Comments (545)
sorted by:
South_Florida_Guy 745 points ago +747 / -2

I mean, did they think if they just did it when most people are sleeping that no one would ever notice?

ProphetOfKek 662 points ago +663 / -1

Yes. Because they’ve gotten away with it before.

LongKahn 405 points ago +405 / -0

I swear that their playbook is like 100 years old and was never updated for the Internet

LiskaEman 277 points ago +277 / -0

They never anticipated us so they never thought to hide it. A bunch of patriots who love their country and aren't brainwashed and suspect their foul play? Nah, what are the chances of that happening.


EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 121 points ago +123 / -2

lOoKs lEgIt bEcUz oRaNj mAn bAd

fkn_lost_my_password 95 points ago +95 / -0


Error404 2 points ago +2 / -0


Justin_is_Fidels_Son 54 points ago +54 / -0

I swear if I posted this on Facebook, tagged everyone that I know who has severe TDS I'd get multiple replies like this. Ostriches, ostriches everywhere.

Yawnz13 32 points ago +34 / -2

Ostriches hide their heads in the sand when something bad is happening. None of these people think that this sort of fraud is bad.

Madman2020 22 points ago +22 / -0

Right. Burying their heads in the sand and having it deeply entrenched in one's anus aren't the same.

Gildoom 23 points ago +23 / -0

I turned off FB, deleted it, I was starting to red pill some folks then magically my likes just disintegrated into nothing unless I posted a dumb picture.

FB is shit. Communist shit.

I think Sydney Powell suggested that these big tech overlords are in bed (trying to get more business, people/faces) in dictator lands so they are throttling people with brains.

DL535 13 points ago +13 / -0

This all started in China. The Internet was spreading in China and threatening the Chinese Communist Party's control. They desperately needed a way to get control of the Internet. So they waved billions in front of OUR tech companies and the shitheads developed the world's most advanced censorship machine for them.

But that wasn't the worst part. The worst part was when corrupt pieces of shit in our own country looked at the Chinese internet control system and were like "you know what? Fuck free speech. We need some of that sweet, sweet censorship over HERE. Make US like China and we can be unaccountable gods who can steal as much as we want and never have to face judgment again."

And the tech companies built them what they wanted.

Everyone responsible should be hanged for treason, honestly.

Tullco 5 points ago +5 / -0

exactly what happened to me.. Im about to delete completely.

EnemiesDestroyed 57 points ago +57 / -0

They will shut down the internet, when things go to shit for them, if they have to keep us disorganized. I might be misremembering but didn’t Obama hand control of the internet over to Britain?

A Dark Winter may also be intended power outages.

LiskaEman 41 points ago +41 / -0

I fully expect it- even though I haven't told my friends or family because I know I'll end up sounding like a psycho. i've moved away from google for my business email and transferred over to a safer one with my webhosting (not wordpress), made my gabs and parlers, although I'm not on social media much anyway so bleh.

Written down everyone's important phone numbers in case the cell phones go out, and we do have a landline if we need it. I've also picked up a bunch of extra battery packs. I haven't decided if they're going to go for any power outtages or not, it's hard to figure in the winter time.

I've never had a smart phone, so not an issue. I'm keeping my little flippy one.

TheSwiftPepe 34 points ago +34 / -0

Preparedness isn’t crazy

LiskaEman 31 points ago +31 / -0

It is when you're talking to a bunch of people that are always digitally connected, use social media a lot and like to talk/be on their phones ! I can't exactly go to them and say "yo, I think the internet's gonna die- along with your cell phones, be prepared!" . The idea in and of itself is ridiculous. I just, have a feeling. A really, really bad feeling. Gut instinct says we're gonna go through hell but we're gonna come out on top, but the backlash from the brainwashed is going to be another war in and of itself.

dixond 22 points ago +22 / -0

I fully expect it- even though I haven't told my friends or family because I know I'll end up sounding like a psycho.

Honestly... I'm conservative because I was raised by my parents to value individual effort, taking responsibility, etc, etc. And yet... I've been trying to wake my dad up to the reality of what's going on for the last five years. Now we're all the way up to The Great Reset, and... I'm pretty sure he just thinks I'm crazy. C'est la vie.

LiskaEman 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm the same way; been trying to convince my mom to have some spare food in case she needs to hide in the house for a bit, but she doesn't believe me. My two aunts have been trying to convince her of the same thing- but she doesn't listen to them either. She insists that she's okay and prepared... I really hope so.

My Dad, I know he thinks i'm being a bit paranoid, but he said he prepared because it'd make me feel better and I 100% believe it, even though he voted for Biden (not brainwashed, we've been able to have intelligent conversations, thankfully) so he has no idea what's coming, either.

They're both in Michigan, but far from Detroit thankfully. We can't help someone if they don't want to listen

CountTheLegalVotes 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same, they come from the time when they still felt like they could trust the government. C'est la vie indeed.

squack567 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just curious who you switched you switched to for your biz email? I’m using gsuite for email/hosting and I’ve been trying to find a replacement but I’m not very tech savvy.

ianpatrick1966 8 points ago +8 / -0

I moved mine to Office 365, it's who my employer uses (45k employees) and we get subpeona'ed by the DOJ all the time. Microsoft tells them to pound rocks and makes the DOJ come to us. After seeing that, I put my trust in them.

LiskaEman 6 points ago +6 / -0

I already hosted my website through dreamhost, so I set up my email through them as well. I'm not tech savvy either, have no idea what i'm doing, and even I was able to make my email work :D but dreamhost has been great and I would highly recommend.

LArnix 5 points ago +5 / -0

my weekend goals set up new private email or head to MLK?

slugbait 4 points ago +4 / -0

A land line can come in handy if you get thrown in jail as some jail will only allow calls to landlines.

MamaMiMi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seriously! Good Grief! I don't know anyone with a landline anymore. Hang even my parents who are 72 & 77 don't have one. Lol I better stay out or my family will think that I have been old person napped

yurimodin 20 points ago +20 / -0

IT pede here, it's ICANN. Us Dept of Science used to handle domain registrar way back when, then they opened it up to the private sector and then handed it over to ICANN. Biggest problem will be attacks via spoiled DNS tables (it should not be feasible but China has actually done this to us before multiple times and caused all .gov traffic to their own spoofed servers). China is broke and desperate, getting Trump out is the only chance they have at not having a depression. Also be on the lookout for "accidental" fiber cuts at strategic points of the internet. If you do nothing else get a shortwave receiver with SSB. With this you can at least listen to ham radio operators from around the world along with commercial high power AM stations at night.

