2823
Comments (306)
sorted by:
355
Isaiah53 355 points ago +358 / -3

If anyone's 15 year-old daughter is weeping over not being able to murder their future children, and the inability to whore around without consequences, they need Jesus.

135
StaceCadet 135 points ago +135 / -0

Weeping over that possibility. It hasn’t even happened yet.

180
Impressive-Length 180 points ago +180 / -0

Nine months of lockdowns, travel bans, forced business closings and mask mandates, and now all of a sudden she’s worried about having sovereignty over herself?

74
SentryS 74 points ago +74 / -0

"HURR DURR iF iT SaVeS JuSt OnE lyFe"

26
rootGoose 26 points ago +26 / -0

I read that in Dave Chappelle's voice.

13
King 13 points ago +14 / -1

IF WE CAN JUST KILL THE NEXT EINSTEIN BEFORE HE IS BORN!

10
PikachuJohnson 10 points ago +11 / -1

An atheist asks, “If God exists, then why hasn’t he sent anybody to cure cancer?”

God then comes to him in his sleep that night and says, “Because you aborted her.”

3
King 3 points ago +3 / -0

BONGO!

33
Magastreammedia 33 points ago +33 / -0

Fucking gold level comment right here

17
TonyGucciano 17 points ago +17 / -0

Damn

21
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 21 points ago +21 / -0

Judging by the looks of the mother, it may be a while before the possibility arises. (Just sayin)

6
RabidZoo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Woof.

3
ChillBlinton 3 points ago +3 / -0

(sad slide whistle)

16
DickTick 16 points ago +16 / -0

A very very very very very slim possibility of it even happening at all.....

3
Sl0re10 3 points ago +3 / -0

Republicans campaign on fear 🤣

19
BasedMedicalDoctor 19 points ago +20 / -1

Jesus, or a self-inflicted gunshot. Call it retroactive abortion. Taking your body back.

-32
Rhayne -32 points ago +2 / -34

I think you're on to something, doc.

12
RosieODonald 12 points ago +12 / -0

Seriously like dammit wear condoms then, fuck!

10
rootGoose 10 points ago +10 / -0

...and so does their 15 year-old!

6
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 6 points ago +6 / -0

They need new parents too.

157
ShitOfPeace 157 points ago +157 / -0

Maybe stop lying to your daughter.

53
Jabron661 53 points ago +53 / -0

Exactly, remind her that when a woman becomes pregnant, she still has her rights, but the baby still has it's rights too.

That's just the way it is, they both have the same rights, the first of which, is life.

45
orthodoxvirginian 45 points ago +45 / -0

Fathers should have rights, too. But they don't. My best friend (RIP) got a girl pregnant. He begged her not to get an abortion. She did it anyway. He never got over it (he died a few years later under different circumstances). I remember how sad he was when he told me.

33
hiddenconservative 33 points ago +34 / -1

The father has no say because it's "her body" yet if the father doesn't want the baby, he's forced to pay for 18+ years because he helped bring the child into the world.

Gotta love the hypocrisy.

13
RabidZoo 13 points ago +14 / -1

The judicial system is fucking bullshit.

6
side_o_beef 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's only his body until money gets involved and everyone wants their cut.

4
DebbieinDallas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dont get a damn gf pregnant. Get a wife pregnant.

2
orthodoxvirginian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course. But most of us make mistakes here and there along the way.

3
DebbieinDallas 3 points ago +3 / -0

Back in the good old days when people got married younger and didnt shack up, there werent so many problems.

2
orthodoxvirginian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally agree.

102
JpnEUP6y 102 points ago +103 / -1

Start with some civics lessons, then move to studying how to prevent pregnancy (abstinence comes to mind).

71
Freetrial 71 points ago +71 / -0

The thing I don't get.... and maybe it's cause I'm a guy. Aren't there birth control methods, that literally you can have in your body for like 5 years where you can be like "Yeah I'm not going to have children in the near future, so hook me up fam" that most (if not all) are covered by either employer provided insurance, if not private insurance?

48
lasmejoresmaga 48 points ago +48 / -0

oh just go ahead and mansplain it some more why dont ya!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
29
WhiteTrashJesus 29 points ago +29 / -0

Excuse me that’s not as liberating as conceiving then having an abortion bigot

18
quartz 18 points ago +18 / -0

You mean, I'll never know what it feels like to have a baby growing inside me and then scramble its brains and vacuum it out?

