1534
posted ago by PedeInspector (edited) +1534 / -0

I made this post earlier, and edited to add more and more states until I got all of them.

For better visibility, I thought a new thread would do better, here they all are.

Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden.

Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates.

There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes.

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248

New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20

Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456

Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882

New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213

Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574

Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102

Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023

California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989

Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0

Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650

Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0

Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0

Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730

Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0

Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0

New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116

Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477

New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610

Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730

Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557

Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849

Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748

South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119

Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276

South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1

North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681

Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0

North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15

District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50

Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272

Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51

Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0

Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408

Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0

Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35

Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13

West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300

Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0

Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

MEGA BREAKING NEWS EDIT:

I VERIFIED THAT THE SWITCHES ARE REAL!

I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the Data.

And here is the specific part when the switch happened.

You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere.

NEW EDIT : Updated the numbers after fixing a small error, MORE states are affected now, holy shit.

I made [this post](https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8JRzaY5/i-found-evidence-of-the-pennsylv/) earlier, and edited to add more and more states until I got all of them. For better visibility, I thought a new thread would do better, here they all are. Switched votes are votes that were taken from Trump and given to Biden. Lost votes are voted that disappeared during the counting, from both candidates. There might be a small overlap between Switched votes and Lost votes. **Dominion Voting Systems :** Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248 New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20 Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456 Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882 New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213 Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574 Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102 Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023 California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989 Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0 Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650 Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0 Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0 Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730 Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408 Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0 Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0 New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116 Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477 New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610 Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730 Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 **Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.** Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557 Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154 **Election Systems & Software :** Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50 Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849 Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748 South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119 Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276 South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1 North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681 Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0 North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15 District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 **Unknown Systems:** Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50 Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272 Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51 Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0 Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408 Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0 Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35 Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13 West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300 Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0 Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0 NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall. **MEGA BREAKING NEWS EDIT:** I VERIFIED THAT THE SWITCHES ARE REAL! I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And it is. Here is the [Data](https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json). And [here ](https://i.maga.host/wGuVGZQ.png)is the specific part when the switch happened. You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went nowhere. NEW EDIT : Updated the numbers after fixing a small error, MORE states are affected now, holy shit.
Comments (141)
sorted by:
99
SikoraP13 99 points ago +99 / -0 (edited)

Not to hijack, but for those interested, I'm going through converting the states to CSV files so people who can't manage a JSON file can still at least see what's going on. Planning to do some actual data analysis later this week, but I figure increasing the reach of the data does more good than one more guy processing it.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O0ggvH/election-data-csv-files-from-jso/c/

25
GuyOnABuffalo 25 points ago +25 / -0

YOU ARE A PATRIOT SIR

8
1600NWMagaAveWASHDC 8 points ago +9 / -1

This is huge. but seeing the counts it may not have mattered in some states to flip us back over to winning column. Or am I reading this wrong? Besides PA that is?

6
SikoraP13 6 points ago +6 / -0

These are just state-wide views of the glitches, and as such may miss precinct-level glitches that may get swept up in the counts. These are just super readily and easily apparent ones. It's a cursory search. If there's a glitch in one precinct that gets masked by a timely addition from another precinct, this level of analysis would not pick that up. This also does not include any fraudulently cast ballots or any ballots due to be disqualified from election malfeasance (like denying poll watchers).

You are correct that the glitches seen here alone, the ones that we can see from state-wide data, wouldn't be enough, but they do establish that there ARE glitches, which supports the ideas of hand-recounts.

It's like looking for shards of broken glass on the carpet. This is picking up the big shards of cup, not using the vacuum cleaner.

2
MuhFeelings 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for this explanation. Really helped clear up what exactly I'm looking at and what OP is alleging.

So it looks like ALL of these "glitches" took votes away from Trump and have them to Biden? Are there any instances of the opposite? Any rational explanation for this besides intentional fraud?

2
SikoraP13 2 points ago +2 / -0

It looks like there were glitches in which votes from both candidates just outright disappeared, but it looks like the transfer of votes only went in one direction, as best as I can tell.

Rational explanations besides fraud? Sure does look like intentionality, simply because the code moving some segment of votes periodicially would be difficult to write. Theoretically possible it's just a series of 'honest mistakes' in the coding that somehow transfer votes, but that's about as likely as T_D going back to Reddit.

