20275
posted ago by TrumanBlack (edited) +20275 / -0

🚨🚨HUGE UPDATE COMMING. LADIES AND GENTS WE GOT EM🚨🚨 [STATUS: NOT RELEASED]

EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK

🏆 https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ 🏆

🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨

UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew

EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives.

https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script.

https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used.

Place both in the same folder.

FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/

The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election

🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone.

.

REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR.

.........

I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all.

EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far.

EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know.

Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

VERIFIED!!!!:

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ]

And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ]

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen.

Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share)

Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051

Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935

Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884

Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560

Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324

SOURCES: Here is the data I used:

EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨

httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

[pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel:

python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N

result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK

[montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results

[ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone.

[warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png

I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27:

votes 27: 573857

trump fraction: 0.578

trump votes: 331689.346

biden fraction: 0.401

biden votes: 230116.657

votes 28: 574417

trump fraction: 0.568

trump vote: 325950.776

biden vote: 232985.942

biden fraction: 0.406

votes change: +560

trump votes change: -5738.57

Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset

🚨🚨HUGE UPDATE COMMING. LADIES AND GENTS WE GOT EM🚨🚨 [STATUS: NOT RELEASED] EVERY THING YOU'RE ABOUT TO READ IS VERIFIED AND WAS MADE BY THIS PEDE [CENTIPEDE] HE DID ALL THE HEAVY WORK 🏆 https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector/ 🏆 🚨🚨🚨🚨EDIT NOV 12: 🚨🚨🚨 UPDATED LIST: https://pastebin.com/X6sW2aew EDIT 2 : Link to the updated script, note, it'll have to be modified to check for the 2nd case scenario, by default it'll check just 1st case scenario, criticism is welcome but I already know the script is a mess, but I'm also confident in the results it gives. https://workupload.com/file/DV4TvqtWEK8 Here is the script. https://workupload.com/file/aTKhxPg2RTr And here is the data used. Place both in the same folder. FULL THREAD: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8XQIWRs/-happening-ive-updated-the-switc/ The data shows serious IREGULARITIES and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election 🚨"Switched did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both.🚨 The results should disturb everyone. . REMINDER: THIS DOESN'T TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TRUMP VOTES DESTROYED, BURNED AND RIPPED APART, THE THOUSANDS OF BALLOTS JUST MARKED FOR BIDEN. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE WE'VE FOUND SO FAR. ......... I saw the video on The Gateway Pundit [ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-huge-another-system-glitch-captured-live-cnn-election-night-20000-votes-swapped-trump-biden-video/ ] and I decided to do some digging of my own, into a more reputable source that can verify that the glitch was indeed real, and that it affected the votes, instead of it being just a display glitch on that news channel. So I went digging into the Edison data [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json] and I found this damning evidence [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ]. As can be seen in the image, only 54 votes were added, but the ratio changed in Biden's favor by a whole 0.6%! This is proof that not only did the glitch happen, but it doesn't seem to have been reverted at all. EDIT : BIG UPDATE, I made a script to run through the data and gather all instances where votes switched from Trump to Biden, Lost Votes means that the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting. I've only done states that use Dominion Voting Systems so far. EDIT 2: Added ALL the states, and separated by voting systems, although no state uses exclusively one system as far as I know. Edit 3: Re-ordered the states, first by switched votes, then by lost votes. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden. Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates. There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes. 🚨🚨🚨WE DECIDED TO LEAVE THIS NUMBERS UP SO YOU CAN SEE HOW OUR RESEARCH HAS EVOLVED.🚨🚨🚨 >Dominion Voting Systems : Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248 New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20 Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456 Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882 New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213 Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574 Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102 Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023 California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989 Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0 Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650 Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0 Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0 Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730 Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408 Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0 Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0 New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116 Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477 New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610 Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730 Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems. Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557 Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154 Election Systems & Software : Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50 Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849 Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748 South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119 Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276 South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1 North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681 Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0 North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15 District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 >Unknown Systems: Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50 Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272 Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51 Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0 Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408 Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0 Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35 Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13 West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300 Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0 Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall. VERIFIED!!!!: I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data. [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json ] And here is the specific part when the switch happened. [ https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png ] You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere. EDIT: Those 2,324 were moved from Trump to Jorgensen. Jorgensen votes = Total votes * (1 - Trump share - Biden share) Nr.27 : 573,857 * (1 - 0.578 - 0.401) = 12,051 Nr.28 : 574,417 * (1 - 0.568 - 0.406) = 14,935 Jorgensen vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 14,935 - 12,051 = 2,884 Total vote increase from Nr.27 to Nr.28 = 574,417 - 573,857 = 560 Jorgensen vote increase - Total vote increase = 2,884 - 560 = 2,324 SOURCES: Here is the data I used: EDISON DATA: https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well. 🚨🚨FROM THE EDISON WEBSITE "Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races" 🚨🚨 httpss://i.maga.host/wvRRA9m.png I scraped the data from the NYT website, here [ https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json ] to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead. Take this picture for example. [ https://i.maga.host/RNPN3Oz.png ] It's like this: Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888 Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32 Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost. I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes. Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh [pede444wow] I took the json files that are included here, and wrote a python script to convert the critical data to one csv file, so you can analyze it in excel: python script: https://pastebin.com/Q6nTP04N result csv file: (download and save to csv file, then open in excel) https://pastebin.com/FQuxxTvK [montag] Here's a GitHub repo of the same data source taken at incremental time periods. https://github.com/favstats/USElection2020-NYT-Results [ComeAndTakeIt_Texas] Hey TrumanBlack, I crunched the 27/28 timestamp data you posted (specifically this - https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png), and uploaded a spreadsheet analysis here (https://i.maga.host/xbwnVuk.png). I do a worst-case and best-case rounding error to generate Max T Vote, Min T Vote, and Max B Vote and Min B Vote that shows if you have 0.578 share, the max number that would represent would be 0.57849999999, and the min number would be 0.5775. The specific pic highlighted here allows no possible way whatsoever that Trump did not lose votes. The smallest number of votes he could have lost assuming in 27 there is a worst case rounding error and in the 28 step there is a best case rounding error (extremely unlikely), Trump lost a 4846.353. In worst case, he lost 5994.627 votes. There is literally NO way anyone can explain this away. They can also not explain that away as an asynchronous issue, as the timestamp itself is later (1), and (2), the total vote count increased. This single time step is proof alone. [warpigpede] Re: the data displayed inhttps://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png I calculated number of lost Trump votes as 5738.57, exactly 1% of the total number of votes (573857) at record 27: votes 27: 573857 trump fraction: 0.578 trump votes: 331689.346 biden fraction: 0.401 biden votes: 230116.657 votes 28: 574417 trump fraction: 0.568 trump vote: 325950.776 biden vote: 232985.942 biden fraction: 0.406 votes change: +560 trump votes change: -5738.57 Exactly 1% is an awfully curious value. I wonder if it is consistent across the entire dataset
Comments (4370)
sorted by:
3458
ratioetlogicae 3458 points ago +3479 / -21

Get this circulating on twitter. And email it to trump campaign.

Provide them with your script.

Great work!

1927
Doth 1927 points ago +1934 / -7

PROJECT VERITAS JUDICIAL WATCH DJT Jr. James Woods Bonginarino

Any of these people can help get more eyes on this--help me @ them, guys... Try to avoid using any keywords that trigger censorship tech. Break the word up with punctuations, misspell them, whatever it takes.

1045
CokeOrPepe 1045 points ago +1051 / -6

upvoting for Bonginarino

673
OldGamerGuy 673 points ago +675 / -2

Put my in the screenshot for the Library of Congress archives.

447
Texas_Rangers 447 points ago +454 / -7 (edited)

Spread this infographic to EVERYONE:

https://imgur.com/a/ZoDUx8N

132
UnitedStatesCitizen 132 points ago +132 / -0

Link bad?

114
Texas_Rangers 114 points ago +115 / -1

Work now? I forgot the 45

82
SocalPede 82 points ago +84 / -2

This is a bit.ly domain that looks dubious at best.

54
Gwot0412 54 points ago +54 / -0

Can you do this at state level? If Dems are emboldened enough to do this on a Presidential election, then they have been doing it for awhile in the Senate and House races.

How awesome would it be to discover we have a 70% majority in the Senate and House too?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
126
DefundCNN 126 points ago +127 / -1

I think the Nebraska switch is actually the smoking gun in all of this.

189
deleted 189 points ago +192 / -3 (edited)
120
PiratePatriot 120 points ago +120 / -0

88% is an unusually high voter turnout. That alone deserves an audit.

https://www.1011now.com/2020/11/04/live-at-130pm-recap-of-nebraska-general-election/

Nebraska exceeded its previous turnout record in terms of total votes cast, which was in the 2016 Presidential General Election, by about 68,000 votes. The unofficial overall turnout was 936,106, which is 74 percent of votes cast.

Thirty-four counties had a turnout of more than 80 percent. Four counties had a turnout of 88 percent. The turnout will increase as 20,000 - 25,000 early ballots that were dropped off Tuesday still need to be processed along with provisional ballots.

Early ballots that were mailed in or dropped off totaled 436,269.

73
Texas_Rangers 73 points ago +74 / -1

Send this to to your legislatures.

72
PlzCoolerMe 72 points ago +72 / -0

Nebraskan here... Nobody I know understood how in the world Sasse could get more votes than Trump. Half the republicans here despise Sasse. It didn’t pass the eye or smell test.

47
dullcare 47 points ago +48 / -1

agree. its likely more of a dominion play... Nebraska probably runs a more honest operation at its polling / counting centers. It probably doesn't have Tamany hall-like egregious in your face fraud like in Philly. Not as many dead voters and torn up ballets etc. So the fraud is more of a pure play electronic fraud by Dominion / Scorecard / Hammer.

85
deleted 85 points ago +88 / -3
75
Cirruspede 75 points ago +76 / -1

Yep. I’m in Omaha and was confused how Biden won.

53
kekkk 53 points ago +53 / -0

LOL @ New York

I bet Cuomo was so terrified of Trump turning NY red.

48
Ladybug87 48 points ago +48 / -0

With that we don't need PA or MI.

229 + 3(AK) + 10(WI) + 16(GA) + 11(AZ) + 1 (NE2) = 270

31
DefundCNN 31 points ago +31 / -0

And it's in somewhere people would normally assume no one would care, and there is no easy way to rationalize another explanation for why it happened, but proportionally, the vote swing is Massive compared to the others, and it just happened to be in a hard red area that was a key area for the electoral college despite no campaiging. There was also a much bigger difference between Trump's vote vs the GOP vote there.

12
Pickles 12 points ago +12 / -0

I picked a random precinct in Douglas County(Nebraska), 8-12. Here is the breakdown for Rep, Dem and Ind (the 47 total votes for the Libertarian is close enough to the # of registered Libertarians so I didn't include them in this analysis)....

8-12 Registered R - 813 Registered D - 833 Registered I - 635

Voter turnout was 72%, so as unscientific as it is, lets just assume 72% across the board. And lets assume ALL Rs vote R and ALL Ds vote D.

Where the INDEPENDENTS voted: Trump 32% Biden 68% Republican Bacon 51.5% Democrat Eastman 48.5%

The Presidential and Congressional races were within 2 votes of eachother. Just for

For some reason the participation in the SENATE race for Douglas Co 8-12 was only 64.7% (compared to 72% for Pres and Con). Using the data in the same way would mean for the Senate race in Douglas Co 8-12, Independents voted....