MamaMiMi 9 points ago +9 / -0

I was actually thinking about getting a ham radio. Can you suggest one that won't break the bank?

clueless_expert 8 points ago +8 / -0

MamaMiMi, you don’t need a license if you aren’t going to transmit. I started with a receiver only - a Tecsun PL-660. It’s a decent little radio. It does AM, FM, MW, Shortwave, Air and SSB. It does okay receiving distant stations when using the included long wire antenna (I just hang it in a tree for extra height). I used this for a long time and ended up getting my General License, but again you don’t need a license to listen.

Scroon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look up Baofeng ham radio. Chinese crap, yeah. But it works and it's like $30 online. Often recommended for a cheap and easy introduction to Ham.

MamaMiMi 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just wrote down anyone who replied to my HAM radio comment in case I need help. Please let me know now if you would prefer that I not private message you. I am harmless. I was born in 1969 and it's a proven fact that anyone born in 1969 is AWESOME! I fact checked that on Snopes , they said it is true! Lol

yurimodin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unless you grab a sweetheart deal on a used radio you are gonna spend BARE MINIMUM $400 for descent HF rig. Personally I am a fan of my Kenwood TS-480SAT with the built in tuner (you want a built in tuner if you can). My older and much heavier Kenwood TS-120 works very well but Its a little clunkier to operate and you have to use an external tuner........long story short plan on $400 + Power supply & accessories. I would also wager that prices are probobly high right now just like ammo etc.

ianpatrick1966 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need to get your license first.

Look into something like an Icom 718 for HF, it's decent and pretty straight forward.

But again, get licensed first. Learn how to configure antennas (SWR, things like that) before even dreaming of buying one.

boreal_storm 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also, short wave antennas are very cheap and greatly enhance reception. You can even construct an antenna yourself from:

a length of bare copper wire,

some insulated wire as a leader from the bare wire to the radio,

an alligator clip for affixing the leader to your whip antenna.

MamaMiMi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I totally understand what you just said! Not bad for an old gal, huh! 95% of my friends have been male my entire life so I picked up a thing or two about these handyman type things

thebigbear 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is for RECEIVE ONLY. You do not want to transmit unless you can get the antenna matched(think tuning a musical instrument) so you do not get feedback and burn out your front end(transmitter section). There are lots of Ham clubs everywhere so just google them or check with any fire station to see what info they have. Most emergency responders know ham guys and gals. It is a hobby but is totally necessary when you lose the standard forms of communications like in a emergency or maybe 10 days of darkness.

yurimodin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm also an extra class ham and can confirm you are correct.

hzuiel 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also IT Pede, while it is unwieldly, you can still go to websites without domain name service, though many sites do not allow direct ip access for security reasons. Perhaps we should have some backup plan, private dns servers or direct IP site mirrors so in the even of a delisting everyone could get to information.

ThePowerOfPrayer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Funny thing is I work for a Fortune 500 with an international presence and we had some issues in Europe because of fiber lines to major hubs "accidentally" getting cut just this week.

TruuthSeeker 15 points ago +15 / -0

He handed it to the UN

monximus91 5 points ago +5 / -0


Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion

BidenHunter 13 points ago +13 / -0

He handed over ICAN to the UN.

Jimmy33 6 points ago +6 / -0

Doing his bit for the One World Government setup.

Amaroq64 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh jesus.

MamaMiMi 8 points ago +8 / -0

I was thinking the same thing. If we didn't have to worry about the creeps, the freaks and the tweets we could have a member phone number list. If something like an internet "glitch" would happen, we would need to stay in touch more than ever. I wouldn't have a problem with putting my cell number on a member list that would only be accessible if we detected things were getting bad. Of course, there would need to be guidelines for which members could access or the Commie-crats would sign up in drives to harass people.

Hunni_bee 8 points ago +8 / -0

Maybe some sort of phone tree? That way the groups of phone numbers would be held by the people below them on their branch of the tree?

MamaMiMi 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was actually just thinking the same exact thing! We are on the same page, my friend! Nice!

AbsoluteChad 16 points ago +16 / -0

When true patriots join power with true autists, no treason can be hidden for long.

LiskaEman 7 points ago +7 / -0

Never have truer words been spoken ! I'm more of a donate as I can/pray/cheer people on from the sideline pede (i'd join in the physical, but as I have too many medical issues I'd be more of a hindrance than a help), but like all of us I see what's going on and try to spread the word as much as I can! There are so many others of us hiding from the crazy left folks

Titanium 7 points ago +7 / -0

TFW they go and try to quarantine The_Donald on reddit to stop the spread of information :)

LiskaEman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just makes us stronger!

Amaroq64 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are we the ones who put this graph together? That's amazing!

SJWsHateUs 23 points ago +23 / -0

Also they didn’t think trump would gain 10 MM votes. Had to shut it down, strategize and most of all, doooooomp

zwiebelsaft 4 points ago +4 / -0

What was bigger? Philly’s 4 AM dump or my 6’7”/310 lb ass’s after a Taco Bell binge during bulking szn?

SJWsHateUs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d hav two give it to the drooooooooooop

unicornpoop 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think plan A and B failed, and they got desperate. Said fuck it, just deny it and hopefully buy enough time to exhaust and demoralize all of us into submitting. What they got wrong was the hell fury that is coming from Trump supporters.

Dahnald2020 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yep. You can tell that olds are running the dem machine (no offense to our elderpedes!)

LongKahn 14 points ago +14 / -0

Especially when it comes to Social Media censorship... I have to imagine (and could be very wrong) that in a way these techie CEOs like Mark and Jack are strong armed into the heavy-handed censorship and probably think its a bad idea.... but no way their soy-laden asses tell literal Satan that his plan is bad

Jimmy33 10 points ago +10 / -0

I've been saying this for so long .. Old Soros is stuck in the 60s with his riots and looters and standover tactics.

Saltydabs 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lmao! Have been saying it’s like they never left the 60s and forgot that EVERYONE has a camera.

OlDirtyBarrister 41 points ago +41 / -0

We can’t allow it to stand this time. And I mean that in absolute terms no matter what it takes to stop this.

Ogcarvattack 15 points ago +16 / -1

ready to report for duty

PhantomShield72 6 points ago +6 / -0

At the ready.

dixond 8 points ago +8 / -0


ArcticDark 4 points ago +4 / -0


james43552352345 17 points ago +17 / -0

They also apparently failed to realize that pedes are some of the most advanced data scientists in the world.

AbsoluteChad 11 points ago +11 / -0

No shit! Most math nerds tend to lean more right than left.

TruuthSeeker 10 points ago +10 / -0

2018 Governor race same shit hapoened

BarbaraStreisand 8 points ago +8 / -0

They got away with it earlier this year when Joe Biden endorsed a rigged referendum in Wisconsin connected to Bill Clintons WI campaign manager. The referendum gave 1 billion dollars to a school district and passed by five votes.