Ascertaining explanations would probably require timeseries data for each of the individual precincts, which to my knowledge, we don't have access to.

5
stonetears4fears 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s times like these I wish I could math.

4
RageBringer 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk

These data aliens break it down in 4 counties in MI. Basically Dominion Voting Systems targets CONSERVATIVE counties/precincts. The vote is allowed to be TRUE until about a county exceeds 20% REPUBLICAN. If a county exceeds this 20-25% REPUBLICAN threshold, the "glitch" algorithm kicks in. It is a CONSTANT value that scrapes an ever increasing PERCENT of Trump Votes and gives them to Biden. The larger the %REPUBLICANS voted, the MORE the % of votes transferred.

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm also trying to set up an online database, and then load the data.

So that we can run our own SQL queries.

For instance we could extrapolate the actual vote counts, side by side, and then visually inspect row by row before running another query to calculate the loss.

32
NotARussinUpvoteBot 32 points ago +32 / -0

That CIA cunt Spanburger won her VA district by like 7 k vote, bet she cheated.

7
CrazyMountain 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can we get the data for other races, not just presidential?

3
-1
Biogenesis88 -1 points ago +0 / -1

President Trump has the power to fire this person correct?

31
meme_oil 31 points ago +31 / -0

sticky this!

10
ThinkAboutYourDad 10 points ago +10 / -0

MODS!!!

28
MAGA_4EVER 28 points ago +28 / -0

Holy God.

I hope you have this to project veritas and got your 25k before posting here.

4
SininStyle 4 points ago +4 / -0

no joke

21
webthing 21 points ago +21 / -0

How do you know they're switched?

81
PedeInspector [S] 81 points ago +81 / -0

Take this picture for example.

It's like this:

Nr.187 : 2,984,468(Total votes) * 0.566(Trump share of the votes) = 1,689,208.888

Nr.188 : 2,984,522 * 0.56 = 1,671,332.32

Do the same thing for Biden, and you'll see that he gained the votes that Trump lost.

I made a program that basically checks every single change in votes, does the above to check if votes were switched, then adds them all up to get the total amount of switched votes.

35
GunTottinPatriot 35 points ago +35 / -0

Send to Trump team and Trump lawyers this is incredible data PepeInspector job well done

7
ADAM_SCHITT 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

Did you check to see if any votes were ever taken away from Biden or were they taken away from Trump 100% of the time?

73
PedeInspector [S] 73 points ago +74 / -1

There were indeed switches that went from Biden to Trump, albeit a LOT smaller, for example, in Pennsylvania, 220,883 Trump votes were switched to Biden, and 24,721 Biden votes were switched to Trump, only reason I didn't mention the other way around, was because I wanted it to get to the top and in the eyes of the Trump team as soon as possible, and thought it might be possible that it impedes that.

33
DonJr2024 33 points ago +33 / -0

PedeInspector this is vital info. We need to see if it went both ways or not. If it happened 90 times in Biden's favor and only 8 times for Trump, that is telling. If it's 90 vs 1 that is super telling. Need this data if you can provide.

8
Kanxo 8 points ago +10 / -2

Someone is really wrong here and we should all try to get to the bottom of this.

This contradicts u/PedeInspector: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/x/c/1BivibkdjK

Don't like the feel of this one folks.

16
ADAM_SCHITT 16 points ago +16 / -0

Idk I think those are important facts though. And if it still overwhelmingly leads to more votes going to Biden it is significant.

0
bitterbut_true 0 points ago +1 / -1

True. But the glitches to Biden may have been on purpose to 'equalize' the fraud; so it can be argued that its a 'glitch' that malfunctions both ways instead of a 100pc Biden fraud.

3
CornandSoybeans 3 points ago +3 / -0

End conclusion=shouldn't be any glitches.

13
svartchimpans 13 points ago +14 / -1

Until you check the reverse order too, this is useless. It may be something that happens equally in both directions due to rounding errors in the truncated (only three decimals) vote total that your algorithm uses.

69
PedeInspector [S] 69 points ago +70 / -1

Sadly, it is the data itself that only uses three decimals, you can see it here https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

But it is definitely not due to any rounding error that these switches and lost votes happen. Why are there so many states with 0 switches and 0 lost votes for example?

