4335
Comments (157)
sorted by:
232
weisschild 232 points ago +233 / -1

The "Hide Child" option is funny in this context.

48
PyroSphere 48 points ago +48 / -0

You're not kidding.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-1
Chief -1 points ago +2 / -3

So we are just gonna hide it!?

People need to know these.

Even 4chan is removing the posts

This is stupid

5
ChocolateEvryday 5 points ago +5 / -0

CP is very illegal.

3
Chief 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am talking about the crime.

2
Thrasymachus 2 points ago +3 / -1

The biggest (actual) political story of the past two centuries, but proof of it offends sensibilities? Blur the worst of it, but fuck right off and spare me the "we can't let people see this" faggotry. Everyone needs to see it. What possible motive could people have (except concern trolling) to want to suppress this information?

But we draw the line at CP

No shit fuckface, and they're the ones who engaged in it and made it. Clutching your pearls about it now is literally covering for the perpetrators.

Edit: Also, I'm not talking to you u/Chief, I'm talking to the OH LAWD folks.

19
Pelosi_Halitosis 19 points ago +19 / -0

Lol! I was just about to post the same. This is why I at least scan the comments.

12
canuckastani 12 points ago +12 / -0

Where's the hide wife button?

5
bigdickhangsright 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hide yo kids, hide yo wife

184
JimmyJam 184 points ago +185 / -1

"Donald Trumps Biggest fan site taken down for distributing child porn!"

what was the content?

"pictures of Hunter Biden having sex with his 14 year old niece"

I thought that was fake?

[head explodes]

57
NahNovaBrah 57 points ago +57 / -0

what was the content? "Sorry sir, that is private information because it's currently under investigation"

18
DonJr2024 18 points ago +18 / -0

Exactly. Come at me 3 letter agencies!

Serious question though: we can still link to articles like the one this morning right?

16
PropagandaWizard1984 16 points ago +16 / -0

The Gateway Pundit article was still up last I checked so I think so. The GP even said they refused to post additional photos they had based on legal advice.

25
DonJr2024 25 points ago +25 / -0

Wow this is so crazy. So Hunter is so guilty that no one can show how guilty he is without being in their own trouble. Yet the feds don't do anything. What a fucking world.

13
PropagandaWizard1984 13 points ago +13 / -0

EXACTLY! Seems like the perfect crime really. All aided by our corrupt federal "authorities".

4
PremiumPatriotPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ultimate Clown World.

1
ChocolateEvryday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes

7
SpaceCityPede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is it proven to be her?

8
JimmyJam 8 points ago +8 / -0

i would say there is better than a 50% 50% chance

6
Deplora 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you've been carefully following all the information that's been released and analyzed, yes, it's proven. I'm a stickler for providing solid evidence to back claims, and I'm 100% convinced.

3
AlohaSnackbar 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem now is, we've seen feet on cock. We've established feet belong to kid. Can't unsee feet on cock.

1
AlohaSnackbar 1 point ago +1 / -0

As it turns out, even if it was "fake" (in the altered video sense), that's still illegal if it is intended to depict ultra deep nono cheese pizza.

70
EJay_Scott 70 points ago +70 / -0

But since they are pictures of Hunter Biden, the authorities won't do anything anyway....so we'good right?

Bueller....Bueller....Bueller....

/s

(I think its clownery that TD would get vanned for reporting the news, but the perpetrator/subject of said images IS STILL WALKING FREE)

24
WU_HAN_FRU 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's clownery. It's reality.

2
PropagandaWizard1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

These are the rules of Clown World now.

66
WalkFastGoHome 66 points ago +66 / -0

Underage* porn. We're still able to post consensual adult sex.

18
MAGA_JUICE 18 points ago +21 / -3

Child porn.

22
AngryWriter 22 points ago +22 / -0

But liberals have redefined the term "child" by acting like children well into the late 40s. What do?

6
pedeypete 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nobody actually wants to see a picture of a nude liberal, so win-win.

3
booblitchutz 3 points ago +4 / -1

but leftists are all pajama wearing, basement dwelling, pot smoking 30 something children. Even Kamala called them "26 year old children" who could "lose their parents insurance".

26 YEAR OLD CHILDREN

Like this.

12
fasterth 12 points ago +12 / -0

"But what about porn with willing children?" - Democrat Legislature

42
BasedMedicalDoctor 42 points ago +42 / -0

What’s the deal with this? Did 4chan discover pics of hunter and children for 100% sure?

36
unsquishable 36 points ago +36 / -0

Not 100%, but the usual 4chan autism where they compare identifying features between known photos from social media and the unknown ones. I think in this case a scar on her ankle among other things.

It was enough for T_D mods to outlaw it in any case.