6
Chiefboss91 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oh Fuck. You win! Miss. Garrission. Ahahahah. Enough internet for me today.

2
quartz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ha, Matt and Trey did the heavy lifting on that one...I just Bidened it.

4
Freetrial 4 points ago +4 / -0

.... I can't get this image out of my head, so you need to endure it too.

"MA! Get the Hoover, I'm gonna suction this bitch out!" The white trailer trash woman says as she attaches a hoover vacuum to her cooch.

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are a bigot for your WHITE TRAILER TRASH reference

1
WhitePowerRanger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’d assume it feels like a ballon does when it deflates

9
Freetrial 9 points ago +9 / -0

Question, Can I abort my child after they've been alive for 14 years? That'll be true Sexual Liberation!

13
WhiteTrashJesus 13 points ago +13 / -0

If you vote for joe he will have a special team to discard unwanted teens in delaware

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +3 / -1

Maybe your wife too, who you are cheating against. A car ‘accident’

2
WhiteTrashJesus 2 points ago +2 / -0

hunter will adopt any unwanted teens until we have time to make it legal to abort them. Preteens are cool too man as long as they party. He’ll also adopt your wife and taxpayers will put up the money for divorce court. Only liberal allies are allowed to abort their wife come on man

24
NativeNorCal 24 points ago +24 / -0

There is birth control that is injected in the arm. It lasts for 3 years. My daughter got it. She has a steady boyfriend, wants to wait to have children and asserts her right to her body by taking responsibility so she doesn't need to kill to live her life. It's fully covered on her private medical insurance - no out of pocket cost.

This need for abortion rights makes no sense in the 21st century when so many forms of birth control are available everywhere.

2
DebbieinDallas 2 points ago +2 / -0

How can you even talk to your kid about sex, knowing she is doing the dirty with a man not her husband.

1
NativeNorCal 1 point ago +1 / -0

I balance it with the alternative of not talking to her and her getting pregnant and having an abortion. I build bridges when needed so I can take care of the other shore better than if there was no bridge.

10
Johnson 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think they're not 100%, just nearly.

15
Based_psychologist 15 points ago +15 / -0

Well over 99% if TAKEN DAILY. So if you’re not disciplined enough to actually take the medicine daily without missing doses, the effectiveness drops a lot. If the woman is aware of her cycles and uses secondary techniques (avoid intercourse, “pull out technique,” or condoms) during highest risk times, that number is much better.

Source: am a guy, but happily married and we only have the number of kids we planned on. No murder needed

7
RighteousViolence1 7 points ago +7 / -0

This exactly. My wife and I were together for a decade before we had a child and she never took birth control. We never even had a close call. It’s really easy to not have a baby.

5
TheDonMother 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well...My husband and I were also together for a decade before having our first. I took pills the whole time and never had a close call. I got pregnant on our first try, as soon as I stopped taking birth control.

4
RighteousViolence1 4 points ago +4 / -0

My wife did not like what bc did to her so we took other precautions. It was easy.

11
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 11 points ago +11 / -0

Add a rubber go the equation. Probably a good idea since we all know you're talking about banging strangers.

5
Freetrial 5 points ago +5 / -0

I get that, but when combined with Say The morning after pill, and a condom, I'd say that's about as protected sex as I can see.

5
AOCs_tits 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep.

7
ThinkMoose 7 points ago +7 / -0

No one is going to take your abortions away. We just need common sense abortion regulations

6
PinochetIsMyHero 6 points ago +7 / -1

Blowjobs work too.

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re disgusting

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kek

1
Notdereksmart 1 point ago +3 / -2

Any woman who gets an abortion should lose her right to ever procreate. Boom.

80
USER_O1 80 points ago +80 / -0

"Mommy, I fear for my existential status within the context of a patriarchal hierarchy," said 6-year-old Stacy, who this week is finger painting signs for the Harris/ Biden campaign when she isn't phone banking.

48
45semiautosp 48 points ago +48 / -0

And the cat is vegan.

26
bangbus 26 points ago +26 / -0

And the daughter has “boy parts.”