16
svartchimpans 16 points ago +17 / -1

Why are there so many states with 0 switches and 0 lost votes for example?

Okay that's pretty damning then.

In fact it seems like you MAY have found "Fraction Magic" fraud in this election. See 9:15 and onwards here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44

10
Granite_MAGA 10 points ago +11 / -1

@PedeInspector

What if you have truly discovered a software bug. You see, this data makes sense if there's a "mistake" (FULL QUOTES) on the Biden side where someone is using a ratio as a percent when moving votes around. I ran this past a guy and he was confused at first because it checks out within truncation if you assume the 0.006 is a percentage. But when you run it back into the code where its a ratio....booom, 18k votes swap.

This could be fully intentional Office Space stuff. I would lean that way cause you'd expect this to be tested and this is a high school code mistake.

4
easedel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Office Space was the first thing I thought of the other day when I was watching a video showing how they could switch votes using decimals.

2
MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points ago +2 / -0

Having read college sophomore code...

1
highlife64 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is Edison submitting percentages in the first place?? Why aren’t they send the votes? WHOLE NUMBERS. And letting the networks do their own percentages? Am I “off base” for thinking this is a backwards way of doing things?

8
IAbsolutelyDare 8 points ago +8 / -0

I notice that MN and VA are both well into the six figures in lost votes. Those states have smelt fishy since 11/3.

5
SheikFromMozambake 5 points ago +6 / -1

Most definitely not "useless". Over time, we'll come to understand the data much better. Patience is a virtue.

5
svartchimpans 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well it's a start and something to investigate. Hopefully it's an actual find and not just a bad algorithm!

3
2020REBOUND 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, so did it affect the actual vote tallies?
Even if it's just a "bad algorithm" it would mean the election is wrong as it is, just based on that?

5
japhillips87 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe you could add a column for adjusted switches. Take PA for example 220,883 - 24,721 = 196,162 total switched from Trump to Biden

3
Virtigo31 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or maybe one of us can help him?

4
zipodk 4 points ago +4 / -0

I totaled michigan and fail to see the difference between a deduction and a switch

When is a deduction a switch

Because just based on when their vote counts go down, biden's went down more (40,697 vs 30,795)

6
signal 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

Please check the script with names reversed. It looks to me like Biden lost even more votes than Trump using the same logic.

Here's the script i made, cleaning up so you can switch the candidate names easier

https://pastebin.com/UzxWWV66

2
ProfessorOak 2 points ago +2 / -0

Forgive my ignorance, does Edison provide media with the exact numbers from SCYTL? If so, we could prove that numbers are being switched at the servers where the unofficial vote tallies are being stored. Do AP and Decision Desk also have records of the updates? If the data matches Edison's, that probably means that the unofficial votes themselves are being altered.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
15
CRASCH 15 points ago +15 / -0

The scary part is that these are just the vote changes visible during an update. I imagine there is also a group of changes that do not show up. These would be changes that happened between updates and obfuscated by legitimate vote changes.

4
Digeratus 4 points ago +4 / -0

agree.

During the active early period where natural arrivals for all parties votes were happening it would be hard to detect a 3% swing as is alleged in the Hammer talks by Gen. Mcinerney. Looking at the data after the "halt" in processing times, when unbalanced dumps of ballots arrived. After 0300 on Nov 4 local time would be interesting. That would be very lopsided for Biden and almost zero for Trump so easier to detect anomalies.

12
smis 12 points ago +12 / -0

this guy inspects all right

8
2020REBOUND 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think the lost votes are due to keeping the TURNOUT in check!

Many districts, precincts and states at the upper maximum of posssible.

For example Ward 273 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

A ward that is pro Trump and hence the turnout numbers ran very high to win it for Biden after Trump was ahead 9PM election day 91.20 % of Turnout

Here's my research on it:

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8JK1ztL/9120--turnout-in-ward-273-milwau/c/

7
FragrantDude 7 points ago +7 / -0

OP, thank you for finding this, I'm going to parse through it too. The only thing to be careful about with this data is that this appears to me to just be the NYT internal data. What that means is that as the night went on, they could have made adjustments on their internal servers that don't reflect anything that happened externally. In other words, they could have had a "glitch" they were using internally to make things look a certain way on their website, but after some time had to "correct" that "glitch" to be closer to the real numbers.