24
BasedMedicalDoctor 24 points ago +24 / -0

That’s not child porn tho. So I don’t know what this post is about. Maybe the mods got tipped off about something coming out

31
unsquishable 31 points ago +32 / -1

If true it's a 14 year old giving Hunter a footjob, so..

22
MAGA_JUICE 22 points ago +22 / -0

It's a big issue in the US and this site doesn't need legal problems. Go else where to view it. Is that hard?

18
unsquishable 18 points ago +18 / -0

I am not arguing with that.

13
CantThinkOfUserName 13 points ago +14 / -1

Yeah that.

12
OozingMachismo 12 points ago +12 / -0

These people are gross.

10
MAGA_JUICE 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's about what is coming out.

9
lilree 9 points ago +9 / -0

Although explicit features of the child in question aren't shown, any photographs of a child engaging in sexual acts is child porn.

0
booblitchutz 0 points ago +1 / -1

I would imagine there are an army of feds DYING to get this site offline.

5
5000wattsx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reading that post, I'm starting to wonder if Joe Biden may be related to Hunter Biden, son of Joe Biden, in some way. But I can't be sure.

11
DonJr2024 11 points ago +12 / -1

Go to the Gateway Pundit.

Pic of Hunter with his dick hanging out and Natalie in the background. Her face is blurred but they are reporting it was her. I doubt they would do that if it wasn't. Would be very libellous.

And then there is a video of a footjob. You briefly see the bottom of a girl's face and 4chan superimposed Natalie's face and it fits real well.

There is also a pic of them in bed laying next to each other, no nudity but still weird.

Also Chanel from OAN stated clearly that there were pics of Hunter and Natalie in sexually inappropriate circumstances meriting immediate investigation.

Trump is doing a great job of staying out of it. But you know behind the scenes, if Hunter doesn't get arrested for this, Trump will decimate those federal agencies.

4
sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

it means nothing if Biden doesn't drop out now. If his campaign isn't over for this it means less than nothing. That's the whole point of HunterGate dropping now instead of after the election or months ago

5
DonJr2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

If Hunter got arrested that would have a meaningful impact. All my retarded liberal friends couldn't say it's fake Russian shit.

If they actually had stuff to make Joe back out - such as video of Joe or of Hunter raping and torturing as we were told exists - it would have come out by now. That was a big LARP.

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s never that easy man. Even 10 years ago, evidence showing that an active politician was getting cuts of shady foreign deals through his son, it would be campaign ending.

Watergate was fucking nothing compared to this.

8
TheLiquidKnight 8 points ago +10 / -2

Not necessarily, but it gives a pretext for taking down the site.

7
ReeeeeeFundthePolice 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’s what I was wondering, they must be floating around or else the constant warnings wouldn’t be appearing, damning stuff for the bidens that nobody wants to see, wonder why law enforcement isn’t doing anything?

4
PropagandaWizard1984 4 points ago +5 / -1

The Gateway Pundit just posted some 100% photos of Hunter taking nude selfies with a minor in the same room, then him laying in bed with the same minor. Highly censored. So we now know 100% he did that shit.

7
sustainable_saltmine 7 points ago +7 / -0

you don't know it's a minor if the evidence of that is obscured or blurred. all you know then is there's "someone on the bed behind them" but you don't know who and can't prove who. you don't have to unblur a face but if you want to say it's "likely an underage person" you can't blur the whole body.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

The original isn't blurred Einstein

0
P0keu 0 points ago +2 / -2

That's not the only photo. We know he was with his niece. She is 14. Foot job.

35
NvJohansson 35 points ago +35 / -0

Yeah, but 14 is considered the age of consent in Greece - Tom Hanks, probably.

All kidding aside, anybody that has anything to do with child pronography should be tracked down and arrested. I'm still sick to my stomach that Hunter hasn't been arrested for participating in it, and not just for distributing pics, and probably never will be.

15
Gobberwarts 15 points ago +15 / -0

Greece is 15. In nineteen US states it's 16.

12
NvJohansson 12 points ago +13 / -1

Still all too young.

8
Gobberwarts 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sort of screws up your theory that he has to fly to greece for sex.

11
PropagandaWizard1984 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's a federal crime to fly to ANY country for the purpose of sex with a person under the age of 18. It doesn't matter what the laws of the country are either. It becomes a crime here in the states when you land. The "PROTECT Act".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003

4
nataliesfoot 4 points ago +4 / -0

But I flew there to smoke crack and make billions, banging kids was just a bonus.

3
PropagandaWizard1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am not a lawyer but that could indeed be a defense in court.....very sad.

5
NvJohansson 5 points ago +5 / -0

I never really considered it a theory but mostly a light-hearted joke...hence the "all kidding aside" after it.

3
davidmode 3 points ago +3 / -0

parts of mexico, 12

14
GeneralPinochet 14 points ago +14 / -0

Also protect these little girls. You know, the thing Joe and Jill Biden failed to do.

