posted ago by PedeInspector (edited) +7483 / -0

This is an updated version of the previous 'HAPPENING' thread, with switches from each candidate to every other candidate, 3rd means 3rd party, all of the 3rd party candidates combined.

The script has been modified to account for precision issues, the total votes lost is the same as in the last thread.

First, we check whether when Trump lost votes, Biden gained that amount of votes, then we do the same for Trump to 3rd party, and so on when checking Biden and 3rd party for switches, afterwards, below the /////// lines, we switch the checking around, it basically means that it is certain that the candidates lost that amount of votes in total, while other candidates gained those votes, but we can't be sure which candidate gained which votes, so I'm showing you both possibilities.

Although, it seems like if we assume that Biden got all the votes that the 3rd party lost, it would explain why he has so many votes, and why so many states flipped out of nowhere.

Everyone can interpret these numbers as they wish, for now, the proof that we have for this data being real is that the Antrim county glitch shows up in the data. We might be able to confirm that it is 100% real once Georgia completes their hand recount. Until then, we should be skeptical of this.

EDIT : To shorten the thread, I deleted the data and added it into this pastebin instead : EDIT: Pastebin was deleted, here's a workupload link to the .txt file instead. https://workupload.com/file/xaRnPzgU8CY

The data shows serious IRREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened in the election.

We will know if this data is good or not once Georgia finishes their hand recount.

EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.

https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.

Place both in the same folder.

EDIT 3 : Doing further investigation.

This is an updated version of the previous '[HAPPENING](https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/)' thread, with switches from each candidate to every other candidate, 3rd means 3rd party, all of the 3rd party candidates combined. The script has been modified to account for precision issues, the total votes lost is the same as in the last thread. First, we check whether when Trump lost votes, Biden gained that amount of votes, then we do the same for Trump to 3rd party, and so on when checking Biden and 3rd party for switches, afterwards, below the /////// lines, we switch the checking around, it basically means that it is certain that the candidates lost that amount of votes in total, while other candidates gained those votes, but we can't be sure which candidate gained which votes, so I'm showing you both possibilities. Although, it seems like if we assume that Biden got all the votes that the 3rd party lost, it would explain why he has so many votes, and why so many states flipped out of nowhere. Everyone can interpret these numbers as they wish, for now, the proof that we have for this data being real is that the Antrim county glitch shows up in the data. We might be able to confirm that it is 100% real once Georgia completes their hand recount. Until then, we should be skeptical of this. EDIT : To shorten the thread, I deleted the data and added it into this pastebin instead : EDIT: Pastebin was deleted, here's a workupload link to the .txt file instead. https://workupload.com/file/xaRnPzgU8CY The data shows serious IRREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened in the election. We will know if this data is good or not once Georgia finishes their hand recount. EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives. https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script. https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used. Place both in the same folder. EDIT 3 : Doing further investigation.
Comments (671)
sorted by:
BishopofBlackpool 418 points ago +422 / -4

Hardest working Pede.

Thank you!!!!

JimmyNelson 204 points ago +206 / -2


TenScoops 119 points ago +121 / -2


PreciselyPaul 91 points ago +91 / -0


Meatbank84 65 points ago +65 / -0

I dare say BIGLY

MemeWarsVet 46 points ago +46 / -0

No problems there, believe me.

Davinci 27 points ago +27 / -0


deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
JudicialDredd 26 points ago +26 / -0


Mr_Beanths 21 points ago +21 / -0


kekkk 17 points ago +17 / -0


CheekyBastard 4 points ago +4 / -0

The fastest creature on Earth!

twoscoops4america 3 points ago +3 / -0


DONS_YUGE_DONG 5 points ago +5 / -0

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

DoubleBased 21 points ago +21 / -0

Could fit 12 skittles on that!

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
TheJake 3 points ago +3 / -0

They were mini m&ms!

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
hondo1 72 points ago +74 / -2

These guys are awesome! Very high energy! I see a bunch of names and numbers and my brain just zones out, which makes me very glad we have these awesome and amazing sleuths on our side!

Thank you for your hard work for this country!

Ghislaines_Ghost 25 points ago +28 / -3

We need an ELI5 executive summary.

BadRonald13 24 points ago +24 / -0

Yeah I thought I was smart until right now

ZeroDeltaTango 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah I thought I was smart until right now

We all are, Ron. After all, it takes intelligence to recognize it in others. And we have it here in spades.

d_lock 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pede took the graph of votes (The numbers behind the graph, but still), found every place that one candidate lost votes, and made two possible places those votes were redistributed. It has to be two possibilities, since this happened while everyone was getting votes, and both counts were going up.

As an example, at 9:00, Trump has 3 votes, Biden 2, and third parties 2. Then, at 9:05, Trump has 5 votes, Biden 4, and third parties 1. That third party vote which went away might have gone to Biden or Trump, depending on which new votes were counted during that time (we can't tell).

Thedaythe_redditdied 10 points ago +10 / -0

And the important take away is even if 3rd party votes were switched to Trump the whole system as a fraud and no votes should ever be switched.

illmatic_diplomat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also important from recent reporting that broke yesterday regarding pos. Malware on dominion server in Germany is that this “switch algorithm” we’ll call it seems sophisticated enough for 3rd party operator(s) to switch votes at will and sweep audit tracks and/or bog down investigators to unweave a very tangled web. So basically, even what we see as final or suspect to be, could very well have had multiple manipulations and intercepts occur of what was/is actual. When key areas oddly and abruptly stopped counting that night w/o reason, only to turn the machines back on a few hours later under the cover of darkness and no supervision is when much of this mess took place. Coincidence?

rootofjesse 1 point ago +1 / -0


FaRmErX2000 15 points ago +15 / -0

4chan Autists on suicide watch

ZeroDeltaTango 3 points ago +3 / -0

4chan Autists on suicide watch

Why? Thought autists were the good guys?

muhqtardtho 9 points ago +9 / -0

Think they're just saying we got our own resident autists over here giving them competition lol.

Kaledon 8 points ago +8 / -0

They are, suicide watch means they're in danger of committing not suicide because Hillary.

ZeroDeltaTango 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got, thanks

anon11111111 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 4chan guys had better up their game!

Cyborgpatriot 7 points ago +8 / -1

Hahaha same here pedes. Numbers just don’t do it for me. However guns and bullets, and running around, it’s high energy time. Lol

Silver_Fox 54 points ago +54 / -0

So Biden stole all the 3rd party votes? Is that why 3rd party support was historically low in this election? I remember so many people mentioning that on election night.

supercanuck 39 points ago +39 / -0

That totally makes sense in the perspective of the fraudster. Not many people would give too much attention to 3rd party votes therefore least likely to get caught cheating (if no one was looking... ) Luckily we have the AMAZING PedeInspector on our side who left no stone unturned!!

rootofjesse 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes. Maybe running data analysis on the third party votes will reveal something we have not noticed. Cause we are only focused on Main candidates. Not my area of expertise, but I am imagine is it important to get locally generated data sets from precincts, instead of the aggregate counts of states that happen much further up the chain from source of votes and initial vote counting

weltbild 12 points ago +12 / -0

I thought it was because the dems blocked ballot access for the green party and then stuffed ballots to reduce the percentage of the third party vote in relative terms.

Opinionated_Ocelot 20 points ago +20 / -0

Looking at just Nevada and Colorado for fun... Gary Johnson received 37k and 144k from those states... Jorgensen only got 14k and 50k.

That's one hell of a drop off in an election with historic turnout across the board. I know she wasn't the greatest candidate, but this is reflected for all other candidates. There is fuckery afoot.

weltbild 4 points ago +4 / -0

johnson was on media leeching from hillary and many libertarians might have voted trump instead

Thedaythe_redditdied 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t disagree with you. But I could also see less people voting third party just because both candidates were so extreme (I know following the constitution shouldn’t be extreme but now it is) so they bailed on third party to save guns or abortion.

SomeJoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm was 3rd party in 2016....tried to Vote Trump this year....but my state also used Dominion so who knows....maybe we should class action sue them for violating our rights.

retredd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bring it! Veterans died and living-maimed for this freedom!

Jojobelle 9 points ago +9 / -0

BIG BRAIN TIME !!! Great work

ChickenFried 4 points ago +4 / -0

Upvote OP messages. A lot of new user shills are coming!