Libertynfreedom4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

They also rigged it so Bernie wouldn’t win! Twice!

BarbaraStreisand 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are saying that Bernies loss was rigged in Wisconsin specifically?

Libertynfreedom4ever 1 point ago +1 / -0

No just in general in the primaries. I don’t really know where they would have had to rig... Bernie strongholds I guess

TheEmperorProtects 101 points ago +101 / -0

Yes they thought people would wake up and see “Biden won!” And just accept it

_Throwgali_ 86 points ago +86 / -0

"Fox News is onboard. Those inbred MAGA apes will believe anything they say!" - some evil Dominion fuck like Eric Coomer, probably

sportsbettingtruth 61 points ago +61 / -0

This is exactly why FOX News was part of the plan. To gaslight people by saying "EVEN FOX NEWS is saying Biden won! Are you going to doubt FOX NEWS who is in the tank for Trump!?!?!"

RussianAgent13 29 points ago +30 / -1

Always has been.


GEOTUSMAGA 17 points ago +17 / -0

So fucking transparent

KiTA 9 points ago +9 / -0

I have absolutely been told this by multiple lefties.

"Trump's own news network says that Biden won!"

aaafirefly123 8 points ago +8 / -0

Are you going to doubt FOX NEWS...


unicornpoop 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look at fox ratings and there’s the answer. Fuck aaaaaaalll y’all’s.

LArnix 25 points ago +25 / -0

They told the lie about Fox news so much they thought it true!

KiTA 28 points ago +28 / -0

It's worse than that. They are so detacthed from the Right that they literally can't understand us. So they have to use the cartoon parody of the right that exists in their brains instead.

Once you realize that a lot of the left's actions make a lot more sense. It's like a strawman, only it's internalized. They can't see anyone BUT the strawmen, and have been indoctrinated to never speak to actual people that might disagree with them.

LArnix 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah we have a friend like that. She asked what I look at on my phone all the time FOX NEWS?!?! My wife laughed and said no he never watches fox.

AtTheInauguration 8 points ago +8 / -0

Imagine thinking that conservatives actually watch Fox.

Forty_Five 19 points ago +19 / -0

My thoughts as well. They do not understand us as well as they think they do.

reddeadpill 18 points ago +18 / -0

They think we’re just as gullible as the leftists.

King5150 3 points ago +4 / -1

Fox is filled to the brim with pork eating, globalist Jews, they have a handful of white apple pie conservatives who push their ratings into the stratosphere but they then bit the hand which feeds it. I cancelled my subscription and now only watch Tucker and Ingram and sometimes Hannity online. Never will i feed them another penny.

RustTrohle 13 points ago +13 / -0

I still can't get over the fact his name is actually "Coomer". I feel like I'm an extra in a movie.

Heck 7 points ago +7 / -0

Watched Tucker but never subbed because I knew this was coming.

SilverBackTrump 28 points ago +29 / -1

And FOX NEWS was the mercenary they used to try and sell it by having them call Arizona way too early and not call NC, AK etc. This was 100% coordinated with the media in some fashion.

King5150 14 points ago +14 / -0 (edited)

and by calling Arizona at the 15% counted mark they basically threw their audience under the bus and we also saw the whole network immediately morph into a CNN clone.

The moment i saw McEnany get cut from the C-SPAN live feed because the presenter got triggered about "fake news" and basically accusing her of lying i immediately cancelled my subscription.

Jimmy33 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's how Lachlan Murdoch and his dumb wife got their invitations back to Soros spirit cooking dinners.

SilverBackTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0


MagyarLadyPede 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Which is crazy considering time zones like California were awake watching, and the fact that people around the world were watching too, many for whom it was the morning /afternoon. Hahha.

daniel1116 38 points ago +38 / -0

This is war they don't give a fuck they're fighting us right wrong subtle obvious it doesn't matter anymore.

FattyWatt 29 points ago +29 / -0

THIS IS WAR. It's not the Chi-comms IN Chy-na. It's U.S. Communists, here, degrading our voting processes. We USA PATRIOTS will take care of that! It's called a United States CONSTITUTION. It takes care of TREASON & Traitors with the death penalty. TRUMP WON 2020!!!!!!

MAKE 6 points ago +6 / -0

The bad apples here domestically are shills getting a fat pay check from other countries. The liberty tree needs to be watered.

MichelesPenis 2 points ago +2 / -0

And that's why killing off the msm by biting the hand that feeds it is a communist plan. Change my mind.

50red 32 points ago +32 / -0

Pretty much. It worked before, just on a much smaller scale.

This time they faced a red wave and had to crank it up. They hoped "everyone voting by mail because of the plandemic" would give them cover.

day221 19 points ago +19 / -0

They hoped "everyone voting by mail because of the plandemic" would give them cover.

Exactly. This is why they couldn't do anything about 2016. Without the mail in ballots to point to as an excuse it would be too obvious to everyone even those deep in the left's bubble. This way they can at least fool the normies who just blindly accept these explanations without thought. In reality, it doesn't pass the smell test though. Republicans requested more or equal mail in ballots in these states, it wasn't 80% Dem. And it doesn't take 10 hours to drive mail in ballots from one end of the city to the other. They should have already been there long before 4 am. Mail in ballots also get shuffled in the mail like a deck of cards so the ratio of Republican/Dem should be fairly constant all night, you wouldn't get this big skewed batch. Etc. It's so obviously BS.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
day221 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump wasn't running in 2018. I suspect they did a dry run for 2020 in places with late night ballot drop offs etc. obviously they wouldn't want to go all out in 2018 when the big one is 2020. They got the house anyway who knows now how much of that was real.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
RecycledHuman 4 points ago +4 / -0

If there were really 410 electoral votes for Trump on the night of the election, then they had no time to be careful. They had to pull out all the stops, and that is why they are screwed.

weltbild 15 points ago +15 / -0

This graph looks like a bloody war they had extreme problems to fight the trump surge and keep up with it.

qwertyuiop123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I count seven instant dips in Trumps tally, no sudden dips climbs, just slow rises upward and then sudden dips down.

sportsbettingtruth 360 points ago +360 / -0

I still remember watching Rich Baris late when this was all going down. He was going through Wisconsin and Michigan saying even if Biden gets 100% of the remaining votes, he can't win. He literally said the only way Biden can win is if they manufacture unreported votes out of thin air. Baris estimated based on % reporting that there were maybe 100k votes left out there, and even if all were for Biden it wouldn't be enough.

Well, What do you know, Milwaukee finds 150k.

MexicanBeerFlu 146 points ago +147 / -1

Well sunnabitch we found them!