22
a_wise_shiba_inu 22 points ago +22 / -0

And everyone clapped.

15
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 15 points ago +15 / -0

Everybody always claps.

9
SentryS 9 points ago +9 / -0

Did you just assume people clapping?!!?

10
orthodoxvirginian 10 points ago +10 / -0

Jazz Hands...can't trigger people, remember?

5
ModernKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

Too many of them have had The Clap, so clapping is a triggering sound for them.

3
SirPokeSmottington 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jazz Hands...can't trigger people, remember?

HEY BIGOT! I'm BLIND!

Fucking oppressive seeing-abled people.

2
yurimodin 2 points ago +2 / -0

point of order comrade.....too much chatter in here.

9
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 9 points ago +9 / -0

Republican voter turnout is gonna make their booty clap on election day

2
XinnietheFlu 2 points ago +2 / -0

As Jeb!-Kin the lack of people clapping triggers me

1
PikachuJohnson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pls clap 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 —Jeb Bush, c. 2016

5
WhitePowerRanger 5 points ago +5 / -0

Stupid bastards

50
Fuckreddit01 50 points ago +51 / -1

Tell her to close her damn legs, she's drawing flies.

10
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 10 points ago +11 / -1

I saw some rats. I think they were looking for cheese.

5
meals23 5 points ago +5 / -0

Patrick Bateman has entered the chat

47
SisyphusRockAndRoll 47 points ago +47 / -0

Imagine thinking it's a 'right' to violently seperate limbs from a newly formed human, suck it's brains out, then throw it in the trash (or sell to democrats), because you just couldn't resist stuffing that dick in your cooch.

15
orthodoxvirginian 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yep. And even before Roe v Wade, there were medical exceptions. So "muh coat hangers in the alley" is BS.

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not even that hard. Just use birth control.

-20
droden -20 points ago +1 / -21

well its a draw the line argument. at one points its 2 cells. then 16 and 128 etc. at some point its vaguely person like. but where does one draw the line? 26 weeks seems reasonable. its a strange dissonance to say they are taking responsibility by getting an abortion but couldn't be responsible and just settle for a footjob like hunter did or use a condom the right way.

13
WhitePowerRanger 13 points ago +14 / -1

Uhh it starts looking like a baby at 5-8 weeks buddy. You’re way the fuck off.

17
CWAC_Patriot 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yep, and heartbeat at 4-6 weeks. But unique dna from conception, and protected and separate from the mother from conception onwards. Therefore I believe life begins at conception.

-22
droden -22 points ago +1 / -23

I can make balloons look like a person but its still not a person. 26 weeks or bust. if it doesnt have neurological activity above a definable threshold its just a bunch of cells. foisting a horrific genetic monster to term is evil. the same with a rape or incest baby. no person should -have- to go through that. if they choose to fine. but it shouldnt be forced.

10
DadliestWarrior 10 points ago +10 / -0

There is so much wrong with your argument. Your depending on arbitrary metrics that cant be consistently applied in any circumstance to measure human life. Not to mention, every arbitrary metric you present (i.e. conciousness, alertness, autonomy etc) can be used to deny fully developed adults a right to life if applied consistently. Take for example, someone rendered comatose temporarily by an accident, or someone unable to feed themselves due to any number of issues.

Science shows us that a unique DNA strand is formed at conception and thus is when human life starts. Any outside action to deter that process is nothing less than ending a life, stage of developement is irrelevant. No matter how you frame it, that is fundamentally what is happenning when you abort (kill) a child.

Face it, the left has fundamentally lost this argument in its entirety. There is no excuse to kill a child in the womb apart from medical exigency or an outright refusal to acknowledge or value human life.

-14
droden -14 points ago +1 / -15

2 (4/8/65536, etc) cells is not a child and is not a person. dna is just code. there is nothing holy or magical about it. by your logic a car accident or slip and fall is murder if the fetus is jarred too much and a miscarriage results which is nonsensical.

9
WhitePowerRanger 9 points ago +9 / -0

You literally just said two “accidents” can be construed as murder. Good Jesus I wouldn’t trust you to wash dishes you’re so braindead

9
LibertyorDeath1776 9 points ago +9 / -0

If DNA is just code with nothing “holy or magical” about it. Why can’t change, say 0.1% of that code? What will happen if I do? If I change 1% of that code I end up as a Bonobo chimp, surely not a human. So if DNA is so fragile, and changing 1% turns you into a completely different species that you cannot mate with, it must be kind of important in defining what is a human, no?