14
xBigCoffinHunter 14 points ago +17 / -3

Define porn. I rub one out to half the memes on here.

8
PillarOfWisdom [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Great point. Some of the memes make laugh harder than I have in years.

3
de9ebkmd7 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some of those sexy Pepe's look a little young ....

3
ObamasLooseButthole 3 points ago +4 / -1

It clearly says "underage" right there

13
MeSewCorny 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think we need to beware of leftist red flaggers posting it here as well.

6
ProdigalSon1997 6 points ago +6 / -0

definitely -- there's already shills pretending to be Trump supporters and trying to post the pictures over the website. I've seen enough shills already ask for the pictures. Pretty sure several are just gross pedophiles.

12
spezisacuckold 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is good. Everything should be allowed that is legal. Anything that is illegal (like mentioned CP) should obviously not be allowed and should be swiftly permabanned.

11
7.62swinebuster 11 points ago +11 / -0

What about pics of fat girls fellating traffic cones?

5
anonaustirol 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just the right thing for the upcoming no-nut november, I guess.

2
BaldEagles 2 points ago +2 / -0

link?

11
deleted 11 points ago +14 / -3
8
kornesque 8 points ago +8 / -0

with underage girls

What about with underaged of the other 76 genders?

8
sgt_richard 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ya this isn't twitter you sick fucks. NO CP!

8
rosie 8 points ago +8 / -0

THANK YOU!!

5
pqsusan 5 points ago +8 / -3

Why is this limited to underage girls? Should extend to all pornographic images. Once upon a time, before the infestation of 14 year old fangirls, TD had some class.

2
Deplora 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a difference between legal and illegal. I'm not saying TD.win should allow unwarranted posting of adult porn, but, for example, the Katie Hill photos were politically significant. And I'd be fine with even more explicit things being posted, with key "parts" blurred out, but faces visible, if there was really a legitimate political purpose in posting them.

2
pqsusan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't disagree. For me, porn is very specific: full on, unblurred, no political purpose, gratuitous sleaze. As long as we don't forget the purpose of TD (supporting Trump and helping him fight the swamp), I'm fine with pics within the parameters you're describing. But, we also have to have to ability to deport actual porn (because you know we'd need it), and be able to tag the explicit but politically important stuff so people don't unknowingly open a post that they may not have wanted to open.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
5
Formerlurker92 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seems fair.

5
unique_string 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can I still post pictures of Senator Coooooooms?

3
PillarOfWisdom [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

He looks like Eduard Delacroix from The Green Mile.

4
bf4truth 4 points ago +4 / -0

big reminder

if CP is censored, it isnt CP

expose the pedos

4
Mad_Maximo 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a rally, not a Democrat basement.

4
grassshrimp 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you. I regret clicking on some links posted here, I want this to be a safe, happy, non-stop rally for our President. I really don't think Hunter's depravity pics here will change anything, let's educate others on Joe's pay for play crimes.

4
jdg00 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a good call.

4
DwellerMike 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ah, C'MON MAN! You know.. the thing!

4
69moleman420 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well i for one have yet to see any porn so i take it mods are kickin ass! Great job yall

3
CanuckPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ban all porn.

3
Kitzinger1 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a sad day when we have to do things like this because of Vice Presidents son deciding to blast the world with hundreds of dick pics and an incestious relationship with his 14 year old niece.

1
sustainable_saltmine 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's just it though, the VP's son ISN'T that's why "we" (the royal WE) have to so people see what's going on. Nevermind though, HunterGate is over. If the FBI has sole authority here, it's over, they will run cover so as "not to affect the election" and it'll never see the light of day. No one will see the photos as it's now "child porn" and we have no evidence to show anyone.

3
Greatest_adventure 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you, for this, mods.

3
smilieface 3 points ago +3 / -0

Be quick if you see anything. Reddit fags like to post than report. And we all know sharing child porn is not below their morals at all.

2
BaronFalcon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Considering they're probably making it and sharing on dark web...yea

3
PropagandaWizard1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

So is the FBI ever going to do something about this or are they complete communist fucktards who steal tax payer money while protecting rich pedophiles? I already know the answer, it was rhetorical.

4
sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

FBI isn't gonna do shit and now that they've declared the Hunter images "child porn" we now can't distribute them as evidence to convince people. Normies will just laugh it off as "that could be anyone, you have no proof it's Natalie Biden, it's blurred so you can't prove it" and they're right. I don't want to see Hunter dick but people have to see that he was in fact see who he was fooling around with or they won't care and just call it a "alt-right russian conspiracy theory"

2
DanIsSwell 2 points ago +2 / -0

They keep spouting the same “Who cares if he has sex with women. That’s not illegal”

The only way to prove he is having sex with 14 year olds, is to show the pictures and point out identifying marks. Ironically....we can’t use the pictures as proof of the pictures.