PedeInspector [S] 221 points ago +222 / -1

Seems I forgot Wyoming, and I can't edit the thread for some reason.


Trump to Biden 0

Trump to 3rd 0

Biden to Trump 0

Biden to 3rd 0

3rd to Biden 49

3rd to Trump 220


Trump to 3rd 0

Trump to Biden 0

Biden to 3rd 0

Biden to Trump 0

3rd to Trump 270

3rd to Biden 0

AlphaNathan 61 points ago +61 / -0

The fact that you're not even American amazes me. God bless you, pede.

johndude 57 points ago +57 / -0

so many non-americans take this extremely seriously, you can't have an idea if you're in the us at the moment

Nornagest 37 points ago +37 / -0

well if your country fall ours are next in line.

scottikus 13 points ago +13 / -0

That doesn't happen in this timeline.

Trump2020Cruz2024 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is this the one where we hang those involved in the streets?

HungNavySeal300Kills 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, in minecraft

2l84aa 2 points ago +2 / -0


wickedwitchofwi 14 points ago +14 / -0

When I worked abroad it felt like there was equal interest in US politics and that country’s general election/politics.

SanFranShitty 11 points ago +11 / -0

This affects everyone. If America falls the world falls with it

Janalein 7 points ago +7 / -0

I live in Germany and I woke up at 6am this morning with Pede in my feed. Been checking his original calculations and this thread since then. Many of us are just as invested as you are as we want Trump to succeed. I’m finally getting the feeling this is the first solid evidence but it’s not good that Trump referred to the 941k as his lost numbers and the data might be too mathematical for the mainstream (and the courts).

Owl91 27 points ago +27 / -0

It's the last stand. Many understand that if America falls, so does everyone else.

Bb15 4 points ago +4 / -0

FoReIgN iNtErFeReNcE!!!1!

Max_Patriot 38 points ago +38 / -0

I just want to thank you for all your hard work.

artifex_mundi_x 21 points ago +21 / -0

3rd to Trump 220

How to interpret this kind of stuff?

PedeInspector [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

220 votes were switched from 3rd party to Trump.

lifeisahologram 43 points ago +43 / -0

They probably programmed it that way to have plausible deniability for it being a “bug”

“Woah it impacts all candidates! Sure 99% went to Biden, but 1% went to Trump! Totes a random bug!”

DelrayFitness 49 points ago +49 / -0

And I want those votes taken away from Trump.

You heard me right. Every LEGAL vote should be counted correctly and every ILLEGAL vote should be discarded. That’s what makes us different from the Dems, we denounce fraud when we see it.

I’m 100% confident the widespread fraud is overwhelmingly Dems, so if every LEGAL vote cast on or before 11/3 goes to the candidate that the voter intended, Trump wins in a HISTORIC LANDSLIDE.

NewUser101 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is right.

We need impartial investigation. Virtually all the errors go one way - our way. But if some little Repub race in Wyoming had a connection to Dominion... or perhaps they fucked up and set like one machine to prefer Trump instead... we need to know and it needs to be corrected.

All the fraud needs to be corrected. All of it.

magahope 7 points ago +7 / -0

And I want those votes taken away from Trump.

You heard me right. Every LEGAL vote should be counted correctly and every ILLEGAL vote should be discarded. That’s what makes us different from the Dems, we denounce fraud when we see it.

Said no leftist ever. ;)

sociopathix 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is not in question. We are the only side who will join with you to drag Trump out in chains if he cheated the election. That's what they don't understand; it's about the election being correct.

But on the same token, you had better line up with us if we find out we should be putting Biden under the jail.

Awilen 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the way.

sneedwt 8 points ago +8 / -0

Or to help hide the switches...if everything goes to one candidate, it's obvious, if they spread it around, it's not.

Also, I'm wondering if they used all states to get the total popular vote to swing towards Biden too.

Trumper926 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is it possible there is a tiny bit if fraud on the R side. Its wyoming. These machines aren't tougg to hack into and program apparently.

Anon1970 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why the R? It could have been set up by D's to implicate R's if there is an investigation into fraud. RINO's are D's incognito.
It's what they do. Alinsky rules.

VisualScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

No issues in Wyoming from this data. This script is not fully corrected for errors yet. I have one that does here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XThzKI/actual-vote-switching-from-data-/

ZeroDeltaTango 3 points ago +3 / -0

Until proven otherwise,







Trumper926 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree. Still saying its a good thing in some ways to prove validity.

rootofjesse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wyoming is pretty solid red state. Why do R's need to do that?

atomisten 9 points ago +10 / -1

ok so why would they switch 270 votes from 3rd to trump? is it proof that it's actually a glitch? or are they just doing some random trump vote switches to use this as defense in court to prove it was glitches and not targeted in favour of biden?

P0keu 15 points ago +15 / -0

Software does what it is told. So either way -- if Trump got votes or Biden got votes -- they made the software, with very specific lines of code, do everything you are seeing. It still means they messed around with election results. So it's not much of a defense in court.

Thewickersnipper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep! It took a lot more effort to code this up. They may even have bugs with all the screwed up logic they added.

BlmAnimalFarmFodder 9 points ago +9 / -0

A convenient "glitch" that we've known about since at LEAST 2006 that our voting machines were corruptible and capable of flipping votes. Eugene Curtis, the programmer that created the code testified to it himself in 2006.

Scooby 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seven ways to Sunday.

VisualScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

This code doesn’t properly correct for the precision error in the data so most of these are not true.

Here are ones that are: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XThzKI/actual-vote-switching-from-data-/

pede-o-saurus 2 points ago +2 / -0

^^ VisualScience's analysis is more solid - credit where credit is due - so if you're serious about the data side of it, check his post out.

Janalein 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a coverup

PedeInspector [S] 25 points ago +25 / -0

Lol, they're running with the old data, the new one is more damning in my opinion, switching votes from Trump to Biden would have been too obvious, the new data, presents the possibility that votes were shuffled around 'randomly', but with a huge amount of the 3rd party votes going to Biden.

2nd case scenario does present the possibility that the votes might have gone to Trump instead, but I believe if that were the case, he would have won a lot more states.

If the Edison data is confirmed as real, it'll prompt investigations in ~46 states, and prove widespread fraud. One can only hope. Sadly, there's always the possibility that the Edison data is flawed.

rooftoptendie 13 points ago +13 / -0

west coast is full of that 3rd party switching. As an ex-Berner, I know exactly why they did this. There are way too many progs and dems who hate biden, prolly voted downticket, and voted green/lib/write in sanders to appease their conscience. Theyre trying to cover up the huge amount of apathy for their candidate.

rootofjesse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes it would be useful to explore the West Coast Vote along those lines using true data.

poobusdoobus 9 points ago +9 / -0

u/TrumanBlack might want to edit a link to this updated, refined list in his post. https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

Otherwise, people are going to keep citing the out-of-date data.

TrumanBlack 11 points ago +11 / -0

I did but we left the data there so people can see how our work has evolved

TRUMPets 5 points ago +5 / -0

We're going to win this thanks to you and all the other based mofos out there. I used to work in big data doing sanity checks on large raw data sets. I know how time consuming this is. Thank you for your service 'Pede' 🙂

emmaright 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, does the President's team know or have access to this? It's disheartening to read things CNN says, like even Ivanka wants him to concede. What can the general Maga public do to help? Emma

TRUMPets 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saw a tweet earlier by geotus with this (or some version of it). Take heart pede, tis always darkest before dawn!

Strzok_is_a_traitor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Legally to lay the foundation you would need to find out where Edison is getting the data and all the steps from start to finish.

I believe its being shared from Dominion servers as the tabulators are connected to the internet to get "updates" and report results to Dominion and the State Election Boards.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
artifex_mundi_x 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes but how or why did that happen?

muy_libre 25 points ago +26 / -1

Maybe the algorithm is designed to shuffle around the votes to make them seem more realistic while still giving Biden a big advantage?

Idk, just throwing the idea out there.

LibDestroyer50000 11 points ago +11 / -0

100% this. The dems put a little extra effort in trying to cover this up. "SoMe VoTeS wEnT tO dRuMpF tOo!". They are doing the equivalent of playing Monopoly, then when they lose they destroy the pieces and say "I won, prove I didn't." Trump is going to raw-dog these idiots, mark my words.

crazychicken132 6 points ago +6 / -0

It looks like they loaded votes into the 3rd party just to 'distribute' them when they hit a certain % with the objective of maintaining a lead. The 3rd party was merely used as a vote bank, the by hand recounts I surmise will show some interesting tallies for 3rd Party.