Republican Sasse 73% Democrat Janicek 9.7% Libertarian Siadek 17.3%

This was 1 precinct that I chose randomly because the registration seemed to be pretty even and my theory would have been that Trump would get 95% of Republicans, 10-15% of Democrats and 50%++ of Independents and that voter turnout for Republicans would be higher than Dems because of enthusiasm, but I of course had a biased opinion, but I live in Nebraska and I see what I see.

40
Circus4One 40 points ago +40 / -0

Just curious why you think NE is the smoking gun. I live in Nebraska and couldn’t believe one of our votes went to Biden. Thanks.

45
arkylady 45 points ago +45 / -0

Not sure what he meant, but maybe since NE doesn't have massive election fraud from every direction happening at the same time, it would be easier to highlight the election software "glitch".

24
Wefoundyouremails 24 points ago +24 / -0

Not OP, but I don't even live in NE and I couldn't believe it! Makes me feel vindicated hearing it from someone else who lives there.

22
dullcare 22 points ago +23 / -1

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2xUQg/is-any-one-else-bothered-by-the-/

The fact that the republican in the NE2 congressional race got more votes in Douglas county than Trump is mighty fishy.

Living in Nebraska, can you explain why there would be a disconnect with the downballet voting? Do you think there are that many cross ballet voters?

16
Jeezy1879 16 points ago +17 / -1

Laughs in West Virginia

13
Ladybug87 13 points ago +13 / -0

With that we don't need PA or MI.

229 + 3(AK) + 10(WI) + 16(GA) + 11(AZ) + 1 (NE2) = 270

4
trumpmixtape 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think virginia and new york are.

Look how fucking close new york was. Imagine if democrats didnt have that hub of influence.

And Virginia is home to basically every dc crony. Look how overwhelmingly desperate they are.

Those states worry me not for Biden, because Biden is done. Those states illustrate it goes beyond him. Its "systemic".

5
dramagan 5 points ago +5 / -0

I live in New York and I think Trump really won New York. That's why they haven't updated the count in almost a week. Look at how many Trump votes were removed from the tally plus how many were switched from Trump to Biden. In addition the areas that haven't been counted are heavily pro Trump. I believe they don't know what to do and aren't updating because they want Trump not to realize how close he is in New York. Even with this fraud once they add in the other areas the margin will get even tighter. That's 29 electoral votes....

2
Douladeb1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I knew something wasn’t right with NY and they stopped counting. The numbers have basically stayed the same and stopped counting on election night. It stayed at 76% of the votes in for over a week almost 2 weeks. I lollies in NY and we are all so done here!! Cuomo is killing us!! Trumps caravans were 50 miles long just prior to Election Day.

1
Rowdy104 1 point ago +1 / -0

How come? I looked at it but I don't see the smoking gun.

46
madlad2020 46 points ago +54 / -8

This looks sketchy af and its asking for a ton of PII and your account is 2 days old. This has self dox honeypot written all over it.

30
Truglow 30 points ago +38 / -8

I dont like the smell of this. 2 day old account? We are dealing with deep state operations so have someone verify.

14
SchittsMethDealer 14 points ago +14 / -0

As far as I can tell, Dominion did not use any protection. No passwords. No Secure Network, nothing. It's like they don't pay programmers. Had them set up probably contract-basis. And has English major interns running the software. Attempt at plausible deniability? Or stupidity? I mean double-check the work, but don't see an angle how this could benefit the deep State. anons being red pilled as they dug. Remember, a lot of the anons are/were apolitical, this is just a fun rabbithole game to them, but saw a few anons get pissed at the corruption. Probably a big red pill when you discover (and see) the data. I did see one anon group that was likely deep state or Dems just doing a parody thread of an anon. easy to click somewhere else. Don't block posts unless they post something worth blocking. Better that than block a new pede--we'd be the same in their minds as Twitter then.

4
DJFG 4 points ago +6 / -2

TrumanBlack has posts more than a month old???

-35
pacalis128 -35 points ago +21 / -56 (edited)

Election media data (Edison) is NOT NECESSARILY the polling data (Dominion).

How do we know that the polling data isn't corrected (transformed) and it's just the media fucking up reporting?

23
Luvmyhub75 23 points ago +23 / -0

Multitudinous evidence of actual fraud on video and audio. Denial is a difficult stage in the stages of grief.

22
iminlovewithtrump 22 points ago +33 / -11

Stfu shill, we don't need low energy in here

11
alucard13mmfmj 11 points ago +11 / -0

The media calls the president these days. Havnt you heard? So their data must be tip top.

9
greenone 9 points ago +10 / -1

Ignore the downvotes, you're right.

We ALL know there was fraud, but this is a broken dataset not suited for how it's being used. There are also super important questions being raised about the logic of the original script.

Even THIS SCRIPT says that Biden would benefit from this more based on the "dropped votes" if you split them out per candidate. I and others believe these are just broken dataset anomalies.check my comment history for usernames of datapedes that agree this is misleading.

This should be unsticky'd IMMEDIATELY. Please spread the word pedes, this will make us look extremely bad.

2
wilsoe2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are totally right to think critically on this data. I'm in the same boat. If this is legit deleting and swapping votes to fix the election then its the biggest political scandal in world history. Given those stakes, it seems "too easy" that the evidence for that is in plain site for eagle eyed observers.

Therefore, i'm thinking there is a reason for deleting votes? The Dominion manual says its a feature for if you accidentally run the same batch twice. That said, it does seem odd how many there are for NY and that some states have 0.

I watched the Dr Shiva video that seems to demonstrate how and when the algorithm kicks in to switch votes. The next layer of this analysis is the timing. If Dr Shiva is right, I want to understand the times in which he sees votes in MI being flipped. That should match the data we see here. My gut is telling me it won't though because there is just one time interval in which MI votes were swapped and it should be much longer than that according to Dr. Shiva's analysis.

41
MixedBlacknWhite 41 points ago +41 / -0

not the right link? site no worky

8
KristiNoemFaceFuck 8 points ago +9 / -1

Done

19
UpTrump 19 points ago +19 / -0

Me too!

16
keeponwinning 16 points ago +16 / -0

Two scoops!

8
NazisWereSocialist 8 points ago +8 / -0

What’s ridiculous is that this, 4chan screenshots, etc. will absolutely be Library of Congress entries...provided the world doesn’t end...

8
PeteButtplug 8 points ago +8 / -0

Do you want the typo as well?

10
OldGamerGuy 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yes, That way I can authenticate it as mine so some leftist doesn't try to steal it.

2
Pgledger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too!

42
CovefefeREEEE 42 points ago +42 / -0

"Ma! The meatloaf!"

35
hilboggins 35 points ago +35 / -0

Dan got ownership in conservative media companies, he can spread like no other.

16
TenScoops 16 points ago +16 / -0

Bologniarossa?

14
MixedBlacknWhite 14 points ago +14 / -0

Brad Pitt, Inglorious Basterds - "Bonginarino"

216
kesquare2 216 points ago +216 / -0 (edited)

Lin Wood

Robert Barnes

James Wood

Scott Presler (the persistence guy)

Viral is key.

135
OconusLurex 135 points ago +135 / -0

Can someone with a twitter please also send this to Rich Barris, @Peoples_Pundit - he's a brilliant & honest poll analyst in touch with Bannon & Trump team (I believe he's been in touch with POTUS himself.) He'll be familiar with all of the data sets and will have a lot of insight into this, and would help pass it along.

93
bekkiluvsit 93 points ago +93 / -0

TWEETED THE ABOVE RESULTS IN A LARGE INFOGRAPHIC TO @DonaldJTrumpJr

@RealJamesWoods

@Peoples_Pundit

@Project_Veritas

@dbongino

@RealRLimbaugh

43
Litehouse 43 points ago +43 / -0

OAN

37
bekkiluvsit 37 points ago +37 / -0

Okay, tweeted OANN

21
LowbloodHighEnergyRI 21 points ago +21 / -0

The Great One Mark Levin, Sebastian Gorka, Bannon???

10
bekkiluvsit 10 points ago +10 / -0

Okay, tweeted the Great One - Mark Levin and Seb Gorka. I think Bannon is banned from Twatter at the moment, but I'll try to connect via his website.

31
BuckyRancher 31 points ago +31 / -0

Good work. Godspeed

17
M4ster_Yoda 17 points ago +17 / -0

I sense glory upon us!

9
BuckyRancher 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes siree bob

16
OconusLurex 16 points ago +16 / -0

Thank you so much, patriot!

15
RedBloodedMeatEater 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sent to Veritas.

8
r4ptur3 8 points ago +9 / -1

Don't forget our Nephilim friend Bannon!

69
free-money- 69 points ago +69 / -0

Seconding Barris...If he gets a hold of this and believes it's legit, mountains will move.

31
Methodmapper 31 points ago +31 / -0

I posted it on his locals page too

29
Trumper926 29 points ago +29 / -0

3rding Barris.

46
deleted 46 points ago +49 / -3
43
Boxcar_Overkill 43 points ago +43 / -0

What's compelling about this is the SIZE of the vote change in Penn.- It's higher than California, Texas, New York, and Florida added together...in fact:

THE NUMBER OF VOTE CHANGES IN PENNSYLVANIA IS ALMOST LARGER THAN THE ALL OF THE REST OF THE COUNTRY COMBINED.

13
FaddyMcSaddy 13 points ago +13 / -0

PA was the crown and it’s no coincidence

14
TheReal45 14 points ago +14 / -0

The Keystone. As the elders of yore spake.

6
PootiePoot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Virginia is even higher than Pennsylvania for lost/switched votes as a percentage of total reported votes.

West Virginia and New York are high too.

23
TrumpFL4life 23 points ago +24 / -1

You're correct, we don't have access to the time-stamp data at the county level. But a lawyer, with a fistful of data that is Public does. It might be enough to get a lookie-loo.

8
deleted 8 points ago +20 / -12
22
deleted 22 points ago +24 / -2
22
AndrewLB 22 points ago +23 / -1

It's already been proven that these dominion voting machines have switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden in a single county in a single county in Michigan. And since this "glitch" has also happened in Wisconsin and Georgia. If this same "glitch" is happening in every county in MIchigan, it would equal about 280,000 votes which is slightly more than what Biden needed to win the state. Coincidence?

The lying MSM which has already reported this problem as a glitch and only happened on that one michigan machine in order to stop additional inquiry, now that multiple 'glitches' are now discovered, they changed their story to it being "human error". lol.

13
DJTrump_MD 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sure, but then how do you explain why the numbers always go against Trump.

11
williammcfadden 11 points ago +11 / -0

Simple recount won't reveal if they then followed up with inserted paper ballots -- or intended to do so but then numbers became too great.

I witnessed this during the early 2016 dem primaries, the glitch downward adjustments against Bernie during the live vote reporting, but I wasn't watching too closely to follow up with research.

4
freedom2520 4 points ago +5 / -1

The glitches are the "order" for fakes to be inserted. They can only order what can be supplied.

22
pede-o-saurus 22 points ago +23 / -1

Hmm, did we find ourselves a few disinformation operatives in this thread? I think we did, but their downplaying was low-energy.

