barrett is still up in the air, but I'm betting she'll land on her feet.

SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

? Alito has already ruled against Boockvar the corrupt SoS in PA.

Viewer01 20 points ago +20 / -0

It means we're going to get a fair shake to prove ourselves in court. Which is all we can really ask for.

They've sent most of the trump appointees to critical battle ground states, so it'll be really hard for us to argue with the results.

BasedStatue 16 points ago +16 / -0


Zuko_Epic 26 points ago +26 / -0

So libtards are in charge of Arizon and Nevada?

fazzman23 29 points ago +29 / -0

at the circuit level yes. But then it can go to the Supreme court

BidenCrimeFamily 8 points ago +8 / -0

But the best libtard justice. She is actually OK sometimes.

BuSpocky 1 point ago +1 / -0


WishdoctorsSong 16 points ago +16 / -0

Maracopa county would like a word with you regarding obvious fraud.

supersecretaccount82 7 points ago +11 / -4

Luckily AZ's governor sounds pretty based, unlike Kemp. I think he's ordering an audit or refusing to certify on his own.

Arizona_pede 17 points ago +17 / -0

Ducey is a big RINO cuck. You should hear how many times he has said "new normal," he's fucking pathetic.

supersecretaccount82 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lame, wasn't aware. Just thought I saw a couple threads here where he was going to delay certification to make sure all lawsuits were cleared, something like that.

Arizona_pede 2 points ago +2 / -0

That might be, but he is as old guard as they come. He answers to the neocons that have taken over the state.

trump_is_lord 5 points ago +5 / -0

I second Arizona_pede's comments. Ducey is far from based. He's a corrupt slimeball.

LoneWolfAlpha 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ducey is trash. AZ resident here

Bldg_2019 14 points ago +14 / -0

Except for Virginia.

HunterBidensLaptop 12 points ago +13 / -1

*A constitutional judge rather than a conservative judge.

PineAppleMan247 171 points ago +173 / -2


A_Triggered_NPC 74 points ago +74 / -0


MikesBigJockstrap 24 points ago +24 / -0

Unlike Pop, I won't ask for half.

HunterBidensReddit 14 points ago +14 / -0

Who knew the Obama Administration has two "big guys" ?

Mike and Joe.

MikesBigJockstrap 11 points ago +11 / -0

Mike can bench 475lbs. That's roughly 20,000 Biden ballots

ShillsBTFO 16 points ago +16 / -0

Laser beams shoot out of Justice Thomas' eyes and destroy Joepedo. Beautiful.

whatlike_withacloth 4 points ago +4 / -0


Will never see this and not lol. Jesus after the kid-touching video what the fuck were they thinking?

chris82tk 11 points ago +11 / -0

I've been waiting 30 years for this, Joseph.

ArcticPharaoh 155 points ago +157 / -2

Georgia: We voted for Biden! Justice Thomas: OH HELL NAH!!

Modus_Pwninz 76 points ago +76 / -0

They might not want to mention Joe Biden's name to ol' Clarence...

Joe Biden's defense team be like "Our candidate..."

CT be like: "Why don't you say his name?"

JBDT: "...As I said, my client..."


JBDT, all NPC faggots: "...George Floyd?"

trumpforeverandever 24 points ago +25 / -1

Hahahaha holy shit

ValhallaGorilla 16 points ago +17 / -1

english, muddafukka, do you speak it?

Sagan 6 points ago +6 / -0

They saved the best case for last, Justice Thomas will be dropping on corn pop

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
TerryDean 4 points ago +4 / -0

My man clarence been waiting along time for this.Bet hes sitting back smoking a cigar as we speak

maga_nificent 118 points ago +118 / -0

JB: C'mon man, you ain't black!

CT: You ain't president!

My life would be near complete if somehow this meme played out in court with SCJ Thomas layin the smackdown in GA.

Trump-Train 46 points ago +46 / -0

I might actually turn to a being of pure Kek and ascend to the 4th Plane where there are no cucks or shills and upvotes flow like water

CreepyJoesOldBalls 18 points ago +19 / -1 (edited)

Where upvotes flock like the salmon of Capistrano.