A_Triggered_NPC 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should be 3rd to Trump #2020 XD

lizardo221 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm willing to throw out there a tiny bit of human error somewhere where they gave a wrong value and then corrected it later. Maybe it's that simple in this case since we only see 200 votes change.

The second option goes to my theory on how Scorecard tries to fake an election. I believe it is fancier than just a simple 3 percent on every score. I think it knows Trump needs a certain amount to be believable, so what it does is look at every precinct ever, and projects what kind of totals it can get away with based on what data has come through. It can't just nuke PA without filling the hole, so it sprinkles in a few extra votes in places like WY so that the grand total looks sort of right.

Last theory I've seen is that these are rounding errors, which is interesting, but they could never explain why PA has an ungodly amount of them while a place like GA is way less, and then all the non dominion states have virtually none.

VisualScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

Explanation and fully transparent code here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XThzKI/actual-vote-switching-from-data-/

This current thread still doesn’t correct for the precision error.

lizardo221 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well does that error disprove the whole theory for starters? The problem I find with it is that it doesn't explain how all the states in question this election happen to all be the ones to have the most "errors" yet somehow many states have none.

VisualScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s disproves the magnitude of the numbers.

New Jersey has the biggest swing I’ve seen, but plenty of states have none when you do the accurate analysis.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Bullet3250 14 points ago +14 / -0

So how does someone hide this from a hand recount.???

monximus91 16 points ago +16 / -0

Recounts at the county level, especially the deep red county level will blow this wide open.

Save the big blue city county shitholes for last. They are intentional sandbag quagmires.

Cheesemaker 7 points ago +7 / -0

If there is a paper trail, then its very hard to hide it from a hand recount (they basically have to go fabricate a bunch of physical ballots and swap them out). If its pure electronic, which it never should be because of exactly this reason, then its nearly impossible. Georgia luckily has a paper trail so they done fucked up.

the_bird 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unless that's what they were doing under shut doors and no supervision. Replacing ballots

Cheesemaker 7 points ago +7 / -0

That was due to a "water pipeline break" that happened to be no where near the ballot counting facility. Nothing to see here. Move along...

Yawnz13 3 points ago +4 / -1

Far as can be seen, it can't.

SlumberBalu 10 points ago +10 / -0

Everyone forgets wyoming, but trump dosnt, trump is an ALL AMERICAN HERO! There are no "fly over" states, just true american STATES! Well ok not really true, only red is american.

Sun_Tzu 145 points ago +146 / -1 (edited)

PedeInspector dropping the data again. Please come to our discord of other .win patriots. We’re about 100 autism’s strong right now we could use you.

We’re the ones who dropped all the MI and PA voter role findings. All devs, stats and investigator nerds trying to save the country.

We have tons of data sets and collective tools built.

I_LIKE_BEER 39 points ago +39 / -0

Thank you for all the work you all do!

localhost 17 points ago +17 / -0

Y'all should switch to using Element (previously Riot). It's encrypted and can be self-hosted meaning it isn't subject to monitoring.

niacin 12 points ago +12 / -0


My husband hosts a server out of the house that we use as our chat server for Element. Great chat option. Offers end to end encryption and login verification options.

Definitely recommend having it as a back-up, if nothing else. We're going into a "Dark Winter". Biden already told us they're at least gonna try.

localhost 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, the more people move to more secure communications the better. Mumble for voice, Element for group chat/media sharing, Signal for texting, Protonmail/Tutanota for email.

niacin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I use the app on my phone for element. I don't even use SMS anymore.

We also use mumble.

Definitely awesome programs.

localhost 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm proud of you guys! :)

You could say I'm a proud boy, lol.

niacin 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've been on Element since it was still "Matrix" and have been trying to get off unencrypted systems.

It started because we had a friend in Shanghai China. We told her about the Tienamin Square massacre and suddenly she stopped appearing online on G-talk (when it claimed to have end to en encryption). Turned out (surprise, surprise )G-talk in china does not have encryption.

A few months later we were able to talk again, but that moment changed everything for us. Secure chats for all our close friends.

Luckyftw 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where is the discord channel? I'm not autist but wouldn't mind cheering you guys on

BidenCrimeFamily 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same here...my skills are outside of Data Science, but I can help where I can!

crusty_curmudgeon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Can you give a 2-3 sentence "Discord for dummies" explanation. And how would we join the Win discord group?

alaf44 5 points ago +6 / -1

Discord is the #1 VOIP service people use. Replaced teamspeak, ventrillo, raidcall, skype, ect.

You can use it as an application, in a web browser, or via a phone app.

To join our server someone would need to send you the invite link.

TruuthSeeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, I noticed about a week before the election or so it became invite for the .win, use to troll it for the best memes

HilarysToe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Would love to join, been looking for a server with people who are working on this. I’ve been aggregating data from 4chan and 8kun. Lots of good work being done there too but sadly it’s being overridden by shills. Hope I can contribute to the right people

Wyopepe 83 points ago +84 / -1

Feels like the fall of our republic by the folks that are all about any means necessary.

They would rather rule over the ashes than live with reality.

jdog 46 points ago +46 / -0

They are traitors. They sold out our Republic to China for power.

Shayhawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

And their souls to the devil.

BishopofBlackpool 6 points ago +6 / -0

In the UK it's all about revenge for Brexit. They hate Brexiteers and Trump, and are happy to have someone pro-EU who will never give the UK a trade deal just as long as Trump loses. Idiots!!!

UKnowTheThing 74 points ago +74 / -0

I’m blown away by some of the brainiac pedes we have. The best brains, believe me.

DJFG 35 points ago +36 / -1

Tremendous brains. Absolutely incredible.

BadRonald13 19 points ago +19 / -0

Nobody has the brains like we do let me tell you. The world has never seen brain power like this before.

A_Triggered_NPC 12 points ago +12 / -0

Many people even say, we have the best brains in history

NancysBarTab 5 points ago +6 / -1

but CNN told me we were all stupid inbred hillbillies?

Marshall 7 points ago +7 / -0


deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
FLIBS 64 points ago +64 / -0

Very true, this Georgia recount will confirm a lot of this data. Very interesting.... Great work.

Oskar 45 points ago +45 / -0

Thats part of what tipped off Dr. Shiva. One county in MA (Franklin) had to he hand counted for some reason. The numbers in the hand count looked very different from the rest of the counties.

MakeAmericaLegendary 13 points ago +13 / -0

That's encouraging. Let's pray that Georgia is the linchpin that sets off this grenade.

HiddenDekuScrub 50 points ago +50 / -0 (edited)

I'll be the one to say it this time: Impressive length!

Edit to Add: Actually, now that I've had time to peruse this list, it seems the dominion software is moving votes all over the place, and is shuffling them quite a bit around that 3rd party candidate. It almost looks like they're shuffling votes around counties, even to the point of adding to Trump's tallies, in order to hide their tracks.

Scottdelia 18 points ago +18 / -0

It's probably to keep it within a certain threshold like 1-3% to make it believable.

HiddenDekuScrub 12 points ago +12 / -0

Indeed. And it makes me wonder if elections are ever as close as we are led to believe.

bearhammer 16 points ago +16 / -0

This is very sophisticated fraud. It doesn't make sense that some states show few Trump votes switching to Biden or Trump gaining votes until you realize Jorgensen may have net lost tens of thousands of votes in each state. I'm beginning to wonder if Jorgensen came in second in some counties!

PurestEvil 12 points ago +12 / -0

I was about to post a comment about how I would construct a device that does election fraud, and one part would be to keep the trajectory of the votes similar while ensuring that the candidate that is supposed to win is always slightly above, but not too far to be suspicious and not too little to be too close.

In order to achieve that, you'd need to shuffle votes around at every step as needed, where, assuming the candidate that is setup to win gets less votes, will have more votes shifted to him than vice versa.

You'll want to keep the curves relatively smooth, so that there is no suspicion, and no room for unexpected turn of events. It might be possible that very red states are counted next, and cause the graph to spike for R. But you'll want to eliminate that variance and pretend like the ballots are perfectly mixed up, and each ballot selected has a chance of 55% to vote for the candidate that is supposed to win.