32
PedeInspector [S] 32 points ago +32 / -0

I edited the original post with proof that the switches are real and not just on the NYT-side, Antrim county is proof of that, seeing as they were all over the news with their glitch, and the glitch can be found in this data too.

7
TrumanBlack 7 points ago +7 / -0

Bro I've been spamming you all over!!! Can you join a discord with all the top Austin's to help us? Also can you make open source your scripts? We are sending it to trump lawyers

27
PedeInspector [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

Sorry, so far only checking comments and working on linking the switches to counties.

Here is the link to a rar file containing all the .json files for the states, and the fraudcatch.py file, you'd need to download python 3.8.2 to use it, click EDIT with idle, then in the window that pops up click Run, to check how many votes were switched from Trump to Biden in a state, you then type findfraud('hawaii') for example, replace hawaii with the name of the file of the state you want to check, the file for new hampshire is named newhamp for example, so findfraud('newhamp'), to check the total lost votes (For both candidates) do lostvotes('newhamp') for example. https://workupload.com/file/s7s8SARjjqh

1
TrumanBlack 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bro how did you get the Edison ear?

34
PedeInspector [S] 34 points ago +34 / -0

I basically stole the data from the NYT website, they use Edison for their data, and Edison has every change in votes saved.

4
TrumanBlack 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks pede you're a great hero. Would you talk to the trump team about it?

51
PedeInspector [S] 51 points ago +51 / -0

I'm actually not an American pede, so I'd rather someone else do that, maybe one of the mods, and refer the team to the post or something.

1
Paxelmania 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh shi admission of fault NYT v PedeInspector will go to Supreme Court

1
FragrantDude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotcha. Either way, good job - this is a great find! Let's break another story hours before any media organization.

1
williammcfadden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always against Trump. Gotcha.

2
FragrantDude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that's my point. They're constantly correcting it to be worse for Trump - they're manipulating the data. That's what I'm saying to watch out for since these numbers won't be the official ones.

7
Epy00 7 points ago +7 / -0

This needs a sticky! Also we need a liason to Trump people and Cruz people.

7
Pavski 7 points ago +7 / -0

You rockstar!! One day I will buy you a beer!

6
metropolinational 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please contact me about sending me your resume when this is over please!!!!

4
AnointedVisions 4 points ago +4 / -0

So have any of these "glitches" turned Biden votes into Trump votes?

3
LitDrummerBoi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have there been any examples of votes switching TO Biden?

3
BarneyFrank 3 points ago +3 / -0

Startling discovery! This is amazing.

Can I ask if there is any independent source available for the Edison data? I would hate for them to be able to say that NYT somehow balls-ed it up. I know that you found the official glitches in this data so that's an encouraging sign. We would have an ace in the hole if we can find a second source which is in lock-step with this.

3
highlife64 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did the switch/loss happen to only the Presidential candidates? I would like to see what happened to all the other candidates in Antrim, as I am a local and this effects me.

3
iamherefortheluls 3 points ago +3 / -0

Please expand with sources of each instance.

3
Virtigo31 3 points ago +3 / -0

YOU FUCKING ROCK!!!

3
TrumanBlack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bro do you think this are small instances and theres actually bigger switches that happened???

69
PedeInspector [S] 69 points ago +69 / -0

The biggest switch seems to be this one in Pennsylvania, 12,401 Trump votes went to Biden, and another 275,518 were 'deleted' from Trump.

6
dopewacks 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

Not to be a buzzkill but some of these "deleted votes" seem like legit reporting errors where batches override previous ones, and it seems like the votes are deleted for both candidates. I looked at the data in Excel and for example here is what looks to be a reporting error in PA https://i.maga.host/8BmkB1Z.png

The 5 columns are: Batch time, Trump vote total, Biden vote total, Trump difference from last batch, Biden from between last batch.

However a lot of the other "deleted" and "switched" votes do seem to be like they were deliberately targeting Trump's votes, like the 19k votes switched from Trump to Biden.

1
turribleNightWork 1 point ago +1 / -0

what's the explanation? how quickly do they report errors and change the data?