You know what to do, 'pedes.

-8
lapdants -8 points ago +5 / -13

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage

This is not official results -- this is exit polling data. From Edison's web site:

Our 2020 general election coverage included election day exit polls at over 700 voting locations, in-person early-voter exit polls, and telephone surveys with absentee and early voters all around the country. In total, Edison Research interviewed over 100,000 voters in the 2020 general election

www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling

As we all know, the polling has been really bad, both in 2016 and in 2020. None of us have access to official state voting data right now, and anyone who says they do is lying.

10
mzog 10 points ago +11 / -1

This is not exit polling data. They also report the official poll data which is what this data set purportedly is. Here is info from NBC which says they get their election data from Edison/NEP.

That said. Nothing about Edison is official. Any mistakes they make in their reporting are not "official" and all analysis of the data set is subject to their garbage/glitches in addition to the state vote data.

3
Nunya__Biznus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Regardless of whether this is exit polling data OR some kind of vote vote feed, THIS is the data that "official sources" are using to call the election.

Get it?

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

youre glowing

1
Spatzy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Na the code has AP in it everywhere. And specifies every detail including absentee ballots etc. It’s definitely legit BUT I see the same error towards Biden as well. They basically rounded off the percentages (i.e 45.89744 to 45.9) for both Biden and Trump to simplify screen reporting which was a blonde move. It favored Biden far more but I don’t think this script calculates Biden’s deductions. To me, this was a media screwup and when the counts weren’t matching up with each state they froze the counting then scrambled to find ballots to make it look legit. I caught a change on Nov 4th between 7:32pm and 8:36pm in Pennsylvania of 32,615 votes reduced for Trump and just under 26k increased for Biden at same time. It wasn’t an exact equal flip. Going to see if I can find this in the data.

-25
clampie -25 points ago +7 / -32

Yeah, I'm not really impressed with this. It's a start but not really that informative.

-21
lapdants -21 points ago +4 / -25

It's exit polling data! Why is no one talking about this? Go to Edison Research's website, they are a marketing firm that does nationwide exit polling.

16
CodeMonkey 16 points ago +17 / -1

I went to their website. They very clearly offer a real time vote counting service in addition to exit polling. Not sure if you're blind or shilling.

5
glowbegone 5 points ago +7 / -2

tits or gtfo

11
ConstitutionalistDon 11 points ago +11 / -0 (edited)

Message Laura Baris, Rich's wife too. It looks like she reads responses more often.

https://twitter.com/LauraBaris

8
OconusLurex 8 points ago +8 / -0

Good thinking! I know Rich must be swamped right now. @LauraBaris

8
salvecitizen 8 points ago +8 / -0

And add @TracyBeanz because the Flynn's like her.

78
wickedwitchofwi 78 points ago +79 / -1

Election Wizard

33
-Howitzer- 33 points ago +33 / -0

SPREAD EVERYWHERE.

29
HossBonaventure 29 points ago +29 / -0

Kamala never stopped

15
Here_we_go 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yeah send to willie brown too

9
Tomboy_Patriot 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just LOL'ed

6
wickedwitchofwi 6 points ago +7 / -1

she fucked Her way to the top

2
trumpmixtape 2 points ago +2 / -0

Been spamming him constantly. Got in immediately after one if his posts too. Twitter puts us all under "more replies", even if we're the only reply. Its infuriating.

2
Anus_Blenders_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a good parody cover for The Who

1
masticatetherapist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to be confused with electric wizard

77
TennesseeScorpio 77 points ago +77 / -0

James Woods! That dudes a damn genius!!!

18
Slyhillary 18 points ago +18 / -0

Literally

12
traveravis 12 points ago +12 / -0

And has an enormous penis

14
CNN_is_ISIS 14 points ago +14 / -0

Can't confirm, but upvoting for the positive mental image

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

He singlehandedly skewed the "average" penis size so now all the lefties feels like they have small dicks.

20
repoman 20 points ago +20 / -0

Scott Presler, good dude and funny as hell.

14
chelthing 14 points ago +14 / -0

Angelic hair too

1
mrcoolj90 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope I can achieve near his hair length by next year into Trump's second term!

12
Methodmapper 12 points ago +12 / -0

posted it to a locals for the second person on this list...we will see if it get's approved

145
Methodmapper 145 points ago +145 / -0

Now, can you run that script on senate races???

196
Doth 196 points ago +196 / -0

in before we realize POTUS goes into his 2nd term with 72 senators

131
Trumper926 131 points ago +132 / -1

I truly love every one of you and continually am praying and fasting for all of you and our victory.

77
Texas_Rangers 77 points ago +79 / -2

Praying is the most important thing you can do right now. Second is spreading this to everyone.

39
Hairy_Mouse 39 points ago +42 / -3 (edited)

Praying is definitely not THE most important. If everybody did nothing about this except for pray, we wouldn't have ANY of this data or evidence.

Gathering evidence to build a case is THE most important thing right now.

You won't suddenly be bestowed a bulletproof case, God doesn't work like that.

WE have to put in the time and effort, then pray all will be revealed and America will be saved. Prayer is good, but don't use it as an excuse to get complacent.

40
AmazingFlightLizard 40 points ago +40 / -0

God wants to help us. But he also wants us to use the tools he gave us

28
You_Aint_Black 28 points ago +30 / -2

Praying is always the most IMPORTANT thing you can do, however right now it may not necessarily be the FIRST thing that you should do.

13
Trumper926 13 points ago +13 / -0

Agree. I have spiritual gifts and am fasting and praying for us. I'm doing my part.

1
trumpmixtape 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think he means praying is the most important you can do while not actively doing anything, if that makes sense.

7
LadyPersephone 7 points ago +8 / -1

Love you too! :D

100
commies0ride0free 100 points ago +100 / -0

And a GOP controlled House?

CUT ALL THE TAXES! ROLL BACK ALL THE REGULATIONS! CUT AL THE FOREIGN SPENDING! DRILL ALL THE OIL! REPEAL ALL THE ACA! DISBAND ALL THE ALPHABET AGENCIES AND END THE FED!

Omg I have so many more. THIS IS MAGA COUNTRY!!!

60
kornesque 60 points ago +61 / -1

EVERY COUNTY IN CA IS ACTUALLY RED!!

11
Test_user21 11 points ago +11 / -0

According to OP?

26
kornesque 26 points ago +26 / -0

Nope, just voicing my desires with parent OP. But I bet with only citizens voting with ID it would be likely.

55
DCdeplorable 55 points ago +55 / -0

Number one should be FAIR ELECTIONS. Purge all voter rolls, ban non military absentee voting, mandatory voter id, paper ballots, mandatory auditing.

If the votes were counted fairly democrats would never have a majority again.

23
ClownTamer 23 points ago +24 / -1

I just came.

20
free-money- 20 points ago +22 / -2

Next: you only get to vote if you are a net contributor, tax-wise. Remove income tax for all government employees and adjust salaries accordingly (drop the charade of "they contribute, too!").

Why should the people being paid to do the job get to vote themselves in and tell themselves how they get to do it?

12
Phil_DeGraves 12 points ago +12 / -0

DAS RAAAYYYCIIIIISSSSSS, though! According to libtard anti-logic.

15
Tcrlaf1 15 points ago +16 / -1

White liberals know in thier hearts that blacks are ignorant and incapable, they must be led to and hand-fed everything. They NEED the guiding hand of the rich white liberal to show them the way. Quite insulting, and utterly racist.

12
HockeyMom4Trump 12 points ago +12 / -0

They've been cheating for years. CA is probably red. MN is red.

6
sagebrushfire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not sure about MN. That state has put the “R” in retard since the 70s.

8
ImWithHearse 8 points ago +9 / -1

Voting verified by blockchain. We need a completely trust-less and decentralized environment. Not owned and built by a Clinton Foundation benefactor. One that you can independently verify that your vote went to the right person and got counted.

21
FliesTheFlag 21 points ago +21 / -0

This guy fucks, Freedom Boner Intensifies

18
AngryWriter 18 points ago +18 / -0

You know we could throw the democrats a bone and increase the size of the SCOTUS like they want, with 4 more Trump appointments.

11
itswood 11 points ago +11 / -0

While I understand your only making a joke...I want to point out how dangerous that would be. You appoint 4 new SCOTUS's and then the next election the democrats get elected nd now the precedent has been set.

No thank you. I value our Constitution and whole heartedly reject all fuckery, from either side of the aisle.

5
bubbletea 5 points ago +5 / -0

Soon everyone is a supreme court justice!

3
AngryWriter 3 points ago +3 / -0

My point is that if we can do it, they can. If both sides can do it, the constitution needs to be amended to fix that. Might as well change the law to "13 justices" while fixing the constitution at the same time so the number can not be increased without constitutional amendment.

15
ProgramNerd 15 points ago +19 / -4

This is an important viewpoint to keep in mind as we go into the close: remember the pedes that use cannabis. It's not talked about here much which is worrying. Repubs are all about states rights until they focus on something they disagree with, then they go full Dem on them. States rights are a crucially important part of our constitution and can't be ignored because it's inconvenient for you.

Sure roll back the national mandates on abortion and drug control, but be ready to lose the battle anyways in the blue states, just like the founding fathers intended.

Be the Lion party, not the Republican party.

26
WowStrongWinning 26 points ago +26 / -0

Drugs sure, abortion no. Protecting babies from being murdered is different than a dude sitting on his couch smoking a joint with a bag of Cheetos.

11
AmazingFlightLizard 11 points ago +11 / -0

Im still not down with other-than-prescription drugs, but if I have to choose between making those go away and saving babies’ lives, we would have another baby boom.

2
ProgramNerd 2 points ago +6 / -4

That's just your opinion. One I agree with, but still. Letifs ts will go Healthcare is a right. It's totally different than protecting a dude sitting on his couch smoking a joint with a bag of Cheetos. People die without it. Just like these babies. Will you be pushing for universal healthcare or are you a hypocrite?

Is abortion in the constitution? It's a not a new phenomenon.

Here's what you do, you vote it down in your state, and only your state, and you stay fuck out of federal laws. Then you make everyone else do the same. Then you go to a state with the laws you like and settle down there, while the aborters can go to their state. If all 50 states outlaw it individually then hell yeah, otherwise tough shit.

7
Comntrinchief 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is there any question that the war on drugs has been an abysmal multi trillion dollar failure?

We have no choice but to try something different. People should be free to do what they want as long as other citizens don’t have to pay for their mistakes like becoming a drug addict.

2
Cacciali_Via 2 points ago +2 / -0

"As long as other citizens don't have to pay..."

Well, they do. In every state that has legalized it, we pay for losers mistakes.

6
commies0ride0free 6 points ago +7 / -1

LEGALIZE ALL THE WEED

6
RedditCantCensorMe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wegalize all the Leed!

1
540k-Again 1 point ago +1 / -0

Off topic to data thread but to straighten things out for you.

Republican Redpills to the answers you seek:

  • All controlled substances should be by prescription; with alcohol (and maybe tobacco depending on State/local ordinances), being dispensed via the usual methods (but the licensing etc. can be simplified to follow the prescription model), and all others through (real) pharmacies.