1A2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

So bizarre, I added that as well when reading his post. Watched Dumb and Dumber too many times.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
TheKekingKing 6 points ago +6 / -0

🌥 Join me 🌥

rossiFan 99 points ago +99 / -0

Justice Thomas identifies directly with the hell that Kavanaugh went through. Payback is a motherfucker.

Vla1ne 56 points ago +56 / -0 (edited)

Kavanaugh was likely a clear reminder to him of how his own case went down, and not a moment too soon. ACB was the unexpected win though. Gotta thank RGB for allowing more conservatives to take the court, and she likely still remembers the shit she had to deal with from the left.

Alito... if the affidavits are even remotely true (which as we have seen, they have been), they ignored his order and mixed hundreds, if not thousands/ tens of thousands of late ballots. He truly needs no introduction.

RawRamen 23 points ago +23 / -0

Gotta thank RGB for allowing more conservatives to take the court

The left praises her but she was just an activist judge her whole life disorting laws as she saw fit. It was her own seflishness for not retiring a decade ago when Obama could have easily replaced her that cost leftists a seat. Not Trump, not Mitch, but RBG. She was never a good judge and if she really gave a damn about any "cause" but herself, she would have resigned long ago.

Vla1ne 7 points ago +7 / -0

Which is why i thank her. If she hadn't hung on till trump took office, we never would have gotten a third judge in there.

chuckachookah 5 points ago +5 / -0

they ignored his order and mixed hundreds, of late ballots.


You mean 10s of 1000s, right, Pede?

Vla1ne 3 points ago +3 / -0

my phone deleted the "if not thousands/ tens of thousands" part of my comment.but yeah, if they find even a few ballots that are from a later date than explicitly told them to stop counting at, or if they cannot identify the ballots that were counted later compared to those counted earlier, then the jig is up.

sustainable_saltmine 63 points ago +64 / -1

yeah but Kagan is 9th. 9th is never going to be a respectable circuit until a conservative Justice is in charge

pyongyangpothead 33 points ago +33 / -0

Turns out, we don't care about their respect now

p8riot 25 points ago +25 / -0

The 9th circuit is much more balanced but still slightly leaning left. So we may as well let them have it, for now. This isn't permanent.

Trump2052 4 points ago +5 / -1

Kagan has diabetes. One cough and we get a 4th justice.

chuckachookah 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sotomayor is the one with diabetes, I believe.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
Trump2052 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be gods way of protecting babies!

MapleLeafMAGA 52 points ago +55 / -3

How does this circuit assignment thing work? I’m not in America unfortunately.

sully [S] 67 points ago +67 / -0

The Chief Justice assigns all the Supreme Court Justices to oversee a section of the country.

Simple_Doot 52 points ago +53 / -1

Can't believe Roberts made these assignments.

Shayhawk 49 points ago +49 / -0

Even Roberts isn't so stupid as to ignore this fraud.

He fucked us on Obamacare but even he can see the writing on the wall and in the end I'll bet he wants to be on the right side of history.

Trump2052 26 points ago +26 / -0

You want to bet on that?

Wallypip3 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's possible that Roberts has always wanted to do right but has been compromised by the blackmail.

If he realized President Trump would win, he could help take em down.

LeftiesAreTheRacists 1 point ago +1 / -0

Double agent Roberts???

Wallypip3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a double agent. Just self serving and compromised. But perhaps no longer.

No_Malarkey_Joe 12 points ago +12 / -0

Didn't Biden block his nomination the first time?

MrWWonka 6 points ago +7 / -1

sure did!

farstriderr 8 points ago +8 / -0

Or he thinks Trump has no case so he's appointing Trump justices so that the Democrat win in the courts he thinks is coming will be accepted.

Ferzth 7 points ago +7 / -0

Roberts is compromised. Somehow, some way, Obambi got to him and/or his family. Perhaps Roberts likes Lolitas, perhaps his wife has some skeletons, perhaps he sold out his oath and Constitution for money or fear or cowardice or politics.

With his insane ruling on Obambi-Care, he became a darling of the Left and mysteriously (snort) immune from all whore-nalist "investigations."