2
dopewacks 2 points ago +2 / -0

I looked at the battleground states in Excel and this only happened in PA with the first few updates, so doesn't seem like a widespread issue.

4
julianleroux 4 points ago +4 / -0

PedeInspector, firstly, Kudos.

Do you have Parler / Gab / email, in case this site gets taken down.

Also, have you thought of putting this work in a public Git repo so that others can contribute?

Also check out: https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords

2
BidenCrimeBill1994 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there a future step that corrects this maybe?

2
LegitClapping 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're an amazing human being!

GOD BLESS YOU!

2
thejohnfist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Give this man a medal. Seriously, if any Trump Staff or Trump Family sees this, this man right here deserves a medal.

2
thethrax 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thinking a bit in another dimension.. Demonrats are likely very aware that this occured.. do you think they could possibly have another plan, example being adding the missing ballots post-election when less people are watching, then when recounts occur the votes will show up? Not even sure if this is possible...

2
CatFarmer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was any down ballot data changed or just president?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
undef 2 points ago +2 / -0

u/PedeInspector - Have you run your script on the house and senate races to check for vote switching or lost votes?

2
TenScoops 2 points ago +2 / -0

is this enough for the win? Will it hold up in court?

2
hk510 2 points ago +2 / -0

OP: Any chance you can jump onto a Discord AMA?

Also, check this out starting at 9:15 regarding "fraction magic" to scam the vote totals:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44

2
ThymeLime 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Is this actually legit? If all of the SWITCHED votes are in Biden's favor:

Trump wins Pennsylvania and wins Georgia.

Were there any switches going from Trump to Biden? Would this change the above?

And that's just switched - if the LOST votes are biased towards Trump then there's a lot of potential change there. Somebody check this! Trump's team must be informed if this is legit!

2
RaisingPhoenix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could we possibly get a list of votes that were swapped from Biden to Trump?

This way we could make a comparison between the two, and it would strengthen our argument that there is rampant fraud in favor of Biden's campaign taking place.

1
Jinx 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you add up all of the Trump Biden and Biden Trump switches - do they match or aren't even close?

1
PBXfactor 1 point ago +1 / -0

REWARD NOTICE - Not only is Project Veritas offering $25k reward, but Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick is offering a $1 MILLION dollar reward for fraud reveal.

REMEMBER ME, PedeInspector, if I was the first to tell you!

1
doubtfulhopeful 1 point ago +2 / -1

If Trump Team attorneys endorse this, I will be happy to distribute. Until then I assume everything is a potential HOAX>

1
ZippyDev 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not include all the prez candidates in the dataset on the ballot for each state ? If adding Jo (Libertarian) does it shore up the number some for the "lost votes"?

1
cyberspace781 1 point ago +1 / -0

What i don't understand is how counties that have WAY less population have equal votes to much larger counties. For example there is 1.6 mil in Philly, yet Alaghney, which has a 400k+ less turned out an equivalent number of votes, and they claim to have a record high turnout in Philly.

1
TrumpDiEstablishment 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/PedeInspector and all others: FIND OUT HOW MANY OF THE LOST VOTES WERE LOST BY EACH CANDIDATE. THEN WE CAN CALCULATE TOTAL SWING IN EACH OF THESE STATES.

This can only be done if we have data on each specific instance that the switches and losses took place. Can you include in your scraper a feature that provides the position of each instance of switches and losses in the code?

1
Friar_Pede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Presidential Medal of Freedom for you sir

1
SpartaCass1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this Scorecard in action?

1
Colesterol 1 point ago +1 / -0

Back up all of your findings into github in case they take down this site!!!!!!!

1
brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unreal. Keep up the fantastic work sir.

1
ridleybourne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone give this man a vote! I mean coat.

1
Dirtydeeds413 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just wanted to come to the original thread and say thanks, you’re a Patriot!!

1
JustInTime2_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stick this please MODS. Get this to DRGEOTUS’s Team.

1
NvCrone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for your work. (insert make him famous for real this time meme.)

1
hk510 1 point ago +1 / -0

God-damned Rock Star!

1
dudewhatdoesminesay 1 point ago +1 / -0

It may seem minimal, but this evidence could potentially give us 1 electoral vote in Nebraska. If they are all from Douglas County.