  • Eventually, all prescription drugs (likely except addictive substances), will be covered(paid zero direct price) with a Republican Strict-Constitutional version which is 180 degrees opposite of 44NoCare or Single-payer leftie crap. Also includes drug treatment programs.

  • For law enforcement activities, If it's drugs, it should be D.E.A. not the FBI, and DEA should be moved from DOJ, to FDA and HHS. Same with A.T.F. should have the F removed, and A.T. moved with D.E.A. and to HHS.

  • Don't be trying to split the Republican Party. DJT is the political head of the Republican Party. He studied and the whole 3rd party thing many times, and he made the choice and decision it was best to vote and JOIN the REPUBLICAN PARTY. MAGA DJT shortened from *"Let's Make America Great Again!" - Ronald Reagan's campaign.

MAGA! And back to our Data thread, which I wish people & Pedes would take the redpills on, from those of us whom have been through this rodeo before.

2
ProgramNerd 2 points ago +3 / -1

Americans aren't going to roll over on what they want just because you come at them with some strong language. We wouldn't have Trump in office now if it worked like that.

My right to use cannabis to medically help myself is just as crucial to me as your gun rights. My ability to use it not medically is as important to me as your free speech rights and entertainment rights. All have to do with liberty. You're just suppressing it at that point. Law enforcement agencies? The ones that regularly bust your average Joe in legal states, just so they can re-up on their slush funds? Those guys that turn aroun, literally when BLM attacks. The ones that take your guns? you want me to trust law enforcement. That's RINO thinking. Fittingly, since your bold plan is "change nothing."

Controlled substances are just another way for the government to take control over you. "Leave alcohol out" said the incredible hypocrite. One of the most harmful, addictive, life-destroying substances out there. "But it's fine cause my beers, MAGA!" as he jiggles his hard won belly into an early grave. Those damn cannabis-users and their cheetos though, amirite?

You don't even touch upon the huge issue of whether or not it should be a controlled substance to begin with. "All controlled substance should be prescription" Except alcohol. Again. I''m not even sure how to engage such a warped idea. It's entirely double think from start to finish, covered up by brazenly invoking Donald Trump's name as if that makes your argument less faulty.

1
ProgramNerd 1 point ago +2 / -1 (edited)

Where are you getting this info from? You've completely killed by MAGA boner and you could see from my months of posts it was the most raging hard-on before this.

So I'd like to confirm that this is Trump's plan for myself. Your sources?

"Back in 1990 at a luncheon held by the Miami Herald, Trump called the United States’ drug enforcement policy a ‘joke’ and was quoted as saying “We’re losing badly the war on drugs. You have to legalize drugs to win that war. You have to take the profit away from these drug czars.'"

In a leaked recording from 2018, Trump was heard to say marijuana makes people “lose IQ points” and at an opioid summit that same year at the White House, Trump advocated the death penalty for drug dealers, equating the provision of lethal drugs with murder. He was quoted as saying “Some countries have a very, very tough penalty — the ultimate penalty — and by the way, they have much less of a drug problem than we do”.

Wow, so is Trump going to legalize everything or turn us into North Korea? Kill the drug dealers, hang them from the street corners?

Trump vs Trump who's right?

13
Homsi2 13 points ago +13 / -0

Better if he had 69 lmao

6
Data 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nice.

2
SoAngryRanger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Niiiicce

1
CNN_is_ISIS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jazz Club!

4
TheJake 4 points ago +4 / -0

68...It means you do me and I owe ya one

1
rattrigger82 1 point ago +1 / -0

77 69 and I get 8 more

3
Shakakka99 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd shit down both legs.

50
thebest2020 50 points ago +50 / -0

House races.!!!!

47
The_Litehaus_Abides 47 points ago +47 / -0

I'm sure we won the House and I want it. The American people voted to give President Trump his mandate and a way to accomplish it. We won the House.

35
Nomoralcompass89 35 points ago +35 / -0

Supermajority goes brrrrrt.

12
kudupoo 12 points ago +12 / -0

You have 1150 Brts to play with Pede..

Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt! Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrttttrrrrrrrrrttttttttt!

6
FliesTheFlag 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is that an A10 Warthog in your pocket!

17
Light_HIV_Effect 17 points ago +17 / -0

That would be great. I'd love to see some of these squad thrown out on their asses.

15
TrumpLover 15 points ago +16 / -1

Winning the house means we can pass national blockchain for all future elections.

7
thebest2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lets start with national 2nd amendment. Then we can go into vote blockchains.

9
thereal____ 9 points ago +9 / -0

Idk, right now I’m feeling that we are one election fraud away from no 2nd. At least we all have the chance to go scuba diving to look for our long lost guns and ammo that fell overboard. There are no do overs from full commie.

2
thebest2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

So invest in scuba gear.. got it!!

4
ImWithHearse 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely! Segwit wallet with one satoshi in it. You could do a decentralized election for 330 million votes for about $58,000

2
TrumpLover 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 2nd amendment makes all gun laws illegal. We don't need the house for that, the supreme court could declare it tomorrow.

1
DaytonaGreg 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is why BIDEN is dangerous. Packing the court and no #2A

2
DonnieTurnip 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why not both.

2
thebest2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because!!! No reason not to!

2
MuricanaBanana 2 points ago +2 / -0

No technology that can’t be verified by a 5th grader honestly. Just leaves elections more vulnerable to fraud. Just use paper ballots and voter ID and ink on fingers.

11
CovefefeREEEE 11 points ago +11 / -0

👆👆👆 This.

38
Scoobysnacks45 38 points ago +38 / -0 (edited)

Please run one on the Michigan senate race. We need to see how the votes were manipulated compared to the senate race. Peters had way less votes than Biden and James had way more votes than Trump. Switching votes from Trump to Biden would give us this result. If you can match the time the switches happen with a graph, we are golden.

13
AmazingFlightLizard 13 points ago +13 / -0

John James needs that seat because ARMY AVIATION ALL THE WAY!

Ahem, but yeah, he seems a good dude and a worthy man to put in the seat.

5
CNN_is_ISIS 5 points ago +5 / -0

Happy Veteran's Day, lad!

16
CornandSoybeans 16 points ago +16 / -0

Can we go back to 2018 and run it. Sorry I'm like a like a special Olympian in the real Olympics when it comes to being a computer athlete.

6
45ACP 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't worry pede, that's most of us here. Our job is to spread the info.

10
Tcrlaf1 10 points ago +10 / -0

My thought as well. How many HOUSE races did they flip with this?

3
GEOTUS_JR 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not enough – we are going to take it!

94
TrumpDynastyForever 94 points ago +95 / -1

Twitter fucking deleted our followers, suspended our account, and unfollowed us from everyone we were following last night for tweeting out a meme about their censorship. We don't know when we'll be back but we'll blast it out to our 0 followers asap. @electionwatch13

23
TruuthSeeker 23 points ago +24 / -1

You have now joined an elite club.

15
kudupoo 15 points ago +15 / -0

They did the same to mine. In their defense, I did have a Patriot Lion as my icon patch, The Constitution, bullets and Flag as my header pic and spelled out my alliegence veeeery clearly in my bio.

10
TruuthSeeker 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mine was a kenosha kid meme, and 2020meme war banner. But I verified my phone number 4-5 times. I stand by everyword.

5
CornandSoybeans 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same here. Small fry and being somewhat careful on what I redpill with. Locked account under review

32
butte_weippe 32 points ago +32 / -0

also each state GOP leader

249
Granite_MAGA 249 points ago +250 / -1

Can someone tell me why in the fuck they are using two or three decimal places of precision to multiply 6 digit numbers then telling us we're within less that for margins?

Anyone else seeing this? Are they really moving votes around by simple ratios?

What on the gluten-free fuck is going on here?

175
wickedwitchofwi 175 points ago +177 / -2 (edited)

Considering this system is funded or affiliated with CLinton Foundation, there's your answer. It appears they programmed it to send .6% percent of the votes to the Dem candidate. Biden's just a name/placeholder. In 4 years it'll be someone else. BUT THEY DIDN'T KNOW WE HAD U/PEDEINSPECTOR

46
Do_u_ev3n_lift 46 points ago +46 / -0

Did he look at the softwares source code? how did he get it?

38
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 38 points ago +38 / -0

JSON data that is used to populate the nyt's election map. They get it from the same place a lot of news outlets get it from.

11
makethemwatch 11 points ago +11 / -0

This though just makes this a display error and not a vote tabulation error. The news gets the vote count to 3 significant figures but that doesnt mean the underlying votes are stored to 3 significant figures

13
stagolee 13 points ago +13 / -0

Actually if you watch Dr Shiva's video today, they do in fact store votes as decimal numbers. The voting machines allow "weighted voting" as a feature so you can allocate votes as 2.0 to 0.5 between the candidates. It's in there by design. He had official data from previous elections showing totals that were fractional. It's absurd.

8
makethemwatch 8 points ago +8 / -0

I saw the video, the problem is Edison is only reporting the percentage to 3 decimal places, but the vote totals are in the millions. If we want to convert the decimal to integers accurately we would need the percent to 7 decimal places

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dr. Shiva's presentation shows they're stored as double-precision floats though, not 3-digit decimals.

Doubles can store every exact positive integer up to 2^53 before they start jumping in larger amounts...and they can similarly store percentages to way beyond the precision necessary to get exact vote totals (after rounding) from each candidate based on percentage of the total vote.

The underlying data type shown in Dr. Shiva's presentation is more than sufficient for perfect precision, but it's still suspicious that it's used at all. A simple and correct voting machine would just use 32-bit or 64-bit integer accumulators (the latter for future-proofing against worldwide elections...shudder). The only reason to use a double seems to be to support the [should-be-illegal] ratio-based voting feature in the laziest possible way (too lazy to ever convert back to integer totals for storage).

4
TDaccount841 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the underlying data the fake news orgs is using can be called into question, so can this coronation.

31
deleted 31 points ago +40 / -9
25
abstr4ct 25 points ago +26 / -1

Then why is it always the third decimal amount?

-28
deleted -28 points ago +9 / -37
32
SellTheSun 32 points ago +33 / -1

however that can be just a data entry.

If it was simply data entry, than some Biden votes would be flipped to Trump as well. This is ONLY happening with Trump votes being switched to Biden votes - how is that just a data entry issue?

9
deleted 9 points ago +12 / -3
-1
roytheboy -1 points ago +4 / -5

This isn't only happening with Trump to Biden votes. Check it out yourself, I was looking through Wisconsin the other day trying to catch fraud and in fact Biden lost significantly more votes than Trump did in that state.

It's garbage data.

14
aaaronsohn 14 points ago +18 / -4

Cope harder, Biden boy.

5
iminlovewithtrump 5 points ago +9 / -4

Get out shill

22
SqRt7744 22 points ago +23 / -1

Really just pure coincidence then that all these "data issues" only benefit Biden 😂👍

3
kallebanen 3 points ago +4 / -1

Look at the script, it's programmed that way.

1
SqRt7744 1 point ago +1 / -0

It just finds the differences, and they never benefit Trump. The code isn't biased.

1
LauraTrumpette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it looking at ALL differences and they never benefit Trump, or is it looking for only the differences that favor Biden and we don't know if any favored Trump?

Thanks!

2
bubadmt 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nothing to see here, move along fellow raci-- I mean, millipede.