Imagine you keep it "wild", and decide to always add or shift 'n' votes for your candidate - if the spikes only occur on one candidate, it might become a notable pattern in some scenarios. Sometimes it has to be more erratic, sometimes it has to be more smooth - so enforcing one pattern (the less exciting one) is a generally safer way to go.

TCPatriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

I was thinking the same thing. It looks like some algorithmic shuffling to maintain a plausible ratio between the candidates.

Alternatively, the Dominion employee interviewed on SGT Report explained a process where a bad ballot would trigger the need for a stack of 50 ballots to be re-scanned, and that she witnessed multiple errors involving counts that should have been cancelled actually being duplicated tenfold.

I believe that the best evidence of fraud will be disclosed with the physical ballots.

mong04 10 points ago +10 / -0

Kind of reminds me of money laundering

HiddenDekuScrub 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah. I know I used the word "embezzling" before.

LordOfTheReeeeengs 6 points ago +6 / -0


firestorm117 48 points ago +48 / -0

Is anyone looking into senate and house races? John James and Kim Klacick both have outstanding claims of similar voting fraud for their races, would be interesting to see if we find a similar pattern there since they'd be two prominent black GOP politicians in majorly affected areas.

LordOfTheReeeeengs 13 points ago +13 / -0

Would be huge if they win!

firestorm117 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yea, I'm thinking they targeted them specifically to try and keep prominent black politicians that represent black communities that have struggled with democrat rule for way too long from becoming key figureheads in the walkaway movement.

rooftoptendie 2 points ago +2 / -0

fucking racist shitheads.

Granny 7 points ago +7 / -0

And Sean Parnell, PA 17.

thebest2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oberweis and Underwood in IL too House seat. We can take the house and senate and boom.

bellcurvestrikesback 1 point ago +1 / -0

Klacik lost by too much to be fraud

blackdudeinresidence 42 points ago +42 / -0

Username checks out.

namechangearoo 41 points ago +41 / -0

So it looks like they were pulling a lot more 3rd party votes in for Biden. That’s where the steal is. Those folks are all lone wolves and would never question their %. Who cares if it’s 1% of 3% to them. Well done guys!!

Meddlesom 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yep, for example... In Colorado, 2016, Gary Johnson got 150,000 votes and Jill Stein got around 60,000, and third parties in total got 240,000 votes, which was 8.5% total.

This election had third party votes drop down to 82,000, which was 2.5%. 8000 for Green party, 48,000 for Libertarian.

I can understand Green party tards voting for Biden... after all, with Greta and AOC as his climate advisors, he's right up their alley. But Libertarians going that hard for Biden? No fucking way.

rooftoptendie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also, don't underestimate the rape claims and the pedo shit. Dems and progs love to be victims, they cherish their victimhood. Any female who has ever been raped, or who thinks they were raped, or any person who has had a brush with pedos in their past did not vote for biden. If anything we should have WAY more 3rd party votes than '16

dataonly 36 points ago +37 / -1

Do you have a net vote summary by state?

And thanks for all your work on this. Have been trying to help spread the word.

BranchCovidian 28 points ago +29 / -1

I'd also like to see the net effect, and we need OP to explain the nomenclature. When he says "Trump to Biden" (or "Biden to Trump", "3rd to Biden", blah blah), does he mean the voter's intent was for Trump but it was switched to Biden? OR, that reversing the switch to preserve the voter's intent requires switching from Trump to Biden? Makes a world of difference.

SunTzusdad 6 points ago +6 / -0

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden, the same goes for Biden to Trump and etc. Copypasta

FullAutoFlintlock -4 points ago +4 / -8

How hard is that to figure out, I mean seriously. 3rd party to Biden, Trump to biden.. voted changed from and to..

Jabron661 7 points ago +7 / -0

I get that much, but why does something that shows votes were flipped Biden to Trump help our case?

I didn't read every line and do all the math, but in some states it looks like Trump stole votes from Biden.

Am I wrong? how does this data help our case in any way?

Example, Mississippi shows that more votes were flipped to Trump than to Biden, does that mean we stole Mississippi?

Sorry if I am missing something here, but this list seems to be very arbitrary and random.

Janalein 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe the software is trying to conceal its tracks by also favoring Trump up to a certain point. As others here have pointed out, it probably stayed within certain threshold to make it more believable.

nimblenavigator0519 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, but it could mean that the voting software is unreliable, calling into question the whole election. How that would effect the outcome is anyone's guess, but it seems overall the voting software favored Biden.

Jabron661 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I went back and read some more and did some of the math, and it does appear to heavily favor Biden.

Still even the thought of one fraudulent vote being given to Trump makes me ill. I really don't even want to give one iota of ammunition to the Democrats. I want all of our votes to be 100% legit.

nimblenavigator0519 1 point ago +2 / -1

I want all of our votes to be 100% legit.


SoldierofKek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ok that's fine, in that case Wisconsin is wrong and it was wrong yesterday. I brought it up and everyone is running down a damn rabbit home as if they're all mathematicians and software engineers. The gateway pundit reported that 19.500 votes were swapped by the voting machines from Trump to biden in one county. This showed 3000. If we're going in front of a court maybe it's be good to have our facts straight!

BranchCovidian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, for Michigan, it says Trump to Biden 9,395, ..., Biden to Trump 11,981. So more votes were changed by the fraudulent machine to help Trump than to help Biden?!?! (However, the "3rd to Biden" really outweighs that at 124k) Hence the confusion and why I thought it might mean the way the votes need to be changed to be correct.

FullAutoFlintlock 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was an algorithm used to shift votes and not look suspect. They had to shift so many however

sketchy_at_best 16 points ago +16 / -0

I did it for the swing states everyone is looking at.


MemeWarVeteran69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks. This makes the most sense

Filetsmignon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Parenthesis is lost votes?

sketchy_at_best 5 points ago +5 / -0


deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
bigwin 2 points ago +2 / -0

can you expand on what your process was?

sketchy_at_best 5 points ago +5 / -0

I am not the guy that wrote the script, I just put his numbers into a slightly more digestible format. You can see the positive numbers are helping x candidate and the numbers in parenthesis are hurting y candidate.

bigwin 1 point ago +1 / -0


Magameister88 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

I did a quick calculations using excel (someone please check if I made mistakes) and here is overall "net summary" for all states OP mentioned:

Trump: +1,211,075

Biden: +6,327,489

3rd Party: -12,186,487

As you can see, numbers dont quite add up so dunno if I made mistake or what.

Edit: Calculated again. adjusted numbers Edit2: It seems my excel-skills suck, and until someone else verifies these numbers, everyone should ignore my comment.

Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the numbers don't add up that's a red flag. Maybe OP can chime in.

idkfa 4 points ago +4 / -0

Weren't there altogether lost votes? That would explain the discrepancy.

SoldierofKek 27 points ago +27 / -0

This is confusing. It looks like you're saying more switched from biden to Trump.

PedeInspector [S] 51 points ago +53 / -2

That is indeed the case in many states, but if we assume that this is indeed fraud by DNC/Biden, it would be expected to see something like that, I would definitely do that in order to make myself look innocent, then take those votes from 3rd party instead, you have plausible deniability and a ton of extra votes that way.

Tiocfaidh_ar_la 35 points ago +39 / -4 (edited)

Is this just a case of you/us not really understanding what the hell happened? I don't mean to discredit your work, but this is obviously vastly different than before. Us throwing shit at the wall hoping to get it right is not the way to victory.

I feel like the way forward is to find things we KNOW to be certain and focus on them. Wide drag nets like this are way way more likely to end in failure and ruins our credibility.

For what it's worth, this goes against what shivas video appears to have produced.

deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
Tiocfaidh_ar_la 8 points ago +9 / -1

You're saying the same thing. There are a LOT of assumptions being made and trying to make sense of what we don't yet know is not how we find a problem.

You have to start with some known qualifying issue and build out from there. I do feel like the inspector is ultra talented, but should probably get a lot more hyper focused on building out from what knowns we have. I, like everyone else appreciate the work. I just don't like seeing time wasted and credibility taken away. Publishing these rough drafts as bible is not really helpful.

SoldierofKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

Agree and imagine if we being this in front of the supreme court..all are old..all of them are freaking boomer age. You have to be able to show such smoking gun evidence that it shocks them into action.

glompywompy 4 points ago +5 / -1

Isn't the fact that it switched at all a problem?

What if dominion only switched votes to Trump? This allows the Dems to really ramp up the fraud on the ballot front, with triple scanning on the same ballot, making fake ballots , etc, then they can say dominion gives them protection since it looks like it favors Trump. Until you look at 3rd party, seems that is where the steal is really happening.

Compare to previous elections, 3rd party never gets more than 2%, they've been running this fraud forever. They just didn't account for how few people went 3rd party in 2016 because Trump was the outsider and there wasn't enough to steal with just dominion alone.

Tiocfaidh_ar_la 4 points ago +8 / -4

I'm really trying to avoid conspiracy in order to get to the truth. I want to win the real battle, not the forums one.

glompywompy -4 points ago +1 / -5

This is not conspiracy though. Dominion flips votes. Period. What is conspiracy about that?

Just realized your a new shill trying to fit in. A sad dem trying to cause dissent and throw shade on legit stuff.

Go back to reddit.

Tiocfaidh_ar_la 2 points ago +7 / -5 (edited)

So the real reason third party never got over 2% is bc dominion software has always suppressed the candidate? Riiight.

Dominion has also not yet been proven to flip votes. Is it a working hypothesis? Absolutely. If we knew it flipped votes this would be a done deal.

Just because I don’t want the work here soured by conspiracy bs doesn’t make me a shill. Focus on things that are provable. We don’t have time, money or resources to waste. Go back to your bunker homie.

bellcurvestrikesback 3 points ago +3 / -0

Logic will prevail

glompywompy 0 points ago +1 / -1

So dominion switching votes is a conspiracy? Got it. You are blind brotha.

SheikFromMozambake 4 points ago +4 / -0

I keep saying this but I'm not getting any traction... Votes are probably being siphoned all the time, not just when we see candidate's vote counts back up. This is a really important point. The fraud is much larger than we can see with the technique being used.

jbvx 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, this exactly. And now the president is tweeting the original numbers which are known to be false. This is going to end up badly if it's wrong. These guys are putting this information out to everyone as if it is correct, but it's been proven wrong. There are too many holes in the argument.

PantsJihad 12 points ago +12 / -0

This interpretation makes sense. A certain amount of "noise" introduced will help conceal the actual intended result. It's like popping smoke to conceal an advance.

mnguy12000 5 points ago +5 / -0

yep they switch 3rd party to biden to win the states after they took votes from Trump and Biden and gave to 3rd party, to then turn around and give back to Biden. this is like Superman 3 shit.

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
magicmike 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Wow, looks like those black boxes are on the fritz again! What can ya do, technology amirite?"

Molten_Plastic 19 points ago +20 / -1

It's the ballot shuffle. Net gains to Biden.

SoldierofKek 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't know. Yesterday the data on Wisconsin was dead wrong. 19.500 votes shifted from Trump to Biden and I saw a mere 3000.

ChickenFried 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they use different settings in different states? And this is only one way to cheat, there are plenty of other ways to fix total numbers.

SoldierofKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know, but if there's all this back and forth it doesn't really fit what that MIT Professor was saying... It even close. He showed a clear line where once the republicans reached a specific threshold a certain amount of votes would be stolen.. unless this is like one of multiple events and the machine is basically playing 3 card monty the whole time.

NancysBarTab 2 points ago +3 / -1 (edited)

I think this is a case of multiple ways to skin a cat. the algorithm will do shuffling in the background and also generate some systematic "white noise" (votes shuffled in other directions) to conceal itself.

but there are votes that are switched manually in the system as well. it's not all automated, as is seen in the instruction manual. the key is going to be tracking down the aggregate count after all those methods are applied.

the good news is software engineers hate wholesale purging data. some record is always kept for troubleshooting purposes. there's always a trail.

Saltyspicoli27 8 points ago +8 / -0

I was reading part of it before my ADHD took over and I started playing with my pet bird... I'm glad somebody's paying attention that's all I can say

bigtimepie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sometimes the only red pill a person needs is an Adderall (or two or three).

SickIcarus 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s how I’m seeing it too. 🤔

jsmith81 -13 points ago +3 / -16

Yeah, I would cut the "Trump>Biden" ones out if I were OP (or edit them to 0), it doesn't seem like this list is doing us any favors the way it looks right now.

Scrivenerian 22 points ago +22 / -0

Cutting results or information because it doesn't look good for our side is no way to sort this out and win.

jsmith81 -9 points ago +2 / -11 (edited)

Publicizing a list that shows Trump benefitting more than Biden from the vote switches will do even less for us. If what OP showed is correct, then the American people did simply not know what's best for itself. Sometimes you need to put what's best for the country over democracy. This isn't me being biased; I did not say this when Obama won his 2 elections, but Trump is a 1 in a life-time president, and we have to do whatever it takes to make sure he gets re-elected.

SoldierofKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah I'm not going to repost this...no way. For one I can't explain it...so I'll look like a jackass. And for two if it even gives the appearance that Trump stole even one vote...i think the only way to check is to have an expert go over this and examine the code.

jafit 22 points ago +22 / -0

As a software developer, I don't see how it's possible to create a program intended to count things that does any of this by accident.

webthing 7 points ago +7 / -0

It was no accident or glitch.

RussianAgent13 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you look at Dr. Shiva's presentation, it actually records votes as a decimal number and allows for a "weighted proportion" to modify the vote count. It's no question part of the algorithm.

KILLARY4PRISON 3 points ago +3 / -0

You don't see how a live distributed system collating responses from dozens of nonstandardized legacy data sources FUBAR an unofficial reporting dataset?

jafit 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are you talking about? The software is actually counting the votes, not scraping the decision desk website to collate results.

REE_Salty 22 points ago +22 / -0

Pede Secretary of Defense

Brokenpurpletoaster3 8 points ago +8 / -0

*office of the elected Pede secretary of defense

fkn_lost_my_password 2 points ago +2 / -0

President-Elect Pede

Justice101pt2 17 points ago +17 / -0 (edited)

I Created a Visualization of Vote Losses/Switches that you can look at the exact point in time and amount of change for every time there was a reduction in votes for any side.

Plz upvote my post on this

DiscoverAFire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great vis!

Cloraxland_ 17 points ago +17 / -0

Do all these states use Dominion?

JustHereForNews 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think 30 including all these contested states

LpTx 9 points ago +9 / -0

28 was the number reported by OANN. (30 is close enough, but I just wanted to feel like I was contributing something here)

MixedBlacknWhite 2 points ago +2 / -0

" but I just wanted to feel like I was contributing something here)"

You done good kid, you done real good.

I'll acknowledge you :)

LpTx 1 point ago +1 / -0


PantsJihad 11 points ago +11 / -0

Here's a fun one: Only one county in AZ uses it. Guess which one?

Yep, Maricopa. The problem one.

cbird54 2 points ago +2 / -0

No Texas specifically does not which is why I'm confused as to why it's included in this list.

TruuthSeeker 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

Yes they do. Just in certain parts of the state, texas is not implemented state wide like many other states that use it. I'll give you a guess of who uses it in texas however

The_Expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who is Austin?

ClemTiger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Older software uses a lot of same scripts, I have been told

deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
MiChecker 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would think that the txt files would have to be crytographically signed. Hash value added to the txt file to validate the data. Only data is signed could be imported as well. The dominion systems then would only accept data from trusted sources. They would have a PKI that would be used for different purposes. We already saw that they have one encryption key for the whole system, I don't know where I saw that, but the manual was posted. Some certificates would be used for exporting, some for intersystem transfers, etc. It's basically a zerotrust model, you distribute unique certs to the individual machines and then it's more trusted system. You can't have signed data from a different machine being used in another machine.

If it doesn't then yes, there is a security potential for changes.

BoatingAccident 12 points ago +13 / -1

SO, serious question. What good is this to us here? Unless Trump's team can vet this stuff and it becomes admissible evidence and can show some proof. What can someone like me do with this information besides look at it and be mad?