Two_Scoops__ 38 points ago +38 / -0



ThinkPolAgent217 12 points ago +12 / -0


I'm gonna cheat my life away

Super_Duper_Wall 6 points ago +6 / -0


ionian 83 points ago +83 / -0

Same thing happened when I was watching Charlie Kirk with Georgia right before they finished counting. Trump was ahead by 29k and they had 14k left to count. It was night and Charlie said, "Trump has Georgia unless they find 50k votes in the morning!"

And what do you know? They suddenly "found" 50k votes in the morning! It's like a comedy act the way the left behaves.

Texas_Rangers 15 points ago +15 / -0

The ease in access of technology and the skills developed by tech people both lead to this attempted steal AND allowed us to catch it.

The internet is a great thing for freedom in many ways.

entropy 33 points ago +33 / -0

Sonofabitch they found the votes!

StraightWhiteCisMale 22 points ago +22 / -0

I remember this too. I remember feeling very confident at that point, like POTUS had WI sewn up. Baris knows this stuff, really better than anyone else out there.

sportsbettingtruth 19 points ago +19 / -0

It was weird how he went silent as soon as the WI fraud began to happen. Then the next appearance he makes on Bannon he said that once he saw what happened he said "Oh My God they are going to steal it..." and then took a nap knowing that the fix was in

clampie 3 points ago +5 / -2

Apparently it's the absentee ballots that came in.

Frednut1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Absentee ballots from where? Milwaukee? We went to bed with Milwaukee not having enough outstanding votes to flip WI even if they were all 100% Biden. This doesn’t add up.

clampie 4 points ago +4 / -0


Lovepede 8 points ago +8 / -0

What's the ratio of Dems/republican in the mail in ballots in states that finished counting by midnight? Florida for example. As most elderly are republican I'm suspicious the narrative is false.

DL535 4 points ago +4 / -0

If those ballots are legitimate, they came from a specific place. Where? What part of Wisconsin has 100% Biden support? It's an insult to people's intelligence to expect them to believe this. It's astronomically unlikely.

The ONLY reasonable explanation is fraud.

deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
Loiuzein 7 points ago +7 / -0

150% of the dead voted early and often for Biden, nothing to see here

Madman2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

Early to dead, early to vote.

nickybops [S] 145 points ago +146 / -1 (edited)
NotInFormation 88 points ago +88 / -0

Oh dear. I've accidentally archived this (the raw .json) offline.

nickybops [S] 67 points ago +67 / -0

Has CNN told you you can do this?

Justin_is_Fidels_Son 20 points ago +20 / -0

Oi, you got a license for that mate?

UpTrump 18 points ago +19 / -1

Make sure it's not on a drive that's plugged in. Microsoft can delete it

MakeAmericaLegendary 6 points ago +7 / -1

No chance MS does that. That's a fantastic way to lose your company.

Loiuzein 14 points ago +14 / -0

Company schmompany gimme that commie monopoly money

icockmyglock 12 points ago +12 / -0

Have you actually been paying attention to what's going on on platforms these days?

MakeAmericaLegendary 5 points ago +6 / -1

Reaching into a personal storage device and deleting data off of it is a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Maybe I have too much faith in Microsoft, but that's such a drastic supermove that would cost them billions in business alone, let alone suits and arrests.

slim2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lenovo installed software that broke internet encryption to be able to serve extra ads and they are still in business. If you are curious check out Superfish.

I wouldn't be too surprised if MS had something in the terms of service that says they can cull data to keep performance good. Even if the data poofed being able to prove who it was would be nearly impossible.

I do agree that they wouldn't do it, but I wouldn't put it past our friends at the National Suspicion Agency.

MakeAmericaLegendary 3 points ago +3 / -0

NSA absolutely would—I'll give you that.

patr10t 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, if this happens, Linux surges in popularity. No way they do this.

ono412 16 points ago +16 / -0

Check out this class structure from that dump:

public class Boolean_Things_That_Happened {

public bool zero_votes { get; set; }
public bool results_expected_within_hour { get; set; }
**public bool show_nothing_votes_decreased { get; set; }**
public bool went_to_runoff { get; set; }
public bool race_won { get; set; }
public bool race_just_won { get; set; }
public bool race_unwon { get; set; }
public bool additional_votes_reported { get; set; }
public bool additional_precincts_reported { get; set; }
public bool has_eevp { get; set; }


Funny they need that boolean huh?

Dex- 9 points ago +9 / -0

Seriously, what the fuck is up with that one? I'm trying to think of a legit explanation. Did you notice that yourself or see anybody else mention it?

ono412 5 points ago +5 / -0

Noticed it myself. I was thinking of doing some data analysis and step one is importing the json class structure. Saw this red flag when doing so.

Dex- 4 points ago +4 / -0

Damn, nice find. I guess it's been hiding in plain sight...we had that data shared a week ago. I didn't go through it all, but it appears that specific one was set to false.

NewUser101 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's spicy and good code analysis, pede. Look for everywhere that variable gets used, what it does, and if there's any comments which might provide insight.

isolepknurd 2 points ago +2 / -0


hey, could this be used to prevent updates when the data is adjusted? e.g. in VA at 05:30:56Z, which is when they removed the 308,341 votes that were loaded at 05:26:48Z?

Thonk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you expound on this? What does a boolean imply in this situation? That true=biden win and false=biden loss?

ono412 5 points ago +5 / -0

A boolean can mean whatever you use it for in the code as a simple true or false condition. So while I can't see the code which would use this bool, since this seems to be a class related to displays, its for each "RACE" class there is a "RACE_DIFF" parameter, this "RACE_DIFF" parameter, has three sub-parameters under it,

public class Race_Diff { public string race_slug { get; set; }

public Boolean_Things_That_Happened boolean_things_that_happened { get; set; }

public Details_About_Changes details_about_changes { get; set; }


The Details_About_Changes is an empty class, the race_slug string which is just a text description of the race, but the third boolean is Things_That_Happened.

Essentially, it seems this variable cluster (also known as a class) has to do with specific events that happened in the race, one of which is to show_nothing_votes_decreased. It's set to false for the trump/biden race, but its interesting that its even an option to be used. It probably toggles on and off whether to display the race on their sites throughout the night to hide anomalies in the data.

kissfan66 2 points ago +2 / -0

the most baffling part is why this one bool would have its intended effect (show_nothing) in addition to the actual "thing that happened"

Crookedlamp 6 points ago +6 / -0

you should archive all the states https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/new-mexico/president.json

if it's a two name state they use a dash.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
fskfsk 29 points ago +29 / -0

The counter-argument seems to be "That's when they posted the mail-in ballots.", although that doesn't explain why they waited until 3am and why it was 100% Biden. You would expect some Trump and 3rd party votes mixed in.

Presumably, they should have started counting the mail-in ballots at 8pm just like everything else.