2
LauraTrumpette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we know that they only benefit Biden? I'm not seeing a number of votes that switched FROM Biden TO Trump, and I don't know if it's because there were none, or because no one has looked.

There's no way in hell that true "glitches" only favor Democrats, even if that's what history shows...

1
SqRt7744 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct, it's deliberate fraud, not a bug. The algorithm they were using has been reverse engineered.

15
pede-o-saurus 15 points ago +16 / -1

Are you just concern trolling? This is the map of fraud. That data comes from vote tabulating machines and they keep a timestamped record of their counts. Lawyers will use this map to file discovery to seize those machines' logs and we'll see how they match. Maybe there's a consolidation or reporting error here or there in the database but this many isn't feasible as a collection of one-off errors. And it also shows how votes can be skimmed between states, and it spot-checks with ground observers and news reports. Elections have been overturned on less. This is the map.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +5 / -9
12
pede-o-saurus 12 points ago +13 / -1

Nice try, disinfo agent. This is what it actually says on Edison's site: "A proven source for accurate and timely nationwide vote tabulation:

In an effort to improve quality, streamline data collection, and expand election coverage in 2018, ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News ended their arrangement with the Associated Press for vote tabulation and now partner with Edison Research for these data.

For the 2018 General Election, Edison Research provided the NEP with a fast and accurate vote count throughout the nation, providing data for all statewide races and all House races."

Tabulation is counting. Everybody has access to official data right now because it's POSTED ON THE COUNTY ELECTION WEBSITES OF EVERY COUNTY, Edison just aggregates it.

Deport this guy.

5
Texas_Rangers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep deport u/lapdants. His concern trolling all throughout this thread. They're getting scared.

3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +4 / -1

I just did a search. The .json file has a field called edison_exit_polls_page pointing to a web URL, but it's mixed in with other random web URL's. They have more references to tabulation, e.g. "Released as a separate subtotal at the end of tabulation" shows up a couple times, and a third with an abbreviation.

This doesn't appear to be exit poll data. It appears to be actual tabulated data, albeit presented in a lossy 3 significant figure format.

We need to be really careful with drawing inferences about dropped/switched votes from calculating Trump/Biden votes from percentages with only 3 significant figures, because anything beyond those figures is basically going to be random noise from timestamp to timestamp.

I suspect the OP's calculations for switched votes are bunk because of this unless he took it into account and gave the "minimum possible swing" or something, but there are still some major abnormalities in the data. The OP pointed one of them out too: There's a 0.6% drop in Trump votes, or 6 ticks of the least sig fig, when the vote total jumped by only 54 from 2984468 to 2984522...that's way outside of rounding error.

-22
deleted -22 points ago +3 / -25
29
pede-o-saurus 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yes.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
5
UndocumentedUpvote 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, what we are seeing here is the final approved for release version of the data, which is already rigged by the algorithm. However that 1M vanished votes come from mathematically, it's a product of data tempering of historic proportions.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +3 / -12
6
idshukhov 6 points ago +7 / -1

4 years ago I would not. Look at your behaviour lately and tell me again how you're not capable of this.

1
QuranIsToiletPaper 1 point ago +2 / -1

Behavior.*

-14
deleted -14 points ago +7 / -21
-9
lapdants -9 points ago +5 / -14

Well, so this is an aggregate data piblished by edison research

This is EXIT POLLING. Straight from Edison Research:

Our 2020 general election coverage included election day exit polls at over 700 voting locations, in-person early-voter exit polls, and telephone surveys with absentee and early voters all around the country. In total, Edison Research interviewed over 100,000 voters in the 2020 general election.

This is not official vote tallies and people are acting incredibly responsibly in this thread.

10
dullcare 10 points ago +11 / -1

they say they interview over 100,000 voters, not millions of voters.. so how do they get millions in the election data counts? Are you implying that these are running estimate of votes that are extrapolated from 100K exit interviews and that they keep adjusting on the fly?... and that they were interviewing shadowy voters in Detroit and Philly at 4 and 5am? Maybe they interviewed a few thousand in the dark of night to get to 138,000 Biden votes and 0 Trump votes?

9
pede-o-saurus 9 points ago +9 / -0

lapdants is a shill. Deport.

4
FoxIsCNN 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, that's exactly what he's implying.

These shills don't realize they're talking to people that can think. They're used to conversations with lobotomized leftists.

2
JoshHawley2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deboonker go deeeeenoooooonk

10
chr21328 10 points ago +12 / -2

he was banned?

3
wickedwitchofwi 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well he shows up for me

2
wickedwitchofwi 2 points ago +4 / -2

Hmmm maybe he deleted his account to be safe? Weird.

8
3
wickedwitchofwi 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think the site was down. I doubt someone would go to so much verifiable trouble only to bail.

1
VioletU53 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree

66
BrookieDragon 66 points ago +66 / -0

So like...the money scam they pulled on Office Space but this time with votes instead of pennies?

38
Harambe4K 38 points ago +38 / -0

The fuckers who did this better not get a minimum security prison with conjugal visits.

29
iamjohnwick 29 points ago +29 / -0

No no. I see Federal-Pound-Them-In-The-Ass prison in their futures.

8
Phil_DeGraves 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Mother shitter! Son of an ass!"

"Peter! Watch out for your cornhole, dude!"

15
Fauxcahantos 15 points ago +15 / -0

i bet they got the idea from Office Space 😂

7
FreedomAintFreeYo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wouldn't surprise me - the idea of going after Flynn with the Logan act came from Law and Order.

4
WassermanSchultz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thought it was West Wing?

2
FreedomAintFreeYo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't watch any network tv and couldn't remember, so I guessed. I was hoping someone knew - thanks!

1
WassermanSchultz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never seen Law and Order or West Wing. I only know about it because Bongino talked about it sometime in the summer.

4
plasmaburnz 4 points ago +4 / -0

When I saw the vertical lines in Biden's totals, I knew someone screwed up. That was too obvious. One possibility is that they programmed it to transfer votes over time, but they forgot to account for pauses in the counting. So for the hours when they stopped counting, the fraud software didn't. They couldn't admit the software was flawed, that would trigger an investigation. They couldn't repudiate the votes, they needed them for Biden to win. The only thing they could do was try to bluff their way through and hope their propaganda machine could cover them.

1
Noadhominem 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best theory yet.

15
Matthew419 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is the best analogy to share with normies to understand what has happened here.. Everyone has seen office space and knows that scene about shaving pennies.

3
Comntrinchief 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you’re stealing.

15
JohnMcCainsTumors 15 points ago +15 / -0

They need some time in federal pound me in the ass penitentiary

8
Granite_MAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

yes

63
McPurrs 63 points ago +63 / -0

Fractional voting has stolen elections for years

20
SobekRa 20 points ago +21 / -1

Watch this shit catch on in other countries. Many governments' sloppy frauds will be resurfacing like floating turds

9
Sporadica 9 points ago +9 / -0

Evidently my country uses dominion counting machines. now im concerned

4
SobekRa 4 points ago +5 / -1

If the electoral data gets purged in the coming days, you know what's up

Would be very interesting to see full independent audits worldwide

9
FreedomAintFreeYo 9 points ago +9 / -0

How many elected officials in this country weren't actually elected...

7
Shit_tyrone 7 points ago +7 / -0

The importance of this needs to be stated. You can't fucking have 0.88 votes. That's bullshit and they use it to steal elections.

36
fartybucketface 36 points ago +36 / -0

I really hope it's the data provider being retarded, and this isn't how we tabulate elections.

110
PedeInspector 110 points ago +111 / -1

Seeing that the Antrim county glitch can be found in the data, it is basically guaranteed that the data matches the real numbers.

11
Do_u_ev3n_lift 11 points ago +11 / -0

Where did you get that snippet of code? Is that from the dominion voting machines? some website?

10
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 10 points ago +10 / -0

Voting machines need open source code and all output needs to be public knowledge. Full crazy level auditing the processing code

3
makethemwatch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its impossible the vote_share is not precise enough, you cant get a raw vote with the percentage to only 3 significant figures

-7
deleted -7 points ago +2 / -9
75
PedeInspector 75 points ago +77 / -2

It's not exit polling data, you can find glitches from videos with this data too, if you see a glitch live on CNN, you can find it in this data.

1
makethemwatch 1 point ago +4 / -3

You only have the 3 decimal places for vote share which is not precise enough to find errors on the order of thousands in the data you posted. You need more significant digits for vote_share otherwise you are generating precision out of thin air

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Btw, did you perform the reverse experiment where we can see potentially how many votes switched from Trump to Biden (and not just vice versa). Please tell me you checked this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
28
lostaccount 28 points ago +28 / -0

In this day and age our voting software should be open-source and available to skim through on GIT...

-__-

3
chr21328 3 points ago +3 / -0

EXACTLY.

20
wickedwitchofwi 20 points ago +23 / -3

It is how they tabulate elections. The system is programmed to swing Dem

24
SHALL_NOT 24 points ago +25 / -1

Hey sorry, retard here. Whats up with the decimal place thing? I've seen it around a fair amount recently. And what is being multiplied?

27
Shit_tyrone 27 points ago +27 / -0

http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/ this website explains it all. It also explains how they fuckin cheat elections with it.

8
SHALL_NOT 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wow this is crazy. I knew the voting systems were corruptible but to see it laid out this way is eye opening.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
yourbrother 6 points ago +6 / -0

Congratulations. Welcome to 2 decades ago.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
PatrickHangry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, it's pretty apparent that he just "beat the cheating" in 2016, because they believed their BS polls too much to go "all out" like they did this year. Even this year they still underestimated the amount of mail-in ballots to fake in advance, and they were only able to cover the difference with a ton of egregious last-minute panic cheating, which was too obvious to go unpunished.

3
Comntrinchief 3 points ago +3 / -0

HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!! RED ALERT!!

This explains everything!

Does anyone know if fractional voting and weighted voting is being used? The article says it could be and no one would know.

1
BSnatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, thats fucking slimee as shit

16
CodeMonkey 16 points ago +16 / -0

The data set, instead of having the vote counts for each candidate, has a total number of votes and a fraction for each candidate.

It looks roughly like this: votes: 1234567 biden: 0.654 trump: 0.321

When you're dealing with a 6 or 7 digit number and multiply by a 3 digit decimal, precision is lost; you don't know exactly how many votes go for each candidate.

Looking at the fake example above, 0.001 of 1,234,567 is 1,235.

Biden's actual vote count could be anywhere between 807,406 and 808,641.

Trump's actual vote count could be anywhere between 396,296 and 397,530.

12
SHALL_NOT 12 points ago +12 / -0

Gotcha, so basically in tight races coming down to a 0.1 point margin the actual results could be different from the reported results.

In general terms, it would seem this is not the most accurate way to count, nor is it the easiest since it requires the candidate votes divided by total votes, rounded to the nearest 0.1%. All while they could do the easier and more accurate thing by reporting the unprocessed raw counts.

In your example it looks like the last sigfig is the thousands place and we don’t actually know how many hundreds went to either candidate.

1
Comntrinchief 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you for this. It makes more sense now. I wasn’t sure how they were going from 3 decimal places can equate to 1 or 2 votes to thousands.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
PatrickHangry 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the kind of attention to detail we need. Good job.