7
DadliestWarrior 7 points ago +7 / -0 (edited)

No, scientifically(certainly magical but not in the literal sense), the biological byproduct resulting from the act of reproduction between two human beings and containing unique DNA is, in fact, a human being who has begun their life. Science tells us this is a human being at the start of their development process. Any attempt to reframe this scientifically factual reality as anything other than that, is nothing short of an exercise in intellectual dishonesty, logical fallacy, cognitive dissonance, ignorance, stupidity and/or moral depravity(any combination of the above).

Concerning your second point, again, you are demonstrating a disconnect concerning logic, legality, morality and philosophy. Its clear you havent thought this argument through very thoroughly at all. A vehicle accident, assuming the driver at fault had no intent or other aggravating circumstances (i.e. DUI) surrounding the death of a child in the womb resulting from said accident, could at most be considered manslaughter. Regarding a slip, this would be considered an accidental death, logically, morally, legally etc. A more apt analogy would be a violent attacker whose actions resulted in the death of the child in the womb. In this case, it would indeed be considered a homicide and many jurisdictions currently treat it as such (ironically given many of these jurisdictions allow abortion showing the obvious fallacy and clear partisan ruling of roe v wade). Science would describe this event as one person taking action to end the developement of another person during their life cycle, otherwise known as killing someone.

Having said all that, you may choose to remain in a state of cognitive dissonance in service to your own pride as most leftists do in this debate but know this, the pro choice position has, objectively, been obliterated by the pro life position on every level, to include but not limited to, scientifically, logically, philisophically, morally, ethically, and soon to be legally. Just because youre personally incapable of intellectually understanding the obvious fallacies required to maintain the pro choice position, does not mean your argument has merit. The only logical argument you could possibly make to support the pro choice position would be a psychopathic/nihilistic one in which you admit that you do not value human life or do so arbitrarily as you have already done, albeit unintentionally, in this thread. This is actually where the pro choice intellectuals at the forefront of this debate currently are. They have accepted the act of abortion is killing a person but are saying they are okay with it. Your arguments are over a decade out of date.

5
AlFreeman 5 points ago +5 / -0

It will be a person unless you kill it. That's the bottom fucking line.

-6
droden -6 points ago +1 / -7

right. will be. not is.

2
PikachuJohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then explain to me why you’ll be charged with double murder if you kill a pregnant woman in New York.

7
cuntard 7 points ago +7 / -0

fetuses are viable before 26 weeks. what the fuck are you talking about “neurological activity above a definable threshold”?

-10
droden -10 points ago +2 / -12

no magic or feelings. a definable threshold whatever it is. not 'it has things that look like arms'. define in a concrete way what a person is based on neurological activity. its certainly not 2 cells.

5
cuntard 5 points ago +5 / -0

ok, but fetuses are still viable before your stated threshold. why is it ok to kill a viable fetus?

4
PikachuJohnson 4 points ago +4 / -0

Any organism with human DNA inherited from other humans is by definition human. This is a fact of science. Dems claim to be the party of mUh ScIeNcE until abortion enters the chat.

1
ColbyP 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is two cells. You just randomly adding that constraint doesn't make it not true, that's just your fucked up belief. Nobody is going to argue with a moron whose entire argument is "you have to agree to my premise first or I won't talk to you". Your beginning premise is false. That's the entire issue of your argument. You're starting from a falsehood and trying to work outwards from there.

7
WhitePowerRanger 7 points ago +9 / -2

You’re so goddamn stupid it’s unbelievable

-12
droden -12 points ago +2 / -14

solid argument. you sound like a TDS bleeding heart lefty

6
WhitePowerRanger 6 points ago +7 / -1 (edited)

There’s no arguing with someone who thinks a balloon and a baby with DNA is the same thing. Im flabbergasted at your knuckle dragging walnut brain.

Edit typo. Bo -> no

-7
droden -7 points ago +2 / -9

is a cell with dna a baby? a person? clearly not.