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O5E01I/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
iPertinax 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you use this data set to see the timestamps of when states 'stopped' counting ballots on election night and when they started up again? I see varying times depending on the state and wondering if this is the data set that can nail that down?

-8
yourbrother -8 points ago +4 / -12

Where's the evidence? This is just words on a screen.

54
PedeInspector [S] 54 points ago +54 / -0

Here is the data I used https://workupload.com/file/LVcwK7AAD8p

The data is from Edison Research, it is used for election coverage by at least ABC News, CBS News, CNN and NBC News. It is also used for the website of the NYT, and probably others as well.

I scraped the data from the NYT website, here to check for other states, replace "pennsylvania" in the link with the state you want to check, for states that have spaces in their names, like new york, write new-york instead.

13
QueenMAGA 13 points ago +13 / -0

Thank you Pede, for putting in so much time to giving us all a full perspective

7
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 7 points ago +7 / -0

My brother, I hope you are tweeting this out to every single trump connected person you can find.

4
Tiocfaidh_ar_la 4 points ago +5 / -1

Where does edison research get its numbers from? All I can find from them officially is that they do exit polls. Obviously this would mean nothing. Cheers for your heavy lifting thus far!

78
PedeInspector [S] 78 points ago +78 / -0

I would really want to know that too, finding that out might be the last piece of the puzzle. The fact that the Antrim County glitch shows up in the data though, confirms that it is indeed official data and represents the 'status' of the real count that the government has.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
5
Orbital_Meme_Command 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey, it’s me again. We messaged earlier about the VA data (https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8Eb5xSR/did-7000-mostly-trump-votes-disa/).

I looked at the script. One of the problems with the script relates to the rounding of “vote share” values in the NYT JSON files. This rounding can give the appearance of votes disappearing when that didn’t happen. The problem is that you do not have the absolute vote counts for each candidate and have to calculate them from the total votes and the voteshare ratio (which has at most 3 sig figs, so your calculated values likewise have at most three sig figs).

So, yes, there will be “false positives” generated by your script.

2
SunTzusdad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bumping for answer

2
Business_Antelope 2 points ago +2 / -0

so if I'm getting this right, it looks like shifting is very uncommon in Ohio. But in Pennsylvania is highly frequent and favored biden by a huge margin.

If fraud, it appears they're also shifting it to Trump occasionally to make it less obvious.

is it possible to analyze every state with this method? would be interesting to see if most states were like Ohio with few switches.

Perhaps they are genuine mistakes, and correcting those by flipping a net amount of votes. But why would one state make so many more mistakes that favor Biden? Also this is poor practice. Banks rollback transactions completely, and re-add a new fixed transaction. They don't fix mistakes by correcting the net balance.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
2
Tiocfaidh_ar_la 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Multiple sources allow Edison Research to provide faster reporting of vote data than any other organization." from their website. Multiple sources is intriguing.

1
KingDoomer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every county in the country needs to be audited. Great work, Pede!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
THE_MAGAL0RIAN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Please contact the Trump team with this!

3
_ra247 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey buddy - just glanced at this and haven't dug in, but quick questions

  • are you taking into account the fact that people vote for 3rd party, neither Biden or Trump?

  • are you taking into account the fact that people may have voted but omitted a vote for president, as crazy as that sounds, but it's posible?

59
PedeInspector [S] 59 points ago +60 / -1

Neither would affect the results at all.

2
_ra247 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s good to hear!

I’m a Python wizard if there’s anything you need

2
TrumanBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Friend, teach us how to steal the data so we can cross reference with other news organizations

3
GreetAndMeet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here is a copy I made yesterday if someone wants to cross-reference it to the current data: http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=75050928054546036079

1
dontUseVinegerAsLube 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can grab data from NYT:

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/virginia/president.json

replace "virginia" with whatever state that's needed.

2
SirCumfrence 2 points ago +2 / -0

If im not mistaken, its just not pulling that information. Its just displaying total votes and percentages for each, it likely isnt actually calculating it based upon those numbers just grabbing what edison is sending

1
_ra247 1 point ago +1 / -0

That makes sense. Just playing devils advocate