185
IncredibleMrE1 185 points ago +186 / -1

OP did tell one lie. This is not a nuke, this is the MOTHER OF ALL NUKES.

192
PantsJihad 192 points ago +192 / -0 (edited)

Oh shit it gets even better. Dr Shiva Ayyadurai is crunching these numbers too and they've more or less reverse engineered the math they used to siphon votes. This is going to blow up HUGE.

This ain't a MOAB, we're getting into Tsar Bomba territory here.

EDIT: I'm not sure how to embed a periscope link, but here's his twitter feed that has it all: https://twitter.com/va_shiva?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3Ava_shiva&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fvashiva.com%2Fdr-shiva-live-election-fraud-in-massachusetts%2F

It looks like they had a system set up to siphon trump votes in districts with greater than 25% trump turnout. The idiots didn't even vary it up, used same math on all cheated counts. Its consistant.

74
DonJr2024 74 points ago +74 / -0

I pray for this. One big nuke that just overturns several states in one go and lands people in front of congress and then in jail.

39
kd5ywa 39 points ago +39 / -0

This isn't "in front of congress stuff". This is insurrection act, thrown in jail immediately crap.

2
Snypr18 2 points ago +2 / -0

As if anyone with the authority to do that actually has the balls to see it done.

18
KingMoonRacer 18 points ago +18 / -0

There are several layers of fraud here. The voting machines are only one.

39
StraightWhiteCisMale 39 points ago +40 / -1

u/DCdeporable did an infographic on this just now. This guy (Dr. Ayyadurai) is an MIT PhD, this is huge.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2y2SY/

1
UpTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I made a genuine attempt to understand this, but I'm not PhD-level smart. ELI5 anyone?

30
wickedwitchofwi 30 points ago +32 / -2

For fuck's sake, what smarter pede than I has sent the code and results and here findings to Trump Campaign and the ilk of patriots 'round the social medes?

13
kornesque 13 points ago +13 / -0

Anyone else having trouble viewing that stream? I've got it small and on on a good connection and it won't play for more than a few seconds before stalling indefinitely.

22
CroatianRepublican 22 points ago +22 / -0

It's on Dr. Shiva's youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=emb_title

The video is incredibly concise and easy to understand. The evidence is damning.

8
kornesque 8 points ago +8 / -0

Youtube

Screw it, as long as it works. Plus the swamp is hosting facts that will kill their candidate, guess I'll take glee in that.

Money link, thanks.

11
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 11 points ago +11 / -0

That’s called an unintentional TD.win DDOS.

7
Hi_Im_Dave 7 points ago +7 / -0

I have downloaded the entire video. It's 1.5GB, so Streamable won't take it. But for users that have ffmpeg, you can grab just about any streaming social media video from the internet by using its .m3u8 playlist file.

For example, in Firefox, if you open his Periscope video, which is the source for the clip on twitter, and then right click it and inspect it, you can find this file.

Right click on video > inspect > Network Tab > Click Reload> then at the top type m3u8 to filter it down.

Click on that m3u8 line and it will open the the url for the m3u8 file.

Now, with ffmpeg, you can grab the entire video to archive, share, watch or whatever. For linux, the ffmpeg command and link for this particular clip is

ffmpeg -i "https://canary-video-us-east-1.pscp.tv/Transcoding/v1/hls/rKWyxg889j4JUHD0KEsyj0kl-HE9Vn8eFx8CZWu8Ccsja84cE-TdFDrN1iD5FKf3Mud0ppwygX71jDplylg7iw/non_transcode/us-east-1/periscope-replay-direct-prod-us-east-1-public/playlist_16841709147873874030.m3u8" -c copy output.mkv

3
kornesque 3 points ago +3 / -0

"All your bitstream are belong to us."

3
patriotblend 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now that it's been reprocessed it's only about 400 mb

4
Thepeter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Put it up on the Maga video hosting site so youtube can't take it down

https://video.maga.host/

5
patriotblend 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's already there by someone named joe.biden.sniffs.children, so let it be written

1
Hi_Im_Dave 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't even think to re-encode it. Apparently that type of critical thinking is above my pay grade I guess!

1
patriotblend 1 point ago +1 / -0

Youtube encodes videos and streams to a tighter compression after they sit for a bit. Now for 720p it shows a 286 MB vp9-codec video file or a 330 MB h.264. Put together with the 65 MB audio file and it's under 400 MB.

It's something you wouldn't notice unless you ran into it before. There's no noticeable difference to the viewer.

2
MakeArdernGoAway 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same here, absolutely no surprises that you can't watch it on twatter.

5
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks, saved it to watch later tonight.

19
Da_Willis_28 19 points ago +19 / -0

If my tally is correct as the total stands right now its 542,178 votes that have been switched and 2,865,807 votes lost. This is the mother of all nukes.

16
kennedyc5217 16 points ago +16 / -0

The “MOAN”

7
CandyBarr 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm moaning just thinking about it

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
iamkats 7 points ago +7 / -0

Might one say, a MOAB?

3
Myrdoc 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not strong enough. Tsar Bomba!!

96
wickedwitchofwi 96 points ago +96 / -0

Can anyone confirm this data has been sent? It would give a lot of us nonsmartcoding pedes peace of mind.

35
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 35 points ago +35 / -0

This data does appear on the nytimes site - you can still access it. What is unclear to me is how Edison obtains this data and if all the vote reversals are "glitches" like the Antrim county one or maybe some happen for other reasons. The fact that the Antrim glitch has been identified does make it seem very real. Hoping some pedes running the script will verify the Oakland county glitch is well.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +2 / -8
9
UndocumentedUpvote 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

Edison Research also does vote counts so what is your point?


“Vote Count The NEP provides media organizations with real-time vote results in all 50 states for statewide races, ballot initiatives and House races. The NEP vote count from Edison Research is the only service continuously updated after Election Day. We track every vote until results are certified by all states. Vote count data is available for statewide results, vote by Congressional District, county vote data breakouts for statewide races, and all U.S. House races.”

3
pede-o-saurus 3 points ago +5 / -2

His point is to try to blunt the impact through disinformation because he's a shill and that's his job. Your job is to push the deport button below his post ;)

2
Rattlefrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

These comments are just as ridiculous as reddit claiming no Trump supporters ever existed on their platform and t_d was therefore a Russian troll farm.

We're going to eventually get something wrong and then we'll discredit ourselves if every single contrary opinion is assumed to be malicious and is disregarded.

2
pede-o-saurus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course we need contrary opinions to figure out where we're wrong; you're absolutely right. But there are also disinfo agents who leap into action whenever something is found saying it's a nothingburger or wrong, typically by continuously re-posting an easily-verified-to-be-wrong statement - in this case "it's exit polling data" (it's the data that drives NYT's counter, they obviously use collected counts not exit polling). The difference is subtle and the point of downvotes and the deport button is they harness collective intelligence of many users to figure out whether it's one of the other, which the mods then use human judgement on. So if it seems like a dumb argument, push the downvote button; if you feel that the pattern of behavior is intentionally deceptive, push deport.

8
UnderCoverTrumper 8 points ago +9 / -1

yis. am also but a humble humanities pede.

52
OrganicVandal 52 points ago +53 / -1

You vill get banned if display truth on Tvitter.

21
TrumpDynastyForever 21 points ago +22 / -1

We were suspended, our followers were deleted, and they removed our follows from everyone we were following last night for sharing a meme about twitter's censorship.....ironic, isn't it? @electionwatch13 if we ever make it back

1114
TrumpTrain2020 1114 points ago +1126 / -12

Dear God,

y u no make me smart like dis?

Thanks,

Me

590
440
TrumpTrain2020 440 points ago +440 / -0

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede.

231
trump_45 231 points ago +232 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede. MAGA!!!

162
namechangearoo 162 points ago +163 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede.

104
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 104 points ago +105 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede.

81
blubberdong 81 points ago +82 / -1

u/PedeInspector - Serious MAGA work, pede!

28
doug2 28 points ago +30 / -2

My alt, no biggie.

(Kidding)

10
bothloveocean 10 points ago +11 / -1

u/PedeInspector - God bless you, Pede! MAGA!!!

51
kornesque 51 points ago +52 / -1

u/PedeInspector - You should never buy your own beer ever again. God bless you, pede.

18
jaybo500 18 points ago +19 / -1

God bless you, Pede.

10
Nameless 10 points ago +11 / -1

Bill Clinton

10
Sir_Shibes 10 points ago +11 / -1

is

64
Postal 64 points ago +64 / -0

Can I buy this dude lunch or something because I want to get him something for this work

57
Trumper926 57 points ago +57 / -0

Lunch? I'm buying him his own Taco Bell.

27
magastrophysicist 27 points ago +27 / -0

In the future, all restaurants are Taco Bell.

This is a good investment.

11
Aoikaze2000 11 points ago +11 / -0

eh.... i'd rather have Chipotle....

At least the food's real there =P

12
magastrophysicist 12 points ago +12 / -0

GIBS THIS DUDE A CHIPOTLE, STAT!

3
EatShitCommie 3 points ago +4 / -1

No way. Chipotle is extra cucked and took a gigantic shit on the American Farmer a few years ago with extremely misleading youtube videos.

Fuck Chipotle.

-Iowan in the Ag industry

2
Lovepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make chipotle not upcharge for everything again!

9
GiliusThunderhead 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fuck now I have to go get taco bell

4
magastrophysicist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hashtag me too

2
Anus_Blenders_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Taco Bell?! =D

18
SHALL_NOT 18 points ago +18 / -0

Peace is the prize

12
wickedwitchofwi 12 points ago +13 / -1

Yeah, how to pay this hero?

34
Trumper926 34 points ago +34 / -0

u/PedeInspector, May the fire of the Holy Spirit continue to enlighten your mind.

1
fiercemodern 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/PedeInspector is obviously one of the most based humans ever to have lived.

70
decaf_covfefe 70 points ago +71 / -1

Not trying to be a concern troll, but said user has been a TD for a little over a day and admits in other posts as not being American. Could be nothing, but just pointing that out.

139
PedeInspector 139 points ago +140 / -1

Yeah, but all the data can be checked by other coder pedes, they can get the data straight from the source too, they don't have to use the one I downloaded, and if they check it, they'll see that everything matches.

51
decaf_covfefe 51 points ago +51 / -0

Thanks man. No offense btw just doing my job. Glad to have you here!

40
wickedwitchofwi 40 points ago +41 / -1

Dr Shiva has found similar per his twitter Ayyadurai Shiva

16
limbaughnomicon 16 points ago +17 / -1

They should compare notes...

10
Haitianbychoice360 10 points ago +10 / -0

THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS!!!!

7
WowStrongWinning 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ok, I just did the math, let me know if there is an error. The system shows a difference of 54 votes from the first tabulation to the second. However, in order for the vote ratio to change as the system shows, that would mean that Trump would have lost 17,876.57 votes and Biden gained 17,929.81 votes. But since there was only a 54 vote difference between the two tabulations it’s impossible for those ratios to change by 17,000 since 17,000 != 54.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
56
Based_psychologist 56 points ago +56 / -0

Worth noting

41
kekNation 41 points ago +41 / -0

Probably someone in a country that desperately wants Trump yo win because they are tired of all the wars our other presidents are starting.