Ogcarvattack 30 points ago +30 / -0 (edited)

the real question is... how did the count them so fast? how long has the remainder of ballots taken to count!?!? too obvious. "oh yeah i can count 180,000 ballots instantly, but it will take weeks to counts the rest."

nickle-pickle-pede 20 points ago +20 / -0

There was a Chinese lady who was part of the observing team for the Republicans. She said a whole bunch of new votes came in around 4am, an hour before all the ballots counters were supposed to leave. They waited for something like an hour but none of the new ballots got counted and everyone (Counters too) left. The next day she found out those ballots had all been magically counted and were for Biden. Putting aside the fact that none of the official staff counted them and there were no observers either, there was the question of how they could count them so quickly. Something like over 100K ballots were counted in an impossible short amount of time.

Litehouse 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just like GA, except our observers were sent home at 10:30. From piecing together info just from various posts with time stamps, I believe Biden may have had a couple of dumps here overnight adding up to about 200k. The time frame that seems especially suspicious to me is between 12 and 3 election night. Anyone have charts like this I can see for GA?

icockmyglock 13 points ago +13 / -0

If you receive a box labeled, "148K Joe Biden mail-in ballots", do you really need to "count" them?

Ogcarvattack 2 points ago +2 / -0

True! G19 edc

bootsy_two_scoops 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep, they “saved up” all the Biden votes and only counted them at 4 in the morning when nobody was watching.

Jimmy33 6 points ago +6 / -0

They didn't ackshully count them. They already knew how many were in each box for Biden.

Justin_is_Fidels_Son 4 points ago +4 / -0

"But Orange Man Bad told his supporters to vote in person so it's totally legit that 100% of the mail in ballots that get counted at 4AM are for Biden with no down ticket votes!!! How can you not understand that this makes complete and total sense!!!"

DL535 4 points ago +4 / -0

I want to leave this argument somewhere.

100,000 votes all for Biden. If the state is split 50-50 the odds of this happening by chance are (0.5)^100,000. If you put this into a calculator the result is zero.

I'm a math teacher. Calculators can display numbers as small as 1^-99. That's decimal point followed by 98 zeroes then 1. It is an inconceivably small number. The probability that 100,000 genuine votes would all be for Biden is smaller than that.

One might object, DJT told his voters to vote in person so most of the ballots would be for Biden. OK fine. let's say 75%. Then the calculation is .75^100,000. You know what the answer is? IT'S STILL ZERO. Even with a much more generous favorability for Biden amongst that set of ballots, this still ESSENTIALLY CANNOT HAPPEN.

So let's be really, really generous. Let's say 99% of mail in ballots were for Biden. Now the calculation is 0.99^100,000. Guess what? THE ANSWER IS STILL ZERO.


Biden lost the state and his lackeys committed federal crimes trying to change the outcome. It is a certain as the sun rising in the east. No amount of lying, sneering, insults, gaslighting and intimidation can change the mathematical facts. THE DEMOCRATS CHEATED AND TRIED TO STEAL THE WHITE HOUSE. FACT FACT FACT.

AsianVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Excellent point. If anyone has trouble understanding the above, here's a simple analogy. The odds of having tail for flipping a normal coin once is 50% or 0.5. The odds of having tails both times for flipping it twice is (0.5)x(0.5)=0.25, thrice is (0.5)x(0.5)x(0.5)=0.125, etc. Flipping it 100,000 times, the odds approach 0. Now if the coin is bent so it tends to show tail 99% of the time (instead of 50% of the time), flipping it 3 times give odds of tail (0.99)x(0.99)x(0.99)=0.97. Flipping it 100,000 times, the odds still approach 0. In other words, the mathematical probability of combined events is essentially zero if the number of events is at least 100. The greater the number of events, the closer the odds are to zero, still. So the odds of ALL OF any given 100,000 (manufactured) ballots went for Cheater Joe was deterministically zero, EVEN IF the odds of EACH OF THEM was 99%, like even in a heavily blue precinct. It's screaming fraud, but if most Americans don't have a reasonable grasp of basic math, they still can't appreciate the significance of the evidence and let the criminals walk. It's like a blindman can't tell the difference between a credit card and a driver license by touch but a man with normal vision can simply by eyeballing them. Yes, it's that obvious a difference!

Rickshawrick 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know that argument is bullshit since the places that got these "bumps" announced they had shut down counting for the night. which also seems to be a first.

fskfsk 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

The "shut down counting" seems to actually be "Now we know how many extra Biden votes we need, take a pause so we can print them."

It also was posted after they kicked out the Republican observers (claiming they were done counting for the day).

2020REBOUND 18 points ago +18 / -0

OP. check this out.. Ward 273 is a prime example of what happened. An R ward in Milwaukee. Trump leading 9PM and losing 4AM which made it a 92% TURNOUT;


This is how it happened on cnn 4AM: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBDjY9q/wisconsin-steal-113000-for-biden/c/
This is how it happened on 538: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPMH8XQ/wisconsin-as-it-happened-overnig/c/

BoJo 5 points ago +5 / -0

You can change the url and get all the states.

And now they're all on archive.org :)

supremeisland 3 points ago +3 / -0

This post needs to be upvoted higher.

Poomer1 122 points ago +124 / -2

Not even the Dominion skim code could save them, they had to resort to straight up ballot injection, violating Benford's Law.

Skim code is believed to work around 4-6% so as to fly under the radar. Which means Trump had a commanding lead of +8%.

the_pragmaticist 57 points ago +57 / -0

You mean exactly what he won by in Ohio where we aren’t suspecting much fraud?

DemsFuckKids 13 points ago +13 / -0

is there a map of states ranking by amount of reported fraud, yet??

NewUser101 7 points ago +7 / -0

Also Florida.

entropy 24 points ago +24 / -0

I'm sure skim code could work at higher percentages, too (see the Venezuelan affidavit in Lin Wood's recent lawsuit) but they didn't want it to be a blow-out. I'm sure that they thought that Biden was going to do well anyway so they just needed to pad it a little bit. Their mistake was thinking that Biden was going to do well.

Personally, if people go to jail for this I think that we should look at collusion with the pollsters as well.

RussianAgent13 9 points ago +10 / -1

we should look at collusion with the pollsters as well

Not to mention the media, and their "decision desks". This is honestly the weakest part of Trump's 2018 EO, but the possibility is still there. Any media found to be working in cooperation with a foreign interference campaign may have their assets seized by the military.

NewUser101 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think election interference on the domestic side needs to be equivalent to treason, and we need to make very clear that collusion carries the same penalties.

roytheboy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is there an explanation of how Benford's Law applies in this election? I haven't seen anything besides those quick mocked-up graphs that don't really hold weight when the precincts they're based on all have the same order of magnitude (ie they all have 3 digit vote totals)

Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +7 / -3

It does not. At all. It's a false lead that we need to stop talking about because it's easily deboonked by anyone with a brain.