PedeInspector [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

If the hand recount in Georgia proves that this data is real, it will make this post into a prediction of the fraud found there. And afterwards, this post might be used as evidence that there is fraud in multiple other states as well. But don't take my word for it, I don't know shit about law.

muy_libre 6 points ago +7 / -1

Right, I don’t think there’s any way they would be able to have the paper ballots match the counts from the machines if vote switching did indeed occur.

mrh218 3 points ago +4 / -1

Please help me understand. Doesn't this predict that one candidate benefited and it could be either Biden or Trump depending on your order of checking? For example, Michigan switched a bunch of votes, but the second way you checked shows Trump gaining huge instead of Biden.

Juantinntwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

The program seems to be keeping all candidates close together so it doesn’t look as suspicious with the desired winner coming out 3% or less ahead. This was actually described almost verbatim just days before the election by trumps people and it was censored by big tech. Lookup scored card and hammer. They are just names of vote manipulation programs, but this data is what they described as their function.

MiChecker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess, I really hope it's something wrong with the data feed. Pede shows that the michigan glitch is in there. So that seems unlikey the feed is totally bad. If it's not, then it seems sufficiently random that it could be like the michigan county where ballot mapping files are getting confused when merges happen. So it appears random, but it's actually the mapping being wrong. At least that's how I read that michigan county issue.

I do wonder.... if that one county could configure their systems incorrectly, other counties could have done the same thing. Would they catch it? Dunno.

One other thing is in Iowa, one down ballot candidate is asking for a recount of a district. Maybe it will be quicker way to tell there depending how they recount.

KickTheDamnBall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assuming we can trust the Georgia recount.

IJustWannaLurk 4 points ago +4 / -0

It can be used to force recounts by hand.

cougar2013 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perform your own analysis and make noise about your result. Can’t hurt.

TrumpTrain2020 12 points ago +12 / -0

Put me in the screenshot so my grandkids can visit me in the National Archives.

mbarnar 11 points ago +11 / -0

Damn michigan siphoned 3rd party votes to Biden. It's genius cuz nobody would think that 3rd party is abnormally high or low.

Haven't read through all of the list but I wonder how many other states did that.

Liberty49220 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Excellent observation. This is great news because a manual recount of the paper ballots in Wayne County will quickly and clearly show whether there was a massive undercount of third party votes.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Redsriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

This makes way more sense than anything else I've seen in the switching theory

3rd party support was INSANELY low this time around. The only % differences from 2016 seem to be 3rd party in swing states all went to Biden, bumping him over Trump. I noticed this day 1. Some say that Trump became such a focus that it was all about trump, but... Why would almost all 3rd party votes go for Biden? Doesn't seem to make sense to me.

bigwin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone made a video about 3rd party losses. Check it out.


Redsriot 2 points ago +2 / -0


Burmeister 9 points ago +9 / -0

Great work MAGA soldier!

thefeebleguy 9 points ago +9 / -0

So how many total votes did POTUS lose compared to Biden?

PedeInspector [S] 33 points ago +34 / -1

I think that if this is indeed the result of fraud by the DNC/Biden, we shouldn't be looking at what Trump lost, but at what 3rd party lost and Biden gained.

thefeebleguy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right, right, overall sounds like a huge hand recount/audit should occur in all of these states.

thefeebleguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then what would be the total lost for each candidate?

Shakakka99 3 points ago +3 / -0

Forget "lost". You want to know the net gain for Biden, and the net gain for Trump.

wickedwitchofwi 2 points ago +2 / -0


MehNahMehNah 9 points ago +9 / -0

Arizona - typically a Republican stronghold - going to Biden? Calling bullshit right away.

Especially with GEOTUS's extremely high approval rating among Republicans.

acada 3 points ago +3 / -0

My friends in AZ believe it. The state’s become a dumping ground for fleeing Midwest liberals.

They want the sunshine but can’t afford California, so they go to Arizona

KILLARY4PRISON 2 points ago +2 / -0

Californians have been flooding Arizona for years. It's incredibly believable.

Staatssicherheit 9 points ago +10 / -1

We might be able to confirm that it is 100% real once Georgia completes their hand recount.

Yes. I would have said all of this was completely fake but Antrim County shows massive fraud like this is possible.

LeafQuery 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if they have paperless voting machines ?...

idislikecheesepizza 2 points ago +2 / -0


A judge ruled that paperless voting was not to be used this election.

CynicProject 9 points ago +9 / -0

For anyone that doubts. If you want to see some actual numbers instead of a script I posted this in the other thread. But check that my math and logic flow. I believe this validates what the OP is seeing.

For TimeSeries 27:

Trump: 0.578 331,689.346

Biden: 0.401 230,116.657

Adding 560 votes, even if all to Biden gives:

230116.657 + 560 = 230676.657

Now form the new ratio of Biden to Trump votes:

Biden: 230676.657/574417 = 0.40158396600

Trump: 331689.346/574417 = 0.5774365069

But the timeseries says Trump should be at 0.568 now, not 0.57743 (0.57743 makes sense as the new ratio for only adding 560 votes to the total)

Going by Timestamp 28, the new values for 574417 total votes are:

Biden: 0.406 * 574417: 233213.302

Giving him: 233213.302 - 230116.657 = 3096.645 extra votes... from where?

Trump: 0.568 * 574417 = 326268.856

Giving him 326268.856 - 331689.346 = -5420.49 votes taken away from his total.

Now, for TimeSeries 29:

Trump: 0.571

Biden: 0.404

Total Votes: 641548

Added Votes: 641548 - 574417 = 67131

67131 Votes added that we don't know what the % per candidate was. But we can find that out by looking at the change in ratios that are new.

Trump: 0.571 * 641548 = 366323.908

Biden: 0.404 * 641548 = 259185.392

A ratio is a relation, between things.

(Biden/Total Vote Count) is one ratio

(Trump/Total Vote Count) is another.

Now, one caveat, the Total Vote Count probably includes votes for other candidates that were running along them.

But either way:

Biden Added Votes: 259185.392 - 233213.302 = 25972.09

Trump Added Votes: 366232.908 - 326268.856 = 40055.052

Total by just adding the additional votes:

40055.052 + 25972.09 = 66027.142, which makes sense as the timeseries shows 67131 votes added.

Once again, this checks out. The timeseries data from 28 to 29 shows correct %. From 27 to 28 shows votes removed. Now, if the number of votes in Timeseries data from 28 to 29 was only a few added (like 500), but there was a significant change in ratios, like what we saw in 27 to 28, that's the issue of losing votes.

Usernameicanrecall 3 points ago +3 / -0

How is Rudy not talking about this?

TheQuickening 2 points ago +2 / -0

Math is one of those things that's hard to get across to the masses.

Ever wonder why they had teachers saying it's okay if a student says 2 + 2 = 5?

Leftists Say 2 + 2 = 5, NewAmerican Article

There's a video out there I've seen where this woman is talking and saying that it's okay to teach the student that 2 + 2 = 5. Right now I can't find it, I hope another one of the Pedes can find it.

Usernameicanrecall 1 point ago +1 / -0

as a math guy... and a 100% non leftist... this is what they mean...


2.2 +2.4= 4.6

Now let A=convert (A, integer) let B= convert(B, integer) let C= convert(C, integer) (
OR another way of looking at it is measurements.. What if our measurements are 2.2 and 2.4, but we have only 1 significant digit...)


(yes, there is a logical fallacy here... when we do the conversion we invalidate A+B=C... convert (A, integer) + convert(B, integer) does not necessarily equal convert(C, integer) ... but just to make the point that the 2+2=5 argument does have some basis in mathematics... it makes the point that perspective matters. Precision matters. )

TheQuickening 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's taking floating-point numbers and converting them to integers.

That's a little different, I'm just talking integers here.

Usernameicanrecall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I know but that's the idea.... It's all about your perspective. From some perspectives 2+2can indeed be 5

TheQuickening 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL I'm with you, it can be a debugging nightmare in some cases when converting data from one type to another type.

sketchy_at_best 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK - I think I am understanding - we are inferring the third party votes, and that appears to be where all of the action is. Is that correct?

StrictlyIncreasing 0 points ago +1 / -1

Quantization! Quantization! (Black line in pic drawn manually to fit between the min/max possible values in Minnesota).

Try this: In a spreadsheet add columns for fixed values of 1.8%, 1.9%, 2.0%, 2.1%, and 2.2% of the total votes. There are no in-between values. And the larger to the total votes get the less accurate a 10th of a percentage point is.

