Comments (51)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Thehumancentipede -1 points ago +1 / -2


This data is to check if overall early vote is up by the same percentage as the youth vote. ITS NOT. Why is that hard to understand?

Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. You can't compare across sources.

Where does Tufts get their information about the FL youth vote breakdown? The FL SOS doesn't provide it.

You're never going to answer because it's not there. Tufts doesn't tell you where they got their data about the youth vote.

Deport. Your doomer bullshit and data retardation adds nothing here.

Thehumancentipede 0 points ago +1 / -1

weird stuff coming out of you. Data discussion should be welcome here, If you don't tufts university data then check target smart.

Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am TRYING to discuss data with you, based on YOUR assertions.

Tufts doesn't say where they get their age breakdown data.

And neither does TargetSmart. They "model" it using some secret sauce. They do the same thing with party breakdown in states that do not have registration by party.

I'm asking you to show where your data are coming from. If you say Tufts or TargetSmart then you have not provided an answer, because they won't say where their data are coming from.

The only hard data on FL we have is from the FL SOS sites which provide NO age breakdown.

We simply do not know how FL youth are voting, despite people's assurances to the contrary.

Thehumancentipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so it’s data from sources you don’t agree with. That’s fine, why would you deport for disagreeing with you on that? Tons of people are saying Rs are up in Michigan and WI based on target smart data