4
PikachuJohnson 4 points ago +4 / -0

Check your facts, buddy. Fetuses have fully developed nervous systems and can survive outside the mother with proper medical care at 20 weeks. I did a paper on this in school.

And the fact is that fetuses can survive earlier and earlier thanks to continuing advances in medical technology, which makes it all the more convincing that life begins at conception.

4
Steeleproduction 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you and the love of your life get pregnant, you go into the doc, and see the little guy with his arms and legs, hear his or her heartbeat. Then that love of your life decides to abort the baby the next day...you would be okay with that just because it's pretty much just like a balloon shaped liked a human is what you are saying?

8
LibertyorDeath1776 8 points ago +8 / -0

It’s not a draw the line argument imo. A new set of DNA is created at conception and the human starts to grow. Humans go through stages In life, and one stage is being 2 cells, you then grow up and get a heart beat, you keep growing up and then start to “look like the rest of us”, then you grow to a point where you do not need your mothers body to survive, L but can survive in the world alone and are born. You then go through about 10000 other changes from birth to death.

To kill a living, growing, human just because it doesn’t “look like you” is absurd and very narrow minded, imo. A heart beat doesn’t make you a human, having a unique set of human DNA and living through the same stages of live all humans that have ever lived went through, that makes you human. You were once two cells, so was I, so was your mother and father, and everyone else ever. Don’t start drawing arbitrary lines on human life because you don’t understand human biology. You create a human at conception. Hence the name

-10
droden -10 points ago +2 / -12

personhood is not 2 cells and some dna. its not 4 cells. define where it begins. 1 cell is not a person. it becomes a draw the line argument. 26 weeks is the most logical point. heart beat and a large amount of neural activity.

8
LostViking1985 8 points ago +8 / -0

Abortion is an intervention in a very well understood process. If you leave a fertilized egg alone, almost all of the time it will develop into a person. Miscarriages and other complications can happen, but an abortion is a conscious choice to end the process that we KNOW creates a new person. I am pro choice for people who have been forced into a situation (rape, medical, etc), but those are less than 2% of abortions. The vast majority of abortions are preventable. Even in those cases I support, abortion is tragic. It's not the person-to-be's fault that they were conceived in bad circumstances.

3
PikachuJohnson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. If left to its natural devices, a zygote will become a baby. It takes an outside force to prevent that.

6
LibertyorDeath1776 6 points ago +6 / -0

1 cell is certainly a person, just a very young one. Part of the human experience is being 1 cell at one time. You are not 1 cell for very long, but it’s absolutely living and growing, and part of the human condition. Life has many stages, and humans are complex creatures, and takes us time to develop into our full form. Everyday there are over 300,000 humans around the world that are one cell, and over 100,000,000 in the womb. These are all humans, just young ones that look and act different than you and me. In only a few months they will grow and develop to look more “people like”, but they are still people. Denying them their humanity is anti-scientific and immoral, imo.

5
Sumarongi 5 points ago +7 / -2

I’m ok with when the ‘morning after pill still works.

I think a good line to draw should be 3months though. If somehow it’s an ‘accident’ the woman still has a ‘choice’. If she can’t decide within 3 missed cycles then tough, Yeah I know it’s a compromise

3
LibertyorDeath1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

For me, thinking about this scientifically, it is clear that humans are created at conception.

But when it comes to abortion, you could make the argument that society chooses all of the time who can live and who can die. We have wars, we have the death penalty, and people die tragically on the job all of the time.

So the question then is, is it okay to kill children in the womb? I say sometimes, and it’s complicated. Just like regular death, intentions matter. If you were raped, sure society can not blame you for killing it. If you were loose with your partner, get knocked up, and the baby is an inconvenience, sorry that’s murder.

3
PikachuJohnson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tbh I feel that aborting a baby that results from rape is wrong. The baby did nothing wrong. It’s not its fault that it was created, so why should it be killed just because of its father’s evil actions. But that’s just my personal opinion.

3
LibertyorDeath1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

That seems fair. At least we can agree it’s a person!

2
DadliestWarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your personal opinion just so happens to be the correct opinion, but I digress.

1
droden 1 point ago +2 / -1

that's fair

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

God damn three months....

0
Fabius 0 points ago +1 / -1

8 weeks. And you're still killing a child.