Benford's Law applies only to real world numbers that span multiple orders of magnitude.

Kholland65 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well it works in large areas with 100,000+ thousand people. At least that’s my understanding. So it basically depends on what data set you’re actually looking at. Sure if York’s looking at a county/precinct with 5,000 people, it’s not going to work. But I would imagine using a whole state or a large metro area with a million people, you can get a much better picture from Benfords.

kissfan66 2 points ago +2 / -0

The important factor is not the size of the values themselves, just that the value pool spreads well over several orders of magnitude. A set of values exclusively between 100,000 and 999,999 has no relation to Benford's.

Italians_Invented_2A 0 points ago +1 / -1

Exactly. Many pedes here really don't understand how Benford works.

Italians_Invented_2A 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's not the size that matters. It's the levels of magnitude, i.e. the variances.

Counties of similar size would still give you results clustered around the same magnitude, so there's no reason for a 1 to be more common than a 3 or a 5.

DL535 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there is something there. Totals with leading digits of 1 or 2 are more common in real datasets, that's basically all Benford's law says. Thing is, a cheating precinct would not know that, they would erroneously think the leading digit is random, like most people do. Nobody wanting to change votes from 800 to a number in the thousands, would pick 1100, they would want to make it higher so they would go to 3 or 4000 or whatever they thought they could get away with. And amazingly, that shows up in the data analyses of districts where cheating occurred.

So I think the argument is probably valid. The only problem with it is, it's too complicated for normal people to understand so they will reject it. It's not POLITICALLY or JUDICIALLY useful even if it's MATHEMATICALLY valid.

We have to use stuff like eyewitnesses, intimidation proven by photo or video, affidavits of unjust practices, this stuff might actually make headway with a sympathetic judge.

kissfan66 0 points ago +1 / -1

The important factor is not the size of the values themselves, just that the value pool spreads well over several orders of magnitude. A set of values exclusively between 100,000 and 999,999 has no relation to Benford's

putin 82 points ago +82 / -0

Check MI - same pattern, but they dumped 135,000 ballots there with Biden in 96% of them. These are banana republic numbers.

Ogcarvattack 30 points ago +30 / -0

that is raycist. calling wayne county a banana republic

FreedomAintFreeYo 32 points ago +32 / -0

Liberals: When you say bananas, I think of monkeys which makes me think of black people which makes you a RACIST!

nickybops [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

We live in 🤡 🌎

Ogcarvattack 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's hard to argue that logic.

KekistanResident 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you see this for other states?

putin 7 points ago +7 / -0

You can download using this link: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json (substitute pennsylvania with any state you want). I have link to python scripts (2.7 and 3) which download all states and convert to csv format - let me know if this is something you want to do.

Also this is a chart I built using these data for PA, WI, MI, GA a while ago: https://media.thedonald.win/post/sp8SCoDT.png

OwlsExterminator 2 points ago +2 / -0

please add link for the CSV for PA, GA, WI, MI, NC, VA

KekistanResident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, that is pretty damning. Should be a red flag to anyone with common sense and decency.

putin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, this is suspicious as hell to anyone familiar with Statistics 101.

You also can't flip 0.6% from Trump to Biden with only 54 votes with 3,000,000 votes already counted: https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png

nickybops [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good shit.

mattyyys 69 points ago +72 / -3

This stuff makes me smile. Like, awe, they tried. How cute.

happybirthdaydude 21 points ago +22 / -1

What concerns me is that they just had Molly McCann on War Room and she said it appears Trump has given up completely on Wisconsin, which is unfortunate given how obvious this fraud is.

deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
Chodefish 2 points ago +2 / -0

usernames don't get better than that

DemsFuckKids 1 point ago +1 / -0

headed to the supreme court after that?

309MilitiaSgt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends... What's a recount going to tell us? An audit would yield better results.

shittinbritts 11 points ago +11 / -0

Pretty sure they just slapped $3MM on the table for recounts in a couple target precints

nukalurk 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm not sure why Wisconsin hasn't gotten more attention, Trump is only down by around 20k votes and the 4am dump that happened in Milwaukee is literally what made the famous red/blue lines.

itsdazzling 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’ve been making posts about Wisconsin for weeks and they don’t pick up on here. We are within 6/10ths of a point and if it’s about the money they just need to ask WI voters who are pissed

MakeAmericaLegendary 7 points ago +7 / -0

That would be such a bad move. There better be teeth to this Dominion thing.

mattyyys 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wouldn't think so and sure hope not. If he can overturn a few other states he doesn't need WI, but why drop it?

Magameister88 2 points ago +2 / -0


Trumper007 43 points ago +43 / -0

Those ballot have to be in 1 piece and need to be inspected. #FATCHANCE

UpTrump 22 points ago +22 / -0

That's why they threw away the envelopes with signatures. Can't verify them now

wolfpack28 19 points ago +19 / -0

You mean the envelopes that never existed? It would have taken them too long to stuff envelopes. Like, "Holy Crap! Printers! We Need More Printers!" "I don't care, just get these Ballots on the truck! Clock is ticking people!!"

Trumper007 7 points ago +7 / -0

By law they have to be retained. Slappy hand. lol

T2R0U2M0P 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't retain envelopes that never existed <taps head>,

DemsFuckKids 3 points ago +3 / -0

the number that is gonna fuck em is that 300%+ voter turn out

Titanium 2 points ago +2 / -0

sounds like a 'whoever the unverified ballots were cast for' problem

RexCollumSilvarum 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they throw away everyone's envelopes, then they can pretend that their fake votes originally had envelopes but they were just tossed away with the rest of them.

Madman2020 29 points ago +29 / -0


simonverde1 4 points ago +5 / -1

LOL I see what you did there

supremeisland 19 points ago +19 / -0

Shutting down the count suddenly on election night had to be done so they could sneak in more votes magically, I'd told everyone in my family that celebrated too early, that the next day "Democrats will magically find enough votes for Biden to win", and big surprise it happened. Yes, the Democrats are this obvious.

DemonicSoap 15 points ago +15 / -0

That's some good old fashioned commie Fuckery right der!

TheJustin 15 points ago +16 / -1

The reason they did it is because they've done it before and it's worked before.

It almost worked in 2016 but Trump was actually too popular and even when they had all of these systems in place they couldn't cover the Gap.

This year they thought having run a constant for your campaign against the man including smears in the media and impeachments and everything else that surely people would be tired of him and they were just need to tweak the algorithm a little bit in order to get the desired result.

But that didn't happen.and so they panicked and dumped

PeaceByStrength 14 points ago +14 / -0

They were surprised in 16.
Now they had in place the most diverse(in methods) vote fraud organization in history.
And they had to deploy all of it to counter the Trump landslide which made it so obvious.