Traitors gonna traitor. Whatever reason he had for making these assignments, self-interest and not altruism or love of Country, had everything to do with it.

chuckachookah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Perhaps Roberts likes Lolitas,

The name John Roberts does appear on the Epstein flight logs. No one has ever inquired if it's the same John Roberts. Good money says that it is.

Bloom620 1 point ago +1 / -0

Roberts, the adoption of his children?

irongeek 19 points ago +19 / -0

maybe he was against the court-packing proposed by Biden.

PeteButtplug 10 points ago +10 / -0

I guarantee even the lefty judges aren't wild about it.

litux 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because it inevitably ends with 300 million Supreme Court justices.

PROBE 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The year is 2055. Every single one of us in the US is now a Supreme Court Justice. New legislation is now being proposed by the Democrat Socalist Ayatollah Caliphate Party to allow new seats to be added to the Supreme Court which include non-US citizens in foreign nations."

Simple_Doot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good observation.

OptimusPrime 16 points ago +17 / -1


TrumpCardUpMySleeve 13 points ago +13 / -0


50red 7 points ago +7 / -0


p8riot 26 points ago +26 / -0

That's weird... Roberts did a good thing?

TrumpCardUpMySleeve 13 points ago +13 / -0


MapleLeafMAGA 22 points ago +23 / -1

Oh wow hahahahahaha. Fantastic

SutopSutolf 14 points ago +15 / -1

Wait, but isn't John Roberts chief justice?

50red 9 points ago +9 / -0

So maybe SCOTUS is 6-3 and not 5-4 after all...

GreatBambino 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes he is!

p3rsonman 12 points ago +12 / -0

Sorry to delve further (Canadian here), what is implied by "oversee"? I guess to stop beating around the bush, does this help Trump in any way with his legal cases?

flashersenpai 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes, assuming the justices will rule in his favor. Look at the orders Alito made regarding PA regarding vote segregation.

litux 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Reeee... SCOTUS pushes for segregation to let Trump win the election..."

GreatBambino 4 points ago +4 / -0


victory2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

They basically respond to emergency appeals and refer the matter to the rest of the court. They have a limited ability to grant a temporary stay until the rest of the court considers the matter.

Sun_Tzu 50 points ago +50 / -0 (edited)

While pawns scream and doom in the front, the power pieces position in the back.

cucks_on_parade 4 points ago +4 / -0

t_d novelty accounts; excellent

Goodcook1 40 points ago +41 / -1

What about Gorsuch? Strategy might be to file suits in any states he oversees that Trump lost just to toss out a line. You never know. Demand an audit and take it to the courts and you might just uncover something.

ChupaCobbler 39 points ago +39 / -0

This could be why they’ve started to mention New Mexico recently.

Goodcook1 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yup and Virginia was mentioned as well

PEPE_the_Frog 14 points ago +14 / -0

What about Gorsuch? Strategy might be to file suits in any states he oversees that Trump lost just to toss out a line. You never know. Demand an audit and take it to the courts and you might just uncover something.


nervecellguy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not finding much info - he was from the 10th Ciruit Court (CO, NM and nearby states)

deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
Goodcook1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Any info on New Hampshire? It was mentioned here on the Donald the other day, but I cant' find the post(s) with any info. Of course, I would image shady shit went down in all states, but I say, any state we lost, we toss a line out and try and uncover whatever we can.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
chuckachookah 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the news? I haven't heard much of a progress report.

Biden is still ahead? Within the margin for recounts? What's the NV rules? (not that the dems follow those anyway)

HunterBidensReddit 34 points ago +34 / -0

"I've waited 30 years for this day, Joe."

If Mr. T calls the digital election fraud, a second "high-tech lynching," it will be one for the history books.

ProdigalSon1997 20 points ago +20 / -0

Thomas denying Biden presidency would be one for the history books for sure. Gonna be so great

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Tucso 30 points ago +30 / -0

Ninth circuit is a joke.

Everblade 68 points ago +68 / -0

Used to be. Trump has largely reshaped it over the past couple of years. We'll see if it's still a joke or not.

Tucso 18 points ago +18 / -0


Xnyr21 13 points ago +14 / -1

Still a joke, just about half as big of one.

Shayhawk 10 points ago +10 / -0

Trump is slowly remaking it in His image.