32
NoMoreCorpRepubs 32 points ago +32 / -0

Ok fellas shut it all down, some shitlib’s daughter cried. Jeez, I never thought it would get this far.

3
monkadelic 3 points ago +3 / -0

She still has the right to get stuffed full of cock. That's all they actually care about. The part where it's someone else that dies for it, is all that's changing.

31
The_Trumpening 31 points ago +31 / -0

Mother convinces daughter that if X happens, they'll lose everything.

X happens, daughter cries.

Great parenting!

2
cherryred 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bet that's what happened. "My daughter came downstairs shaking. She heard (maybe from me) how horrible her life is gonna be not to be able to abort all those parasitic clumps of cells with no limit." Then she started crying, sad that her mother is so stupid.

22
b2acctx 22 points ago +22 / -0

I'll take $1,000 for things that didn't happen, Alex.

Why do dems lie so much? I just don't get it.

15
lasmejoresmaga 15 points ago +15 / -0

because their whole world view is a convoluted lie

7
SimplePede 7 points ago +7 / -0

A lie we must be coerced into accepting, condoning, and going along with because we're the problem

20
Southernbasedbelle20 20 points ago +20 / -0

She probably doesnt even have a daughter, all the left does is compulsively lie to get their way.

20
Debutante 20 points ago +20 / -0

She's fifteen and weeping over the possibility she won't be able to abort? The "problem" is you've failed as a mother and at this point it's a little late to attempt to teach a girl self-respect.

1
SatisfactionCity 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what I’m saying about modern women is that they have gone insane. The thought that a 15 year old girl who hit puberty 2 years ago is crying at the possibility that she can’t kill her own child is so demented. All the male feminists that support this are simping so hard, there are no real men left and certainly the epidemic of single mothers is not helping.

17
SpezisaRetard 17 points ago +17 / -0

My daughter just came up to me and said why are all libs so emotional and stupid. I was shaking, trust me lads.

15
JackBurtonsTruck 15 points ago +15 / -0

How about she do some parenting and calm the kid down?

9
PhoQueDemocrats 9 points ago +9 / -0

Go read her post. Rofl she's the one who fucked the kid up.

5
JackBurtonsTruck 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh man, I went in to have a look and couldn't find the tweet, what a dumpster fire of a timeline!

6
PhoQueDemocrats 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lol! Yeah, I was looking for the tweet to see the responses, but her other tweets made me realize why her kid is messed up.

10
bluedevilga 10 points ago +10 / -0

But you do? Easy. Stop lying through your teeth to your children. The socialism that you advocate, is much more deadly than any thing in the Constitution

10
Tenspot20 10 points ago +10 / -0

Stop calling your cat a human, for starters!

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
suburban_woman 7 points ago +7 / -0

It’s amazing how many people don’t get this, including senators.

2
WhitePowerRanger 2 points ago +2 / -0

“But aren’t you worried, if say, too many people are on the island, it will capsize and sink?”

7
Freetrial 7 points ago +7 / -0

I mean, as much as I think Roe V Wade set Women's Snatch rights back about 50 years, yeah. You can't just go into case law and just upend it willy nilly. That's why even with a conservative majority on the SPC I'm not scared of all of sudden "Gay rights being taken away".

1
WhitePowerRanger 1 point ago +2 / -1 (edited)

Gay privileges*

When you put an identifier before “rights” it’s a privilege. Now if you suck dick, you have extra rights not afforded to me. Privilege

And marriage isn’t a fucking right. No one is entitled to it. It’s a regligious ceremony that America somehow let the government get involved in.

Edit. Downvoters are gay

7
Logan_W_Logan 7 points ago +7 / -0

It’s been 12 hours since confirmation. Has ACB made abortion illegal yet? How long do we have to wait for her to wave her magic wand and undo all the past SC decisions we don’t like?

5
Freetrial 5 points ago +5 / -0

Liberals have a 30 day money back guarantee before things get undone that they don't like. Gotta wait out that warranty period.

6
DickTick 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lol......

Somebody should go on Twitter today and start asking all these women what exactly is different today than yesterday... What rights don't they have today that they had yesterday....

6
my_pw_is_password 6 points ago +6 / -0

Damn she should be flagged for child abuse...