Hunter has not been charged with child porn for creating the pictures, but ironically.....we can be charged with child porn for sharing the already shared pictures.

2
PropagandaWizard1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sadly you are quite correct.

1
BaronFalcon 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do they know it's child porn if they don't know who it is?

3
Chick-fill-eh 3 points ago +7 / -4

There's softcore porn on here daily.

27
labajada 27 points ago +27 / -0

Post of Hot chicks wearing thongs and MAGA hats, while participating in a Trump boat parade, is the American way and gives me hope for the future.

Plz keep posting.

7
JoeandHunterBiden11 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hmmmmm,, now you've got my attention...

Signed,

Hunter Bi.

5
YouGotbbQd 5 points ago +5 / -0

Example, please.

2
Deplora 2 points ago +2 / -0

And that's not illegal.

3
PaganRob 3 points ago +4 / -1

I worked for years doing crime writing on the web and running crime blogs. Posting illegal images is a non-starter even blured as far as the FBI is concerned. In any context when you run into child porn this is how you keep out of jail:

  1. Contact FBI cyber crimes online, leave your number.
  2. contact Center for Missing and Exploited Children

I know a guy who almost got into trouble trying to write up a case

3
sustainable_saltmine 3 points ago +3 / -0

and people expect the FBI to do anything about this case other than continue to cover it up because it's hurting Joe Biden's campaign? naive AF.

1
PaganRob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not about them it's about protecting yourself with a paper trail.

3
DonJr2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should all call the FBI and say we saw child porn on the internet. Great idea! Maybe we'll get some rookie on the phone who won't know that Hunter is "privileged" and untouchable.

3
gorillachannel 3 points ago +4 / -1

There are zero pictures or videos in the released Hunter Biden materials involving child porn.

Rudy Juliani is not releasing child porn to the public.

Nobody on TD is posting such materials.

You are hysterical. This is a hysteria. Stop.

3
sustainable_saltmine 3 points ago +3 / -0

THIS. IF it was child porn, Rudy wouldn't be able to even possess it let alone post it anywhere if it was. They would have nailed him for it. But regardless, if anything's blurred, then it might as well be hearsay. You can't submit blurred images as proof.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
StaryHickory 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would it be amazing to have one of us charged with distribution of child porn while the guy who produced and "performed" in the child porn is not even a person of interest? Where does the hypocrisy end?

3
A_Colostomy_Bag 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good to know, I was just about to post my collection of Nancy Pelosi with Maxine Waters!

3
SlanderousMe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for that grotesque mental image. Once I stop vomiting I will curse your name.

2
ProdigalSon1997 2 points ago +3 / -1

This needs to be added to "Our Rules" on the right, although it probably falls under "Follow the Law".

2
nimblenate 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought it was Russian disinformation and not real?

2
Losersloseagain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then how are you going to report anything on hunter?

2
IAmtheGodWarrior 2 points ago +3 / -1

On behalf of all the autists here, I must say, your title is annoying and frustrating and I hate you for it.

2
hereticpatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Slippery slope. Nobody wants to see child porn, does that mean it’s not in the public’s interest to see what is really happening? By censorship, it becomes far easier to ignore and makes it much less likely justice will occur. If the mainstream media and big tech are going to pretend like it’s not happening, how the hell is the population supposed to know the truth? Why follow the lead of the machine? Error on the side of transparency and freedom. No censorship.

2
BunnyPicnic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone else pissed that if we try to expose hunter, we get punished. But he still hasn't even been questioned yet? Where the fuck is he? He should at the very least be questioned. I mean, that ain't a weed pipe.

2
85Dacudo 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the photos of Hunter and the under age kids turns out to be true we need to be really careful about how we proceed.

2
Au_contrarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is how the left takes down The Donald. Produce child pornography and release it at a moment in history where it's virtually impossible to ignore. Deep state FBI stooges hitting f5 on /new 24/7.

2
npeachmint 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some are getting carried away with this and people who aren't posting porn are getting deported. I had to create another account. My main one apparently got banned just for posting a link to gnews.org. No porn in the actual link. Can't login to it any more. Admins need to fix this, no way to salvage my old account that had 31K points on I can find.

1
BaronFalcon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, could be sleeper agents

1
not_a_shill 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if they are having sex with underage boys? Or theys? Are we playing by California rules and thats ok?

1
prof_robinson 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure this is right, considering how difficult it is to discuss the Democratic Party without bringing pedos into it; sometimes the kiddie porn just is part of it

1
blunt_person2 1 point ago +1 / -0

...did THOSE pictures get leaked?

So, they're really... REALLY real?

Fucking hell.

1
Salt_n_Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Word on the street is that Hunter likes little boys too....better says girls or boys /s

1
ORANGE-MAN-RAD 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need some meth Mondays here.