DL535 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, I have been telling people not to focus on any one method, multiple methods of fraud were used, we probably haven't identified them all even now.

MenicusMoldbug 14 points ago +14 / -0

Isn't that right after that police escort thumbstick drive of new votes from Milwaukee?

USANumber1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Wasn't this dump delivered on a flash drive as well that they can no longer locate?

DippedBeef 11 points ago +11 / -0

Holy shit! Trump just tweeted this picture. Hi, Mr. President!!!!


nickybops [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Super based.

Shakakka99 9 points ago +9 / -0

A dump that big? Stacy Abrams was involved.

LugNuts 2 points ago +2 / -0

with corn and hair in it

Shakakka99 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm upvoting this with a really long stick, then throwing the stick as far away as possible.

trump2036 9 points ago +9 / -0

Exactly enough votes to tie the race, all in one neat single dump of ballots. Totally looks organic

BarbaraStreisand 6 points ago +6 / -0

Was the election in Wisconsin rigged through the education bureaucracy using money from a rigged referendum that JOE BIDEN shilled for earlier in the year? The referendum, which passed by 5 votes, gave one billion dollars to the Racine school district, but the money is controlled by a private organization run by BILL CLINTONS WISCONSIN CAMPAIGN MANAGER.

Was some of that money earmarked for corrupted poll workers / teachers? The NEA and teachers union endorsed Biden. Also Democrat Gov Tony Evers previously served as the Wisconsin Superintendent of Public Instruction. Did they rig it in Wisconsin through the education bureaucracy?

Wisconsin schools are rife with corruption and pedophilia scandals. By February of 2020 there had already been three WI educators charged with federal sex crimes in 2020 alone, including the superintendent of Altoona. The Wisconsin Public Education Network uses a pedophile logo. Some school districts in Wisconsin even allow incarcerated criminals to teach at school WHILE THEY ARE IN JAIL using work release programs similar to the one Jeffrey Epstein got. It would be extremely easy to use blackmail to control what happens to money allocated to school districts in WI

Wisconsin was the first state to swing in Bidens favor after the counting freeze and that is not a coincidence. Pelosi had just stated a few weeks prior that the entire election was "riding on Wisconsin" while earlier in the year Joe Biden shilled for a blatantly rigged referendum in Wisconsin? And the person in control of the money allocated by that referendum is Bill Clintons Wisconsin Campaign manager??

...Then Wisconsin is the first state in a series of "miraculous" comebacks for Biden??? Fishy.

Ehi_Passika 5 points ago +5 / -0

Has anyone explained why the NYT json data is reported as the total number of votes and the percentage for the 2 top candidates rather than showing the actual number of votes the candidates got at each update?

DiscoverAFire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because dominion processes the numbers as two percentages and a vote total, not as individual raw counts, because it's (intentionally or unintentionally) garbage software.

HocusLocus 1 point ago +1 / -0

21st century slack.
Everyone liked bar graph widgets.
No one demanded accurate numbers.
We're on the downwards spiral now

A_Colostomy_Bag 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is so blatant, it would be our duty to overthrow a Biden dictatorship.

BasedRedPillZeus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unbelievable corruption. When you control the entire media industrial complex you can be sloppy and get away with it.

DragonNRG 5 points ago +5 / -0

just like my own personal 3:51am dumps, it is pure liquid shit

DeboonkedFact 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is not the first time a dump in the middle of the night has caused a shitty mess.

Filetsmignon 5 points ago +8 / -3 (edited)

I'm once again going to try and play Devil's Advocate. I tried this on another thread the other day, nobody understood what that meant apparently and I got downvoted to oblivion and called a cuck. I just want to point out what the MSM / Dem explanation is for this so we can discuss it and hopefully put holes all through it. Their explanation is "this spike is Milwaukee (insert Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit for other States with similar spikes) submitting their votes, and of course it's 85+% for Biden because Milwaukee is overwhelmingly Democrat and the numbers are huge because the city has a massive population". It sounds reasonable. Now smarter Pedes than I, how is this not a good explanation?

Win4Don 10 points ago +12 / -2

The thing that made me suspicious was the pauses. I crashed out sometime after 3 AM feeling pretty good. I knew the gap would close some but with the leads Trump had, I felt pretty confident. A lot of outlets starting reporting counting would stop for the night and pick up again later in the morning. I woke up around 6:30 I started checking more results and like everyone else I was WTH. The pause and then the massive dump in WI tipped everybody off. I have watched Presidential elections for 30 years. Never have I seen a comeback in 4 swing states like we seen in 2020. If it smells like shit, it's probaby shit. There is no other plausible explanation, IMO. Whether stuffed ballots boxes, fraud uploads, or vote switching, there is no way in Hell this thing was legit. I just hope the Trump legal team can prove it.

ObviousCommonSense 4 points ago +4 / -0

Being on the West Coast, I was up watching the entire time and you're exactly right. It was the unanimous pause - at the exact same moment - across multiple states that had me LOLing and blowing up my friend's phones telling them Democrats were clearly and obviously filling out ballots to make up for the huge hole Biden was in.

And then literally what was predicted happened, across all those paused states, minutes apart from each other. It defies reason to think anything other than cheating occurred.

supremeisland 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without solid evidence, the courts won't grant any form of legal remedy, hell if this thing draws any closer to certification dates, there won't be any legal remedies available to rectify this fraud of an election.

DiscoverAFire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even DC went 15%-20% for trump. As the percentage for trump decreases, the likelyhood decreases exponentially. The odds that not even 5% of the votes were for Trump is infinitesimal. The chance that none of them... impossible.

Also, turn the question on them. What is the population of Milwaukee compared to the other districts? Why do the other districts only have 60% turnout and Milwuakee has 90+% ?

Is it really that likely that milwaukee hates trump 10 times as much as Dayton? (or other similar town in a non-swing state)

RANDOR0423 4 points ago +7 / -3

The data doesn't support your argument. Other largely democrat county (shit holes) submitted their data and it wasn't an outlier.

Filetsmignon 2 points ago +3 / -1

To be clear: it's not MY argument. It's the Dem/MSM argument. I'm just trying to see if we can debunk it. So how does the data not support it in more detail, if you can?

RANDOR0423 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh I know! I was arguing as if I was against the media.

itsdazzling 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is the Republican’s argument as well, this is from the head of the state reps https://imgur.com/gallery/e8bKEup

Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

Each county slowly feeds in the results as they count them, so even from Milwaukee they should have dripped slowly and steadily.

What does NOT happen is that a county counts all they have in secret and only after they are done they report back all at once, which is the argument you're making.

angryrhino83 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think historically Milwaukee has been close to like 65-35 dem advantage. It's strongly democrat but not 80-20 for example.