6
Magatropolis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why does every one of these posts use the same language.

"Voted to take rights away"

These people are like robots repeating what they are told to say.

5
Lurker6 5 points ago +5 / -0

The NPC meme is a good meme because it's based on the truth.

They don't have the capacity to express unique thoughts of their own all the time, so they have to use a handful of canned responses.

6
MaxineWaters4Prez 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is why 15 year olds aren't allowed to vote.

5
Valboosky 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tell that slut to bring a condom. Problem solved.

5
Brickwell 5 points ago +5 / -0

Stop asking the internet for parenting advice for one.

5
Anthonysaxetogrind 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tell her not to fuck LaQuan without a rubber.

5
Drinkup4 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sounds like you are encouraging your to have unprotected sex. If that is the only thing she cares about.

5
Djohnsonsgagreflex 5 points ago +5 / -0

Teach her to make different choices in any of the dozens of voluntary decisions that happen before a woman gets pregnant. Convenience killing is making the worst of all decisions following a series of bad ones.

5
SameCookiePseudonym 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nobody should be so wrapped up in politics that they cry because of something that happens in Washington DC. This is an example of parenting failure.

5
Watermaker67 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pack up your belongings and family, move to a country that will do a better job of protecting your rights. You have the means, haul ass before things get any worse for you!

4
MAGA_MEME 4 points ago +4 / -0

"time to seek asylum in Saudi Arabia"

4
GreetingsEarthlings 4 points ago +4 / -0

They should find a way to remove the fetus but keep it alive using the artificial womb technology I've heard about and bring it to term. Then give the identity of the mother that tried to kill them when they reach 18.

See how they'd feel about that.

4
cbonez416 4 points ago +4 / -0

We all know these crazy stories are fake and in these peoples heads

4
Snarfbot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bereft means without, she could have said she was "bereft sanity," or "bereft slippers," or "bereft my favorite blanky," all those would have been fine. But just bereft period doesn't make sense.

Just another example of a liberal who thinks she is much smarter than she actually is.

4
Get-schlonged 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is like my 15 year old son when sotomayor and the other carpert muncher got on the bench. He came down weeping about them nullifying the bill of rights.

3
MDK2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

What will we do?

What we SHOULD do is take the child away from you, seeing you're mentally abusing her.

3
Keiichi81 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh no! It might again be up to individual states to determine whether I'm able to get casually knocked up and then kill the baby because I don't want to be inconvenienced! I'm so oppressed! My future has been stolen from me!

3
Mad_Maximo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stop hoeing yourself out? Learn true self care and self worth, succeed and win.

3
Deusvolt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I feel bad for the kid. Her parents are trash, and her future dont look good.

3
Rock_Flag_Eagle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Annnnnd of course they're from Massachusetts.

3
realMeggah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Try not being a whore for 5 seconds.

3
Dgilles111 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

I guess the only thing left to do is teach her not to be a whore. But how? Girls are helpess, passive sexual slaves and theres no other means of birth control. This is 1955, afterall.

3
Purple_Drank 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who uses “Bereft?”

3
The_Anti_Chreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stripped of her future? So, she intended to get unintentionally pregnant?

3
BasedMedicalDoctor 3 points ago +3 / -0

BEREFT

E

R

E

F

T

3
Usernameunavailable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Be a better parent.

3
Willy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't let your daughter be a skank,lara.you dumb ass.

3
Honkey_McCracker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tell her to not be a ho.

3
Locust 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the generation of people that grew up with # StopBullying campaigns in school. Too many soft ass people walking around.

3
DadliestWarrior 3 points ago +3 / -0

What will you do? Maybe try considering the consequences of your actions before you act and owning them when you do. Degenerate leftists.

3
not_a_shill 3 points ago +3 / -0

Her daughter knows what it feels like to be a gun owner, a christian, a business owner.

The SCOTUS doesnt strip rights away. Lawmakers do that.The Constitution and the Bill of Rights Guarantees them... SCOTUS is supposed to uphold the Constitution.

There is no inalienable right to murder a baby, force others to pay for your birthdcontrol, or to force others to pay for your healthcare, or to force others to decorate your cake.

The left has no idea what rights are.

2
DemsHaveNoHomeHere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Boohoo you damn satanist