Example from one point in MN data: If third party "drops" from 2.1% to 2.0%. And the total vote count increased from 3,190,637 to 3,193,224. Then 2.0% goes from 63,813 to 63,864. 2.1% goes from 67,003 to 67,058

Let's say the third party vote at the time was 67,011 and increased to 67,021. (impossible to know for sure with this data).

It now drops below the 2.1% threshold. Without taking into account the rounding errors you would think the third party votes decreased by (67,003 - 63,864)=3139 votes, when in reality it increased by 10.

CynicProject 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not sure what you're arguing for or against.

You DO know the third party vote, and you know how many votes were added to that total.

Lets check out near the end to verify this checks out:

Time Series 532:

Trump: 0.505

Biden: 0.479

Total Votes: 5,531,222

Total: 0.984 (98.4%)

3rd Party = 1 - 0.984 = 0.016 * 5531222 = 88499.552

Looks like the 3rd party count is accurate based on the percentages.

Going back to Time Series 26 then:

Trump: 0.582 = (0.582 * 550389) = 320326.398

Biden: 0.397 = (0.397 * 550389) = 218504.433

Total: 0.979 = (0.979 * 550389) = 538830.831

Total Votes: 550389

3rd Party = 1 - 0.979 = 0.021 * 550389 = 11558.169

Our Total Vote Variable is: (TrumpVotes + BidenVotes + ThirdPartyVotes) = 550389

Time Series 27:

Trump: 0.578 = (0.578 * 573857) = 331689.346

Biden: 0.401 = (0.401 * 573857) = 230116.657

Total: 0.979

3rd Party = 1 - 0.979 = (0.021 * 573857) = 12050.997

Total Votes: 573857

Votes Added from 26: 573857 - 550389 = 23468

Time Series 27 checks out based on votes added.

Now Time Series 28:

Votes Added from 27: 574417 - 573857 = 560 ADDED!!!

Once again, here are the new counts

Trump: 0.568 = (0.568 * 574417) = 326268.856 DECREASE OF 5420.144 VOTES! (-5420.144)

Biden: 0.406 = (0.406 * 574417) = 233213.302 INCREASE OF 3096.645 VOTES! (3096.645)

Total: 0.974

3rd Party = 1 - 0.974 = (0.026 * 574417) = 14934.842 INCREASE OF 2883.845 VOTES!

But only 560 votes were added.

StrictlyIncreasing 1 point ago +1 / -0

My main point is just to be careful using this data. Everything is rounded to a tenth of a percent, so it's not very accurate. In almost every other post about this data, the numbers have just fallen in the noise (but there are some crazy swings in some states, especially PA). I wish we had accurate numbers to use an not this crappy data limited to 10th of a percent.

Now, I did just step through your math with min/max error accounted (using just the numbers your presenting and not verifying in data). In this case it still does look fishy.

Here's the same work repeated but with the +- .0005%

Time Series 532:

Trump: 0.505

Biden: 0.479

Total Votes: 5,531,222

Total: 0.984 (98.4%)

3rd Party MIN 1 - 0.984 - 0.0005 = 0.0155 -> 0.0155 * 5,531,222 = 85,734

3rd Party MAX 1 - 0.984 + 0.0005 = 0.0165 -> 0.0165 * 5,531,222 = 91,265

3rd Party: 85,734-91,625

Looks like the 3rd party count is accurate based on the percentages.

Going back to Time Series 26 then:

Trump MIN: 0.5815 -> (0.5815 * 550,389) = 320,051

Trump MAX: 0.5825 -> (0.5825 * 550,389) = 320,602

Trump: 320,051-320,602

Biden MIN: 0.397 -> (0.3965 * 550,389) = 218,229

Biden MAX: 0.397 -> (0.3975 * 550,389) = 218,780

Biden: 218,229-218,780

(Trump + Biden) MIN: 0.9785 -> (0.9785 * 550,389) = 538,556

(Trump + Biden) MAX: 0.9795 -> (0.9795 * 550,389) = 539,106

Total Votes: 550,389

3rd Party MIN = 1 - 0.9795 = 0.0205 * 550,389 = 11,283

3rd Party MAX = 1 - 0.9785 = 0.0215 * 550,389 = 11,833

3rd Party: 11,283 - 11,833

Our Minimum Calculated Total Vote Variable is: (TrumpMinVotes + BidenMinVotes + ThirdMinPartyVotes) = 549,563

Our Minimum Calculated Total Vote Variable is: (TrumpMaxVotes + BidenMaxVotes + ThirdMaxPartyVotes) = 551,215

Our Calculated Total Vote Variable is: 549,564-551,215 (And known to be 550,389)

Time Series 27:

Trump MIN: 0.5775 = (0.5775 * 573,857) = 331,402

Trump MAX: 0.5785 = (0.5785 * 573,857) = 331,976

Trump: 331,402-331,976

Biden MIN: 0.4005 = (0.4005 * 573,857) = 229,830

Biden MAX: 0.4015 = (0.4015 * 573,857) = 230,404

Biden: 229,830-230,404

Total: 0.979

3rd Party MIN = 1 - 0.979 - 0.0005 = (0.0205 * 573,857) = 11,764

3rd Party MAX = 1 - 0.979 + 0.0005 = (0.0215 * 573,857) = 12,338

3rd Party: 11,764-12,338

Calculated Total Votes = 572,996-574,718

Total Votes: 573,857

Votes Added from 26: 573,857 - 550,389 = 23,468

Time Series 27 checks out based on votes added.

Now Time Series 28:

Votes Added from 27: 574,417 - 573,857 = 560 ADDED!!!

Once again, here are the new counts

Trump MIN: 0.5675 = (0.5675 * 574,417) = 325,982

Trump MAX: 0.5685 = (0.5685 * 574,417) = 326,556

Trump: 325,982-326,556 DECREASE OF 4,846-5,994

Biden MIN: 0.4055 = (0.4055 * 574,417) = 232,926

Biden MAX: 0.4065 = (0.4065 * 574,417) = 233,501

Biden: 232,926-233,501 INCREASE OF 2,522-3,671 VOTES!

Total: 0.974

3rd Party MIN = 1 - 0.974 - 0.005 = (0.0255 * 574,417) = 14,648

3rd Party MAX = 1 - 0.974 + 0.005 = (0.0265 * 574,417) = 15,222

3rd Party: 14,648-15,222 INCREASE OF 2,310-3,458 VOTES!

But only 560 votes were added.

TheJustin 8 points ago +8 / -0

The question people keep asking me about this data is why do we even have it? Like, if you were going to steal the election why would you leave this evidence of the steel in the data feed that you give to everybody?

I'm okay if the answer is simple you think people won't dig far enough to find out, but this is pretty blatant and egregious if true

NeverInterruptEnemy 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only reasonable explanation of why any of this would be so fucking obvious, is that usually it isn’t, I don’t throw around “landslide“, but there really might be some truth that they just had to cheat too much.

Absolutely could be a reasonable explanation for why votes subtract and move between candidates, although I struggle to figure out what that even the kids start to be.

But it’s the popularity conditional that has to be true. And if you look at the rallies, you look at some of the honest pulling was, you look at the improvement in Hispanic and blacks, you look at the 95% approval inside the Republican Party... If there was cheating, and if it’s obvious, it was because they had to do much.

My issue is they’ve they’ve had enough time to possibly make any digital cheating Match paper ballots they have on hand. so without discovering something in a re-canvassing, it seems a hand count might just confirm their data, legitimize it.

mrh218 12 points ago +12 / -0

They broke the golden rule of rigging elections: Never try to steal an election that isn't close!

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
juicemoney9 8 points ago +8 / -0

Get this Pede a Medal of Freedom

JustHereForNews 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is insane

Jobu567 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dude. God bless you.

Light_HIV_Effect 7 points ago +7 / -0

Third parties should be livid with this information. Is there any indication they are getting involved in the legal fights?

We keep hearing "oh third parties aren't viable they never get a large percentage of the vote". They should be up in arms about this, maybe they don't like Trump but they certainly didn't intend to vote for Biden.

Malamutememer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please help me understand - what is presented after "////////////"? Look at Michigan for example, why is this data presented separately?