Observation 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)

Looks like an 80/20 split in Milwaukee (city itself) is similar to that in 2016:

2016: Clinton 188,653, Trump 45,167; total votes cast (excluding third parties and write-ins) 233,820

2020: Biden 194,646, Trump 48,413; total votes cast: 243,059

And re: 2012,

Obama’s victory margin in Milwaukee grew by 15,070 votes in 2012 compared with 2008, boosted by a turnout that saw 87% of the city’s registered voters casting a presidential ballot. His winning margin in the city was a stunning 170,831 votes.

(The 2012 split was indeed almost exactly 80/20 here.)

143,379 votes is a big chunk of 195,000. If that number indeed represents votes just in the city itself, the remaining split would have looked like 51,267 Biden / 23,250 Trump (a 55/45 split).

JetJocky 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

It's becoming more and more obvious what they did.

  1. close down the count, 5 states did at almost the same time
  2. determine how many votes Biden is behind
  3. create that number of votes plus a small lead and dump them
  4. from that point forward the algorithm adjusts the Trump count as it comes in to keep the Biden lead within a range of 1%- 2%.

In almost all cases, the gap stays consistent once the large vote dump is made. This link explains it in more detail: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/caught-part-6-michigan-georgia-like-pa-va-caught-pattern-biden-gained-lead-massive-vote-dumps-remainder-votes-possessed-biden-trump/

gogueofreeee 4 points ago +5 / -1

is there a graph like that for other states? AZ, MI, PA, VA, NH, NV?

DiscoverAFire 4 points ago +4 / -0

MI yes

PA - no, but the mail in ballots just shift in blocks. They're 50-50 until the night of the 4th, then 45-55 for a day, then 40-60 for a day. Super weird looking graphs that clearly indicate fraud, but a slow fraud not a fast fraud.

Not sure about the others.

Yewki 4 points ago +5 / -1

Why was the counting halted? Why did they wait and SEPARATELY count an enormous amount of ballots that favored Biden? How could the mail in ballots favor Biden that much, didn’t Republicans request a similar amount in WI?

Kekbewithus 4 points ago +4 / -0

These data dumps must have a name associated with them, or video of the people who were there at the time, or sworn affidavits of eye witnesses, or a list of people who were working or clocked in at the time.

Why is this so hard to investigate and actually arrest people? One person pleading guilty blows this whole thing wide open.

AAron_Burrr 4 points ago +4 / -0

They dumped 200k for biden in wisconsin and 140k for Biden in Michigan at the same time at 4:40 AM in the midwest. I literally watched it happen lol.

ono412 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even weirder, the expected votes processed SHOOTS to 99% from 92% after only 300 votes are added... Yet after that point 300 more are added. So somehow 300 is both 8% and 0%. CONVENIENTLY right after biden secures over .5%? I can only assume EEVP stands for "Estimated Election Verification Percentage"


kung-flu-fighting 2 points ago +2 / -0

already a lot of posts about this - remember this one - https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Sn1ueO/-red-alert-they-stole-minnesota-

MarkWaterNoChiAgent 1 point ago +1 / -0

"... Most major news organizations, including ABC News, the Associated Press and ABC13 instead are using a calculation the AP calls "estimated expected vote percentage." ..."
"...  EEVP ...."

( https://abc13.com/how-do-counties-count-votes-precinct-reporting-explained-what-does-mean-abc13-voter-information-2020/7583072/ )

xAnomaly 4 points ago +4 / -0

trump posted this same image an hour ago.

Diotima 2 points ago +2 / -0


MAGALogic 4 points ago +4 / -0

All I know is that when I went to sleep around 3:00 AM was that Trump won the election. Period!

pepe_sanchez 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is so stupid... it's like someone panicked and just hit the Biden button.

americanzoomer 3 points ago +3 / -0


G_regulator 3 points ago +3 / -0

When was the last entry before the 3:42 dump for Biden? I believe this is what their saying when talking about the speed the dominion machines can scan ballots at. 134,000 for Biden and by the looks the Trump line for the same period is about 1/4 the size of the Biden line so let's say total 45k votes for Trump and them together and that's approx 180K ballots scanned in for that dump.

If we know the speed of the machine at "Y" ballots per minute and the time the last count was added we can determine that a total of 180k ballots were processed in "X" minutes and the machine has a speed of "Y" ballots per minute.

So that's 180K ballots in X minutes but the machine can process Y ballots per minute we can sumise thats a "shit load of fraud in a short amount of time" more fraud than the machine can process.

Therefore Bush did 9/11 and Biden rigged the 2020 election are both proveable true statements.

Skull_Wax 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nothing to see here, move along! Move along!

chingazo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks legit. /s

Staatssicherheit 3 points ago +3 / -0


Yewki 3 points ago +4 / -1

The left will justify this by saying Wisconsin simply started counting the mail in ballots at this time. But why didn't we see this behavior at all in other states like Minnesota, Florida, and Texas? Why did they "save" these mail in ballots until the very end at 4 AM? How did the drop favor Biden by 85% here? In MI it was nearly 100%

My theory: They created mass ballots ahead of time in specific counties. In MI, some counties ended up with 300%+ voter turnout, so they got sloppy there. They probably included some Trump ballots too so they wouldn't have to worry about mixing them at the polling station. MI got sloppy (again) because their massive 150k drop was 97% Biden... oops. They stored these fraudulent ballots somewhere and only planned to use them if Biden was losing in their state. Why would you use them unless you absolutely had to? As to how they created the envelopes for their fake ballots, could have been done a number of ways. They likely did completely fake signatures on all of them... good luck matching hardly legible names against the database. So then all you need to do is deliver these fake ballets, have the volunteers count them, and you win. A small group of people in each state could have pulled this off

Usernameicanrecall 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do we have similar time stamped data for previous elections? Devil's advocate: do we know this is not normal when a large batch of comes are submitted at once?

dakin116 3 points ago +3 / -0

GEOTUS tweeted it :P

big_beautiful_wall 3 points ago +3 / -0

This makes it very obvious and clear to even the most casual observer.

SJWsHateUs 3 points ago +3 / -0

I doooooomped!

Fenrir24 2 points ago +3 / -1

"It wAs a ReD mIrAgE stOOOOOpId DrumpfTaRd! Lol GeT ReKt!!" - Democrats/MSM/RINOS

I took some liberties and improved their penmanship and grammar for clarity.

feraxil 2 points ago +3 / -1

BuT mUh DaTa EnTrY eRrOr!!!!

AwatingOrders 2 points ago +2 / -0

⚠️ Official sources say this is totally legit

ITOLDYOUSO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just was this on the madman's twitter!!

chanel_rions_hairgel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump was here.

Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump posted this!

GhostOfMyFormerSelf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, nothing sus about that... #TrumpWon