ProdigalSon1997 29 points ago +29 / -0

How is it that every time I feel hopeless and talk of wanting to die because of do-nothings in the government, something happens that restores my hope -- things like this? Must be God looking out for all of us!

geocitiesuser 20 points ago +20 / -0

One may even think there is a very stable genius behind it all.

OrangeFruitGood 15 points ago +15 / -0

You're even talkin' about dyin'? Well before you do anything rash... dig this!

Everybody plays the fool, sometime. There's no exception to the rule. Listen, Pede, it may be factual, may be cruel. I ain't lyin', everybody plays the fool.

J_Von_Random 23 points ago +24 / -1


StaryHickory 23 points ago +23 / -0

Good, Feel like we will get justice in a couple of those. GA is hot mess right now. Almost as bad as PA. Its the brazen coverup by Kemp that is jaw dropping.

CaptainChrisPBacon 24 points ago +24 / -0

Kemp has really fucked up. Georgia is a dead Red state. I know they stole Chatham County. They stole it in 2016 also. I never seen the first Biden sign anywhere. Never seen any Hillary signs. But Democrats have held a strong power on the county. I am going to take a wild guess and say though voter fraud. Ya know like throwing out voting machines on the side of the road. This happened yesterday in Chatham county. https://www.wtoc.com/2020/11/19/old-voting-equipment-found-side-road-garden-city/?fbclid=IwAR1MEfBuRk75kVoTrfDwgNktaP5l2TGoM6MO2lFQClBh5oDMaA0nB3Kw9Ys

YoungPede 4 points ago +4 / -0

R.I.P. that machine knew too much.

phillipcurl 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m from Chatham. It’s blue for sure. But more like 48-52 than whatever it was this election.

Sagan 2 points ago +3 / -1

Chatham is full of riggers regardless

whatdayisit 4 points ago +4 / -0

What is totally insane is he ran against Abrams!! No doubt she would be worse but talk about 2 evils.

67Vert 11 points ago +12 / -1

If GA and PA get thrown out neither can get to 270. House of Reps would determine the Presidency. And I believe Republicans have the majority of state delegations

GravityBounce1976 11 points ago +12 / -1

31 to 19

voter129472974 8 points ago +8 / -0

The hilarious part is that DC doesn't get a vote. And with Republicans likely holding onto the Senate, that would go for Pence.

It's the 116th Congress that would make the vote, right? Not the upcoming 117th?

chuckachookah 5 points ago +5 / -0

And with Republicans likely holding onto the Senate, that would go for Pence.

IF. Two GA Senate seats in special runoff will determine that, right?

voter129472974 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck I forgot about that. 50-48 according to PeoplesPunditDaily (they partner with DecisionDesk).

Idk where those 2 races are leaning.

nuts 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's the 117th

PeteButtplug 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is this updated? Pre-election it was 26-24.

GravityBounce1976 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm pretty sure it's 31-19.

123breadman -5 points ago +2 / -7

In your retarded scenario, Joe Biden would be president and Trump would be VP.

Truly hilarious for democrats, but horrible for us.

67Vert 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nope. Only on vote per delegation.

123breadman 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sorry I'm retarded and was thinking the house (federal) not each individual state's house

MrWWonka 3 points ago +3 / -0

edumucate yourself and keep up!

PineAppleMan247 21 points ago +21 / -0


Undead-Voter 7 points ago +7 / -0


Phil_DeGraves 18 points ago +18 / -0

Supreme Court is just regular court with tomatoes and sour cream.

leatherbottom 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you for the chuckle.

TrumpWinz 17 points ago +17 / -0

Clarence is going to light those mofos up in Georgia. It shall be glorious.

magacheeseball 16 points ago +16 / -0

Checking the wayback machine and what changes were made (https://web.archive.org/web/20201115175448/https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx):

Current MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh WI - Amy Coney Barrett PA - Samuel A. Alito GA - Clarence Thomas

Previous MI - Brett M. Kavanaugh WI - Sonia Sotomayor PA - Samuel A. Alito GA - Clarence Thomas

So we were in great position before, but now we're in perfect condition! MAGA!

zaia123 4 points ago +4 / -0

why was sotomayor changed? any idea?

magacheeseball 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just an idea, but the court wasn’t complete prior to ACB, so Sotostain was just filling in

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
usmcphrog46 14 points ago +14 / -0


HighIQIndividual 13 points ago +13 / -0

Thanks fully the MSM isn’t covering this. If they were, they’d be going nuts.