Maybe someone in middle east who has actually been paying attention to the incredible peace deals Team Trump are striking and who has seen the peaceful way Trump has decimated Iran and N. Korea.

Possibly someone in a developed country tired of having China steal all their patents and undermine every other countries ability to win any sort of manufacturing business by using stolen technology, child labor, and no worker’s rights.

A lot of non Americans are rooting for Trump because he is good for the whole non-commie world.

16
Trumper926 16 points ago +16 / -0

Amen to this.

11
idindudat 11 points ago +11 / -0

Like taiwan

35
3sigma_gal_for_Trump 35 points ago +35 / -0

The good thing is that what he posted is 100 percent verifiable, since the data is online for everyone to download, and other programmer pedes are already working on it. The only outstanding issue is whether the vote switches identified are all the same in nature as the Antrim ones or if there were some other type of glitches that may have been data feed issues and not genuine vote switches.

3
Texas_Rangers 3 points ago +4 / -1

I wish we could narrow the issues to certain counties.

2
wickedwitchofwi 2 points ago +3 / -1

This

6
McPurrs 6 points ago +6 / -0

so get someone to check his work and just be thankful until then

42
DukeDicky 42 points ago +42 / -0

u/PedeInspector did you upload the Edison data so we have a source copy in case there's any fuckery with anyone going in and getting to manually change the values? And THANK YOU!

93
PedeInspector 93 points ago +95 / -2

Yep, it's all in that workupload link above, every single state.

33
VinceVonVroom 33 points ago +33 / -0

Just checking and maybe someone else asked it, but did you run the same test to see if Biden votes were switched to Trump? Is it possible the events were occurring both ways?

14
Tantalus4200 14 points ago +14 / -0

Upvoted to solidify the truth

3
Texas_Rangers 3 points ago +5 / -2

There were some switching from Biden to Trump, but it was overwhelmingly the opposite.

3
MuricanaBanana 3 points ago +5 / -2

The math would be showing negative numbers if votes were switched to Trump.

13
LRRP 13 points ago +13 / -0

Dewd... amazing

9
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 9 points ago +10 / -1

Dumb question, but you have sent this to everyone in the trump orbit, right? If you have I'm gonna need more popcorn

9
DukeDicky 9 points ago +9 / -0

I never doubted you! :)

0
ContaigeousSuicide 0 points ago +2 / -2

You have changed the world.

35
DonJr2024 35 points ago +38 / -3

Have we checked for the opposite - Biden votes lost to Trump? Just to see if there is some randomness to it?

23
Trumper926 23 points ago +24 / -1

Yes but they are much smaller.

15
DonJr2024 15 points ago +16 / -1

Yup saw he said that. We need to get the exact numbers.

We need to change "glitch" into "fraud" and we need the full data to show that.

5
Walleyevision 5 points ago +13 / -8

Deport!!! Concern troll!!!! Shill!!!! /s

30
DonJr2024 30 points ago +30 / -0

Fuck, it is pretty bad at times lately.

PedeInspector did answer that he saw in PA about 20,000 (vs 200,000 for Biden) go Trump's way. I asked him to check other states. It's important data.

22
doug2 22 points ago +22 / -0

Absolutely. I'm the biggest Trump fan their is but we need an honest count. Jesus that should go wo saying.

9
Barbs 9 points ago +9 / -0

The framework upon which we hash out our differences should be fair and transparent to everyone. We can bicker and argue about politics all day long, but it’s the ballot box that ultimately determines the direction of our country.

So I’m with you, I want to see it all. There’s a reason that neither side really pushes for more secure voting, and it’s because they both want to retain the option to cheat. We need to uncover all of it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
friedchicken 4 points ago +4 / -0

You asked a valid question, that ADDS TO THE CASE. Anyone who did this might want plausible deniability and/or leave some reasonable doubt.

THE PROSECUTION MUST TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION!

2
Lurker6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly, any evidence that things were fucky in the counts just makes court cases stronger or increases the chance that republican led legislatures investigate.

3
Kek_The_World 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don jr... is that really you;/-

9
DonJr2024 9 points ago +9 / -0

Sorry, I'm not even American. Just a Canadian who dreams more and more of moving down there. I'm sure Don Jr is around here though.

4
Fauxcahantos 4 points ago +4 / -0

yeah I remember the old days on reddit, if you asked any questions you were a shill working for Hillary 😂

2
friedchicken 2 points ago +3 / -1

EXCELLENT QUESTION!

Answer is YES, and it is SIGNIFICANTLY less.

25
DJT_JR6544 25 points ago +25 / -0

https://thedonald.win/u/PedeInspector This is amazing! Thank you!

95
Doth 95 points ago +95 / -0

God tailor-made each of us to a purpose. Find your strength and use it in service to others, it is rewarding and fulfilling to find your place in the world!

22
friendofno1 22 points ago +22 / -0

Indeed. I’m sadly not math-minded enough to help figure this numbers shit out, but God blessed me with an eye for good design. I can use that to persuade for good instead of evil, unlike most artists.

11
SpaceAce 11 points ago +11 / -0

Can my purpose just be eating tendies and watching TV?? I feel like that may be my calling....

Don't tell my fiancee i said this, she will give me an evil scowl and ignore me.

1
Ragnar_Danneskjold 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol at least you still have a fiancee. My purpose in life is to fail at everything I've tried and end up 37 and alone.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
73
Loiuzein 73 points ago +73 / -0

We all have differing strengths :)

40
TrumpTrain2020 40 points ago +40 / -0

You're my favorite Pede.

15
Loiuzein 15 points ago +15 / -0

(ಸ‿ಸ)

16
Filo76 16 points ago +16 / -0

Is biting sarcasm a strength? Because I have that in spades.

7
Loiuzein 7 points ago +7 / -0

hell yeah it is! sarcasm and insults in general are strong teaching mechanisms as well as general entertainment!

3
Haitianbychoice360 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey! Whatever works. Lol

2
loverat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm a sarcastic and caustic bitch - I love eviscerating libtards with words. We are the infantry battling on the front lines of the Info war.

1
lilome33 1 point ago +1 / -0

I say when you take the mask off you have an airgasm.

2
UnoriginalNickname 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make memes with biting sarcasm

1
Onebadmoth 1 point ago +2 / -1

Remember, tact is for people who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic

9
ex67v 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is the true "diversity". It's not based on where you come from, or the tint of your skin, or which tribe you affiliate with. We're stronger because our skills and experience compliment one another, not because we have an even distribution of identity groups.

3
knowIdotruth 3 points ago +3 / -0

And as centipedes, differing lengths.

PedeInspector length: Impressive.

39
Here_we_go 39 points ago +40 / -1

He seriously fucked me by being dyslexic

35
Nomoralcompass89 35 points ago +35 / -0

Don't feel too bad, there's people out there that suck at breathing.

63
wickedwitchofwi 63 points ago +64 / -1

Mainly George Floyd

23
Dialectic 23 points ago +23 / -0

Mmmmm delectable spice

4
wickedwitchofwi 4 points ago +5 / -1

POSH SPICE I'll tell you what I WANT

2
Whatyougotson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just had a flashback to spiceworld

10
SHALL_NOT 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, thats breefing

9
GeneralPinochet 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

In fairness, he did it to himself with all the fentanyl and other respiratory depressants. Can’t blame God for that.

5
wickedwitchofwi 5 points ago +6 / -1

Name checks out, do you rent helicopters to pedes? Asking for a friend.

The friend is me.

5
GeneralPinochet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Si. I have a whole fleet standing by.

3
wickedwitchofwi 3 points ago +4 / -1

Looking to take some key officials in some blue state for a tour.

5
kornesque 5 points ago +5 / -0

rimshot

2
TrumpTrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

audible lol achieved

4
SoAngryRanger 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well you don’t need to brag about it.

(D y s l e x i a = sex daily; dyslexic joke)

3
Megladonald 3 points ago +4 / -1

Sti lla doog ym dneirf, erew no eht pmurt nairt dna erew annog NIW!

2
TrumpTrain2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

OCOH HOOC

2
zipodk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I get this isn't a magic solution but did you try a font made for dyslexia such as https://www.opendyslexic.org/

14
leakmouth 14 points ago +16 / -2

Pound me 2 God

5
wickedwitchofwi 5 points ago +6 / -1

Considered yourself pounded. Welcome back. Did you enjoy the experience?

899
PedeInspector 899 points ago +907 / -8

u/TrumanBlack

Damn, you're better than me at getting attention lol.

Btw, update the thread with the numbers here : https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O0gyAf/huge-evidence-glitches-all-over-/

Those are the updated numbers with the bugs fixed, and way more states affected.

Also delete the part where I mention the bug, otherwise once you update the thread with the good numbers, pedes might think they are still the wrong numbers.

443
Oback_Barama 443 points ago +443 / -0 (edited)

So let me get this straight. The voting software occasionally takes the vote total, and then calculates the percent of the vote for the opposition candidate to the third digit, and then drops the third digit, and give it to the preferred candidate? and redistributes?

So if there are 4,000,000 votes in and DJT has 51.7% of the vote that means he has 2,068,000 votes. It then shifts that .7% of the vote to Biden?

So now DJT has 2,040,000 votes with exactly 51% of the vote?

Do this three or four times over the course of the night and hope no one notices the rounding error and you can shift a state at least 2% towards your favor.

I'm guessing that they had this going in ALL STATE using this software and still lost several. As the Election Night went on, and it was clear they were losing the MUST WIN STATES that's when they stopped the count and disturbed the emergency Biden Only Ballots.

TLDR: The Dem's were using Lex Luthor's The Superman 3 plan to get rich off of banking rounding errors to steal the election. Only we turned out the vote so hard they had to manufacture extra ballots.

Is that right?

Edit: Office Space, Yes

244
IsrorOrca 244 points ago +244 / -0

I equate it more to Office Space. They were stealing a fraction of a penny, but they fucked up; they either didn't carry a 1 or didn't count on the sheer volume of vote Trump was going to get. They got greedy.

101
leakmouth 101 points ago +101 / -0 (edited)

wasnt the bad guy in the movie "Ghost" doing that then Roadhouse found out but bad guy had Roadhouse killed by a weird looking black guy that also looked hispanic (kinda like Juan Williams) and tried to fuck G.I. Jane when she was still hot but looked too butch with that Backstreet Boys haircut before Roadhouse came back as an ass-kicking ghost?

Peter Griffin: "Roadhouse..."

34
feraxil 34 points ago +34 / -0

Can you switch every instance of "Demi" with "G.I. JANE"?

11
leakmouth 11 points ago +11 / -0

I got ya fam

8
feraxil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thanks!

24
Spudster 24 points ago +24 / -0

You should write movie reviews for a living.

4
leakmouth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kind of reminds you of the tangeants Patrick Bateman would go off on except more retarded

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
IAbsolutelyDare 10 points ago +10 / -0

I want to see this movie now...

6
bigdickhangsright 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah but then the bartender from TNG talked to the dirty dancer and decided to cash his check because he sang a repetitive song.

2
novanleon 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean Whoopi who also happens to be a co-host on The View, aka. the worst daytime talk show that ever existed, and coincidentally also an avid Trump-hater?