Trump to Biden 9,395

Trump to 3rd 7,411

Biden to Trump 11,981

Biden to 3rd 12,268

3rd to Biden 124,803

3rd to Trump 24,631


Trump to 3rd 11,906

Trump to Biden 4,900

Biden to 3rd 21,529

Biden to Trump 2,720

3rd to Trump 144,555

3rd to Biden 2,179

PedeInspector [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because we can't know 100% who got the switched votes, the list on the top shows the possibility that maybe Biden got most of the votes that were switched from Trump, list at the bottom shows that maybe 3rd party got them and so on.

sketchy_at_best 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm kind of confused why the numbers don't at least agree from the first set to the second set. If we know one party lost votes and only don't know who they went to, wouldn't the numbers remain constant?

lestork 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't get it - how many votes were taken from 3rd party in Michigan?

  • in the upper scenario 3rd party loses 149,434
  • in the lower scenario 3rd party loses 146,734
MikeObamasVeineyCock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why not just have a graph with the rate of vote change for all candidates? And total vote change.

Malamutememer 2 points ago +2 / -0

So neither scenario is confirmed true?
X amount of votes changed and these are possible results? Why not just present the net change for each state for each party?

IcePic 2 points ago +2 / -0

So if I’m reading this right, one possibility is that 144,555 votes switched from 3rd party to Trump, benefitting Trump?

PedeInspector [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Indeed, but I believe if that were the case, Trump would have won that state.

airgag 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or possibly the votes were only removed, in some cases, and not switched to anyone?

fapoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty new to this and I'm shit at maths. but think of the ////////// as a "or this happened"

Trump lost 16,806 Biden lost 24,249 3rd lost 149,434

but where they went to we can't confirm. so OP is providing you with possible scenarios using the //////////////

(Although because Biden won we can safely assume the votes went to him as he "won")

correct me if I'm wrong guys.

Eclypse3d 1 point ago +2 / -1

If this shows that a lot of 3rd party votes switched to Biden, any votes that switched from Trump to 3rd could then be transferred to Biden without it being so obvious.

MiChecker 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

Hi Pede, I am a software developer. I am reviewing the script and adding comments to figure out what it's doing.

What is this if/then check supposed to do on line 25? I get this first part of the checks, if i != 0 and TrumpNow < TrumpThen and (TrumpThen - TrumpNow) > (0.00049999 * series[i]["votes"]) + 50:

specifically this second piece that is only allowing the trump switch vote check to start if the trumpvotes have gone down by a greater than a threshold (TrumpThen - TrumpNow) > (0.00049999 * series[i]["votes"]) + 50

I've expanded this if/then to a series of lines of code with comments. My current understanding:

        # Calculating a threshold that will activate the vote change analysis
        # .000499999 is What?
        ThresholdPercent = 0.00049999

        # AddedFactor is What?
        AddedFactor = 50

        ThresholdChange = (ThresholdPercent * series[i]["votes"]) + AddedFactor

       # Checking to see if Trumps current number of votes is lower than the previous update.
       # Also checking to see if the difference of the vote change is greater than our threshold
        if i != 0 and TrumpNow < TrumpThen and (TrumpThen - TrumpNow) > ThresholdChange:
PedeInspector [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because if the difference of the vote change is lower than the threshold, the change could be attributed to an issue with the precision of the Edison data, since we only have data for up to 3 decimal points.

gb67 1 point ago +1 / -0

And all of it is incorrect because it only considers rounding imprecision with one factor.

SFWarrior 6 points ago +6 / -0

autists unite!

KuzoKevin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Great work. Thanks!

Thingthing22 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holy shit. So Trump got more votes transferred to him in Texas than Biden?!? WUUUT? RINOs going down too?!

NoBrakes603 4 points ago +4 / -0

look at third to Biden. They put more from Biden to Trump to cover their tracks, but when it’s all added up Biden comes out ahead due to the steal from third party.

Thingthing22 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd rather RINOs go down too. And the states take Trump's cue on who to install.

boredrandomguy 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think they did it on every "Straight Ticket" ballot selected as Republican that the voter did not separately select Trump for president.

The voters left it blank because selecting "Straight Ticket - Republican" would include Trump as part of their selection. However, it left it open for someone to later fill in Biden under the Presidential selection to override the voter's choice and you couldn't prove that it was changed. That is why you see all of the other Republican's getting their votes but not Trump.

DiscoverAFire 2 points ago +2 / -0

That could be part of it, but biden got tons of votes that don't have any other votes on the ticket.

Syluxridley 5 points ago +5 / -0

Impressive length

Triple556223 5 points ago +5 / -0


Connect with this guy https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ

He's asking for some TRUMP TRAIN support MAGA please and thank you!

PatriotLove 5 points ago +5 / -0

y no totals?

wickedwitchofwi 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the other thread he posted that got close to 20k upvotes

Arkful773 4 points ago +4 / -0

🚨✅🔥 EMAIL BLAST COPY & PASTE TEMPLATE TO GEORGIA GOP LEADERS. DEMAND FULL AUDIT. STOP THE STEAL. Take 1 minute to do this, I did all the work for you!! 👉🏻

Copy & Paste the emails below into your TO field in Email. Then, copy the subject and the body and paste and you're ready to go - Just Remember to Sign with Your Name, Phone, & Address. EVEN IF YOU'RE NOT FROM GA, do it! But forward to GA friends too! MODIFY LETTER AS YOU SEE FIT!)

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],


Dear Georgia State Legislator,

As an American Citizen and one of the 73 Million+ Avid Supporters of President Donald Trump, I am appalled and disgusted by the Blatant Election Corruption and Fraud from the State of Georgia which turned a Massive Trump Victory into a fraudulent Biden margin.

The many, many instances of fake ballots, late ballots, ballots from dead people, fake Water Main Breaks, and software "glitches" likely swung hundreds of thousands of votes from President Trump to the corrupt Biden and the Democrats. We are counting on YOU to take leadership and investigate, expose, and reverse this situation, along with your governor.

The future of the United States depends on Fair, Free Elections without Fraud. Georgia will be looked upon as a third world banana republic if you don't fix this!! As a fellow American and Patriot, I implore you to do so for the sake of our great nation! We will never have a legitimate election again if YOU Don’t Fix this!!!

All_lives_matter 4 points ago +4 / -0

The analysis I’d be interested in seeing is: did this happen in 2016? What about 2012 or 2008? If so, to what degree and for whom?

If it didn’t in 2016 then this is just so abundantly clearly hammer and scorecard.

sketchy_at_best 4 points ago +4 / -0

I made a graphic showing the net effect in the important swing states, assuming Biden was the beneficiary. I'm still not sure I understand how this works, admittedly.


Trumper926 1 point ago +1 / -0

it makes sense. Its more believable too. If u want votes, raid the 3rd party guys, no one watches those too much except at the end people are like "oh look libertardian got 2% good job guy!".

NewsGuard 4 points ago +4 / -0

The MI stats had me scared until I saw the 3rd to Biden stats lmao

adam_schiff 4 points ago +4 / -0


This is big work. In the interest of WINNING, I need to play devil’s advocate. The libs are not going to take our word for it.

  1. Are there other explanations for these characteristics? Can these be explained away without acknowledging either a system error or manipulation?

  2. What do we need to get, that is available to us, to beef up your work?

userbot123 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, they normalized the results from 2016 across multiple states and decided which ones would switch, while trying to expand Biden votes in blue areas and some Trump votes in red areas so that things wouldn't get suspicious

Sea_Still 3 points ago +3 / -0

Impressive length

VisualScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Check out the comment from u/TrumpTrainWooWoo in my thread: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XThzKI/actual-vote-switching-from-data-/

He explains why the threshold for filtering precision errors ought to be 0.001 rather than 0.004999

With the 0.004999 number you're actually still catching all of those precision errors right where they're happening. The threshold needs to be higher to account for any precision errors in either timestamp, and we need to be more conservative in it's application to be correct.

VisualScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you share your updated code? I’d love to combine and compare it with mine and print out the time frames of these vote changes.

PedeInspector [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here it is.

Note: It's still a mess, but I'm confident in the results.

VisualScience 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you want to add time stamp you can look at my code here: https://workupload.com/file/vyR59ggZH3J

Might save some time for you and help everyone else stop exactly when these happened.

VisualScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

Awesome, thank you.

Thewickersnipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

You ok? Haven’t seen any activity from you in a few days. Just a little concerned for your safety.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0