CyberCriminaI 6 points ago +6 / -0

can "predict" for everyone you know, because you know this gonna be some reeeeeeeeeeee shieeet

SutopSutolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point, they're actually saving the public from riots in the streets....until the real riots begin.

CousinEddie 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

If trump does win the meltdown is going to be awesome.

The amazing and wonderful POCs are going to burn and loot entire cities full of liberals.

Nothing brings me greater joy than liberals being culturally enriched by their pet blacks.

The_Spicy_Memes_Chef 12 points ago +12 / -0

All the stars are lining up

DanTheComputerMan 12 points ago +12 / -0 (edited)


chesswhilehigh 6 points ago +6 / -0

Scalia. Alito is still alive isn’t he?

Upvoted, regardless

DanTheComputerMan 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOL TRUE brainfart

BeefChucker 4 points ago +4 / -0


Choppermagic 10 points ago +10 / -0

Clarence Thomas for Georgia? Oh hell yeah. The gov. needs to watch his step!

Fvazquez310310 6 points ago +6 / -0

“Hello Joseph remember me?”

mercynurse 9 points ago +9 / -0


Arizona, Nevada= Kagan

FJCS 9 points ago +9 / -0

Today, the Circuit Justices (that is, Supreme Court justices who are assigned to supervise a certain circuit) “no longer sit as judges on appellate panels…[instead], acting alone, [they] have the power to grant stays or injunctions in both civil and criminal cases, to arrange bail before and after conviction, and to provide other ancillary relief, such as extensions of time for various filings and other procedural variances.” [7]

RC22 9 points ago +9 / -0

there was also a rebuke letter issued to the PA supreme court i heard.

Reaper088 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hey, did I just hear Christmas bells a'ringing?

Cause oh boy, looks like our Clarence got his wings after all!

Filial_Piety_is_key 4 points ago +4 / -0

XD I dunno if half the people here will understand this reference. I don't think they have sat through any black and white movies ever.

Reaper088 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's alright The new generation will get to see It's A Wonderful Life's sequel play out

And this time, Clarence isn't an Angel 2nd Class anymore...

SteveSanchez80 8 points ago +9 / -1

So far, so good.

LiskaEman 8 points ago +8 / -0 (edited)

Yeah baby it's party time! This is what we were waiting for and it's a good sign! Ramping up the prayers.

RC22 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pa Supreme Court made a mockery of the law with their recent ruling this seems to be the backlash Even little children are smarter than the Pa SC Here Joey Mom said to share this banana with you, you can have the peel. she didn't say what part of the banana to share

Banick088 7 points ago +7 / -0

Holy shit

This is really going to happen isn't it

OutcastSeal 7 points ago +7 / -0


Furshezil 7 points ago +7 / -0

4d chess

Shadowreaper07 7 points ago +7 / -0

"PA - Samuel A. Alito"

Paging u/HillarysDiaper demand is massively exceeding supply.

JasonThomasJones 6 points ago +6 / -0

Potus knew this would happen all along. He would say more but doesn't want to add to the pressure of scotus. They will be giving their lives for the constitution. Targets will be on them. God behind them

dissenter_track 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can a lawyerpede explain what role the Justices play in the Circuit Courts?

cuntard 6 points ago +6 / -0

not a lawyer, but found this online:

The Supreme Court helpfully explains, at length, why the justices’ circuit assignments matter. Petitioners will submit emergency applications to an individual justice. A recent example? Pennsylvania Republicans (in the Third Circuit) submitted an emergency application with Justice Samuel Alito, asking for an injunction in an election-related case. Alito responded by granting the request himself to the rest of the Supreme Court.

You may have noticed as well that petitions for a writ of certiorari (a petition for SCOTUS to hear a case) note which circuit the petition is coming from: On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the _____ Circuit.

“[F]our of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay, e.g., a stay of execution in a death penalty case,” the high court’s rules note. “Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.”


looks like it prevents cuck activist lefty judges from denying an emergency requests in key states

dissenter_track 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, it is on its way to happening basically. EPIC.

