21
Comments (14)
sorted by:
3
Greenetarpaulin 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s exactly why it’s important to vote R down ballot.

3
Thehumancentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

we would win in that scenario right?

2
Greenetarpaulin 2 points ago +2 / -0

As long as we have 26 red states, we would win that scenario. But that’s not what’s going to happen.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
lefkoslykos 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep - one vote per state, republican control state legislatures sufficient to win

2
boreal_storm 2 points ago +2 / -0

The rats would shit themselves.

2
ElvenGhostAgent 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the woketards has their way, they’d abolish the electoral college.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Dawginole 1 point ago +1 / -0

However... The Parl tells me that the House must be seated to take the delegation vote. Which means if Dems get in court battles over seats and nothing is decided by Jan 20th, then Pelosi is seated as action president until the House can vote.

1
h4ck3l 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would explain why they're courting Nebraska so hard since they can split their two electoral votes.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

The map is plausible with one exception. I think Trump wins all of Nebraska.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CommieSlaughter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nebraska 2016 Trump: 495,961 Hillary: 284,494

Not going to happen.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0