2
bigdickhangsright 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah how'd you guess it

2
novanleon 2 points ago +2 / -0

That settles it. We've successfully connected the rampant voter fraud of the 2020 presidential election to Whoopi Goldberg... I think our job it done here boys!

2
Ifififififokeydoke 2 points ago +2 / -0

Finally something I can understand in this post!!

35
Skogin 35 points ago +36 / -1

Didn’t the Office Space scam copy the Superman scam? It’s all the same scam.

28
Sporadica 28 points ago +28 / -0

They literally said in the movie "like from superman 3", I watched it a couple weeks ago. great movie.

3
brassmule 3 points ago +3 / -0

All I know is, we better see some Dem crooks and Dominion coders going to Federal Pound Me In The Ass Prison.

23
TeddyIndeed 23 points ago +23 / -0

Wasn't that Richard Pryor in Superman 3? Being sloppy got him busted too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7JBXGkBoFc

7
Oback_Barama 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, thank you! I forgot it was Superman 3

7
TeddyIndeed 7 points ago +7 / -0

I remembered it was Richard Pryor (red Ferrari) but totally forgot it was a Superman movie. First I went to The Toy, then Brewster's millions.

Full disclosure: this is about the limit of my forensic abilities - but I'll gladly volunteer it all for TheDonald & DJT!!!!

16
4a1fac047b144338 16 points ago +17 / -1

That is some Super Man 2 shit.

17
feraxil 17 points ago +17 / -0

I think it was Super Man 3.

15
OGTD1 15 points ago +15 / -0

I hesitate to post with all the stats experts in here but yes the car scene in Office Space came to mind. “So your stealing right?”

12
ProjectLawler 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah but this is more like redistributing the votes to make it fair for Joe.

8
rickscarf 8 points ago +8 / -0

If your state has under 400,000 votes then you won't have to worry under Joe's plan, but if you have more votes than that then Joe is going to get his fair share kicked back to the Big Guy

10
2008RonPaul2012 10 points ago +10 / -0 (edited)

The 7/11, right? You take a vote from the tray... From the crippled children?!?

No --no that's the jar. I'm talking about the tray, you know, the votes for everybody.

Ohhh for everybody, okay...

Yeah. Well those are whole votes. I'm just talking about fractions of votes here, okay? But we do it from a much bigger tray, and we do it a couple million times.

4
Herecomedatpresident 4 points ago +4 / -0

underrated comment

66
CornandSoybeans 66 points ago +66 / -0

Exactly what happened. Plus I'm sure they harvested ballots from registered individual that were very likely not to vote by running an algorithm to find them. These would have been mailed in on time and the only way to prove those fraudulent would be to find the voter and ask them if there result matches the way they voted. ( not likely).

49
Italians_Invented_2A 49 points ago +49 / -0

It can be done. Take Republicans that haven't voted in the last 2 or 3 elections, knock at their door, ask if they voted this time. If they say no, they could be asked to testify.

Trump's campaign has ground game, this can be done easily.

9
Shamb3 9 points ago +9 / -0

According to the Detroit lawsuit they just added names to the voter registration roll and ran the ballots that came from god knows where through.

6
brassmule 6 points ago +6 / -0

And ran some ballots through the counter 50+ times. That was always the most common way to scam votes in Wayne County and it's what crazy plant lady discovered in 2016.

During her recount, they had a tub of ballots that was supposed to have 500 and it only had like 36, as I recall. Because they'd turn them all through the optical scanner/tabulator dozens of times each.

9
Herecomedatpresident 9 points ago +9 / -0

big tech had way more to do with this than we realized. That is why Jack looked so unbelievably weird and smug at the congressional hearings.

8
RinoHuntersUnite 8 points ago +8 / -0

Check out the Voter Integrity Project.

They're literally doing this.

And they have phonebanks where they are calling people and asking them. Then sending someone to their home to get a sworn affidavit from them.

1
emeraldcity 1 point ago +1 / -0

re. contacting voters to see if they voted that way: I've seen this done before. It is possible.

37
XavierMiles 37 points ago +37 / -0

Sounds more like OfficeSpace where they forgot some mundane details.

24
KornHoLi0 24 points ago +24 / -0

This is not a mundane detail Michael!

14
Light_HIV_Effect 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is not some mundane detail, Michael!

7
Hilldawg4Prison 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is what I'm trying to understand as well.

6
usa_foot_print 6 points ago +6 / -0

What the actual fuck.

92
TrumanBlack [S] 92 points ago +92 / -0

Fixed! Is this better?

102
PedeInspector 102 points ago +103 / -1

Yep, nice.

56
TrumanBlack [S] 56 points ago +56 / -0

Great pede!

29
Granite_MAGA 29 points ago +29 / -0

Am I correct in seeing that we are losing precision using 2 and 3 decimal place ratios to move 6 digit votes around?

I think I know how to math, and you can drop a few 10k votes here and there that way.

Like, that's Office Space level decimal point fuckery.

11
Jojobelle 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm witnessing greatness you and Trumanbkack are doing gods work!! God bless

11
Sheepfuzz 11 points ago +11 / -0

You deserve a Nobel Peace Prize

31
Magus_Strife 31 points ago +31 / -0

Were there any times where Trump benefited, or 100% for Biden? I am not doubting here, I am just imagining that would be the defense from my normie and Lefty friends.

15
KARMAAACS 15 points ago +16 / -1

Send this info to the campaign man and to RICO Rudy!

7
GorillaChannel1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nice work Pede.

618
p8riot 618 points ago +621 / -3

The switch amounts we can double in terms of swing impact (100 votes switched = 200 point advantage for Biden)

So this would give PA to Trump outright

347
MakeAmericaLegendary 347 points ago +348 / -1

Along with the popular vote. Of course, all of this is somehow going to be our fault in the end because of course it is.

231
America_No_1 231 points ago +231 / -0

Racism drove the Democrats to cheat. They had to do it to defeat systemic racism, friend.

102
PantsJihad 102 points ago +103 / -1

My white penis makes them evil.

50
Fauxcahantos 50 points ago +54 / -4

they are always promoting the BBC now, always showing black guy with white girl. Imagine needing media propaganda in everything to get girls to f-ck you

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
30
Emper 30 points ago +31 / -1

The worst part is this shows they disenfranchised black voters more than any other group.

28
TeddyIndeed 28 points ago +29 / -1

They want generations of black Americans stuck in awful school systems and never breaking out.

School choice? NO FUCKIN' WAY.

That's the only plain systemic racism I can recognize and would like to fix.

19
NancysBarTab 19 points ago +19 / -0

teachers unions

12
joker 12 points ago +12 / -0

Leechers union

10
Lovepede 10 points ago +10 / -0

This infuriates me. Charter schools don't cost tax payers any extra but are free to compete and achieves superior results. Beyond childhood nutrition, stable two parent household and employment it's the best chance a poor kid have to change their legacy.

17
infinitysupreme 17 points ago +17 / -0

Every Democrat friend I have (I was raised, educated, and worked in NYC), the honest ones, they would all prefer Biden win by vote fraud than Trump win honestly.

12
rickscarf 12 points ago +12 / -0

it's true, they'd rather go the rest of their lives never knowing if their vote really matters, anyone can get anyone elected in the future, "but its ok because the orange man is bad and its worth it"

6
loveshock 6 points ago +6 / -0

Defeat systemic racism by systemic cheating.l

2
Major_Nutt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll put $50 they try to use this as an excuse once the fraud evidence is indisputable for even the MSM. f

"Don't you people understand???? We HAVE to beat OrAnGe MaN in order to defeat racism, sexism, etc."

19
dancn 19 points ago +19 / -0

RRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEUUUSSSIIIIAAAAAAA!!!!!

6
BoatingAccident 6 points ago +6 / -0

"YOU CHEATED!"

-The Left

5
Tocqueville 5 points ago +5 / -0

you mean the fault of every Trump voter? That's kind of the way the system should work

4
kesquare2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm ok with that.

122
rebelde_sin_causa 122 points ago +122 / -0

Also gives VA to Trump easily. Gives us Nevada but close. Gives us Georgia. And comes close to forcing a recount in NY

107
-REEEEEEEDACTED- 107 points ago +108 / -1

MOTHER OF GOD -- can you imagine the poo-flinging galactic liberal chimpout if NY was ruled as a Trump victory?

52
cheesecakelove 52 points ago +52 / -0

It has to happen. We’re back to the status quo with Biden. That’s a road that leads to the death of America by small cuts.

I obviously want Trump to win, but not for the same reasons as others.

31
Trumper926 31 points ago +31 / -0

A recount in NY. Don't tease me like this.

2
America1stAndOnly 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a recount everywhere. Did you see how close Texas was? I don't buy those numbers for a second.

1
cumonmaaan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do... i live here and the shitards are moving here in droves.

21
rvpilot 21 points ago +22 / -1

poo-flinging galactic liberal chimpout

LMAO!!! My sides! 😂😂😂

12
reddeadpill 12 points ago +12 / -0

Mega chimpout coming!

Chimpout is seriously one of my favorite words of all time, it describes so many situations in perfect levels of sad irony.

14
-REEEEEEEDACTED- 14 points ago +14 / -0 (edited)

The best part is chimpout was used for the longest time to denote nothing more than the grandest of public freakouts.

Then some absolutely non self-aware racist-ass libshits heard the word chimp being used and immediately thought bLaCk pEopLe reeeee

Fucking weirdos.

9
reddeadpill 9 points ago +9 / -0

The left has always been the real racists.

-6
NeonNazis -6 points ago +2 / -8

Yea except us genuine racists have been using chimpout exactly how you describe it as for decades. It's ok though it's super fun to say

3
Emodius 3 points ago +4 / -1

Been thinking the same. How glorious lol

47
5minutes2midnight 47 points ago +47 / -0

Oh boy...I wanna see VA red again!!!

12
Cswanger22 12 points ago +12 / -0

It should have people were fired up here

17
TeddyIndeed 17 points ago +17 / -0

Recount NY. Long Island went from reddish to red, btw. Not an insignificant development.

10
Only_Rosie_ODonnell 10 points ago +10 / -0

Many other NY counties went red

You can compare this years elections to 2016 and 2012

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-elections/new-york-results

17
p8riot 17 points ago +18 / -1

I only see a 24k swing in VA, are you counting lost votes?

11
rebelde_sin_causa 11 points ago +11 / -0

yes

13
p8riot 13 points ago +14 / -1

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

This makes it sound like .. I'm not sure now actually

6
Trumper926 6 points ago +6 / -0

We need these numbers too. But I think this is the dam breaking.

10
Haitianbychoice360 10 points ago +10 / -0

I was wondering about NY. This is above my pay grade and can barely understand the ramifications of all of these numbers. LOL

31
lake-koshkonong 31 points ago +32 / -1

This is just incredible. Incredible work.

26
richmomz 26 points ago +26 / -0

It also makes up most if not all of the popular vote difference. I haven’t totaled the amounts but we’re looking at a net impact of at least 4 million votes.

11
p8riot 11 points ago +12 / -1

How are you counting "lost votes" ? Do we know how they're attributed?

11
richmomz 11 points ago +11 / -0

I assumed most if not all were “lost” from Trump’s tally, but I am not certain that is the case. OP (or his source) indicated there were instances where vote flips went the other way (from Biden to Trump) but they were tiny compared to the Trump to Biden flips.