Cliffinati 6 points ago +6 / -0

MI Kavanugh


GA Thomas

PA Alito

DrinkMoreLibTears 6 points ago +6 / -0

What do the justices do when running the Circuit courts? How will this help us?

cuntard 4 points ago +4 / -0

not a lawyer, but found this online: The Supreme Court helpfully explains, at length, why the justices’ circuit assignments matter. Petitioners will submit emergency applications to an individual justice. A recent example? Pennsylvania Republicans (in the Third Circuit) submitted an emergency application with Justice Samuel Alito, asking for an injunction in an election-related case. Alito responded by granting the request himself to the rest of the Supreme Court. You may have noticed as well that petitions for a writ of certiorari (a petition for SCOTUS to hear a case) note which circuit the petition is coming from: On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the _____ Circuit. “[F]our of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay, e.g., a stay of execution in a death penalty case,” the high court’s rules note. “Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.”


looks like it prevents cuck activist lefty judges from denying an emergency requests in key states

DrinkMoreLibTears 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. I also read later that they help fast track cases to SCOTUS.

cuntard 1 point ago +1 / -0

that’s what i was specifically referring to, but didn’t word very well.

h4ck3l 6 points ago +6 / -0

I got Kavanaugh!

TheBigKahuna 6 points ago +6 / -0

Does Kagan, Breuer, and Sotomayor really need an assignment? Let them just wait for things to come before them in SCOTUS. Otherwise, they can stay home

AmazingFlightLizard 6 points ago +6 / -0

How is Roberts Chief Justice? Doesn’t Thomas have seniority?

FJCS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thomas has been on the court the longest (seniority) the Chief is an appointed position. Bush nominated Roberts as chief.

PaleIsTheNewTan 6 points ago +6 / -0

How were the assignments assigned? I’m shocked a liberal scotus wasn’t handed these key swing states

MubbyTheLarge 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just a hunch, but maybe Trump’s cleaning house last week also involved getting a monkey off Roberts’ back? I’m just a lowly pede but that’s what my gut tells me.

Wallypip3 5 points ago +5 / -0

Roberts was compromised by the same blackmail techniques that they used to spy on the Senate.

HunterBidenCokeMirro 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is what I am thinking as well.

SutopSutolf 5 points ago +5 / -0

Someone said it was the Chief Justice. That would be Roberts. So. Interesting...

Jimmy_Russler 5 points ago +5 / -0

I second this question

Did they draw states from a hat?

Deplorable_in_PA 4 points ago +4 / -0

my guess is Roberts probably knows well ahead they would be hearing these cases and decided he didn't want Biden winning and trying to pack the court

Jota211 6 points ago +6 / -0

unfortunately AZ is lost based on this. Trump could have won by 2 Million votes in AZ and she would still give it to Biden :-D

Dtom13 4 points ago +4 / -0

MI: 16 electoral votes

PA: 20 electoral votes

GA: 16 electoral votes

WI: 10 electoral votes

AZ: only 11 electoral votes

It's almost too perfect to be a coincidence.

geocitiesuser 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wow, this is so spicy its hard to believe it's real.

Sagan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Going as planned

brownguy 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is no coincidence, my frens. God is in control.

AnonLurker 5 points ago +5 / -0

is this true? holy hell at least we got some good news..

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2A_Conservative 4 points ago +10 / -6

Can we trust ACB ?

Sumarongi 14 points ago +14 / -0

Do we have a choice?

QuranIsToiletPaper 9 points ago +10 / -1

Zero evidence to not trust her. Don't concern troll for no reason.

ramennov 14 points ago +14 / -0

Skepticism is the default stance. Trust should be earned by her actions.

leatherbottom 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is true. I would say just seeing the way she handled herself throughout the appointment process, and the knowledge she knows by heart, is a good sign. First impression is she follows the constitution, not some personal agenda.

Shayhawk 6 points ago +6 / -0

All I want is for her to FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION

GabenOfficial 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t know

cuntard 2 points ago +2 / -0

unless she and everybody that wrote to the senate supporting her nomination are liars, i think she is fine. we’ll see soon enough, though.